Two negatives equal a positive. By disagreeing with your disagreement I am agreeing with the position that you disagreed with.

double negitive

Remind me of the baaaabe.

Too bad binge reading is the only kind of reading I do.

PS I subscribe to Lucas's canon - NOT that from Disney.

huh, I thought Disney made that one. But if Lucas made it, how come it has so many inconsistencies with the normal canon?

George Lucas has by no means been a perfect writer.(as evidenced by 1999-2005)
therefore Star Wars can by no means be considered a perfect series.
If George Lucas makes contradictory plot points, we have to accept them as canon, as he held the artistic freedom to do what he wants with the plot. Now he has passed the torch onto a respectful company with equally respectful writers, directors and producers who hold the same rights.

Also, you don't get to talk shit about The Force Awakens when you've only seen 3 minutes of it.

uh.... no. Lucas wrote episodes I-VI. Disney added tons of shit between III and IV which doesn't add up with IV-VI. It's Lucas's vision, so his shit is canon. The Disney Clone Wars 3D shit doesn't belong to canon. I haven't seen episode VII yet, but it may or may not be canon. I downloaded a cam version and within the first 15 minutes I see that there is basically a re-incarnation of Darth Vader - complete with breathing apparatus and black poly-vinyl costume and cape, and an old man and young man in the desert. I fell asleep shortly after that. It was really confusing and seemed like a re-boot if anything.

The Clone Wars cartoon was created by George Lucas in 2008.
Disney acquired lucasfilm in 2012.
Clone Wars + The Force Awakens are canon according to Disney and thus Lucas.
Disney can control what is canon because George Lucas sold the rights of the franchise to them. He would not have done so if he didn't trust them. And if he trusts them, I do too.

PS I subscribe to Lucas's canon - NOT that from Disney.

huh, I thought Disney made that one. But if Lucas made it, how come it has so many inconsistencies with the normal canon?

George Lucas has by no means been a perfect writer.(as evidenced by 1999-2005)
therefore Star Wars can by no means be considered a perfect series.
If George Lucas makes contradictory plot points, we have to accept them as canon, as he held the artistic freedom to do what he wants with the plot. Now he has passed the torch onto a respectful company with equally respectful writers, directors and producers who hold the same rights.

Also, you don't get to talk shit about The Force Awakens when you've only seen 3 minutes of it.

Thought that was just shading.

it was in "Attack of the Clones", the second episode of Star Wars. Also, the Django clones do age faster to get to maturity, but then they are held there for I think something like 60 years, eventually reaching age "40" or something. You probably listened to all that non-canon Disney shit.

>non canon > disney

disney now controls the canon storyline.

uh.... no. Lucas wrote episodes I-VI. Disney added tons of shit between III and IV which doesn't add up with IV-VI. It's Lucas's vision, so his shit is canon. The Disney Clone Wars 3D shit doesn't belong to canon. I haven't seen episode VII yet, but it may or may not be canon. I downloaded a cam version and within the first 15 minutes I see that there is basically a re-incarnation of Darth Vader - complete with breathing apparatus and black poly-vinyl costume and cape, and an old man and young man in the desert. I fell asleep shortly after that. It was really confusing and seemed like a re-boot if anything.

The Clone Wars cartoon was created by George Lucas in 2008.
Disney acquired lucasfilm in 2012.
Clone Wars + The Force Awakens are canon according to Disney and thus Lucas.
Disney can control what is canon because George Lucas sold the rights of the franchise to them. He would not have done so if he didn't trust them. And if he trusts them, I do too.

PS I subscribe to Lucas's canon - NOT that from Disney.

huh, I thought Disney made that one. But if Lucas made it, how come it has so many inconsistencies with the normal canon?

George Lucas has by no means been a perfect writer.(as evidenced by 1999-2005)
therefore Star Wars can by no means be considered a perfect series.
If George Lucas makes contradictory plot points, we have to accept them as canon, as he held the artistic freedom to do what he wants with the plot. Now he has passed the torch onto a respectful company with equally respectful writers, directors and producers who hold the same rights.

Also, you don't get to talk shit about The Force Awakens when you've only seen 3 minutes of it.

i did not know that

it was in "Attack of the Clones", the second episode of Star Wars. Also, the Django clones do age faster to get to maturity, but then they are held there for I think something like 60 years, eventually reaching age "40" or something. You probably listened to all that non-canon Disney shit.

>non canon > disney

disney now controls the canon storyline.

uh.... no. Lucas wrote episodes I-VI. Disney added tons of shit between III and IV which doesn't add up with IV-VI. It's Lucas's vision, so his shit is canon. The Disney Clone Wars 3D shit doesn't belong to canon. I haven't seen episode VII yet, but it may or may not be canon. I downloaded a cam version and within the first 15 minutes I see that there is basically a re-incarnation of Darth Vader - complete with breathing apparatus and black poly-vinyl costume and cape, and an old man and young man in the desert. I fell asleep shortly after that. It was really confusing and seemed like a re-boot if anything.

The Clone Wars cartoon was created by George Lucas in 2008.
Disney acquired lucasfilm in 2012.
Clone Wars + The Force Awakens are canon according to Disney and thus Lucas.
Disney can control what is canon because George Lucas sold the rights of the franchise to them. He would not have done so if he didn't trust them. And if he trusts them, I do too.

PS I subscribe to Lucas's canon - NOT that from Disney.

huh, I thought Disney made that one. But if Lucas made it, how come it has so many inconsistencies with the normal canon?

George Lucas has by no means been a perfect writer.(as evidenced by 1999-2005)
therefore Star Wars can by no means be considered a perfect series.
If George Lucas makes contradictory plot points, we have to accept them as canon, as he held the artistic freedom to do what he wants with the plot. Now he has passed the torch onto a respectful company with equally respectful writers, directors and producers who hold the same rights.

Also, you don't get to talk shit about The Force Awakens when you've only seen 3 minutes of it.

but in the comic we can't hear her voice, and her armor is white and not grey.

Thought that was just shading.

clone troopers were phased out because they aged quicker than regular soldiers.

Hence why Boba Fett got killed by a blind man with a stick.

i did not know that

it was in "Attack of the Clones", the second episode of Star Wars. Also, the Django clones do age faster to get to maturity, but then they are held there for I think something like 60 years, eventually reaching age "40" or something. You probably listened to all that non-canon Disney shit.

>non canon > disney

disney now controls the canon storyline.

uh.... no. Lucas wrote episodes I-VI. Disney added tons of shit between III and IV which doesn't add up with IV-VI. It's Lucas's vision, so his shit is canon. The Disney Clone Wars 3D shit doesn't belong to canon. I haven't seen episode VII yet, but it may or may not be canon. I downloaded a cam version and within the first 15 minutes I see that there is basically a re-incarnation of Darth Vader - complete with breathing apparatus and black poly-vinyl costume and cape, and an old man and young man in the desert. I fell asleep shortly after that. It was really confusing and seemed like a re-boot if anything.

The Clone Wars cartoon was created by George Lucas in 2008.
Disney acquired lucasfilm in 2012.
Clone Wars + The Force Awakens are canon according to Disney and thus Lucas.
Disney can control what is canon because George Lucas sold the rights of the franchise to them. He would not have done so if he didn't trust them. And if he trusts them, I do too.

PS I subscribe to Lucas's canon - NOT that from Disney.

huh, I thought Disney made that one. But if Lucas made it, how come it has so many inconsistencies with the normal canon?

George Lucas has by no means been a perfect writer.(as evidenced by 1999-2005)
therefore Star Wars can by no means be considered a perfect series.
If George Lucas makes contradictory plot points, we have to accept them as canon, as he held the artistic freedom to do what he wants with the plot. Now he has passed the torch onto a respectful company with equally respectful writers, directors and producers who hold the same rights.

Also, you don't get to talk shit about The Force Awakens when you've only seen 3 minutes of it.

Yeah, which is why it loses its' scariness so damn quickly. After reading a couple of stories, you pretty much know exactly when the scary shit is going to pop up. It removes some of the unknown.

It's not the kind of material to be binge read. That's why he does so many one-shot stories.

Too bad binge reading is the only kind of reading I do.

Did the stuntman voice him too?

The voice was provided by sound editor David Acord

Ok, thanks. I feel he should get some credit too.

My guess would be to stop people from attacking Alex for lying or something.

well baby steps people!

It's not the tools, it's the people using them. Even if you magically remove all guns from the USA, the killing would continue, simply because nobody has even thought about fixing the source, beyond a couple tiny efforts. Social issues are the cause, and until they are resolved, gun control has the effectiveness of putting a band-aid on gaping wound, with the added bonus of attacking the law abiding.

Yeah but Homicide rates in Australia more or less plateaued though robbery rates skyrocketed, fuckin people man, we suck as a species.

The robbery rate did skyrocket, but it's been on a decline since 2002

well baby steps people!

Thanks fam

Oh, 'aight

Sources?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimarite#Isamiashi_.E5.8B.87.E3.81.BF.E8.B6.B3

Thanks fam

Right, so this is non-spoiler as possible
The latest JoJo has 4 testicles, because multiple dimensions or some shit

I thought that "four testicles" was an allegory for something else, but I found out that josuke legitimately has four testicles.

I'm only up to stone ocean. It'll take time for me to get there okay.

Right, so this is non-spoiler as possible
The latest JoJo has 4 testicles, because multiple dimensions or some shit

I thought that "four testicles" was an allegory for something else, but I found out that josuke legitimately has four testicles.