Upload
Login or register

headkicker

Last status update:
-
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:5/11/2011
Last Login:1/16/2016
Location:UK
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 358 total,  429 ,  71
Comment Thumbs: 6780 total,  7424 ,  644
Content Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 35 Content: Peasant → Level 36 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 67% (67/100)
Level 266 Comments: Pure Win → Level 267 Comments: Pure Win
Subscribers:0
Content Views:9228
Times Content Favorited:10 times
Total Comments Made:1150
FJ Points:7076
Favorite Tags: the (3) | fuck (2) | in (2) | shit (2)

latest user's comments

#55 - 2edgy4me 06/21/2013 on *Clever title* 0
#10 - Picture 06/20/2013 on Eating wieners... +55
#72 - Y'see (even though this is fake) the argument that we don't wa… 06/20/2013 on Secksbox +1
#601 - If I have dozens of potential kids out there, the odds are sta… 06/19/2013 on Effect of Feminism 5 0
#119 - More Kids = Greater Chances of Survival Playing it by numb…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/18/2013 on Effect of Feminism 5 +1
User avatar
#124 - Sethorein (06/18/2013) [-]
If you have dozens of kids and none of them live long enough to breed then it doesn't matter.

And ya... that's what I figured... Also, do you seriously only hate marriage because you're afraid your wife will turn into a raging cunt and ruin you? 'Cause that's not really the norm...
#601 - headkicker (06/19/2013) [-]
If I have dozens of potential kids out there, the odds are stacked heavily in my favour.

Why do you assume I hate marriage?
I'm just telling you that it's not necessary for making children.
#116 - If this is about gene propagation then it has nothing to do wi…  [+] (4 new replies) 06/18/2013 on Effect of Feminism 5 +1
User avatar
#118 - Sethorein (06/18/2013) [-]
Gene propagation also requires that your kids survive.

My guess is there's gotta be some statistic of married couples v single parents and the quality of child care. Kinda curious what it says.
#119 - headkicker (06/18/2013) [-]
More Kids = Greater Chances of Survival
Playing it by numbers greatly improves chances of success.

From what I remember; the general consensus is that married couples, hetero or homosexual in nature, are more beneficial to a child's healthy development than a single parent upbringing.
Usually.
User avatar
#124 - Sethorein (06/18/2013) [-]
If you have dozens of kids and none of them live long enough to breed then it doesn't matter.

And ya... that's what I figured... Also, do you seriously only hate marriage because you're afraid your wife will turn into a raging cunt and ruin you? 'Cause that's not really the norm...
#601 - headkicker (06/19/2013) [-]
If I have dozens of potential kids out there, the odds are stacked heavily in my favour.

Why do you assume I hate marriage?
I'm just telling you that it's not necessary for making children.
#106 - Not really. We were doing it for thousands of years before the…  [+] (6 new replies) 06/18/2013 on Effect of Feminism 5 +2
User avatar
#110 - Sethorein (06/18/2013) [-]
Well before marriage was created there were no real governmental benefits period. I mean other than making sure that you survived better than on your own...

Anyhow. If you're a man it'd be hard as hell to find a woman willing to let you have a child by her without marriage... I guess for a woman though it's fine... though it's nice to have support isn't it?
#116 - headkicker (06/18/2013) [-]
If this is about gene propagation then it has nothing to do with government benefits.

Equally, if it's about gene propagation; I don't need to be present at all during my child's life to meet that goal.
Nor would I need to be in a particularly stable relationship.
For instance; if I was a sociopath and valued gene propagation over morality, I could rape several members of the opposite gender, as many as possible in fact, to increase the chances of my seed spreading.

Raising a child and gene propagation are two completely different things.
User avatar
#118 - Sethorein (06/18/2013) [-]
Gene propagation also requires that your kids survive.

My guess is there's gotta be some statistic of married couples v single parents and the quality of child care. Kinda curious what it says.
#119 - headkicker (06/18/2013) [-]
More Kids = Greater Chances of Survival
Playing it by numbers greatly improves chances of success.

From what I remember; the general consensus is that married couples, hetero or homosexual in nature, are more beneficial to a child's healthy development than a single parent upbringing.
Usually.
User avatar
#124 - Sethorein (06/18/2013) [-]
If you have dozens of kids and none of them live long enough to breed then it doesn't matter.

And ya... that's what I figured... Also, do you seriously only hate marriage because you're afraid your wife will turn into a raging cunt and ruin you? 'Cause that's not really the norm...
#601 - headkicker (06/19/2013) [-]
If I have dozens of potential kids out there, the odds are stacked heavily in my favour.

Why do you assume I hate marriage?
I'm just telling you that it's not necessary for making children.
#97 - You do know that you can have kids without marriage right?  [+] (8 new replies) 06/18/2013 on Effect of Feminism 5 +3
User avatar
#104 - Sethorein (06/18/2013) [-]
... It's incredibly difficult :\

Don't spouses get benefits that unwed parents don't from the government?
#106 - headkicker (06/18/2013) [-]
Not really. We were doing it for thousands of years before the institution of marriage was created.
I think it varies depending on your area, but I believe in the UK you are eligible for certain benefits if you are a single parent.
User avatar
#110 - Sethorein (06/18/2013) [-]
Well before marriage was created there were no real governmental benefits period. I mean other than making sure that you survived better than on your own...

Anyhow. If you're a man it'd be hard as hell to find a woman willing to let you have a child by her without marriage... I guess for a woman though it's fine... though it's nice to have support isn't it?
#116 - headkicker (06/18/2013) [-]
If this is about gene propagation then it has nothing to do with government benefits.

Equally, if it's about gene propagation; I don't need to be present at all during my child's life to meet that goal.
Nor would I need to be in a particularly stable relationship.
For instance; if I was a sociopath and valued gene propagation over morality, I could rape several members of the opposite gender, as many as possible in fact, to increase the chances of my seed spreading.

Raising a child and gene propagation are two completely different things.
User avatar
#118 - Sethorein (06/18/2013) [-]
Gene propagation also requires that your kids survive.

My guess is there's gotta be some statistic of married couples v single parents and the quality of child care. Kinda curious what it says.
#119 - headkicker (06/18/2013) [-]
More Kids = Greater Chances of Survival
Playing it by numbers greatly improves chances of success.

From what I remember; the general consensus is that married couples, hetero or homosexual in nature, are more beneficial to a child's healthy development than a single parent upbringing.
Usually.
User avatar
#124 - Sethorein (06/18/2013) [-]
If you have dozens of kids and none of them live long enough to breed then it doesn't matter.

And ya... that's what I figured... Also, do you seriously only hate marriage because you're afraid your wife will turn into a raging cunt and ruin you? 'Cause that's not really the norm...
#601 - headkicker (06/19/2013) [-]
If I have dozens of potential kids out there, the odds are stacked heavily in my favour.

Why do you assume I hate marriage?
I'm just telling you that it's not necessary for making children.
#26 - No, but bad graphics can render a game almost unplayable. 06/16/2013 on Take Note +2
#33 - Bronies literally cannot be knocked further down the peg totem… 06/16/2013 on Here comes the butthurt +1