Upload
Login or register

haziri

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:11/07/2011
Last Login:7/27/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#22186
Highest Content Rank:#8999
Highest Comment Rank:#2708
Content Thumbs: 68 total,  99 ,  31
Comment Thumbs: 2343 total,  2709 ,  366
Content Level Progress: 20% (1/5)
Level 3 Content: New Here → Level 4 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 71% (71/100)
Level 222 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 223 Comments: Mind Blower
Subscribers:1
Content Views:6318
Total Comments Made:671
FJ Points:2617

latest user's comments

#17 - **haziri used "*roll picture*"** **haziri rolled image ** 07/07/2015 on haziri's profile 0
#19 - **haziri used "*roll picture*"** **haziri rolled image ** 07/07/2015 on thetully's profile 0
#17 - **haziri used "*roll picture*"** **haziri rolled image ** 07/07/2015 on thetully's profile 0
#16 - **haziri used "*roll picture*"** **haziri rolled image ** 07/07/2015 on thetully's profile 0
#27 - Yes, commend those souls to santa. 06/05/2015 on Satan +1
#148 - Which doesn't make it reasonable. People can bitch about dlc f… 04/25/2015 on Paying for mods 0
#141 - Yes, I get that, but this isn't them taking a cut on skyrim's …  [+] (2 new replies) 04/25/2015 on Paying for mods 0
User avatar
#145 - lollar (04/25/2015) [-]
No matter how many reasonable voices are against buisness tactics like paid dlc , people still buy them and give big profits.Valve sees it and wants to get a share of it.Respect to it's buyer's means nothing compared to big money by rich idiots.
#148 - haziri (04/25/2015) [-]
Which doesn't make it reasonable. People can bitch about dlc for a thousand years, it will always exist, but this is not that. This is modders, who use to work for nothing more than praise, getting the chance to be paid. The entire argument here is whether or not it's reasonable. The fact is, valve taking 75% isn't going to last, because either the modders and/or the players are going to say screw it to their proposal.
#134 - So the fact that it's unreasonable is okay because? This is a …  [+] (4 new replies) 04/25/2015 on Paying for mods 0
User avatar
#138 - lollar (04/25/2015) [-]
No,I don't support Valve.What I am trying to say is that valve has become stronger over the years and holds a big share of the market(pc games).Not only stronger but it has developed a cut status among it's fans.Valve like a true coorporation does what every industry does.Exploit.Valve makes a deal with companies(like bethesda) saying that if they want to promote their game through their platform they will have to agree to their terms and conditions.
#141 - haziri (04/25/2015) [-]
Yes, I get that, but this isn't them taking a cut on skyrim's sales, but the modding communities. When they say they want X% from the publishers, the publishers agree because they have the money for it. If a modder wants to make a mod and get paid for it, and they see they're going to be getting very little for it, chances are they might just say "fuck it."

Nobody wants to see Valve go the way of EA, and this is a worrisome step in that direction for them. On top of everything, the cut that valve is taking makes the idea of the modders getting paid appear in the background, which is absolutely not where it should be.
User avatar
#145 - lollar (04/25/2015) [-]
No matter how many reasonable voices are against buisness tactics like paid dlc , people still buy them and give big profits.Valve sees it and wants to get a share of it.Respect to it's buyer's means nothing compared to big money by rich idiots.
#148 - haziri (04/25/2015) [-]
Which doesn't make it reasonable. People can bitch about dlc for a thousand years, it will always exist, but this is not that. This is modders, who use to work for nothing more than praise, getting the chance to be paid. The entire argument here is whether or not it's reasonable. The fact is, valve taking 75% isn't going to last, because either the modders and/or the players are going to say screw it to their proposal.
#125 - They don't own skyrim though. The only thing Valve is doing in…  [+] (6 new replies) 04/25/2015 on Paying for mods 0
User avatar
#132 - lollar (04/25/2015) [-]
Valve works like a supermarket,mall.I will store your items here,promote you but you have to agree to my terms.Take a share tec.
#134 - haziri (04/25/2015) [-]
So the fact that it's unreasonable is okay because? This is a digital service. To store something in a supermarket or mall requires space. Hosting a game on valve's servers is nowhere near the same cost as storing items in a mall or supermarket. The analogy doesn't work here, and even if it did it would still be unreasonable.
User avatar
#138 - lollar (04/25/2015) [-]
No,I don't support Valve.What I am trying to say is that valve has become stronger over the years and holds a big share of the market(pc games).Not only stronger but it has developed a cut status among it's fans.Valve like a true coorporation does what every industry does.Exploit.Valve makes a deal with companies(like bethesda) saying that if they want to promote their game through their platform they will have to agree to their terms and conditions.
#141 - haziri (04/25/2015) [-]
Yes, I get that, but this isn't them taking a cut on skyrim's sales, but the modding communities. When they say they want X% from the publishers, the publishers agree because they have the money for it. If a modder wants to make a mod and get paid for it, and they see they're going to be getting very little for it, chances are they might just say "fuck it."

Nobody wants to see Valve go the way of EA, and this is a worrisome step in that direction for them. On top of everything, the cut that valve is taking makes the idea of the modders getting paid appear in the background, which is absolutely not where it should be.
User avatar
#145 - lollar (04/25/2015) [-]
No matter how many reasonable voices are against buisness tactics like paid dlc , people still buy them and give big profits.Valve sees it and wants to get a share of it.Respect to it's buyer's means nothing compared to big money by rich idiots.
#148 - haziri (04/25/2015) [-]
Which doesn't make it reasonable. People can bitch about dlc for a thousand years, it will always exist, but this is not that. This is modders, who use to work for nothing more than praise, getting the chance to be paid. The entire argument here is whether or not it's reasonable. The fact is, valve taking 75% isn't going to last, because either the modders and/or the players are going to say screw it to their proposal.
#103 - Modders deserved to be paid for their work, but valve taking 7…  [+] (8 new replies) 04/25/2015 on Paying for mods +6
User avatar
#116 - lollar (04/25/2015) [-]
Valve is acting like an intermediarie.That's how things work in agricalture(as far as I know).The farmer sell weat at a minnum price per tone , a middle man increases the price and eventually selling it more expensive to distibutors.
#125 - haziri (04/25/2015) [-]
They don't own skyrim though. The only thing Valve is doing in this scenario is hosting skyrim. They aren't doing anything to deserve a 75% cut.
User avatar
#132 - lollar (04/25/2015) [-]
Valve works like a supermarket,mall.I will store your items here,promote you but you have to agree to my terms.Take a share tec.
#134 - haziri (04/25/2015) [-]
So the fact that it's unreasonable is okay because? This is a digital service. To store something in a supermarket or mall requires space. Hosting a game on valve's servers is nowhere near the same cost as storing items in a mall or supermarket. The analogy doesn't work here, and even if it did it would still be unreasonable.
User avatar
#138 - lollar (04/25/2015) [-]
No,I don't support Valve.What I am trying to say is that valve has become stronger over the years and holds a big share of the market(pc games).Not only stronger but it has developed a cut status among it's fans.Valve like a true coorporation does what every industry does.Exploit.Valve makes a deal with companies(like bethesda) saying that if they want to promote their game through their platform they will have to agree to their terms and conditions.
#141 - haziri (04/25/2015) [-]
Yes, I get that, but this isn't them taking a cut on skyrim's sales, but the modding communities. When they say they want X% from the publishers, the publishers agree because they have the money for it. If a modder wants to make a mod and get paid for it, and they see they're going to be getting very little for it, chances are they might just say "fuck it."

Nobody wants to see Valve go the way of EA, and this is a worrisome step in that direction for them. On top of everything, the cut that valve is taking makes the idea of the modders getting paid appear in the background, which is absolutely not where it should be.
User avatar
#145 - lollar (04/25/2015) [-]
No matter how many reasonable voices are against buisness tactics like paid dlc , people still buy them and give big profits.Valve sees it and wants to get a share of it.Respect to it's buyer's means nothing compared to big money by rich idiots.
#148 - haziri (04/25/2015) [-]
Which doesn't make it reasonable. People can bitch about dlc for a thousand years, it will always exist, but this is not that. This is modders, who use to work for nothing more than praise, getting the chance to be paid. The entire argument here is whether or not it's reasonable. The fact is, valve taking 75% isn't going to last, because either the modders and/or the players are going to say screw it to their proposal.