let it begin......

maybe...maybe not

let it begin......

We've maximized our purple lines it seems.
come to my profile comments for my GSB review review (lol)
www.funnyjunk.com/user/Zeigh

M'kay I'll look at GSB first, then skydrift.

Thanks dude, I really appreciate this.

I was just writing something on the D&A board, but I'll read more if you have a particular review you'd like...reviewed lol.

Well how about the one I uploaded tonight, Skydrift? Or maybe Gratuitous Space Battles? GSB is a more informative review, I was worried maybe a little TOO informative.

We've maximized our purple lines it seems.
come to my profile comments for my GSB review review (lol)
www.funnyjunk.com/user/Zeigh

M'kay I'll look at GSB first, then skydrift.

Thanks dude, I really appreciate this.

maybe when the summer sales start.

Same can be said of older games though. Simply because something is old doesn't mean everyone has played it.
I'm still suggesting to people who ask for a good RPG to play Chrono Cross, Legend of Dragoon and Star Ocean the 2nd Story. All PS1 games and all very, very good.

I understand. I'll try and be more informative in my future reviews. Are you reading any more of them or are you done? XD

I was just writing something on the D&A board, but I'll read more if you have a particular review you'd like...reviewed lol.

Well how about the one I uploaded tonight, Skydrift? Or maybe Gratuitous Space Battles? GSB is a more informative review, I was worried maybe a little TOO informative.

We've maximized our purple lines it seems.
come to my profile comments for my GSB review review (lol)
www.funnyjunk.com/user/Zeigh

M'kay I'll look at GSB first, then skydrift.

Thanks dude, I really appreciate this.

Not with that attitude.

You don't have to be a woman to be a whore...

love as large as brontasaurus.

i want to lock you in my gaRAge

I couldn't be a whore even I wanted to be...

Not with that attitude.

Well, what usually happens, at least for me I can't speak for other people.
I hear about a game, let's say skyrim for example's sake.
I hear about the game, I look at a few pictures and game play videos on youtube or the equivalent, I'll then go to a reviewer I like and/or trust see what they think about the game and what's in it and what it requires.
If they can do that in a comedic way along with giving me the kind of information I need all the better.
Sometimes there's vital info about the game that could be a game changer but isn't easily seen in a video or pictures. One example I can think of is the game Kingdoms of Amalur that came out some months ago I was considering buying it until a reviewer went over it and apparently the game was too linear, essentially like a modern fps but with swords. Go to point A, complete quest, go to point B ad infinitum ad nauseum.

Oh and I also forgot a 6th bullet point earlier ;
6-Game system requirements.

Fair enough, I see your point. However I don't like reviewing new games. I prefer older ones that people know about, preferably a game which has recieved either positive or negative attention which I think is unjustly given. I then give my own opinion on it, like my Red Faction: Armageddon review. Critics really disliked it when I thought it worked quite well.

System requirements are understandable. If I could I'd arrange my website differently when I can post the title, platforms and system requirements of every game I review. Sadly I'm not a web designer so I'm not good at sorting out layouts and things.

Same can be said of older games though. Simply because something is old doesn't mean everyone has played it.
I'm still suggesting to people who ask for a good RPG to play Chrono Cross, Legend of Dragoon and Star Ocean the 2nd Story. All PS1 games and all very, very good.

I understand. I'll try and be more informative in my future reviews. Are you reading any more of them or are you done? XD

I was just writing something on the D&A board, but I'll read more if you have a particular review you'd like...reviewed lol.

Well how about the one I uploaded tonight, Skydrift? Or maybe Gratuitous Space Battles? GSB is a more informative review, I was worried maybe a little TOO informative.

We've maximized our purple lines it seems.
come to my profile comments for my GSB review review (lol)
www.funnyjunk.com/user/Zeigh

M'kay I'll look at GSB first, then skydrift.

Thanks dude, I really appreciate this.

You really expect that to work? She'll just think he's some kind of stalking freak and see through his lie.

hargleblarg used troll attempt, it failed.

i kind of do, but im really bad at getting girls

Ok, for revenge here's what you do:

1) Go to her house
2) Leave a flower on the doorstep
3) Ring the doorbell or knock, then run away
4) Repeat this every day without fail for at least two weeks, make sure it's the same flower each time
5) Make her paranoid that she has a stalker
6) One day knock on her door and hold a bundle of the same flowers, then say that it's been a while since you guys last spoke
7) Wait for her reaction.
8) If she accuses you of being the stalker say you've been staying up-country or something for the past two weeks
9) Enjoy the insanity as it spreads through her entire being.

You really expect that to work? She'll just think he's some kind of stalking freak and see through his lie.

Well I just finished reading your killing floor review and highly enjoyed.
Rules for surviving Killing Floor:
1) Do not anger the Fleshpound
2) Stay away from the Fleshpound
3) Let someone else handle the Fleshpound
4) Hope that the Fleshpound hasn't put you on the list of things for it to f*** up
5) By the Nine, stay away from the Fleshpound

This segment right here was my favorite.
I actually don't have much to say about it aside from the fact that you completely forgot to mention anything about the visual graphics or how the the game performed on your system. (Always two very important points)
If I were to say what some of the most important aspects of a game is I'd would probably say (in no particular order)
1-Game play ; how the game reacts with player feedback (controls and the like)
2-Visuals
3-Story (if it has one)
4-Online player interactions ; how the average member of the community acts
5-Game mechanics ; enemy A.I. and in game physics etc.

I'm glad you enjoyed the review.

When I write a review I try and limit how much I write, as I'm worried that people will get bored and stop reading. I also find I ramble about little details I personally found great as opposed to the important "this is what you need to talk about" things. I do try XD

I tend to do my reviews based on the belief that whoever is reading has at least some knowledge of the game beforehand. Maybe that's where I'm going wrong?

Well, what usually happens, at least for me I can't speak for other people.
I hear about a game, let's say skyrim for example's sake.
I hear about the game, I look at a few pictures and game play videos on youtube or the equivalent, I'll then go to a reviewer I like and/or trust see what they think about the game and what's in it and what it requires.
If they can do that in a comedic way along with giving me the kind of information I need all the better.
Sometimes there's vital info about the game that could be a game changer but isn't easily seen in a video or pictures. One example I can think of is the game Kingdoms of Amalur that came out some months ago I was considering buying it until a reviewer went over it and apparently the game was too linear, essentially like a modern fps but with swords. Go to point A, complete quest, go to point B ad infinitum ad nauseum.

Oh and I also forgot a 6th bullet point earlier ;
6-Game system requirements.

Fair enough, I see your point. However I don't like reviewing new games. I prefer older ones that people know about, preferably a game which has recieved either positive or negative attention which I think is unjustly given. I then give my own opinion on it, like my Red Faction: Armageddon review. Critics really disliked it when I thought it worked quite well.

System requirements are understandable. If I could I'd arrange my website differently when I can post the title, platforms and system requirements of every game I review. Sadly I'm not a web designer so I'm not good at sorting out layouts and things.

Same can be said of older games though. Simply because something is old doesn't mean everyone has played it.
I'm still suggesting to people who ask for a good RPG to play Chrono Cross, Legend of Dragoon and Star Ocean the 2nd Story. All PS1 games and all very, very good.

I understand. I'll try and be more informative in my future reviews. Are you reading any more of them or are you done? XD

I was just writing something on the D&A board, but I'll read more if you have a particular review you'd like...reviewed lol.

Well how about the one I uploaded tonight, Skydrift? Or maybe Gratuitous Space Battles? GSB is a more informative review, I was worried maybe a little TOO informative.

We've maximized our purple lines it seems.
come to my profile comments for my GSB review review (lol)
www.funnyjunk.com/user/Zeigh

M'kay I'll look at GSB first, then skydrift.

Thanks dude, I really appreciate this.

I just started with tribes, I'm working through killing floor now on your suggestion.

Ah I can see why you said my jokes are stale.

I did the Tribes review literally on the day I first played it (it was my only requested review) so I didn't have time to really think.

If it's not too much trouble I'd appreaciate it immensly if you coudl read as many reviews as possible and address as many faults as possible. Nobody else seems willing to give me negative criticism.

Well I just finished reading your killing floor review and highly enjoyed.
Rules for surviving Killing Floor:
1) Do not anger the Fleshpound
2) Stay away from the Fleshpound
3) Let someone else handle the Fleshpound
4) Hope that the Fleshpound hasn't put you on the list of things for it to f*** up
5) By the Nine, stay away from the Fleshpound

This segment right here was my favorite.
I actually don't have much to say about it aside from the fact that you completely forgot to mention anything about the visual graphics or how the the game performed on your system. (Always two very important points)
If I were to say what some of the most important aspects of a game is I'd would probably say (in no particular order)
1-Game play ; how the game reacts with player feedback (controls and the like)
2-Visuals
3-Story (if it has one)
4-Online player interactions ; how the average member of the community acts
5-Game mechanics ; enemy A.I. and in game physics etc.

I'm glad you enjoyed the review.

When I write a review I try and limit how much I write, as I'm worried that people will get bored and stop reading. I also find I ramble about little details I personally found great as opposed to the important "this is what you need to talk about" things. I do try XD

I tend to do my reviews based on the belief that whoever is reading has at least some knowledge of the game beforehand. Maybe that's where I'm going wrong?

Well, what usually happens, at least for me I can't speak for other people.
I hear about a game, let's say skyrim for example's sake.
I hear about the game, I look at a few pictures and game play videos on youtube or the equivalent, I'll then go to a reviewer I like and/or trust see what they think about the game and what's in it and what it requires.
If they can do that in a comedic way along with giving me the kind of information I need all the better.
Sometimes there's vital info about the game that could be a game changer but isn't easily seen in a video or pictures. One example I can think of is the game Kingdoms of Amalur that came out some months ago I was considering buying it until a reviewer went over it and apparently the game was too linear, essentially like a modern fps but with swords. Go to point A, complete quest, go to point B ad infinitum ad nauseum.

Oh and I also forgot a 6th bullet point earlier ;
6-Game system requirements.

Fair enough, I see your point. However I don't like reviewing new games. I prefer older ones that people know about, preferably a game which has recieved either positive or negative attention which I think is unjustly given. I then give my own opinion on it, like my Red Faction: Armageddon review. Critics really disliked it when I thought it worked quite well.

System requirements are understandable. If I could I'd arrange my website differently when I can post the title, platforms and system requirements of every game I review. Sadly I'm not a web designer so I'm not good at sorting out layouts and things.

Same can be said of older games though. Simply because something is old doesn't mean everyone has played it.
I'm still suggesting to people who ask for a good RPG to play Chrono Cross, Legend of Dragoon and Star Ocean the 2nd Story. All PS1 games and all very, very good.

I understand. I'll try and be more informative in my future reviews. Are you reading any more of them or are you done? XD

I was just writing something on the D&A board, but I'll read more if you have a particular review you'd like...reviewed lol.

Well how about the one I uploaded tonight, Skydrift? Or maybe Gratuitous Space Battles? GSB is a more informative review, I was worried maybe a little TOO informative.

We've maximized our purple lines it seems.
come to my profile comments for my GSB review review (lol)
www.funnyjunk.com/user/Zeigh

M'kay I'll look at GSB first, then skydrift.

Thanks dude, I really appreciate this.

Some people don't seem to understand that, or think that I'm pissing on them for the sake of pissing on them aka trolling. or just being a dick.

Yeah I know what you mean.

How many of my reviews did you read by the way? And which one/s if I may ask?

I just started with tribes, I'm working through killing floor now on your suggestion.

Ah I can see why you said my jokes are stale.

I did the Tribes review literally on the day I first played it (it was my only requested review) so I didn't have time to really think.

If it's not too much trouble I'd appreaciate it immensly if you coudl read as many reviews as possible and address as many faults as possible. Nobody else seems willing to give me negative criticism.

Well I just finished reading your killing floor review and highly enjoyed.
Rules for surviving Killing Floor:
1) Do not anger the Fleshpound
2) Stay away from the Fleshpound
3) Let someone else handle the Fleshpound
4) Hope that the Fleshpound hasn't put you on the list of things for it to f*** up
5) By the Nine, stay away from the Fleshpound

This segment right here was my favorite.
I actually don't have much to say about it aside from the fact that you completely forgot to mention anything about the visual graphics or how the the game performed on your system. (Always two very important points)
If I were to say what some of the most important aspects of a game is I'd would probably say (in no particular order)
1-Game play ; how the game reacts with player feedback (controls and the like)
2-Visuals
3-Story (if it has one)
4-Online player interactions ; how the average member of the community acts
5-Game mechanics ; enemy A.I. and in game physics etc.

I'm glad you enjoyed the review.

When I write a review I try and limit how much I write, as I'm worried that people will get bored and stop reading. I also find I ramble about little details I personally found great as opposed to the important "this is what you need to talk about" things. I do try XD

I tend to do my reviews based on the belief that whoever is reading has at least some knowledge of the game beforehand. Maybe that's where I'm going wrong?

Well, what usually happens, at least for me I can't speak for other people.
I hear about a game, let's say skyrim for example's sake.
I hear about the game, I look at a few pictures and game play videos on youtube or the equivalent, I'll then go to a reviewer I like and/or trust see what they think about the game and what's in it and what it requires.
If they can do that in a comedic way along with giving me the kind of information I need all the better.
Sometimes there's vital info about the game that could be a game changer but isn't easily seen in a video or pictures. One example I can think of is the game Kingdoms of Amalur that came out some months ago I was considering buying it until a reviewer went over it and apparently the game was too linear, essentially like a modern fps but with swords. Go to point A, complete quest, go to point B ad infinitum ad nauseum.

Oh and I also forgot a 6th bullet point earlier ;
6-Game system requirements.

Fair enough, I see your point. However I don't like reviewing new games. I prefer older ones that people know about, preferably a game which has recieved either positive or negative attention which I think is unjustly given. I then give my own opinion on it, like my Red Faction: Armageddon review. Critics really disliked it when I thought it worked quite well.

System requirements are understandable. If I could I'd arrange my website differently when I can post the title, platforms and system requirements of every game I review. Sadly I'm not a web designer so I'm not good at sorting out layouts and things.

Same can be said of older games though. Simply because something is old doesn't mean everyone has played it.
I'm still suggesting to people who ask for a good RPG to play Chrono Cross, Legend of Dragoon and Star Ocean the 2nd Story. All PS1 games and all very, very good.

I understand. I'll try and be more informative in my future reviews. Are you reading any more of them or are you done? XD

I was just writing something on the D&A board, but I'll read more if you have a particular review you'd like...reviewed lol.

Well how about the one I uploaded tonight, Skydrift? Or maybe Gratuitous Space Battles? GSB is a more informative review, I was worried maybe a little TOO informative.

We've maximized our purple lines it seems.
come to my profile comments for my GSB review review (lol)
www.funnyjunk.com/user/Zeigh

M'kay I'll look at GSB first, then skydrift.

Thanks dude, I really appreciate this.

No problem.
I don't normally write critiques but the few times I have they tend to have the reaction of people thinking I'm trying to piss all over their work.

I've gotten into the habit of telling people that I'm not.

By all means, piss on my work all you like. I welcome negative feedback as it shows me where to improve.

Some people don't seem to understand that, or think that I'm pissing on them for the sake of pissing on them aka trolling. or just being a dick.

Yeah I know what you mean.

How many of my reviews did you read by the way? And which one/s if I may ask?

I just started with tribes, I'm working through killing floor now on your suggestion.

Ah I can see why you said my jokes are stale.

I did the Tribes review literally on the day I first played it (it was my only requested review) so I didn't have time to really think.

If it's not too much trouble I'd appreaciate it immensly if you coudl read as many reviews as possible and address as many faults as possible. Nobody else seems willing to give me negative criticism.

Well I just finished reading your killing floor review and highly enjoyed.
Rules for surviving Killing Floor:
1) Do not anger the Fleshpound
2) Stay away from the Fleshpound
3) Let someone else handle the Fleshpound
4) Hope that the Fleshpound hasn't put you on the list of things for it to f*** up
5) By the Nine, stay away from the Fleshpound

This segment right here was my favorite.
I actually don't have much to say about it aside from the fact that you completely forgot to mention anything about the visual graphics or how the the game performed on your system. (Always two very important points)
If I were to say what some of the most important aspects of a game is I'd would probably say (in no particular order)
1-Game play ; how the game reacts with player feedback (controls and the like)
2-Visuals
3-Story (if it has one)
4-Online player interactions ; how the average member of the community acts
5-Game mechanics ; enemy A.I. and in game physics etc.

I'm glad you enjoyed the review.

When I write a review I try and limit how much I write, as I'm worried that people will get bored and stop reading. I also find I ramble about little details I personally found great as opposed to the important "this is what you need to talk about" things. I do try XD

I tend to do my reviews based on the belief that whoever is reading has at least some knowledge of the game beforehand. Maybe that's where I'm going wrong?

Well, what usually happens, at least for me I can't speak for other people.
I hear about a game, let's say skyrim for example's sake.
I hear about the game, I look at a few pictures and game play videos on youtube or the equivalent, I'll then go to a reviewer I like and/or trust see what they think about the game and what's in it and what it requires.
If they can do that in a comedic way along with giving me the kind of information I need all the better.
Sometimes there's vital info about the game that could be a game changer but isn't easily seen in a video or pictures. One example I can think of is the game Kingdoms of Amalur that came out some months ago I was considering buying it until a reviewer went over it and apparently the game was too linear, essentially like a modern fps but with swords. Go to point A, complete quest, go to point B ad infinitum ad nauseum.

Oh and I also forgot a 6th bullet point earlier ;
6-Game system requirements.

Fair enough, I see your point. However I don't like reviewing new games. I prefer older ones that people know about, preferably a game which has recieved either positive or negative attention which I think is unjustly given. I then give my own opinion on it, like my Red Faction: Armageddon review. Critics really disliked it when I thought it worked quite well.

System requirements are understandable. If I could I'd arrange my website differently when I can post the title, platforms and system requirements of every game I review. Sadly I'm not a web designer so I'm not good at sorting out layouts and things.

Same can be said of older games though. Simply because something is old doesn't mean everyone has played it.
I'm still suggesting to people who ask for a good RPG to play Chrono Cross, Legend of Dragoon and Star Ocean the 2nd Story. All PS1 games and all very, very good.

I understand. I'll try and be more informative in my future reviews. Are you reading any more of them or are you done? XD

I was just writing something on the D&A board, but I'll read more if you have a particular review you'd like...reviewed lol.

Well how about the one I uploaded tonight, Skydrift? Or maybe Gratuitous Space Battles? GSB is a more informative review, I was worried maybe a little TOO informative.

We've maximized our purple lines it seems.
come to my profile comments for my GSB review review (lol)
www.funnyjunk.com/user/Zeigh

M'kay I'll look at GSB first, then skydrift.

Thanks dude, I really appreciate this.

And why can't we all be proud of being human and drop the patriotic bullshit

Because as a whole species, even though we're responsible for some of the most amazing things the world has ever seen, we're also equally responsible for the worst atrocities up to and including destruction of this very planet.

I really liked how accurate the brotherhood review was. You sir got yourself a fan

Thank you kindly. If you're at all interested (though why you would be is beyond me) I also do youtube videos.

www.youtube.com/rkwheels

I liked it well enough. I liked the way in which you interrupted the monotony with some jokes here and there (although repetitive at times).
The information about the game was all there, game play, visuals, player interaction and in game mechanics.
Your closing line was nice but overall a bit underwhelming.
I think you'll do fine in your interview, just remain calm and don't exaggerate.

Some things to consider would be to vary the kinds of jokes you use. The first time you made a self deprecating joke about being immersed into a game foreign to you was funny, but not so much the fourth or fifth time.
Another thing to consider would be changing the format just slightly, maybe putting up bullet points concerning each factor of the game, one bullet point for graphics, another for game play etc.

I try and spice my reviews up as much as possible, but I'm fairly new at this so I'm sure I'll get better with time. If you read my Killing Floor review you'll see I did put up a bullet point list to vary it.

My humour is bad, and I'm sure in time I'll get it right.

Thanks for the criticism, it really helps.

No problem.
I don't normally write critiques but the few times I have they tend to have the reaction of people thinking I'm trying to piss all over their work.

I've gotten into the habit of telling people that I'm not.

By all means, piss on my work all you like. I welcome negative feedback as it shows me where to improve.

Some people don't seem to understand that, or think that I'm pissing on them for the sake of pissing on them aka trolling. or just being a dick.

Yeah I know what you mean.

How many of my reviews did you read by the way? And which one/s if I may ask?

I just started with tribes, I'm working through killing floor now on your suggestion.

Ah I can see why you said my jokes are stale.

I did the Tribes review literally on the day I first played it (it was my only requested review) so I didn't have time to really think.

If it's not too much trouble I'd appreaciate it immensly if you coudl read as many reviews as possible and address as many faults as possible. Nobody else seems willing to give me negative criticism.

Well I just finished reading your killing floor review and highly enjoyed.
Rules for surviving Killing Floor:
1) Do not anger the Fleshpound
2) Stay away from the Fleshpound
3) Let someone else handle the Fleshpound
4) Hope that the Fleshpound hasn't put you on the list of things for it to f*** up
5) By the Nine, stay away from the Fleshpound

This segment right here was my favorite.
I actually don't have much to say about it aside from the fact that you completely forgot to mention anything about the visual graphics or how the the game performed on your system. (Always two very important points)
If I were to say what some of the most important aspects of a game is I'd would probably say (in no particular order)
1-Game play ; how the game reacts with player feedback (controls and the like)
2-Visuals
3-Story (if it has one)
4-Online player interactions ; how the average member of the community acts
5-Game mechanics ; enemy A.I. and in game physics etc.

I'm glad you enjoyed the review.

When I write a review I try and limit how much I write, as I'm worried that people will get bored and stop reading. I also find I ramble about little details I personally found great as opposed to the important "this is what you need to talk about" things. I do try XD

I tend to do my reviews based on the belief that whoever is reading has at least some knowledge of the game beforehand. Maybe that's where I'm going wrong?

Well, what usually happens, at least for me I can't speak for other people.
I hear about a game, let's say skyrim for example's sake.
I hear about the game, I look at a few pictures and game play videos on youtube or the equivalent, I'll then go to a reviewer I like and/or trust see what they think about the game and what's in it and what it requires.
If they can do that in a comedic way along with giving me the kind of information I need all the better.
Sometimes there's vital info about the game that could be a game changer but isn't easily seen in a video or pictures. One example I can think of is the game Kingdoms of Amalur that came out some months ago I was considering buying it until a reviewer went over it and apparently the game was too linear, essentially like a modern fps but with swords. Go to point A, complete quest, go to point B ad infinitum ad nauseum.

Oh and I also forgot a 6th bullet point earlier ;
6-Game system requirements.

Fair enough, I see your point. However I don't like reviewing new games. I prefer older ones that people know about, preferably a game which has recieved either positive or negative attention which I think is unjustly given. I then give my own opinion on it, like my Red Faction: Armageddon review. Critics really disliked it when I thought it worked quite well.

System requirements are understandable. If I could I'd arrange my website differently when I can post the title, platforms and system requirements of every game I review. Sadly I'm not a web designer so I'm not good at sorting out layouts and things.

Same can be said of older games though. Simply because something is old doesn't mean everyone has played it.
I'm still suggesting to people who ask for a good RPG to play Chrono Cross, Legend of Dragoon and Star Ocean the 2nd Story. All PS1 games and all very, very good.

I understand. I'll try and be more informative in my future reviews. Are you reading any more of them or are you done? XD

I was just writing something on the D&A board, but I'll read more if you have a particular review you'd like...reviewed lol.

Well how about the one I uploaded tonight, Skydrift? Or maybe Gratuitous Space Battles? GSB is a more informative review, I was worried maybe a little TOO informative.

We've maximized our purple lines it seems.
come to my profile comments for my GSB review review (lol)
www.funnyjunk.com/user/Zeigh

M'kay I'll look at GSB first, then skydrift.

Thanks dude, I really appreciate this.

what about the third attention whore pointing out the first and second aforementioned whores?

I'm not a woman.

You don't have to be a woman to be a whore...

love as large as brontasaurus.

i want to lock you in my gaRAge

I couldn't be a whore even I wanted to be...

Not with that attitude.

The worst part is that they think they are the final say in that just because they posted this they think they are somehow better than the people they are angry at.