Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

grrphc    

Rank #2007 on Comments
grrphc Avatar Level 246 Comments: Doinitrite
Offline
Send mail to grrphc Block grrphc Invite grrphc to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:12/25/2010
Last Login:10/25/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#6351
Comment Ranking:#2007
Highest Content Rank:#4465
Highest Comment Rank:#1090
Content Thumbs: 605 total,  809 ,  204
Comment Thumbs: 5167 total,  7317 ,  2150
Content Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 58 Content: Sammich eater → Level 59 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 10% (10/100)
Level 246 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 247 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:1
Content Views:42454
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:1756
FJ Points:5338

latest user's comments

#17 - ...I guess? What you said still doesn't make sense. &q…  [+] (5 new replies) 09/18/2014 on Who will win?! -2
#18 - ThekidsTEN (09/18/2014) [-]
The dreamcast sold really well, so I couldn't have said that.
A war is a series of battles that are won or lost
A console war is a series of "battles" between each other
Dreamcast was out of the war after its initial release
He said Dreamcast won
I say that's why its successor (which have you, was never made) sold well
Do you not understand what sarcasm is? or do you take everything on the internet literally?
User avatar #20 - grrphc (09/18/2014) [-]
The Dreamcast didn't sell well in any sense of the word, you have no idea what you're talking about.
You're honestly arguing semantics just to make you seem less retarded than you actually are, even going as far as to delete your stupid "Read comment #7" comment that even you realised was stupid.
I already explained that your sarcastic remark didn't work because for something to ironically "sell well" it has to first exist, bringing all the way back to "That's why the Dreamcast 2 exists, right?" being a better sarcastic remark to fit your "witty reply".
You've been a retard since you've started replying to that guy, and you're a retard now. I'm done with this argument.
#21 - ThekidsTEN (09/18/2014) [-]
>didn't sell well
>10.5 millon sold
>First console to have internet connectivity
>"the Dreamcast was initially well received with a very successful launch and strong sales"
>#8 best of all time console
>In japan they still making licensed games for it
And your the cunt that is arguing semantics, look at your second post, literally all of it is semantics. I would insult you again, but I think instead of getting offended by the insult I think you would critique what insult I would use. I would say you're too dumb to insult, but realistically you're too pretentious.
User avatar #22 - grrphc (09/18/2014) [-]
Ignoring the fact that most of your shit just has to do with how GOOD of a console it was and not how SUCCESSFUL of a console it was
>10 million
>Compared to the 64's 30 million
>Compared to the PS's 100 million
Shut the hell up, you have no idea what you're talking about.
The fact that you went out of you're way to thumb down my comments on OTHER posts shows me I'm talking to a fucking child, I'm done. You're immature and on top of that You're dumb as a bag of shit, kid.
#24 - ThekidsTEN (09/18/2014) [-]
It was released as a gen 2 console at the same time that gen 3 was released (specifically ps2). Same thing with the Wii U. It is comparable to last gen, but was released too late. And I read every comment you ever posted and thumbed accordingly. You come off as kinda a dick in every post. You need to lighten up a bit
#14 - >Dreamcast 2 It doesn't exist.  [+] (8 new replies) 09/18/2014 on Who will win?! -1
#16 - ThekidsTEN (09/18/2014) [-]
now see #8
User avatar #17 - grrphc (09/18/2014) [-]
...I guess?
What you said still doesn't make sense.
"That's why the Dreamcast 2 sold so well." implies the Dreamcast 2 was made, and sold poorly.
A sarcastic response that actually would have made sense was "That's why the Dreamcast sold so well." or "That's why the Dreamcast 2 exists, right?".
#18 - ThekidsTEN (09/18/2014) [-]
The dreamcast sold really well, so I couldn't have said that.
A war is a series of battles that are won or lost
A console war is a series of "battles" between each other
Dreamcast was out of the war after its initial release
He said Dreamcast won
I say that's why its successor (which have you, was never made) sold well
Do you not understand what sarcasm is? or do you take everything on the internet literally?
User avatar #20 - grrphc (09/18/2014) [-]
The Dreamcast didn't sell well in any sense of the word, you have no idea what you're talking about.
You're honestly arguing semantics just to make you seem less retarded than you actually are, even going as far as to delete your stupid "Read comment #7" comment that even you realised was stupid.
I already explained that your sarcastic remark didn't work because for something to ironically "sell well" it has to first exist, bringing all the way back to "That's why the Dreamcast 2 exists, right?" being a better sarcastic remark to fit your "witty reply".
You've been a retard since you've started replying to that guy, and you're a retard now. I'm done with this argument.
#21 - ThekidsTEN (09/18/2014) [-]
>didn't sell well
>10.5 millon sold
>First console to have internet connectivity
>"the Dreamcast was initially well received with a very successful launch and strong sales"
>#8 best of all time console
>In japan they still making licensed games for it
And your the cunt that is arguing semantics, look at your second post, literally all of it is semantics. I would insult you again, but I think instead of getting offended by the insult I think you would critique what insult I would use. I would say you're too dumb to insult, but realistically you're too pretentious.
User avatar #22 - grrphc (09/18/2014) [-]
Ignoring the fact that most of your shit just has to do with how GOOD of a console it was and not how SUCCESSFUL of a console it was
>10 million
>Compared to the 64's 30 million
>Compared to the PS's 100 million
Shut the hell up, you have no idea what you're talking about.
The fact that you went out of you're way to thumb down my comments on OTHER posts shows me I'm talking to a fucking child, I'm done. You're immature and on top of that You're dumb as a bag of shit, kid.
#24 - ThekidsTEN (09/18/2014) [-]
It was released as a gen 2 console at the same time that gen 3 was released (specifically ps2). Same thing with the Wii U. It is comparable to last gen, but was released too late. And I read every comment you ever posted and thumbed accordingly. You come off as kinda a dick in every post. You need to lighten up a bit
#15 - ThekidsTEN has deleted their comment.
#10 - >being a tier ten edgelord Holy **** dude,…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/18/2014 on Ice cube prank +1
User avatar #14 - cuntism (09/18/2014) [-]
Ha I didn't mean to come off that way, it's just this is such a douchey joke to pull

It's like unscrewing the salt off the shaker, or shaking someone's beer before handing it them. It's the playground of the dick
User avatar #23 - becauseoprahsaidso (09/18/2014) [-]
and you you'd know a few things about dicks and playgrounds wouldn't you
User avatar #26 - cuntism (09/18/2014) [-]
Well played sir, ha
#11 - This is the best ******* .gif I've ever seen on FJ. 09/18/2014 on The old switcheroo +53
#38 - Jacob's Candidates 4-Locke 8-Hurley 15-Sawyer … 09/18/2014 on I have the power! +2
#101 - Paul. 09/17/2014 on God dammit, Paul +6
#225 - >OP Is from Vegas Ayy! 702 represent! Any other FJe… 09/17/2014 on tinder n shit +1
#64 - Just because only one pack of DLC was released on Day 1 doesn'… 09/17/2014 on EA Games -1
#26 - That's not what we were talking about, we are talking about th…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/17/2014 on EA Games -1
User avatar #29 - yusay (09/17/2014) [-]
You really don't have a clue what you're talking about. Only one of the DLC was day one, and it was just old maps. Releases in December, March, July and TBA isn't cutting content out of the game, that's content they didn't even have done when they shipped. I already told you why people consider BF4 unfinished. People lodged legitimate complaints against BF4 being an unfinished game, not some petty bull about DLC months to a year after the game is out (which is a good thing FYI).
User avatar #64 - grrphc (09/17/2014) [-]
Just because only one pack of DLC was released on Day 1 doesn't mean they didn't have more.
They already had the DLC MAPPED OUT for Battlefield 4. That is pre-planned DLC. That is cutting content to later sell it as bonus material.
Besides the fact we're talking about EA games as a whole, and not just Battlefield 4 that you seem so quick to protect.
Battlefield 3 is literally unplayable online unless you buy the DLC
Sims 4 doesn't even have pools. POOLS. and Toddlers have been reduced to items rather than characters.
EA has been doing this kind of shit for eternity, that's what we're talking about. YOU don't have a clue what we're talking about since you just decided to jump into a conversation only reading the top 3 replies.
#6 - Are you kidding me? This is Naughty Dog's diamond. It's even g… 09/16/2014 on (untitled) -1
#5 - Ken Larson? A dude with 78 friends back in this classic, "… 09/16/2014 on Christians -1
#10 - >Bank destroys families If you do what you said you wou…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/16/2014 on EA Games -1
#11 - cursesnew (09/16/2014) [-]
Yea keep telling that to yourself. There are worse companies out there that actually harm others in a bad way. Them publishing and do note PUBLISHING bad games is not enough for them to be the worst company.

As for kids labor, not sure which country but some third world country and I'm sure it happens in Africa. It's big enough and the economy isn't all that good there.
#13 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/16/2014) [-]
While I agree that there are companies that use these shithole ethics to get stuff made, Please reread EVERYTHING that has been said.
First off, African kids are not used for that kind of work because they are more like natives while Asian countries are mostly modern and use the abundance of kids they have. Still bad, But atleast my Nike's don't require me to buy shoelaces with pre-ordering them giving me the insole.
Second, What the first guy said about Banks. And on that note, We are governing 'WORST COMPANIES' not 'MOST EVIL COMPANIES'

Worst means making a faulty product and having a negative response with your consumers. Apple has a positive consumership because while they do use Child labour and produce something that other phones have, The fucking thing still works.

Battlefield 4 on the other hand, Was broken upon launch and had DLC mapped out already. DLC is about making something after the game when it is out, Not selling parts of your game. Let us not forget Simcity as well.
#8 - It's not now. lmao. EA has won worst company for years, people…  [+] (4 new replies) 09/16/2014 on EA Games -1
#9 - cursesnew (09/16/2014) [-]
They won the award because we had a ton of butthurt gamers voting for a poll which they mostly knew about.

But ok so they are worse than the Bank that destroys families or companies that hire kids in africa to do their stuff. Or outsource their work to another country where the payment is practically slave payment.

Yea I'm sure EA are far worse than that because they published a few bad games. Try to argue with your dad or mom on which company is worse and then bring up EA.

You'll sound like a whiny little kid that lost his candy.
It'll be like Cartman
"But moooooom, the company is making bad games!"


Also Battlefield 4 as it is now is worth the money and the Premium package as well. BF3 was worth the price too.
User avatar #10 - grrphc (09/16/2014) [-]
>Bank destroys families
If you do what you said you would when you signed your bank agreement, your bank can never fuck you over. I see where you're coming from, but this is being professional victim.

>Companies that hire kids in AFRICA
lolwut? Asian countries maybe, but there are little to no companies using African slave labor.

EA however is a company who keeps releasing half-assed games like Sims and Battlefield and finishing them up with DLC. The last time I played a complete EA game was like NBA 2k I think.
They are a video game company
They are the worst at what they do
Therefore, they win worst company for 3 consecutive years.

#11 - cursesnew (09/16/2014) [-]
Yea keep telling that to yourself. There are worse companies out there that actually harm others in a bad way. Them publishing and do note PUBLISHING bad games is not enough for them to be the worst company.

As for kids labor, not sure which country but some third world country and I'm sure it happens in Africa. It's big enough and the economy isn't all that good there.
#13 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/16/2014) [-]
While I agree that there are companies that use these shithole ethics to get stuff made, Please reread EVERYTHING that has been said.
First off, African kids are not used for that kind of work because they are more like natives while Asian countries are mostly modern and use the abundance of kids they have. Still bad, But atleast my Nike's don't require me to buy shoelaces with pre-ordering them giving me the insole.
Second, What the first guy said about Banks. And on that note, We are governing 'WORST COMPANIES' not 'MOST EVIL COMPANIES'

Worst means making a faulty product and having a negative response with your consumers. Apple has a positive consumership because while they do use Child labour and produce something that other phones have, The fucking thing still works.

Battlefield 4 on the other hand, Was broken upon launch and had DLC mapped out already. DLC is about making something after the game when it is out, Not selling parts of your game. Let us not forget Simcity as well.
#8 - Doesn't justify the fact that his A moves are gone for good.  [+] (3 new replies) 09/16/2014 on Smash Bros Trivia +3
#21 - waker (09/16/2014) [-]
Yes this indeed, I mostly played Lucas for the better recover move and A moves. His PK fire is trash compared to Ness.
User avatar #30 - chrisel (09/16/2014) [-]
I only used PK fire when I
With Ness: wanted to trap them and do some damage
With Lucas: if I saw him/her running to me and I needed an attack to quickly occupy them with something (being hit).

Ness's PK Fire was to easy to escape so I never used it though I did use the PK fire of Lucas.
#56 - waker (09/17/2014) [-]
I think that they are pretty much the same except that Ness' PK fire lasted longer and created the opportunity for combos. On Lucas the whole move was used just cause of the range since his air moves were way better anyway. I'm gonna miss the down A to standard a to some ground A move combo that (well, on a more casual level) brought the opponent pretty much to 40% or so without a chance to move if you timed it well enough.
#20 - I didn't make fun of you for greentexting, I made fun of you f…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/16/2014 on In Parallel Universe -1
User avatar #21 - wertologist (09/16/2014) [-]
If a meteor the size of a city happens to fly by Earth, it's completely reasonable to say there's a chance it will hit. I do help pay for the WiFi at my house. An internet bill is me paying the fee to use the internet. I know MS is not all Xbox. That doesn't change the fact that they will always try to get more money. If they made DLC to change the skins on PC, that would also ruin part of the game since that was a free feature. Charging to change skins would be a new policy too if it was put in.
#18 - > ******* greentexting that I was being sar…  [+] (3 new replies) 09/16/2014 on In Parallel Universe -4
User avatar #19 - wertologist (09/16/2014) [-]
First, I didn't greentext. You used ">" so I used them to respond. Don't bitch about me using them if you used them yourself. It makes you a hypocrite. I didn't say DLC was killing the industry. I said the community. If there is profit to be made off something, there's a strong chance a company will try to exploit it. MS is no exception. I'm not saying they WILL put an online fee, but if it will get them money they may. If they make you have to buy xbox live just to buy DLC or even redeem codes for a game, that's reason enough to believe they may try something. I do pay a fee to browse the internet. It's called a bill. DLC for Minecraft would be horrible. They only DLC that I can imagine it would have would be for exclusive items which in turn would fuck up the game for people who play online and don't pay for DLC.
User avatar #20 - grrphc (09/16/2014) [-]
I didn't make fun of you for greentexting, I made fun of you for what you chose to greentext.

Saying there's a "strong-chance something bad might happen" is tinfoil hat retarded. I could say there's a chance that a meteor the size of my city is going to hit us, worrying about it is pointless.
You're fucking stupid to assume Microsoft is all about Xbox when their primary source of income is PC.
An internet bill is not a fee, and the way you're bitching about DLC, I doubt you even pay it yourself. If they released DLC, it'd be cosmetic. It'd be shit like skins, how Microsoft usually handles DLC. They'd release a Minecraft 2 before making mandatory DLC to play the game.
User avatar #21 - wertologist (09/16/2014) [-]
If a meteor the size of a city happens to fly by Earth, it's completely reasonable to say there's a chance it will hit. I do help pay for the WiFi at my house. An internet bill is me paying the fee to use the internet. I know MS is not all Xbox. That doesn't change the fact that they will always try to get more money. If they made DLC to change the skins on PC, that would also ruin part of the game since that was a free feature. Charging to change skins would be a new policy too if it was put in.
#10 - That's literally the foundation of this website. 09/16/2014 on Clever Title +6
#6 - It's not bad. It's just released unfinished so you can fin…  [+] (11 new replies) 09/16/2014 on EA Games +4
User avatar #23 - messerauditore (09/17/2014) [-]
And Battlefield 3 was at least 65% DLC. So fucking stupid.
User avatar #17 - yusay (09/17/2014) [-]
Battlefield 4 being unfinished had absolutely nothing to do with DLC. It was unfinished in that it was extremely bugged and had several balancing issues since the start of the game, mostly centered around the game's netcode. Many of these bugs are still in the game a year after release. If you're going to blame them blame them for the right reason, not something stupid like DLC.
User avatar #26 - grrphc (09/17/2014) [-]
That's not what we were talking about, we are talking about the fact that they deliberately took pieces out of the main game to sell them later on as DLC, or even day on DLC for a lot of their games.
Stop being condescending and "against the status quo" and read what you're replying to.
User avatar #29 - yusay (09/17/2014) [-]
You really don't have a clue what you're talking about. Only one of the DLC was day one, and it was just old maps. Releases in December, March, July and TBA isn't cutting content out of the game, that's content they didn't even have done when they shipped. I already told you why people consider BF4 unfinished. People lodged legitimate complaints against BF4 being an unfinished game, not some petty bull about DLC months to a year after the game is out (which is a good thing FYI).
User avatar #64 - grrphc (09/17/2014) [-]
Just because only one pack of DLC was released on Day 1 doesn't mean they didn't have more.
They already had the DLC MAPPED OUT for Battlefield 4. That is pre-planned DLC. That is cutting content to later sell it as bonus material.
Besides the fact we're talking about EA games as a whole, and not just Battlefield 4 that you seem so quick to protect.
Battlefield 3 is literally unplayable online unless you buy the DLC
Sims 4 doesn't even have pools. POOLS. and Toddlers have been reduced to items rather than characters.
EA has been doing this kind of shit for eternity, that's what we're talking about. YOU don't have a clue what we're talking about since you just decided to jump into a conversation only reading the top 3 replies.
#7 - cursesnew (09/16/2014) [-]
All Battlefield games have had DLC and booster packs. Not sure why people get up in arms about it now.

Even the most special Battlefield game, being BF2 had expansion packs. Besides the content we get from spending about $40 on the Premium package is just insane.
User avatar #8 - grrphc (09/16/2014) [-]
It's not now. lmao. EA has won worst company for years, people have been complaining about it forever.
You're only now noticing.
#9 - cursesnew (09/16/2014) [-]
They won the award because we had a ton of butthurt gamers voting for a poll which they mostly knew about.

But ok so they are worse than the Bank that destroys families or companies that hire kids in africa to do their stuff. Or outsource their work to another country where the payment is practically slave payment.

Yea I'm sure EA are far worse than that because they published a few bad games. Try to argue with your dad or mom on which company is worse and then bring up EA.

You'll sound like a whiny little kid that lost his candy.
It'll be like Cartman
"But moooooom, the company is making bad games!"


Also Battlefield 4 as it is now is worth the money and the Premium package as well. BF3 was worth the price too.
User avatar #10 - grrphc (09/16/2014) [-]
>Bank destroys families
If you do what you said you would when you signed your bank agreement, your bank can never fuck you over. I see where you're coming from, but this is being professional victim.

>Companies that hire kids in AFRICA
lolwut? Asian countries maybe, but there are little to no companies using African slave labor.

EA however is a company who keeps releasing half-assed games like Sims and Battlefield and finishing them up with DLC. The last time I played a complete EA game was like NBA 2k I think.
They are a video game company
They are the worst at what they do
Therefore, they win worst company for 3 consecutive years.

#11 - cursesnew (09/16/2014) [-]
Yea keep telling that to yourself. There are worse companies out there that actually harm others in a bad way. Them publishing and do note PUBLISHING bad games is not enough for them to be the worst company.

As for kids labor, not sure which country but some third world country and I'm sure it happens in Africa. It's big enough and the economy isn't all that good there.
#13 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/16/2014) [-]
While I agree that there are companies that use these shithole ethics to get stuff made, Please reread EVERYTHING that has been said.
First off, African kids are not used for that kind of work because they are more like natives while Asian countries are mostly modern and use the abundance of kids they have. Still bad, But atleast my Nike's don't require me to buy shoelaces with pre-ordering them giving me the insole.
Second, What the first guy said about Banks. And on that note, We are governing 'WORST COMPANIES' not 'MOST EVIL COMPANIES'

Worst means making a faulty product and having a negative response with your consumers. Apple has a positive consumership because while they do use Child labour and produce something that other phones have, The fucking thing still works.

Battlefield 4 on the other hand, Was broken upon launch and had DLC mapped out already. DLC is about making something after the game when it is out, Not selling parts of your game. Let us not forget Simcity as well.
#16 - >Online fees Oh no! Those dreaded online fees on every …  [+] (5 new replies) 09/16/2014 on In Parallel Universe -3
User avatar #17 - wertologist (09/16/2014) [-]
> I don't play games that have online fees. Why would I want to add another fee to play the game I own and played online for free for years?

> I wouldn't put it past MS to try something if it means profit.

> DLC is killing the gaming community. A lot of DLC for games gives an advantage to the person paying more. Also, when I buy a game, I want it to be 100%. Not 60% with DLC filling in 5%. Books come 100%. You don't buy a book and look for $15 extra pages.
User avatar #18 - grrphc (09/16/2014) [-]
>Fucking greentexting that
I was being sarcastic, moron. Microsoft has never had any online fees for anything other than Xbox Live so it'd be stupid to assume they'd put an online fee solely on Minecraft. You didn't pay an online fee to get on your computer and go on FJ, did you? Didn't think so.

>Fucking greentexting any of the shit you did.
What "policies" would generate profit? When has Microsoft done anything of the sort that you're describing, or are you just trying to fit in on the Internet?
DLC isn't "killing gaming" at all. Gaming is at an all time high with hundreds of AAA games making companies millions of dollars.
A company handling DLC bad like EA doesn't mean that DLC is bad.
You're hardly ever buying a game that's "60%" with DLC filling in "40%".
User avatar #19 - wertologist (09/16/2014) [-]
First, I didn't greentext. You used ">" so I used them to respond. Don't bitch about me using them if you used them yourself. It makes you a hypocrite. I didn't say DLC was killing the industry. I said the community. If there is profit to be made off something, there's a strong chance a company will try to exploit it. MS is no exception. I'm not saying they WILL put an online fee, but if it will get them money they may. If they make you have to buy xbox live just to buy DLC or even redeem codes for a game, that's reason enough to believe they may try something. I do pay a fee to browse the internet. It's called a bill. DLC for Minecraft would be horrible. They only DLC that I can imagine it would have would be for exclusive items which in turn would fuck up the game for people who play online and don't pay for DLC.
User avatar #20 - grrphc (09/16/2014) [-]
I didn't make fun of you for greentexting, I made fun of you for what you chose to greentext.

Saying there's a "strong-chance something bad might happen" is tinfoil hat retarded. I could say there's a chance that a meteor the size of my city is going to hit us, worrying about it is pointless.
You're fucking stupid to assume Microsoft is all about Xbox when their primary source of income is PC.
An internet bill is not a fee, and the way you're bitching about DLC, I doubt you even pay it yourself. If they released DLC, it'd be cosmetic. It'd be shit like skins, how Microsoft usually handles DLC. They'd release a Minecraft 2 before making mandatory DLC to play the game.
User avatar #21 - wertologist (09/16/2014) [-]
If a meteor the size of a city happens to fly by Earth, it's completely reasonable to say there's a chance it will hit. I do help pay for the WiFi at my house. An internet bill is me paying the fee to use the internet. I know MS is not all Xbox. That doesn't change the fact that they will always try to get more money. If they made DLC to change the skins on PC, that would also ruin part of the game since that was a free feature. Charging to change skins would be a new policy too if it was put in.
#97 - Yeah, but then Bungie left Microsoft and made Destiny. Tha…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/16/2014 on Kaz Fucking Hirai 0
User avatar #109 - obidomkenobi (09/16/2014) [-]
Correct, Bungie gave the rights to the Halo franchise to 343i after they did Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary. They did good, so they got the right. Once they took over, they removed the maps you had to purchase from Reach a day after a lot of people bought them, which annoyed me, and people eventually stopped playing Halo 4 when they turned it into a fuck fest of jet packs and unbalanced spawn/weapon/map system. It was really bad. Most of the time it was okay, you could deal with it or gain the upper hand. But eventually, you knew where ever you spanwed, you directly won or directly lost with no come backs. They tried to make it too Call Of Duty-ish, which works for Call Of Duty, because love or hate it, look at it's massive fan base, and how well the game works most of the time, where as for Halo, it never worked. Halo was it's own being. A huge chunk, like a massive percentile of the Halo fan base always talk about the days of Halo 1, 2, 3, ODST and sometimes Reach and want it back so much so that they keep remaking old maps instead of making new ones.

So all in all, Microsoft can make things better. I don't want to bring up a PS4 vs Xbox 3 debate, because that's not what it's about. They can also make dumb choices, which if they do, will show a lot. Overall, it's the company they buy out that has to implement what Microsoft say, and if they're good, the product is, especially with Microsoft's resources backing them up. Microsoft could tell them to make a new Zombie survival game like Project Zomboid, State of Decay and Minecraft all in one. It sounds good on paper, especially when thought out, but at the end of the day it's up to the company to make it happen. On the other hand, Microsoft could tell them to make Minecraft with Call Of Duty, and it could turn out shit. It depends on the company.

You give a man the means to make a nice steak dinner, and it's his skills, care and patience that make a good steak or a make you go to a take out.
#32 - Picture 09/15/2014 on (untitled) 0
#181 - >Be Hispanic >Be 16 taking my SATs >Do well o… 09/15/2014 on privilege +15
#70 - But that's hella projecting. Maybe in high school or somet…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/14/2014 on Sweet Justice +3
#76 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/14/2014) [-]
You don't really need an excuse to break up. If you're not feeling the relationship anymore or just feel like you need to, break up.

Otherwise you're just dragging someone along unfairly.
#46 - Implying there was any reason to vote for Romney over Obama of…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/14/2014 on (untitled) -1
User avatar #47 - sspacecore (09/14/2014) [-]
Listen, I don't have time to keep arguing, let me make it clear that completely respect your opinion, while I think you are wrong, I respect the points you made in your comments, I just disagree with them. I feel like I did a good job of proving you wrong, while you do not, there appears to be nothing I can do change that, and even then I don't have time to do so if there was a way. Goodbye.
#40 - >If some people do that then they all do that No you …  [+] (3 new replies) 09/14/2014 on (untitled) -2
User avatar #45 - sspacecore (09/14/2014) [-]
You state things that everyone with a high school level of education already knows, obviously not all black people are niggers, but if you have a basic understanding of political economics, there was no reason to vote for Obama unless you were A. an unintelligent "black" person who identified with Obama, solely because he is also "black" (see comment #28), B. an unintelligent democrat who identified with Obama, solely because he is a democrat (again, see comment #28). Please, think about rereading your comments before you post them, and maybe then you would see that "greentexting" and using profanity is the easiest way to make your entire argument look foolish. Finally, are you implying that a thought in itself cannot be idiotic, that all thoughts are intelligent?
User avatar #46 - grrphc (09/14/2014) [-]
Implying there was any reason to vote for Romney over Obama of all people?
McCain maybe, but definitely not Obama.
Also, Obama is incredibly charismatic, especially while he was a senator and during his first election. It was a no brainer that he was going to win with all that he was saying and promising, You projecting your assumptions onto people as if they were fact doesn't make it true.
This argument started because you called me retarded solely for THINKING that he was being sarcastic, that's it. You're making this something much bigger than it actually was.
Also, I don't think thoughts are either. I think they're thoughts. Ideas. Things that pop into someone's head that lead to actions that can be smart or dumb.
User avatar #47 - sspacecore (09/14/2014) [-]
Listen, I don't have time to keep arguing, let me make it clear that completely respect your opinion, while I think you are wrong, I respect the points you made in your comments, I just disagree with them. I feel like I did a good job of proving you wrong, while you do not, there appears to be nothing I can do change that, and even then I don't have time to do so if there was a way. Goodbye.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1250

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #15 - gugek (10/18/2014) [-]
Hey! Have a fantastic day today :-]
User avatar #14 - tomahawkkit (09/27/2014) [-]
I was going to say niger, but now that I see your actually blackish I don't want you to get the wrong idea
User avatar #7 - applecopy ONLINE (08/20/2014) [-]
ello
User avatar #8 to #7 - grrphc (08/20/2014) [-]
..Hello.
User avatar #9 to #8 - applecopy ONLINE (08/20/2014) [-]
sup?
User avatar #10 to #9 - grrphc (08/20/2014) [-]
Well, I um...
I'm..
Alright who are you..?
User avatar #11 to #10 - applecopy ONLINE (08/20/2014) [-]
idk
and that's cool
User avatar #12 to #11 - buddhadom (08/29/2014) [-]
Good start now tell him he's pretty.
#1 - haunterbrony **User deleted account** (04/05/2013) [-]
I saw that.
User avatar #2 to #1 - grrphc (04/05/2013) [-]
I have NO clue what you're talking about.
#3 to #2 - haunterbrony **User deleted account** (04/05/2013) [-]
www.funnyjunk.com/text/4521853/A+Game+With+Absolute+Freedom/148#148

Summoned Adm!n for some reason.

Not that I really care, it's just late and I'm supposed to work, so... procrastinating.
User avatar #4 to #3 - grrphc (04/05/2013) [-]
I have no clue why this made me laugh, but the fact that you caught me is so funny.

I was trying to test out if the invisible character would make DJ 4DM1N's name appear normal, I was wrong.
#5 to #4 - haunterbrony **User deleted account** (04/05/2013) [-]
Glad to have made you laugh.   
   
Just use an exclamation mark when mentioning Adm!n, and it should be fine.
Glad to have made you laugh.

Just use an exclamation mark when mentioning Adm!n, and it should be fine.
 Friends (0)