x
Click to expand

grrphc

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:12/25/2010
Last Login:3/02/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 605 total,  818 ,  213
Comment Thumbs: 5938 total,  8265 ,  2327
Content Level Progress: 80% (8/10)
Level 58 Content: Sammich eater → Level 59 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 7% (7/100)
Level 251 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 252 Comments: Contaminated Win
Subscribers:1
Content Views:43587
Times Content Favorited:12 times
Total Comments Made:1923
FJ Points:5835

latest user's comments

#17 - >Implying I don't go outside I said I lived in Vegas. 11/09/2014 on Stay home. Stay safe. -2
#57 - Well hey man, some guys just like different games. I know Port…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/08/2014 on I Think Someone Disagrees 0
User avatar #58 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
then let us agree that it depends what you like, i'm an argumentative tossrag by nature and I can't help it

but I can agree that 60 bucks for 4 and a bit console games is a pretty good deal
#56 - I mean, it is kinda ****** that these are just 4 games … 11/08/2014 on I Think Someone Disagrees 0
#53 - I'm asking you a question based on your preference at this poi…  [+] (5 new replies) 11/08/2014 on I Think Someone Disagrees 0
User avatar #54 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
you're right about team fortress, but preference aside charging $60 for what are essentially rehashes of in some cases 10 year old games is pretty despicable, calling them 1080p is also a bit misleading, since an xbone renders in 900p then scales it up
User avatar #56 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
I mean, it is kinda shitty that these are just 4 games that we've already played ignoring the Halo 5 Beta, and the only reason shit like this flies anymore is because besides Nintendo no one is backwards compatible anymore, but at the same time this is what A LOT of people asked for. What was originally Halo 2 Remastered for Xbone suddenly became The Master Chief collection for the same price people rejoiced.
Good Debate, Good debate
And for the record, I don't even have an Xbone. lol. I was pretty upset when MCC didn't come to PC like I hoped/was rumoured
User avatar #55 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
but got sidetracked, to answer your first point, the valve complete pack is better value in my eyes, as i've always found halo to be, well, shit
User avatar #57 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
Well hey man, some guys just like different games. I know Portal was fun as shit the first time I played it, Half-Life was a really, really cool FPS when I played it too.
User avatar #58 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
then let us agree that it depends what you like, i'm an argumentative tossrag by nature and I can't help it

but I can agree that 60 bucks for 4 and a bit console games is a pretty good deal
#51 - If we're going to argue 3rd party purchases than what's the …  [+] (7 new replies) 11/08/2014 on I Think Someone Disagrees 0
User avatar #52 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
are you really going to argue duplicates/sequels in defense of a pack of four and a half mediocre fps games from the same series?
User avatar #53 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
I'm asking you a question based on your preference at this point because it's where I see this argument heading.
I didn't mean it as a general question, I meant you, how do you not think it's the better value?

I'm not trying to argue that they're the same game in the bundle, they're not. I've played most of those games except for the L4D's.
What I'm saying is some games being a multiplayer only experience in there, while others are single player only. Hell, Team Fortress shouldn't even be in there as far as I'm concerned.
User avatar #54 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
you're right about team fortress, but preference aside charging $60 for what are essentially rehashes of in some cases 10 year old games is pretty despicable, calling them 1080p is also a bit misleading, since an xbone renders in 900p then scales it up
User avatar #56 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
I mean, it is kinda shitty that these are just 4 games that we've already played ignoring the Halo 5 Beta, and the only reason shit like this flies anymore is because besides Nintendo no one is backwards compatible anymore, but at the same time this is what A LOT of people asked for. What was originally Halo 2 Remastered for Xbone suddenly became The Master Chief collection for the same price people rejoiced.
Good Debate, Good debate
And for the record, I don't even have an Xbone. lol. I was pretty upset when MCC didn't come to PC like I hoped/was rumoured
User avatar #55 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
but got sidetracked, to answer your first point, the valve complete pack is better value in my eyes, as i've always found halo to be, well, shit
User avatar #57 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
Well hey man, some guys just like different games. I know Portal was fun as shit the first time I played it, Half-Life was a really, really cool FPS when I played it too.
User avatar #58 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
then let us agree that it depends what you like, i'm an argumentative tossrag by nature and I can't help it

but I can agree that 60 bucks for 4 and a bit console games is a pretty good deal
#48 - >Lying to try to make yourself seem right Amazing. FJ i…  [+] (9 new replies) 11/08/2014 on I Think Someone Disagrees -2
User avatar #49 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
www.greenmangaming.com/s/gb/en/pc/games/action/valve-complete-pack/

or maybe just shopping around, but for agument's sake, $99.99 for 24 games = $4.16 per game
User avatar #51 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
If we're going to argue 3rd party purchases than what's the fucking difference of "buying Master Chief Collection from a friend for only $30?"
Quantity=/=Quality dude. Looking at those games, half of them are Half-Life 2insert subtitle here) and another nice chunk of them are counterstrike.

These are 4, completely remastered, 1080P 60FPS Halo Games with EVERY Multiplayer map including Reach and ODST , and a Beta for the Halo 5 Multiplayer. How is that not the better value?
User avatar #52 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
are you really going to argue duplicates/sequels in defense of a pack of four and a half mediocre fps games from the same series?
User avatar #53 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
I'm asking you a question based on your preference at this point because it's where I see this argument heading.
I didn't mean it as a general question, I meant you, how do you not think it's the better value?

I'm not trying to argue that they're the same game in the bundle, they're not. I've played most of those games except for the L4D's.
What I'm saying is some games being a multiplayer only experience in there, while others are single player only. Hell, Team Fortress shouldn't even be in there as far as I'm concerned.
User avatar #54 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
you're right about team fortress, but preference aside charging $60 for what are essentially rehashes of in some cases 10 year old games is pretty despicable, calling them 1080p is also a bit misleading, since an xbone renders in 900p then scales it up
User avatar #56 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
I mean, it is kinda shitty that these are just 4 games that we've already played ignoring the Halo 5 Beta, and the only reason shit like this flies anymore is because besides Nintendo no one is backwards compatible anymore, but at the same time this is what A LOT of people asked for. What was originally Halo 2 Remastered for Xbone suddenly became The Master Chief collection for the same price people rejoiced.
Good Debate, Good debate
And for the record, I don't even have an Xbone. lol. I was pretty upset when MCC didn't come to PC like I hoped/was rumoured
User avatar #55 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
but got sidetracked, to answer your first point, the valve complete pack is better value in my eyes, as i've always found halo to be, well, shit
User avatar #57 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
Well hey man, some guys just like different games. I know Portal was fun as shit the first time I played it, Half-Life was a really, really cool FPS when I played it too.
User avatar #58 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
then let us agree that it depends what you like, i'm an argumentative tossrag by nature and I can't help it

but I can agree that 60 bucks for 4 and a bit console games is a pretty good deal
#45 - What the **** are you even trying to argue? Master …  [+] (11 new replies) 11/08/2014 on I Think Someone Disagrees 0
User avatar #46 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
$60 for 4.5 games = $13.33 per game
$79.34 non-sale price for 24 games = $3.30 per game

what the fuck are you trying to argue?
#48 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
>Lying to try to make yourself seem right
Amazing. FJ in a nutshell.
User avatar #49 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
www.greenmangaming.com/s/gb/en/pc/games/action/valve-complete-pack/

or maybe just shopping around, but for agument's sake, $99.99 for 24 games = $4.16 per game
User avatar #51 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
If we're going to argue 3rd party purchases than what's the fucking difference of "buying Master Chief Collection from a friend for only $30?"
Quantity=/=Quality dude. Looking at those games, half of them are Half-Life 2insert subtitle here) and another nice chunk of them are counterstrike.

These are 4, completely remastered, 1080P 60FPS Halo Games with EVERY Multiplayer map including Reach and ODST , and a Beta for the Halo 5 Multiplayer. How is that not the better value?
User avatar #52 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
are you really going to argue duplicates/sequels in defense of a pack of four and a half mediocre fps games from the same series?
User avatar #53 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
I'm asking you a question based on your preference at this point because it's where I see this argument heading.
I didn't mean it as a general question, I meant you, how do you not think it's the better value?

I'm not trying to argue that they're the same game in the bundle, they're not. I've played most of those games except for the L4D's.
What I'm saying is some games being a multiplayer only experience in there, while others are single player only. Hell, Team Fortress shouldn't even be in there as far as I'm concerned.
User avatar #54 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
you're right about team fortress, but preference aside charging $60 for what are essentially rehashes of in some cases 10 year old games is pretty despicable, calling them 1080p is also a bit misleading, since an xbone renders in 900p then scales it up
User avatar #56 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
I mean, it is kinda shitty that these are just 4 games that we've already played ignoring the Halo 5 Beta, and the only reason shit like this flies anymore is because besides Nintendo no one is backwards compatible anymore, but at the same time this is what A LOT of people asked for. What was originally Halo 2 Remastered for Xbone suddenly became The Master Chief collection for the same price people rejoiced.
Good Debate, Good debate
And for the record, I don't even have an Xbone. lol. I was pretty upset when MCC didn't come to PC like I hoped/was rumoured
User avatar #55 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
but got sidetracked, to answer your first point, the valve complete pack is better value in my eyes, as i've always found halo to be, well, shit
User avatar #57 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
Well hey man, some guys just like different games. I know Portal was fun as shit the first time I played it, Half-Life was a really, really cool FPS when I played it too.
User avatar #58 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
then let us agree that it depends what you like, i'm an argumentative tossrag by nature and I can't help it

but I can agree that 60 bucks for 4 and a bit console games is a pretty good deal
#43 - Has Reach and ODST's multiplayer maps Why would the "… 11/08/2014 on I Think Someone Disagrees 0
#42 - Valve complete pack is expensive as **** unless you get…  [+] (14 new replies) 11/08/2014 on I Think Someone Disagrees 0
User avatar #59 - askafj (11/08/2014) [-]
3 old games and 1 remake
User avatar #44 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
then have some patience and get it on a sale
User avatar #45 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
What the fuck are you even trying to argue?
Master Chief Collection is still the better deal since you don't have to "wait to get it on a sale."
User avatar #46 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
$60 for 4.5 games = $13.33 per game
$79.34 non-sale price for 24 games = $3.30 per game

what the fuck are you trying to argue?
#48 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
>Lying to try to make yourself seem right
Amazing. FJ in a nutshell.
User avatar #49 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
www.greenmangaming.com/s/gb/en/pc/games/action/valve-complete-pack/

or maybe just shopping around, but for agument's sake, $99.99 for 24 games = $4.16 per game
User avatar #51 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
If we're going to argue 3rd party purchases than what's the fucking difference of "buying Master Chief Collection from a friend for only $30?"
Quantity=/=Quality dude. Looking at those games, half of them are Half-Life 2insert subtitle here) and another nice chunk of them are counterstrike.

These are 4, completely remastered, 1080P 60FPS Halo Games with EVERY Multiplayer map including Reach and ODST , and a Beta for the Halo 5 Multiplayer. How is that not the better value?
User avatar #52 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
are you really going to argue duplicates/sequels in defense of a pack of four and a half mediocre fps games from the same series?
User avatar #53 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
I'm asking you a question based on your preference at this point because it's where I see this argument heading.
I didn't mean it as a general question, I meant you, how do you not think it's the better value?

I'm not trying to argue that they're the same game in the bundle, they're not. I've played most of those games except for the L4D's.
What I'm saying is some games being a multiplayer only experience in there, while others are single player only. Hell, Team Fortress shouldn't even be in there as far as I'm concerned.
User avatar #54 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
you're right about team fortress, but preference aside charging $60 for what are essentially rehashes of in some cases 10 year old games is pretty despicable, calling them 1080p is also a bit misleading, since an xbone renders in 900p then scales it up
User avatar #56 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
I mean, it is kinda shitty that these are just 4 games that we've already played ignoring the Halo 5 Beta, and the only reason shit like this flies anymore is because besides Nintendo no one is backwards compatible anymore, but at the same time this is what A LOT of people asked for. What was originally Halo 2 Remastered for Xbone suddenly became The Master Chief collection for the same price people rejoiced.
Good Debate, Good debate
And for the record, I don't even have an Xbone. lol. I was pretty upset when MCC didn't come to PC like I hoped/was rumoured
User avatar #55 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
but got sidetracked, to answer your first point, the valve complete pack is better value in my eyes, as i've always found halo to be, well, shit
User avatar #57 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
Well hey man, some guys just like different games. I know Portal was fun as shit the first time I played it, Half-Life was a really, really cool FPS when I played it too.
User avatar #58 - listerthepessimist (11/08/2014) [-]
then let us agree that it depends what you like, i'm an argumentative tossrag by nature and I can't help it

but I can agree that 60 bucks for 4 and a bit console games is a pretty good deal
#12 - >Live in Las Vegas >Literally never met a celebrity …  [+] (6 new replies) 11/08/2014 on Stay home. Stay safe. -1
User avatar #16 - Temari (11/09/2014) [-]
Try going outside
User avatar #18 - grrphc (11/10/2014) [-]
Lmao, why would you thumb me down?
Faggot.
User avatar #19 - Temari (11/11/2014) [-]
Why do you care? Who actually cares about thumbs? Fag.
User avatar #20 - grrphc (11/11/2014) [-]
I obviously do and you thumbed me down for no reason, faggot.
User avatar #21 - Temari (11/11/2014) [-]
>2013+1
>Caring about thumbs

I thumbed you down cause I didn't like the point you were making. Do you want me to respond "I disagree" and thumb you up or some shit? Man up.
User avatar #17 - grrphc (11/09/2014) [-]
>Implying I don't go outside
I said I lived in Vegas.
#94 - >Caring about what's relevant instead of just liking what you like 11/08/2014 on Slifer the Executive Producer +4
#84 - Because you're retarded. If you look at the numbers on a n…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/08/2014 on Queer 0
#85 - cdroid (11/08/2014) [-]
Okay, so let's not round. 96.2 isn't 90. Nor is it close if we're not rounding.
#51 - I was questioning what he was saying. Have you never put voice…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/08/2014 on Wendy's -1
User avatar #58 - leifbunny (11/10/2014) [-]
I indeed have put my voice to my writing. If I didn't... I'd sound pretty bland, and wouldn't have much of a vocabulary to work with. That said: What annoys me the most here is that you're now actually saying you talk like thiiiis? With an upward inflectiooooon? You're actually making me quote family guuuuuy what's wrong with yoooooou?

TL;DR: Don't be that guy. Don't be the one who sounds like the stereotypical valley girl. And if you can't... at least don't TYPE like one.
User avatar #60 - grrphc (11/10/2014) [-]
>Being that pretentious
The way you talk isn't better than the way I talk, faggot.
User avatar #61 - leifbunny (11/12/2014) [-]
Call it pretentious. Go ahead. You've been wrong about everything else so far. This will be where you turn it around. The fact remains: If you don't understand basic grammar and why it bothers people, you probably should pay more attention in class.
It's not a crime to be proud of your native tongue, or to be sick of people sticking their dick into it. No other language on earth has seen so much "evolution" as English.
#22 - Jokes. They're called jokes.  [+] (4 new replies) 11/08/2014 on Thats a Penis 6 +17
#45 - shadowsumbraremade (11/08/2014) [-]
They're jokes, sure,its just that they're not funny.
User avatar #30 - brobafett (11/08/2014) [-]
The same punchline of "I'm a lesbian!" for 10 years a good joke does not make.
#49 - Ken M (11/08/2014) [-]
You don't even watch Ellen.
User avatar #23 - screwyouman (11/08/2014) [-]
If you keep doing things the same way over and over, you can make it into a nutshell.
#15 - No, what you said is irrelevant. What I said is very relevant.  [+] (1 new reply) 11/08/2014 on NeinGag 0
#16 - ryjed (11/08/2014) [-]
**ryjed rolled image** hahaha what you said is irrelevant to my irrelevance. My statement was a fact. It was not a direct reference to the specific joke of the picture, but the overall theme of the post
#29 - No..? They can emphasize their sentence however they want?  [+] (5 new replies) 11/08/2014 on Wendy's -4
User avatar #41 - leifbunny (11/08/2014) [-]
Just like you can put question marks at the end of statements that clearly aren't questions.
User avatar #51 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
I was questioning what he was saying. Have you never put voice into your writing?
But let's get on the "Grr, he didn't say something mean about Tumblr!" bandwagon.
User avatar #58 - leifbunny (11/10/2014) [-]
I indeed have put my voice to my writing. If I didn't... I'd sound pretty bland, and wouldn't have much of a vocabulary to work with. That said: What annoys me the most here is that you're now actually saying you talk like thiiiis? With an upward inflectiooooon? You're actually making me quote family guuuuuy what's wrong with yoooooou?

TL;DR: Don't be that guy. Don't be the one who sounds like the stereotypical valley girl. And if you can't... at least don't TYPE like one.
User avatar #60 - grrphc (11/10/2014) [-]
>Being that pretentious
The way you talk isn't better than the way I talk, faggot.
User avatar #61 - leifbunny (11/12/2014) [-]
Call it pretentious. Go ahead. You've been wrong about everything else so far. This will be where you turn it around. The fact remains: If you don't understand basic grammar and why it bothers people, you probably should pay more attention in class.
It's not a crime to be proud of your native tongue, or to be sick of people sticking their dick into it. No other language on earth has seen so much "evolution" as English.
#12 - But that wasn't the joke.  [+] (3 new replies) 11/08/2014 on NeinGag 0
#14 - ryjed (11/08/2014) [-]
**ryjed rolled image** that is irrelevent
User avatar #15 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
No, what you said is irrelevant. What I said is very relevant.
#16 - ryjed (11/08/2014) [-]
**ryjed rolled image** hahaha what you said is irrelevant to my irrelevance. My statement was a fact. It was not a direct reference to the specific joke of the picture, but the overall theme of the post
#96 - It's genetic because Naruto had the Nine-Tails in him while … 11/08/2014 on To all the NaruSaku fans +1
#94 - Holy **** who actually made that picture though? … 11/08/2014 on To all the NaruSaku fans 0
#45 - It must suck being an actual retard.  [+] (2 new replies) 11/07/2014 on To all the NaruSaku fans 0
#77 - gamrgrl (11/07/2014) [-]
Like you should talk.
User avatar #94 - grrphc (11/08/2014) [-]
Holy shit who actually made that picture though?
It's quite flattering, UchihaLover would be proud.
#44 - She walks in and says "Mom, I think boys are stupid"… 11/07/2014 on To all the NaruSaku fans +1
#43 - Adviser. 11/07/2014 on To all the NaruSaku fans 0
#10 - Why do people think they just slap *roll picture* anywhere in …  [+] (1 new reply) 11/07/2014 on Frogs 0
#12 - custydustbunny (11/07/2014) [-]
**custydustbunny rolled image** roll picture *roll picture*
#69 - Now this, this was kinda funny. 11/07/2014 on Feminism +4
#90 - This wasn't ******* funny at all.  [+] (3 new replies) 11/07/2014 on Femanon and Friends +15
User avatar #95 - TwistedBamboozler (11/07/2014) [-]
Couldn't agree more. Was hoping for some serious rektage. But nothing. Take my thumb brother
#94 - meentako (11/07/2014) [-]
I agree. I'm so fucking shit of Anti-FeministJunk.com
Where's the fucking funny?
User avatar #91 - scootabot (11/07/2014) [-]
This fits so well.

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1250
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #15 - gugek (10/18/2014) [-]
Hey! Have a fantastic day today :-]
User avatar #14 - tomahawkkit ONLINE (09/27/2014) [-]
I was going to say niger, but now that I see your actually blackish I don't want you to get the wrong idea
User avatar #7 - applecopy (08/20/2014) [-]
ello
User avatar #8 to #7 - grrphc (08/20/2014) [-]
..Hello.
User avatar #9 to #8 - applecopy (08/20/2014) [-]
sup?
User avatar #10 to #9 - grrphc (08/20/2014) [-]
Well, I um...
I'm..
Alright who are you..?
User avatar #11 to #10 - applecopy (08/20/2014) [-]
idk
and that's cool
User avatar #12 to #11 - buddhadom (08/29/2014) [-]
Good start now tell him he's pretty.
#1 - haunterbrony (04/05/2013) [-]
I saw that.
User avatar #2 to #1 - grrphc (04/05/2013) [-]
I have NO clue what you're talking about.
#3 to #2 - haunterbrony (04/05/2013) [-]
www.funnyjunk.com/text/4521853/A+Game+With+Absolute+Freedom/148#148

Summoned Adm!n for some reason.

Not that I really care, it's just late and I'm supposed to work, so... procrastinating.
User avatar #4 to #3 - grrphc (04/05/2013) [-]
I have no clue why this made me laugh, but the fact that you caught me is so funny.

I was trying to test out if the invisible character would make DJ 4DM1N's name appear normal, I was wrong.
#5 to #4 - haunterbrony (04/05/2013) [-]
Glad to have made you laugh.   
   
Just use an exclamation mark when mentioning Adm!n, and it should be fine.
Glad to have made you laugh.

Just use an exclamation mark when mentioning Adm!n, and it should be fine.
 Friends (0)