Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a 6% commission on everything you buy.

grrphc    

Rank #1293 on Comments
grrphc Avatar Level 239 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to grrphc Block grrphc Invite grrphc to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:12/25/2010
Last Login:8/21/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#12529
Comment Ranking:#1293
Highest Content Rank:#4465
Highest Comment Rank:#1313
Content Thumbs: 551 total,  740 ,  189
Comment Thumbs: 4296 total,  5971 ,  1675
Content Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
Level 55 Content: Sammich eater → Level 56 Content: Sammich eater
Comment Level Progress: 49% (49/100)
Level 239 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 240 Comments: Doinitrite
Subscribers:1
Content Views:36676
Times Content Favorited:16 times
Total Comments Made:1431
FJ Points:4640

latest user's comments

#36 - No, but it's common knowledge that anons are frequent dumbasse…  [+] (1 new reply) 5 hours ago on Mario Joy Ride -2
#39 - anonymous (4 hours ago) [-]
Most people on FJ are frequent dumbasses. Most people on the internet are frequent dumbasses.
And not for nothing, but you're the one who bitched about me being an anon from the first comment as an argument.
The fact is Nintendo targets family audiences rather than taking on a larger development scope, and fumbles with trying to acquire more desirable exclusives that would bring people into the WiiU bracket. Playstation and Xbox are hardpressed consoles to go against so they have to resort to more conservative models of business. Three new IPs isn't that big of a deal for something that should be as big as the WiiU's gameplay capability.
#31 - >Taking hyperbole as literal fact Now you're just …  [+] (3 new replies) 5 hours ago on Mario Joy Ride -2
#33 - anonymous (5 hours ago) [-]
I never got aggrevated, but you sure seem to be.
If you didn't want people to call you out on the hyperbole, don't use the hyperbole. You fill the stereotype of a nintendo fanboy when you do that, like you're doing now by acting like my lack of an account is a matter in the argument.
User avatar #36 - grrphc (5 hours ago) [-]
No, but it's common knowledge that anons are frequent dumbasses on FJ.

Stop projecting, you're honestly trying to use "No u" as an argument.
I shouldn't have to censor my speech to make sure autists like you don't take it seriously, you should just understand common speak.
#39 - anonymous (4 hours ago) [-]
Most people on FJ are frequent dumbasses. Most people on the internet are frequent dumbasses.
And not for nothing, but you're the one who bitched about me being an anon from the first comment as an argument.
The fact is Nintendo targets family audiences rather than taking on a larger development scope, and fumbles with trying to acquire more desirable exclusives that would bring people into the WiiU bracket. Playstation and Xbox are hardpressed consoles to go against so they have to resort to more conservative models of business. Three new IPs isn't that big of a deal for something that should be as big as the WiiU's gameplay capability.
#28 - >Anon What you said isn't a ******* p…  [+] (6 new replies) 5 hours ago on Mario Joy Ride -1
User avatar #42 - tobituary (4 hours ago) [-]
Anon may be cynical, but he's also right.
Nintendo are a business. And if you think there's any reason why they churn out mario games with the frequency that they do other than to maximise profits, your sadly mistaken.

Also, Nintendo don't deserve props for making DLC that is essentially fancy sponsored advertising free. It would be an insult to the consumer to make them pay for a single kart that quite frankly, has no place in the Mario universe.

Don't get me wrong, I do love Nintendo. I've owned everyone of their console since the SNES but they are far, far from perfect. Take their eshop for example. Where I'm from, NES games literally cost the same (or more in some cases) as PS1 games cost on the PSN which is quite frankly unacceptable.
#29 - anonymous (5 hours ago) [-]
I don't expect Nintendo to do anything. I respect their model. It's a good model to have, it's an effective model to have. But it certainly doesn't earn them "The ONLY COMPANY THAT MAKES REAL GAMES" titles anytime soon.
You're the one that's acting like they're the last good video game company when they keep themselves to targeting family models moreso than they do a larger scope. I'm not the one whose being the cynical asshole, you are.
#31 - grrphc (5 hours ago) [-]
>Taking hyperbole as literal fact

Now you're just backpeddling and trying to argue semantics for literally no reason at all. How was I being an asshole at all? All I said was Valve was questionable, and then later said that I still supported them and used Steam. YOU felt the need to personally get aggravated for no reason at all.
But you're an anon. You'll probably stop commenting once you realise how fucking retarded you are and you'll never have to feel the shame.
#33 - anonymous (5 hours ago) [-]
I never got aggrevated, but you sure seem to be.
If you didn't want people to call you out on the hyperbole, don't use the hyperbole. You fill the stereotype of a nintendo fanboy when you do that, like you're doing now by acting like my lack of an account is a matter in the argument.
User avatar #36 - grrphc (5 hours ago) [-]
No, but it's common knowledge that anons are frequent dumbasses on FJ.

Stop projecting, you're honestly trying to use "No u" as an argument.
I shouldn't have to censor my speech to make sure autists like you don't take it seriously, you should just understand common speak.
#39 - anonymous (4 hours ago) [-]
Most people on FJ are frequent dumbasses. Most people on the internet are frequent dumbasses.
And not for nothing, but you're the one who bitched about me being an anon from the first comment as an argument.
The fact is Nintendo targets family audiences rather than taking on a larger development scope, and fumbles with trying to acquire more desirable exclusives that would bring people into the WiiU bracket. Playstation and Xbox are hardpressed consoles to go against so they have to resort to more conservative models of business. Three new IPs isn't that big of a deal for something that should be as big as the WiiU's gameplay capability.
#16 - Have their been enough Native American's killed solely for the…  [+] (1 new reply) 6 hours ago on The Bible +1
#19 - anonymous (5 hours ago) [-]
The white man takes what the white man can, if you cannot reclaim or defend it then it is simply survival of the fittest.
#14 - But Valve has been questionable on A LOT of other topics.. …  [+] (9 new replies) 7 hours ago on Mario Joy Ride 0
#27 - anonymous (5 hours ago) [-]
And Nintendo isn't?
You're acting like Nintendo doesn't just churn out Mario-themed games and keep with a "stay safe" model to ensure their profits are maintained.
Nintendo isn't the only good company out there, and they're sure as hell not flawless.
User avatar #28 - grrphc (5 hours ago) [-]
>Anon

What you said isn't a fucking problem though. It's just cynical assholes like you that pretend it's a problem. They keep producing fun games, what difference does it make who the character is? They don't have a "stay-safe" model, they listen to fans and produce what they buy. What exactly is it that you want Nintendo to do, exactly? They have THREE new IP's exclusively on Wii U now, you're literally bitching for bitching's sake.
User avatar #42 - tobituary (4 hours ago) [-]
Anon may be cynical, but he's also right.
Nintendo are a business. And if you think there's any reason why they churn out mario games with the frequency that they do other than to maximise profits, your sadly mistaken.

Also, Nintendo don't deserve props for making DLC that is essentially fancy sponsored advertising free. It would be an insult to the consumer to make them pay for a single kart that quite frankly, has no place in the Mario universe.

Don't get me wrong, I do love Nintendo. I've owned everyone of their console since the SNES but they are far, far from perfect. Take their eshop for example. Where I'm from, NES games literally cost the same (or more in some cases) as PS1 games cost on the PSN which is quite frankly unacceptable.
#29 - anonymous (5 hours ago) [-]
I don't expect Nintendo to do anything. I respect their model. It's a good model to have, it's an effective model to have. But it certainly doesn't earn them "The ONLY COMPANY THAT MAKES REAL GAMES" titles anytime soon.
You're the one that's acting like they're the last good video game company when they keep themselves to targeting family models moreso than they do a larger scope. I'm not the one whose being the cynical asshole, you are.
#31 - grrphc (5 hours ago) [-]
>Taking hyperbole as literal fact

Now you're just backpeddling and trying to argue semantics for literally no reason at all. How was I being an asshole at all? All I said was Valve was questionable, and then later said that I still supported them and used Steam. YOU felt the need to personally get aggravated for no reason at all.
But you're an anon. You'll probably stop commenting once you realise how fucking retarded you are and you'll never have to feel the shame.
#33 - anonymous (5 hours ago) [-]
I never got aggrevated, but you sure seem to be.
If you didn't want people to call you out on the hyperbole, don't use the hyperbole. You fill the stereotype of a nintendo fanboy when you do that, like you're doing now by acting like my lack of an account is a matter in the argument.
User avatar #36 - grrphc (5 hours ago) [-]
No, but it's common knowledge that anons are frequent dumbasses on FJ.

Stop projecting, you're honestly trying to use "No u" as an argument.
I shouldn't have to censor my speech to make sure autists like you don't take it seriously, you should just understand common speak.
#39 - anonymous (4 hours ago) [-]
Most people on FJ are frequent dumbasses. Most people on the internet are frequent dumbasses.
And not for nothing, but you're the one who bitched about me being an anon from the first comment as an argument.
The fact is Nintendo targets family audiences rather than taking on a larger development scope, and fumbles with trying to acquire more desirable exclusives that would bring people into the WiiU bracket. Playstation and Xbox are hardpressed consoles to go against so they have to resort to more conservative models of business. Three new IPs isn't that big of a deal for something that should be as big as the WiiU's gameplay capability.
#15 - ohhitheree (7 hours ago) [-]
Well technically you own a license that allows you to play the game. It cannot be taken away. Your account on the other hand, can. This isn't like EA where you get banned for talking bad about their new game. Chances are, if you are banned on Steam it is for a good reason.
#27 - Holy **** ! FJ Is actually this backwards! It … 7 hours ago on The crossovers -1
#10 - Well, I um... I'm.. Alright who are you..?  [+] (1 new reply) 7 hours ago on grrphc's profile 0
User avatar #11 - applecopy (7 hours ago) [-]
idk
and that's cool
#8 - ..Hello.  [+] (3 new replies) 7 hours ago on grrphc's profile 0
User avatar #9 - applecopy (7 hours ago) [-]
sup?
User avatar #10 - grrphc (7 hours ago) [-]
Well, I um...
I'm..
Alright who are you..?
User avatar #11 - applecopy (7 hours ago) [-]
idk
and that's cool
#5 - >Implying my IP has stayed the same for ******* … 7 hours ago on Pirating and CIA +1
#11 - But the fact that you can't accept it ties into what I just sa…  [+] (4 new replies) 7 hours ago on The Bible +1
#18 - alexanderh (5 hours ago) [-]
Depending on your world-view, yeah, it does.

But pay attention to what I said. I dislike religion, but don't mind faith. It's the fact that the faith has become organised and is being used as a cause and as a reason to do things that I dislike religion. Religion has been used as a reason to go to war and it has lead to a lot of hate between religions (and atheists). It is also being used as a reason to remain ignorant, which, to me, is inexcusable. Choosing to be ignorant because you believe that god will make everything okay is just plain stupid. "God did it" is not a reasonable explanation for pretty much anything, at least to me. I need more. I need better answers than that. I don't care about the who, but about the how, about how the world was created. For example, if you say that god created the universe using the big bang, we'll get along just fine. But if you say that god created the universe 6000 years ago, I'm going to treat you like an idiot, because that doesn't make sense.

I don't give a shit if you believe in god or in an afterlife. That's your business. But please keep it to yourself, and don't teach it (or even suggest teaching it) on the same level as science.
User avatar #13 - hashtronaut (6 hours ago) [-]
there's been enough people killed in the name of "god" for me to agree with alexanderh
User avatar #16 - grrphc (6 hours ago) [-]
Have their been enough Native American's killed solely for the white man to take their land for us to agree with SJW? This is a poor argument.
#19 - anonymous (5 hours ago) [-]
The white man takes what the white man can, if you cannot reclaim or defend it then it is simply survival of the fittest.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1250

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Latest users (1): akkere.
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #7 - applecopy ONLINE (7 hours ago) [-]
ello
User avatar #8 to #7 - grrphc (7 hours ago) [-]
..Hello.
User avatar #9 to #8 - applecopy ONLINE (7 hours ago) [-]
sup?
User avatar #10 to #9 - grrphc (7 hours ago) [-]
Well, I um...
I'm..
Alright who are you..?
User avatar #11 to #10 - applecopy ONLINE (7 hours ago) [-]
idk
and that's cool
#1 - haunterbrony **User deleted account** (04/05/2013) [-]
I saw that.
User avatar #2 to #1 - grrphc (04/05/2013) [-]
I have NO clue what you're talking about.
#3 to #2 - haunterbrony **User deleted account** (04/05/2013) [-]
www.funnyjunk.com/text/4521853/A+Game+With+Absolute+Freedom/148#148

Summoned Adm!n for some reason.

Not that I really care, it's just late and I'm supposed to work, so... procrastinating.
User avatar #4 to #3 - grrphc (04/05/2013) [-]
I have no clue why this made me laugh, but the fact that you caught me is so funny.

I was trying to test out if the invisible character would make DJ 4DM1N's name appear normal, I was wrong.
#5 to #4 - haunterbrony **User deleted account** (04/05/2013) [-]
Glad to have made you laugh.   
   
Just use an exclamation mark when mentioning Adm!n, and it should be fine.
Glad to have made you laugh.

Just use an exclamation mark when mentioning Adm!n, and it should be fine.
 Friends (0)