Upload
Login or register

grantyboy

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:10/19/2013
Last Login:10/07/2015
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Thumbs: 4100 total,  4746 ,  646
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 92% (92/100)
Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:411
FJ Points:2992

latest user's comments

#4 - Those eyes -where have I seen them before?  [+] (2 new replies) 08/17/2015 on Literally Me +72
#10 - whitepyros (08/17/2015) [-]
Shapeshifter by lemonfront is my guess
#11 - melllvinnn (08/17/2015) [-]
no, we've seen them from where >>#4 said
#36 - I'm pleased to read this - too often people on here jump not u… 08/10/2015 on Fucking tumblr 0
#2 - I agree with you but as you say it goes both ways. That means …  [+] (11 new replies) 08/09/2015 on Fucking tumblr +40
User avatar
#45 - makethingsworse (08/10/2015) [-]
I second this. But let's be honest, gentleman:

All we want is a girl in a sundress.
User avatar
#24 - strallee (08/10/2015) [-]
In these days girls just want attention, less clothes + more skin = more attention (Facebook likes, and etc).
Guys can wear whatever they want, and still be ok. But girls tend to have less and less clothes on them.
Here in my country, in my city, the are all 93% skin, and the 7% clothes.
User avatar
#21 - lolollo (08/10/2015) [-]
People do tend to do that. It's not like the "dapper young gentlemen" went extinct, its that we grossly misconstrue how the "dapper young gentlemen" thinks and behaves. Guys like the one in the picture would probably have no interest in the type of girl mentioned in the original comment. Especially since back then was the apex of the "women need to be subservient, pregnant, and dutiful" culture because it slowly, but surely dropped down in the 60s and 70s when everyone found "the commies" and "the gays" to freak out at instead .

Plus, the overall philosophy which would make that culture relevant changed, drastically. You don't dress like that ambiently, you do so for the sake of business, where it serves a function. It's beginning to come out that relationships require a lot more than just what wearing a suit "for shiggles" would signify, which is to say "I have money for expensive clothing" and "I'm into girls who only care that I have money for expensive clothing." Most likely because a guy who wears a suit is just as likely to trick you into an abusive relationship as he is to be legitimately into a healthy relationship.

Besides, even without the suit, society is starting to move beyond the assumption of "you look attractive, which must mean I'll want to spend the rest of my life with you." People don't dislike the "fedora neckbeard" trope for the fedora, or the neckbeard, just as people don't like the "dyed hair, overweight' trope for the dyed hair or the excess weight.

They dislike the trope because of the misguided, bitter white knight attitude, and the feminazi ideals...respectively.
#15 - anon (08/10/2015) [-]
Answer is simple. People don't dress fancy for themselves, they dress fancy to be noticed. The reason men no longer dress like gentlemen and women no longer dress classy is because of societal expectations. Men generally dress up for 2 reason, they are required to as per their job, or they are trying to impress a mate. This is a biological function of human mating. But the reason for the slacking is our "heightened" evolution allowing us to overpower primitive thought.

In short, men dress like gentlemen because that is what women want, women will dress classy because that is what men want. Right now in our current time period, people have slacked off in expectation. Thus we see idiots in saggy pants dating the yoga pants people.
#32 - anon (08/10/2015) [-]
"People don't dress fancy for themselves."

Have you worn a well-fitting suit? Feels glorious.
User avatar
#3 - ultimatebuttercup (08/09/2015) [-]
When I say girls no longer dress classy I am talking about the average girl. Dressing yourself to be sharp or classy used to be a whole lot more common than these days. Its both genders changing their expectations of beauty. Why I am a little upset is that in this tumblr post, they say "omg gourgous, I am left breathless, why dont men dress like this anymore", they see a well cut gentleman and instantly think that all men should dress like this. However, the way you present yourself is in reality the people whom you attract to yourself. If you dress trashy, you will get trashy; if you dress well, you will get well; if you dress classy, you will get classy. No classy woman will get a trashy dude and vice versa. I mean there are exceptions, but what I am saying is that the women in the Tumblr post are not classy because they are not used to classy and most likely dont deserve these kind of men they are drooling over.

I am kind of talking about the prince charming effect, where because a girl sees a beautiful man, every common man will be compared to that perfect man. This happens to men too.

Also with regards to the men on funnyjunk, wearing a fedora does not make you sharp looking, its like putting flames on a pinto. I am talking the details, suit, tie, nice shoes, clean shaven, hair well kept, good pants, cologne, and the whole shebang. I am not pandering to the general populous of funnyjunk.
#36 - grantyboy (08/10/2015) [-]
I'm pleased to read this - too often people on here jump not upon an opportunity to correct or constructively criticize but instead pounce upon opportunities to make [X group they don't belong to] look bad and make themselves appear better by comparison. All I would say is that we don't know that the people commenting on that picture weren't self-aware men questioning sartorial developments.
#4 - anon (08/10/2015) [-]
See, here is the thing though. A guy who just dresses up out of nowhere for no reason is weird. A guy who wears a nice suit in the right location is super sexy. That being said the complaint is more that there are a lot of guys who don't even bother to dress fashionable what-so-ever. Most guys I see are just running around in whatever is comfortable, while a lot of girls at least keep up on fashion trends and sacrifice comfort for the sake of looking good.

You don't need a full suit and tie, even a casual blazer is hot. Look at this guy for example, he's clearly well dressed and he doesn't look out of place in modern day fashion: s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/25/29/5c/25295c87e0fb4cefdcca9875b2538c5b.jpg.
User avatar
#6 - ultimatebuttercup (08/10/2015) [-]
See but you are wrong. Its not the occasion it is a lifestyle. If you only look good for an occasion then you still are not going to necessarily attract a classy lady or man. A man or woman who dresses well shows to everyone around them that they are collected and put together or that is the air that they put off. On top of that, how do you, who does not know them, know that they are not dressed exactly for the situation that they want to be in. Some people enjoy or like looking professional. Some men genuinely walk around in nice clothes because it is what feels good. Some of those clothes just fit perfectly and feel comfortable and look sharp on top of that.
#11 - bleachboi (08/10/2015) [-]
Ya'll are both dumb. Hang out in cities where people actually dress nicely. Girls don't look bad anymore, guys don't look bad anymore: style changed. A lot of things may be different, but a lot of things still remain the same. You go to the nicest cities in America, Italy, France, England, Germany, wherever, you will find gorgeous women dressed beautifully and dashing men dress handsomely. Get the fuck out of whatever city you're in and head to a big city and open your eyes. Hot people are everywhere, you just gotta look for em'.
#16 - At the end of the gif you can see him fly backwards and slide … 07/22/2015 on /pol/ Plays Splatoon 0
#11 - Picture 07/22/2015 on /pol/ Plays Splatoon +3
#8 - This guy's probably dead or at least blind with several broken…  [+] (5 new replies) 07/22/2015 on /pol/ Plays Splatoon +2
#14 - thejaymezians (07/22/2015) [-]
Well, you did see the stream going over his head as a warning for several seconds didn't you? That was more than enough. And Hammer was right. That's a riot control hose, not a fire fighting hose. While he may not be able to open his eyes for a while and they might be bloodshot, he'll retain his sight just fine. As long as he isn't stupid enough to get sprayed in the face repeatedly.
User avatar
#12 - hammerzietcht (07/22/2015) [-]
Congratulations, that is exactly what it is not. see those pulses (4 total)? notice how he takes the stream in his face (lol, fag) without issue until the pulse hits him?
crowd control cannons are designed from the ground up to A) save water - riot vehicles can't always hook up to the mains. B) remove people from certain locals. the basic stream is pretty much aiming and intimidation, if you are stupid enough to decide to challenge it it's your choice.
I would say this one did exactly what it was supposed to.

#16 - grantyboy (07/22/2015) [-]
At the end of the gif you can see him fly backwards and slide at least 20 feet within half a second - he's no doubt severely injured or dead. Its completely disproportionate considering he's a peaceful protester waving a flag. Corrupt, Islamist police give him a warning shot whoopee-fucking-doo
#10 - bismarcksback (07/22/2015) [-]
Fantastic.
#11 - grantyboy (07/22/2015) [-]
#18 - Comment deleted 07/22/2015 on (untitled) 0
#16 - Picture 07/22/2015 on Women's teams in FIFA 16 +6
#23 - Degrees in bar tending pls. I bet you're the same type who den… 07/22/2015 on English major -2
#26 - Comment deleted 07/22/2015 on (untitled) +9