Well, current theories state that an atom at absolute zero and absolute heat would possible disassemble, as the nucleus of an atom is held together via subatomic particles and the attraction between them, there is no atomic shell as far as we know. So, you end up theoretically with a split atom at absolute zero, but since there's no energy, there's no boom, just single subatomic particles. This could in theory pave the way for real world alchemy, as you could take the protons of an element, and give them energy again to force them to create whatever you wanted.

At absolute hot though, I would expect a big boom, whether its just a nuke or a big bang idk.

Hmm! Now that is kind of exciting actually, the thought of using a machine similar to the large hedron collider to achieve absolute zero temperatures for a fraction of a moment in order to change one substance into another. That's cool as hell, and is also a very nice contrast to the projected big bang 2.0 that is likely to take place at absolute hot.

Thanks for all this info based chemist anon.

No, we have theories, VSauce did a video on it that's pretty good. But put simply, assuming we had a way to infinitely funnel energy into an atom, we don't know if there is an absolute hot. Currently, we figure it would either initiate another big bang due to the sheer amount of energy in one place, as e=mc^2 and all that, or it would 'melt', but that's more of a physics thing.

Yeah, I just watched the vsauce vid. Based Yugioh Kris above us shared, was really interesting stuff. Now I'm curious as to the effects of something reaching above Planckt temps versus absolute zero. I feel like I remember some funky stuff happening at absolute zero, but I'm not too sure. Still, would be interesting to compare and contrast the two.

Well, current theories state that an atom at absolute zero and absolute heat would possible disassemble, as the nucleus of an atom is held together via subatomic particles and the attraction between them, there is no atomic shell as far as we know. So, you end up theoretically with a split atom at absolute zero, but since there's no energy, there's no boom, just single subatomic particles. This could in theory pave the way for real world alchemy, as you could take the protons of an element, and give them energy again to force them to create whatever you wanted.

At absolute hot though, I would expect a big boom, whether its just a nuke or a big bang idk.

Hmm! Now that is kind of exciting actually, the thought of using a machine similar to the large hedron collider to achieve absolute zero temperatures for a fraction of a moment in order to change one substance into another. That's cool as hell, and is also a very nice contrast to the projected big bang 2.0 that is likely to take place at absolute hot.

Thanks for all this info based chemist anon.