Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

goll    

Rank #13283 on Comments
goll Avatar Level 319 Comments: Wizard
Offline
Send mail to goll Block goll Invite goll to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Date Signed Up:12/25/2010
Last Login:9/22/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#13283
Highest Comment Rank:#391
Content Thumbs: 3 total,  1 ,  4
Comment Thumbs: 19769 total,  20766 ,  997
Content Level Progress: 1.69% (1/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 43.3% (433/1000)
Level 319 Comments: Wizard → Level 320 Comments: Covered In Thumbs
Subscribers:0
Content Views:7
Total Comments Made:2989
FJ Points:17699

latest user's comments

#74 - i call this one black steel 11/12/2013 on Smaden Jith +18
#217 - i love this because it shows just how hypocritical these peopl… 11/11/2013 on Oh lawd 0
#508 - both sides have there ups and downs that is the siths downside… 11/11/2013 on Wallpaper 0
#188 - i decided to just drop consoles altogether and move to pc 11/11/2013 on PS-Snore vs X-Bone One +5
#137 - Picture  [+] (8 new replies) 11/11/2013 on Wallpaper +12
User avatar #147 - thebestpieever (11/11/2013) [-]
The Sith one sounds so much more appealing...
User avatar #392 - whtkid (11/11/2013) [-]
IT;s supposed to, but that's why the jedi are peace keepers
User avatar #177 - krasnogvardiech (11/11/2013) [-]
Because it's technically true.
#399 - bann (11/11/2013) [-]
In the sith example you become enslaved by your lust for power, destroying you and everyone in your way. Equally self defeating, but at least the jedi don't ruin everyone else's day in the process.
User avatar #508 - goll (11/11/2013) [-]
both sides have there ups and downs that is the siths downside if you fall into the trap the sith are selfless and selfish at the same time. they work their way to the top stepping on anyone who gets in their way, BUT they then train an apprentice who they know will eventually become stronger then them and kill them, that is the apprentices sole purpose. they do this because the sith way values the survival of the fittest over personal power.
#477 - krasnogvardiech (11/11/2013) [-]
Well, that depends on how you look at it.

There's no peace, never. Whether it's simple disputes like whose dog bit who all the way to intergalactic wars, there will never truly be peace.
Passion is simple reaction to events. From an outside perspective, it's almost always subjective because everything's in relation to the being experiencing that passion or emotion.
Strength is simply capacity. You've seen complete evil bastards with great reputations all the time, but have you ever wondered why the people always follow the villain? It's because the hero went up against the villain, their creed to the evil one's creed, and theirs lost. It's not so simple as 'Oh that's evil, I shouldn't do that'.
Like Strength, Power simply means ability. If you have power, you can do X. If you're not powerful enough - not able, in other words - then by default you're not strong enough to do it.
Victory is simply success. Succeed in your endeavours and yes, people will like you.
They're going into the Force to find themselves. That's all you have to do - find something you like or want or think you'd be good at, and throw yourself utterly at it, and don't give up until you've mastered it. You will be tried. You will be tested. And the badass that will be spat out is who you really are.

No idea what they're on about chains breaking - is this a prison riot? Better yet, did someone's bondage gear suffer an accident?
#518 - bann (11/12/2013) [-]
Alright, back in the saddle

While I agree there is never any peace, I think passion could also be interpreted as a striving, a yearning for possession. Possession, like peace, is truly an impossible feat, as possession is as temporary as peace, you can hold it for awhile but eventually it'll come to pass. Perhaps they're equally self defeating, but at least the jedi way is sustainable and allows for some sense of inner peace. Given that the Sith historically loose all sense of passion to their lust for power, it seems that their beliefs don't work in practice.
#487 - bann (11/11/2013) [-]
you have raised many great points which I'll reply to in the morrow
#136 - Picture 11/11/2013 on Wallpaper 0
#49 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 11/09/2013 on I expected Japan... +28
#88 - asftrooper (11/09/2013) [-]
#51 - it is because when we say it it is for shock value, jokes, or… 11/08/2013 on Tumbler nuts 0
#18 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 11/07/2013 on What a classic zinger +1
#41 - lordfuckerslives (11/07/2013) [-]
#2235 - hk-47 ftw  [+] (1 new reply) 11/07/2013 on What's your secret that... 0
#2246 - canadianbetamale (11/07/2013) [-]
#27 - 1) he is not keeping books from people he is just not deliveri…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/06/2013 on Worth the Read 0
User avatar #28 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
1. how is this different
2. again, fiction is subjective so this is meaningless. Books are books.
3. ok
#25 - wow before it was just a misunderstanding now you are just bei…  [+] (3 new replies) 11/06/2013 on Worth the Read 0
User avatar #26 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
I'ts not a misunderstanding.
You would keep people from certain books because YOU don't like them.
That's the purest form of censorship possible.
User avatar #27 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
1) he is not keeping books from people he is just not delivering them to them
2) it has nothing to do with my personal opinion of the books it is about the subject matter
3)i will no longer be responding to this thread as it is no longer a conversation and will just turn into a blame game
User avatar #28 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
1. how is this different
2. again, fiction is subjective so this is meaningless. Books are books.
3. ok
#23 - you are taking what i said to an extreme it was never meant to…  [+] (5 new replies) 11/06/2013 on Worth the Read 0
User avatar #24 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
>Confirmed for supporting censorship
User avatar #25 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
wow before it was just a misunderstanding now you are just being an ass on purpose
User avatar #26 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
I'ts not a misunderstanding.
You would keep people from certain books because YOU don't like them.
That's the purest form of censorship possible.
User avatar #27 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
1) he is not keeping books from people he is just not delivering them to them
2) it has nothing to do with my personal opinion of the books it is about the subject matter
3)i will no longer be responding to this thread as it is no longer a conversation and will just turn into a blame game
User avatar #28 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
1. how is this different
2. again, fiction is subjective so this is meaningless. Books are books.
3. ok
#20 - i was talking more from an educational stand point rather than…  [+] (7 new replies) 11/06/2013 on Worth the Read 0
User avatar #22 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
In that case, there should be nothing but manuals and textbooks.
I think you mean you care about books with historical value.
But then you're making the same hypocritical mistake the school did, if you only leave in the ones that match YOUR curriculum, you're just using your own brand of censorship.

The point isn't the limit the options to the good stuff, it's to let people get there on their own by supplying as much material as possible.
User avatar #23 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
you are taking what i said to an extreme it was never meant to be taken to. how much education value are you going to get out of something like twilight or 50 shades or demonata(throwing one i actually like in there so you can't say i am biased)? not that much, they are mainly for entertainment purposes and the guy is not have to risking his ass to provide entertainment to people.
User avatar #24 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
>Confirmed for supporting censorship
User avatar #25 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
wow before it was just a misunderstanding now you are just being an ass on purpose
User avatar #26 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
I'ts not a misunderstanding.
You would keep people from certain books because YOU don't like them.
That's the purest form of censorship possible.
User avatar #27 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
1) he is not keeping books from people he is just not delivering them to them
2) it has nothing to do with my personal opinion of the books it is about the subject matter
3)i will no longer be responding to this thread as it is no longer a conversation and will just turn into a blame game
User avatar #28 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
1. how is this different
2. again, fiction is subjective so this is meaningless. Books are books.
3. ok
#18 - and they can have them. but he was trying to keep the books th…  [+] (9 new replies) 11/06/2013 on Worth the Read 0
User avatar #19 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
There's not a single book you can't learn SOMETHING from, even if it's "wow this author sucks" or "I guess I don't like this genre"
It's important to know bad literature, so you can better enjoy the good.
Also, guilty pleasure reading.
User avatar #20 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
i was talking more from an educational stand point rather than a entertainment standpoint
User avatar #22 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
In that case, there should be nothing but manuals and textbooks.
I think you mean you care about books with historical value.
But then you're making the same hypocritical mistake the school did, if you only leave in the ones that match YOUR curriculum, you're just using your own brand of censorship.

The point isn't the limit the options to the good stuff, it's to let people get there on their own by supplying as much material as possible.
User avatar #23 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
you are taking what i said to an extreme it was never meant to be taken to. how much education value are you going to get out of something like twilight or 50 shades or demonata(throwing one i actually like in there so you can't say i am biased)? not that much, they are mainly for entertainment purposes and the guy is not have to risking his ass to provide entertainment to people.
User avatar #24 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
>Confirmed for supporting censorship
User avatar #25 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
wow before it was just a misunderstanding now you are just being an ass on purpose
User avatar #26 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
I'ts not a misunderstanding.
You would keep people from certain books because YOU don't like them.
That's the purest form of censorship possible.
User avatar #27 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
1) he is not keeping books from people he is just not delivering them to them
2) it has nothing to do with my personal opinion of the books it is about the subject matter
3)i will no longer be responding to this thread as it is no longer a conversation and will just turn into a blame game
User avatar #28 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
1. how is this different
2. again, fiction is subjective so this is meaningless. Books are books.
3. ok
#16 - quality and personal opinion on how good it is are two differe…  [+] (11 new replies) 11/06/2013 on Worth the Read 0
User avatar #17 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
I still say it's bullshit, and you should let people form their own opinions.
User avatar #18 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
and they can have them. but he was trying to keep the books that belong in school in school. the books you can actually learn something from.if they want to read something else they can read it on their own time.
User avatar #19 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
There's not a single book you can't learn SOMETHING from, even if it's "wow this author sucks" or "I guess I don't like this genre"
It's important to know bad literature, so you can better enjoy the good.
Also, guilty pleasure reading.
User avatar #20 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
i was talking more from an educational stand point rather than a entertainment standpoint
User avatar #22 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
In that case, there should be nothing but manuals and textbooks.
I think you mean you care about books with historical value.
But then you're making the same hypocritical mistake the school did, if you only leave in the ones that match YOUR curriculum, you're just using your own brand of censorship.

The point isn't the limit the options to the good stuff, it's to let people get there on their own by supplying as much material as possible.
User avatar #23 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
you are taking what i said to an extreme it was never meant to be taken to. how much education value are you going to get out of something like twilight or 50 shades or demonata(throwing one i actually like in there so you can't say i am biased)? not that much, they are mainly for entertainment purposes and the guy is not have to risking his ass to provide entertainment to people.
User avatar #24 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
>Confirmed for supporting censorship
User avatar #25 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
wow before it was just a misunderstanding now you are just being an ass on purpose
User avatar #26 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
I'ts not a misunderstanding.
You would keep people from certain books because YOU don't like them.
That's the purest form of censorship possible.
User avatar #27 - goll (11/06/2013) [-]
1) he is not keeping books from people he is just not delivering them to them
2) it has nothing to do with my personal opinion of the books it is about the subject matter
3)i will no longer be responding to this thread as it is no longer a conversation and will just turn into a blame game
User avatar #28 - tittylovin (11/06/2013) [-]
1. how is this different
2. again, fiction is subjective so this is meaningless. Books are books.
3. ok
#15 - what the **** is wrong with those people? banning… 11/06/2013 on Worth the Read 0
#12 - praise the doctor he regenerated for our sins!  [+] (9 new replies) 11/06/2013 on Soon... +8
#17 - pariahlol (11/06/2013) [-]
So, I've actually thought about this before. Once immortality and time travel are both possible, then wouldn't the wielder of such power be essentially god? They become omniscient, able to be anywhere at any time, and able to change anything. Nothing can stop them. In my opinion the Doctor is the true god of the Doctor Who universe. He's had his effect on everything, he is the one who determines the rules for the universe, he is the one who judges the rest of the universe.
User avatar #30 - wattehhec (11/06/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure the Doctor came to the same conclusion near the end of season 4 when he visited the first human colony on Mars, and then he realized how he can't change whatever he wants, and that some things are necessary for the rest of the universe and time.
User avatar #20 - newforomador (11/06/2013) [-]
One other thing I've thought about, wouldn't it be possible that humans are Time Lords? I mean, they have basically the same look, with the only anatomical difference being two hearts and regeneration. Regeneration could be something added to their body when they look into the time vortex, and the second heart is only there after their first regeneration. They have the ability to go through time, and it never says the exact date that Gallifrey is put into the time lock, nor when the Time Lords actually appeared. It is possible that humans eventually discovered how to create a TARDIS, and after that they gained regenerations, and decided to call themselves time lords. The writing that they use would be different because it is a mix of all the forms of writings, plus some stuff from aliens. I doubt anything like it will ever be said in the show, but I find it quite possible.
#100 - pariahlol (11/10/2013) [-]
If you recall, the way they explained River's ability to regenerate is that she was concieved in the time vortex. In that episode, the Doctor mentions that the first time lords were actually humans exposed to the time vortex for extended periods. At least that's what i remember
User avatar #101 - newforomador (11/10/2013) [-]
Really? It's been awhile since I've watched, so I must've forgotten that.
#102 - pariahlol (11/10/2013) [-]
Yeah, so you pretty much estimated the truth. Congratulations
#29 - kmichel (11/06/2013) [-]
Humans can't handle a timelord's mind though, and that was shown in one of the earlier episodes.
User avatar #75 - newforomador (11/06/2013) [-]
Living around the the opening to the time vortex could make humans like that, or just evolution. And after awhile, children would be born with the innate ability to have a mind like that.
#26 - darthblam (11/06/2013) [-]
This sounds both ludicrous and valid.
#10 - the whole censorship thing does not even make any sense "…  [+] (2 new replies) 11/05/2013 on Admin these past couple weeks +2
#29 - omnipotentsoap (11/05/2013) [-]
Also I was just going through flagged content and Miranda's mass effect fully clothed but was flagged, also yoga pants and a fully clothed Mikasa AoT
#28 - omnipotentsoap (11/05/2013) [-]
I get not wanting lewd stuff being associated with my business but a girl in a bikini...really. Also half the ads on here have scantily clad women anyway
#52 - i like this one 11/04/2013 on the best NOPE gif ever created 0
#139 - they have a name for this, it's called photoshop. 11/03/2013 on Pixels +2
#51 - dwarves i knew it, they are real. they told me i was crazy but… 11/02/2013 on Thieves hit our store last... +2
#96 - Picture 11/02/2013 on I knead an adult 0
#72 - bring out the different colored light bulbs  [+] (1 new reply) 11/01/2013 on easy mode +8
User avatar #151 - subadanus (11/01/2013) [-]
Bought some and put them in my room.

My finest moment.
#91 - Picture 10/29/2013 on pocket sand +2
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1413 / Total items point value: 6459

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #11 - roll (09/26/2013) [-]
i like ur name
User avatar #12 to #11 - goll (09/26/2013) [-]
why? it is a random collection of letters with no significance to anyone but myself
User avatar #13 to #12 - roll (09/26/2013) [-]
becus its like mine only with a g
User avatar #14 to #13 - goll (09/26/2013) [-]
ah, i see
User avatar #15 to #14 - roll (09/26/2013) [-]
yes
#16 to #15 - goll (09/26/2013) [-]
indeed
indeed
User avatar #10 - droop (07/18/2013) [-]
Avatar is good.
User avatar #9 - goll (03/09/2013) [-]
**goll rolls 452,267,544**
User avatar #5 - goll (02/01/2013) [-]
**goll rolls 02,735,879**
User avatar #4 - goll (11/30/2012) [-]
**goll rolls 7,845**
User avatar #3 - goll (11/30/2012) [-]
**goll rolls 882**
User avatar #2 - goll (11/08/2012) [-]
**goll rolls 774**
#1 - hrodebert (06/18/2012) [-]
You have posted 1337 comments! 21:08 - 06.18.12 Congratz
 Friends (0)