If you're using chrome, click on the Chrome menu, then Tools, Extensions, and finally the trash icon. Just refresh the page and the search bars should be gone.

For Firefox, click the Firefox button, Add-ons, "Extensions or Appearance". Select the one you want to take off and click "remove."

For I.E., I'm not so sure.

got it thanks

They had one good album, then they were sell outs like aerosmith. I don't remember saying "Quit being a faggot and go listen to metallica right now!" so i don't need to calm down either. I'm just pointing out the only reason they're famous is because their songs are humorous at best like "pour some sugar on me"....but in terms of talent i don't think they have any really. You could make a point that the drummer has heart to come back after losing his arm in the accident, but let's be honest, of course he'd comeback, how else is he going to make his money?

I'm a tired stranger pay no mind to me I'm just being a cynic.

Weird gif for funnies and sorrys?

Thats good how?.... how is he supposed to play? all he does is hit a drum repetitively

They had one good album, then they were sell outs like aerosmith. I don't remember saying "Quit being a faggot and go listen to metallica right now!" so i don't need to calm down either. I'm just pointing out the only reason they're famous is because their songs are humorous at best like "pour some sugar on me"....but in terms of talent i don't think they have any really. You could make a point that the drummer has heart to come back after losing his arm in the accident, but let's be honest, of course he'd comeback, how else is he going to make his money?

I'm a tired stranger pay no mind to me I'm just being a cynic.

Weird gif for funnies and sorrys?

That was already discussed on the actual content the other day.

I do know that feel bro.

Which is about as effective as nailing a crack house in the "War against Drugs": you get a load of arrests and a few dead junkies plus a nice PR scoop until ten minutes later when some enterprising assholes works out that the local crack-junkies need a new supplier and sets up another crack house two streets away.

How? That's easy enough in the first wave because the enemy holds positions and wears uniforms but once the superior force has beaten the initial resistance to the ground you're looking at guerilla warfare and that's not so simple to deal with because the enemy now looks civilian. Conventional military wisdom says you need 1 soldier for every 10 civilians to crush an insurgency, that's to man checkpoints, check cars for bombs, secure building, and run patrols. Even then you're looking at a long stay. Special Forces are only useful for lightning raids on enemy targets or other special operations and are essentially useless in any other capacity.

Finding these "nests" and starting one of those "lightning raids" on them sounds like a start.

Which is about as effective as nailing a crack house in the "War against Drugs": you get a load of arrests and a few dead junkies plus a nice PR scoop until ten minutes later when some enterprising assholes works out that the local crack-junkies need a new supplier and sets up another crack house two streets away.

That's why you can't just send in the SEALS, it's like trying declare war on ants. You can easily squash any individual or destroy a nest but they all operate independently. Saudi Terrorist doesn't care if you kill the leader of Iraqi Terrorist's cell because the only thing they have in common is that they thought 9/11 was a cool guy who doesn't afraid of anything.

The reason a nation can't win the "War on Terror" is because there is no real enemy in the first place.

So you send the special forces to clear the out. The ones that know what they're doing in combat instead of the high school dropout infantry who are scared just being there.

How? That's easy enough in the first wave because the enemy holds positions and wears uniforms but once the superior force has beaten the initial resistance to the ground you're looking at guerilla warfare and that's not so simple to deal with because the enemy now looks civilian. Conventional military wisdom says you need 1 soldier for every 10 civilians to crush an insurgency, that's to man checkpoints, check cars for bombs, secure building, and run patrols. Even then you're looking at a long stay. Special Forces are only useful for lightning raids on enemy targets or other special operations and are essentially useless in any other capacity.

Finding these "nests" and starting one of those "lightning raids" on them sounds like a start.

Which is about as effective as nailing a crack house in the "War against Drugs": you get a load of arrests and a few dead junkies plus a nice PR scoop until ten minutes later when some enterprising assholes works out that the local crack-junkies need a new supplier and sets up another crack house two streets away.

>2013
>Still believes Al Qaeda is anything other than a blanket term for terrorists who are Muslim.

Does it really matter? Either there are terrorists out there

That's why you can't just send in the SEALS, it's like trying declare war on ants. You can easily squash any individual or destroy a nest but they all operate independently. Saudi Terrorist doesn't care if you kill the leader of Iraqi Terrorist's cell because the only thing they have in common is that they thought 9/11 was a cool guy who doesn't afraid of anything.

The reason a nation can't win the "War on Terror" is because there is no real enemy in the first place.

So you send the special forces to clear the out. The ones that know what they're doing in combat instead of the high school dropout infantry who are scared just being there.

How? That's easy enough in the first wave because the enemy holds positions and wears uniforms but once the superior force has beaten the initial resistance to the ground you're looking at guerilla warfare and that's not so simple to deal with because the enemy now looks civilian. Conventional military wisdom says you need 1 soldier for every 10 civilians to crush an insurgency, that's to man checkpoints, check cars for bombs, secure building, and run patrols. Even then you're looking at a long stay. Special Forces are only useful for lightning raids on enemy targets or other special operations and are essentially useless in any other capacity.

Finding these "nests" and starting one of those "lightning raids" on them sounds like a start.

Which is about as effective as nailing a crack house in the "War against Drugs": you get a load of arrests and a few dead junkies plus a nice PR scoop until ten minutes later when some enterprising assholes works out that the local crack-junkies need a new supplier and sets up another crack house two streets away.

You're comparing an entire Army to one small group of Canadian soldiers. Special Forces (American, British, Canadian) do their own thing in sneaky ways. The rest of the military's main job is building infrastructure, handing out food and trying not to make more bad guys.

although i agree, that is only specific to this war, usually armies are made to wipe out other armies

Agreed, but that all changed after Vietnam

We could do anything we wanted to, we just don't fucking do it. If we had sent in the navy seal team the first year we went after bin laden and the rest of AL-queda they could have been done by now. But no we send in the army, even the national guard, for Christ sake the national guard isn't for foreign affairs. We should be done over there. We have our special forces and the seals, but we don't do anything with them.

>2013
>Still believes Al Qaeda is anything other than a blanket term for terrorists who are Muslim.

Does it really matter? Either there are terrorists out there

That's why you can't just send in the SEALS, it's like trying declare war on ants. You can easily squash any individual or destroy a nest but they all operate independently. Saudi Terrorist doesn't care if you kill the leader of Iraqi Terrorist's cell because the only thing they have in common is that they thought 9/11 was a cool guy who doesn't afraid of anything.

The reason a nation can't win the "War on Terror" is because there is no real enemy in the first place.

So you send the special forces to clear the out. The ones that know what they're doing in combat instead of the high school dropout infantry who are scared just being there.

How? That's easy enough in the first wave because the enemy holds positions and wears uniforms but once the superior force has beaten the initial resistance to the ground you're looking at guerilla warfare and that's not so simple to deal with because the enemy now looks civilian. Conventional military wisdom says you need 1 soldier for every 10 civilians to crush an insurgency, that's to man checkpoints, check cars for bombs, secure building, and run patrols. Even then you're looking at a long stay. Special Forces are only useful for lightning raids on enemy targets or other special operations and are essentially useless in any other capacity.

Finding these "nests" and starting one of those "lightning raids" on them sounds like a start.

Which is about as effective as nailing a crack house in the "War against Drugs": you get a load of arrests and a few dead junkies plus a nice PR scoop until ten minutes later when some enterprising assholes works out that the local crack-junkies need a new supplier and sets up another crack house two streets away.

"Just kinda there"

Easily the most ignorant comment about the war I've ever read. I take it you've never been anywhere near that part of the world, correct?

By just there, i mean they aren't getting jack shit done and are just fucking up the place in the process while they tell us they're making progress in random stuff.

You're comparing an entire Army to one small group of Canadian soldiers. Special Forces (American, British, Canadian) do their own thing in sneaky ways. The rest of the military's main job is building infrastructure, handing out food and trying not to make more bad guys.

although i agree, that is only specific to this war, usually armies are made to wipe out other armies

Agreed, but that all changed after Vietnam

We could do anything we wanted to, we just don't fucking do it. If we had sent in the navy seal team the first year we went after bin laden and the rest of AL-queda they could have been done by now. But no we send in the army, even the national guard, for Christ sake the national guard isn't for foreign affairs. We should be done over there. We have our special forces and the seals, but we don't do anything with them.

>2013
>Still believes Al Qaeda is anything other than a blanket term for terrorists who are Muslim.

Does it really matter? Either there are terrorists out there

That's why you can't just send in the SEALS, it's like trying declare war on ants. You can easily squash any individual or destroy a nest but they all operate independently. Saudi Terrorist doesn't care if you kill the leader of Iraqi Terrorist's cell because the only thing they have in common is that they thought 9/11 was a cool guy who doesn't afraid of anything.

The reason a nation can't win the "War on Terror" is because there is no real enemy in the first place.

So you send the special forces to clear the out. The ones that know what they're doing in combat instead of the high school dropout infantry who are scared just being there.

How? That's easy enough in the first wave because the enemy holds positions and wears uniforms but once the superior force has beaten the initial resistance to the ground you're looking at guerilla warfare and that's not so simple to deal with because the enemy now looks civilian. Conventional military wisdom says you need 1 soldier for every 10 civilians to crush an insurgency, that's to man checkpoints, check cars for bombs, secure building, and run patrols. Even then you're looking at a long stay. Special Forces are only useful for lightning raids on enemy targets or other special operations and are essentially useless in any other capacity.

Finding these "nests" and starting one of those "lightning raids" on them sounds like a start.

Which is about as effective as nailing a crack house in the "War against Drugs": you get a load of arrests and a few dead junkies plus a nice PR scoop until ten minutes later when some enterprising assholes works out that the local crack-junkies need a new supplier and sets up another crack house two streets away.

Which would be great for America...if we were actually taking any oil, or actually conquered any of the places we send our military. We just kind of show up, blow things up, and then spend countless dollars maintaining military bases there. It's infuriating, really.