|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #43647 on SubscribersLevel 212 Comments: Comedic Genius
OfflineSend mail to gardenjustice Block gardenjustice Invite gardenjustice to be your friend flag avatar
- Text/Links 14
- Pictures 18
- YouTube 8
- Animated Gifs 1
- Favorites 12
- Friends 1
- Comments 588
- Channels 3
- All 646
latest user's comments
|#1 - Comment deleted [+] (1 new reply)||05/18/2013 on Amy's Baking Co.||0|
|#7 - Make a kickstarter, i'll throw money at you.||05/17/2013 on My Dog||-1|
|#3 - I can, I live there. [+] (1 new reply)||05/12/2013 on Nuclear Missile Alert||+1|
|#4 - Political cancer, buzz off||05/11/2013 on Get Impeeched||+1|
|#11 - Added ya||05/04/2013 on Ranked Teams?||0|
|#8 - Sorry man, on North American servers. [+] (1 new reply)||05/04/2013 on Ranked Teams?||0|
|#5 - Aw that blows, thanks for commenting regardless m8 [+] (1 new reply)||05/04/2013 on Ranked Teams?||+1|
|#3 - What's your name? [+] (1 new reply)||05/04/2013 on Ranked Teams?||0|
|#2 - NA||05/04/2013 on Ranked Teams?||0|
|#532 - Your beautiful comment was ruined by your icon.||05/04/2013 on Katie||0|
|#9 - Goddamn chinks||04/27/2013 on this made me sick||0|
|#199 - That's not an option here.||04/22/2013 on yep||0|
|#1 - Kinda just wanted some registration laws. That's ok though, yo… [+] (69 new replies)||04/22/2013 on yep||+175|
#762 - anonymous (04/23/2013) [-]
>Live in Illinois
>Have some of the strictest gun/ registration laws
>Niggers keep killing each other in chicago and rockford anyways
#177 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
New background check laws would have not prevented Sandy Hook, VT, or Columbine. Just sayin'.
#156 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
It's like you Americans genuinely don't understand that when guns are banned, gun crime drops dramatically. O_o
#155 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
The joke is that if you plan on using a weapon for a serious crime, you're not going to register it legally. I've seen weapons being sold at garage sales, out of trucks, and other places. And my guess is that they didn't own the weapons legally either.
#753 - burdenedsoul (04/23/2013) [-]
i agree, i do think that having required background checks is a good idea, but what i don't agree with is the fact that some people want to completely ban guns, and saying that it'll be safer for our children, and cause less gun violence, which is bullshit, a criminal isn't going to go into a gun shop and buy a gun to go kill someone, they'll buy it in back alleys and from underground markets/sellers, an insane man bent on shooting up a school isn't going to stop and think because of a gun free zone, if anything he's more likely to hit areas with gun bans, because he knows that no one will shoot back, in the aurora shooting, the theater was a no gun zone, in the Clackamas town center, the only reason why he shot himself is because an off duty armed security officer (who didn't notice the "no guns" signs) pointed his weapon at the shooter, who then turned the gun on himself
TL;DR gun bans: no bueno. gun background checks: bueno
#697 - drewbridge (04/23/2013) [-]
I thought of gun magazine bans kinda like this.
Cars are legal. There are speed limits. Most crashes happen at around 25-40 mph-ish (for Europeans, that's 40-65 kph).
Well, maybe we should ban speeds above 20mph to avoid having more fatal accidents and people being all-around safer.
Going 20mph will get you were you need to go, it's faster than walking, it's comfortable and really safe, there is no downside besides gas and you being impatient and not getting where you want fast enough. (exceptions for professional companies that need the extra speed and have licenses for it)
I honestly think if everyone in the US only went 20mph in vehicles, hundreds of thousands of lives would be saved every year. I also think it's impractical and that it should never be implemented countrywide, because it's pretty dumb.
(Car accidents kill far more people than gun violence each year, btw)
#602 - anonymous (04/23/2013) [-]
why do i always over think this argument..? You, sir, just put me to shame.
#723 - anonymous (04/23/2013) [-]
I don't know... I have generalized anxienty and a panic disorder, which involves passing out around blood/guts, when getting shots, etc. I don't think that makes me any less qualified to be a gun owner, but there is a good chance that many harmless (to anybody other than the person who has it) psychological disorders such as mine could keep people from getting a gun license if screening went too far.
#581 - ThePleasureman (04/23/2013) [-]
Being for any new gun registration or background check is arbitrarily ignorant. We already have gun registration and background checks. Being "for" background checks only means more of something we already have. What we need is to create things like better security in schools and other public buildings. Also actually hold people accountable for what they do and say.
#562 - anonymous (04/23/2013) [-]
If youre not gonna take away my guns, why do you need to know which ones i have?
There's already background checks that keep criminals from buying firearms.
#526 - twofreegerbils (04/23/2013) [-]
confirmed for fewgunz
confirmed for fudd
confirmed for not knowing gun legislation history
confirmed for naive
confirmed for sheeple
Its way too easy to own a machine gun! Everyone who wants to buy a machine gun/suppressor/SBR/SBS/DD/AOW should have to go through a background check!
Said soccer moms of the 30's.
We'll get right on that! Said Uncle Sam. Thus the NFA was created. What Unkie Sam didn't tell us was that...
LOL GOTTA PAY $4000 (30's inflation adjusted) TO GET ONE
LOL IN 34 YEARS WE'RE CLOSING THE REGISTRY FOR MACHINE GUNS
LOL THANKS FOR SUPPORTING OUR DE FACTO BAN
You want background checks on Every firearm transfer? The only way to ensure that happens is to create a registry for all guns. A registry that the ATF would keep open, in good faith... Or maybe they'll just decide to close it one day, and not accept new entries, just like in '68. See: de facto ban.
JIDF pls go.
#402 - anonymous (04/23/2013) [-]
its not about "having something to hide" you fuckwit
#334 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
go to hell, fudd.
#66 - wiseguytwo (04/22/2013) [-]
I am in the same boat mate. I am a proud gun owner and own multiple guns they want to ban. I have no problems with more background checks. The problem is with the recent attempt to get more background checks, they tried to throw the "assault weapons" ban and magazine limits in with it. That was why I wasn't a 100% supporter of the recent failed bill attempt. I want to see more background checks but where do they stop. Will a parking ticket prevent any future gun purchases? Would that be their way to stop gun sales. Consider that my friend and keep shooting!
#599 - wiseguytwo (04/23/2013) [-]
P.S. I just love the gif, 'murica!!!!
#633 - captainrattrap (04/23/2013) [-]
I wanted to find reasons and that's what you gave me, so thanks.
1: Rifles, especially american rilfes, break. They won't last long without considerable upkeep and their value would go up greatly. Uncles wouldn't give them to their young nephews and insane people wouldn't be able to get them easily without spending alot of money on the black market and with time even those guns would be gone.
2: The dangerous shootings happen with assault rifles. A handgun conflict would be close up and people exercising their rights would be able to protect themselves in those situations, and an assault rifle wouldn't even be able to be used.
3: If there's a revolution, we're not gonna jump straight to huge gunfights on the street. Guerrillas will break into a concentration camp or army camp and arm the populace. Before then we can use sticks, stones, pistols, shotties, and stolen equipment from soldiers.
I'm not disregarding what you say. It's made me consider your side a little bit more, but I still don't think it's worth the risk.
#653 - wiseguytwo (04/23/2013) [-]
Seeing as we, unlike most of FJ, are being civil, here are my counter arguments to your arguments mate.
1) Personally, I consider American made guns to be of the utmost quality and reliability. I have an M1 Garand in my possession that fires just as well as it did back in the 40's. I also have an 1863 Springfield Musket used in the Civil War that fires like a champ. Our guns are so closely monitored during production phase to prevent any catastrophic failures. No gun manufacturer wants a lawsuit on their hands for an improperly made weapon.
2) Incorrect good sir. Most gun related crimes are with handguns. I kid you not with what I said up top. Most gun related crimes happen with handguns. "Assault Weapons" are rarely used in gun crimes. Democrats are literally just pissed off that the 1994 ban expired and they have been looking for a reason to get it reenacted since it expired. Sandy Hook offered that opportunity. However, by this time, the AR-15 has become the "American Gun." The AR-15 is consider this because of how many wars it has one and how reliable they can be.
3) This may be true, but the guerrillas will need to start somewhere. The AR-15 offers them that starting point. They start small. Knock over small targets and gather gear then move up to the big leagues when they have the supplies, knowledge and tactics to hit something like a heavily guarded armory to steal more supplies to arm more of the population. This scenario is EXTREMELY unlikely but it is one, if not the number one reason, why the 2nd amendment was created.
The door is open for more questions and/or comments!
#569 - anonymous (04/23/2013) [-]
Because there isn't a reason to ban them at all.
#718 - eliteqtip (04/23/2013) [-]
The infamous AR-15 is only effective up to a few hundred yards. I could buy a 30-06 hunting rifle and kill something from 1000 yards. Range is a completely unrelated factor in the anti-gun argument.
More murders are committed with baseball bats than AR-15s. Banning something that millions of people own because some people use them improperly is moronic.
AR-15 are also extremely effective for coyote and hog hunting/extermination.
#584 - anonymous (04/23/2013) [-]
How does banning a rifle just because it has a adjustable stock prevent people from being shot? The "Ban" doesn't mean rounding up every semi aautomatic and putting them in a furnace, it just limits the attachments of the rifle.
#595 - anonymous (04/23/2013) [-]
I did and my last comment goes back to my first, there isn't a reason for any of current legislation banning "assault rifles" to pass, maybe read up on this stuff before you blindly support it just because it says "hurr guns bad."
#51 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
well no, they're actually gonna take things up a notch, which i find ridiculous, soon enough anyone that has committed a misdemeanor, won't be allowed to have a gun, those crimes include vandalism possession of marijuana etc. It's fucking ridiculous cause then pretty much a lot of people will be stripped from their rights for having a criminal record, for petty things that happened in the past. I'd agree with the law if it was at least a felony, but misdemeanor is too small of a crime to lose your 2nd amendment
#10 - localcatbarber (04/22/2013) [-]
I'm sorry... I totally respect and understand your wish to be allowed to own a gun, as it is a tool for protection... but why exactly are people proud gun owners? I mean, so many people are going to gun shows and buying lots of expensive guns and showing them off and shit. Isn't the deal with owning a gun that you hope you'll never have to use it? Like, apart from training?
#20 - iamtheblackgoat (04/22/2013) [-]
And again, in the same way I was with gardenjustice about wanting registration, I'm with you about frowning upon gun worship...are guns, imo, still pretty cool? Yeah, otherwise I wouldn't have one. Are they still really scary? Also yes, and tools with that much power need to owned with a sense of somberness
#17 - therealtjthemedic (04/22/2013) [-]
Let's imagine we are talking about those guys who FUCKING LOVE cars.
'but why be proud of owning something that anyone can get and that pretty much has one purpose; to drive?'
'but why be proud of owning something that anyone can get and that pretty much has one purpose; to play?'
#128 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
yet you can get into a crash or run over a kid chasing a ball. cars can be lovely like guns and kill as well. they are massive unguided missiles and a bullet is small and has one path
#22 - localcatbarber (04/22/2013) [-]
As I replied to iamtheblackgoat I understand people liking to hunt, and yes, I can see how people can find target shooting fun, but I still don't get why so many people are proud of the gun itself. I just think it's unhealthy for a society to worship something that is made to destroy and kill.
#713 - anonymous (04/23/2013) [-]
You could also question why people are proud of the car itself.
#373 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
I'm proud of my gun because it was passed down to me from my father, and his father before him. I am also proud because I put in the time and effort to become effective and competent with the safety and operation of firearms, and it shows very well whenever I shoot. I am also proud because it is an American tradition and part of my heritage that I am keeping alive. Lastly, I am proud because I know that if somebody tries to harm me or somebody that I care about I have the ability to defend against them.
I'm not trying to prove any point, I was just telling you why I am proud of my gun. I hope that gave a little bit of clarification, and I hope that you have a very nice day. God bless.
#716 - anonymous (04/23/2013) [-]
I don't really understand why you got thumbs down... Because of the "God bless" maybe???
#4 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
inb4 you anon pussy
I dont have anything to hide and who died and made you king to say i dont deserve a gun because i dont want everyone and their brother to have knowledge that i one one
|#19 - I didn't think I deserved this many red thumbs, oh well.||04/21/2013 on FBI in action||0|
|#2 - **gardenjustice rolled a random image posted in comment #349… [+] (6 new replies)||04/20/2013 on FBI in action||-17|
#4 - anonymous (04/20/2013) [-]
you can see the gate get opened at the end of the gif
|#3 - Shut up carlos||04/15/2013 on Too soon?||+1|
|#5 - Sense, this picture makes nun [+] (2 new replies)||04/13/2013 on Welll yes..... Yes i did||0|
|#341 - **gardenjustice rolled a random image posted in comment #40 …||04/09/2013 on Appreciate Your Views!||0|
|#15 - What color am I.||04/07/2013 on If ever a quote was true....||-1|
|#313 - Peanut Butter||04/03/2013 on Oh Facebook||0|
|#364 - Alright, NO POST ON ED DAY?||04/03/2013 on Rest in Peace, voice actor...||0|
|#39 - WELL STOP IT.||03/18/2013 on Oh, Velma!||0|
|#17 - Don't like people saying that as the series progressed you did…||02/17/2013 on Title||+6|
|#2119 - **gardenjustice rolls 6**||02/17/2013 on What Kind of FJ'er are You?||0|
|#726 - **gardenjustice rolls 47** Dubs and I too, will delete my account.||02/13/2013 on He Went Down with Honor||0|