Click to expand


Last status update:
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:2/21/2012
Last Login:1/03/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#10421
Highest Content Rank:#3517
Highest Comment Rank:#4965
Content Thumbs: 4710 total,  5924 ,  1214
Comment Thumbs: 1256 total,  1693 ,  437
Content Level Progress: 8% (8/100)
Level 147 Content: Faptastic → Level 148 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 22% (22/100)
Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
Content Views:205804
Times Content Favorited:243 times
Total Comments Made:589
FJ Points:6003

latest user's comments

#1 - Comment deleted  [+] (1 new reply) 05/18/2013 on Amy's Baking Co. 0
#2 - morke Comment deleted by gardenjustice
#7 - Make a kickstarter, i'll throw money at you. 05/17/2013 on My Dog -1
#3 - I can, I live there.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/12/2013 on Nuclear Missile Alert +1
#5 - mcmonsterkitty (05/12/2013) [-]
#4 - Political cancer, buzz off 05/11/2013 on Get Impeeched +1
#11 - Added ya 05/04/2013 on Ranked Teams? 0
#8 - Sorry man, on North American servers.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/04/2013 on Ranked Teams? 0
User avatar #9 - redtooth (05/04/2013) [-]
Ah, I misunderstood. Nevermind.
#5 - Aw that blows, thanks for commenting regardless m8  [+] (1 new reply) 05/04/2013 on Ranked Teams? +1
#6 - valorcore (05/04/2013) [-]
Good luck finding people!
#3 - What's your name?  [+] (1 new reply) 05/04/2013 on Ranked Teams? 0
User avatar #4 - valorcore (05/04/2013) [-]
Nawh man, i'm on EU servers.
#2 - NA 05/04/2013 on Ranked Teams? 0
#532 - Your beautiful comment was ruined by your icon. 05/04/2013 on Katie 0
#9 - Goddamn chinks 04/27/2013 on this made me sick 0
#199 - That's not an option here. 04/22/2013 on yep 0
#1 - Kinda just wanted some registration laws. That's ok though, yo…  [+] (69 new replies) 04/22/2013 on yep +175
#762 - anonexplains (04/23/2013) [-]
>Live in Illinois
>Have some of the strictest gun/ registration laws
>Niggers keep killing each other in chicago and rockford anyways
User avatar #384 - Whetstone (04/23/2013) [-]
I know right? When I learned what this law was actually about, the first thing I thought was "Why isn't this already active? This seems like a given."
#177 - anonexplains (04/22/2013) [-]
New background check laws would have not prevented Sandy Hook, VT, or Columbine. Just sayin'.
User avatar #499 - HarvietheDinkle (04/23/2013) [-]
in general, you can't prevent things that happen in the past.
#156 - anonexplains (04/22/2013) [-]
It's like you Americans genuinely don't understand that when guns are banned, gun crime drops dramatically. O_o
User avatar #199 - gardenjustice (04/22/2013) [-]
That's not an option here.
#155 - anonexplains (04/22/2013) [-]
The joke is that if you plan on using a weapon for a serious crime, you're not going to register it legally. I've seen weapons being sold at garage sales, out of trucks, and other places. And my guess is that they didn't own the weapons legally either.
#3 - iamtheblackgoat (04/22/2013) [-]
As a proud gun owner, I'm with you all the way...if you're really, really against background checks for owning a weapon, then you probably have something to hide and don't deserve a fucking gun
User avatar #761 - clockworkmage (04/23/2013) [-]
And thank you for being rational, good sir. I applaud you.
User avatar #753 - burdenedsoul (04/23/2013) [-]
i agree, i do think that having required background checks is a good idea, but what i don't agree with is the fact that some people want to completely ban guns, and saying that it'll be safer for our children, and cause less gun violence, which is bullshit, a criminal isn't going to go into a gun shop and buy a gun to go kill someone, they'll buy it in back alleys and from underground markets/sellers, an insane man bent on shooting up a school isn't going to stop and think because of a gun free zone, if anything he's more likely to hit areas with gun bans, because he knows that no one will shoot back, in the aurora shooting, the theater was a no gun zone, in the Clackamas town center, the only reason why he shot himself is because an off duty armed security officer (who didn't notice the "no guns" signs) pointed his weapon at the shooter, who then turned the gun on himself

TL;DR gun bans: no bueno. gun background checks: bueno
User avatar #697 - drewbridge (04/23/2013) [-]
I thought of gun magazine bans kinda like this.

Cars are legal. There are speed limits. Most crashes happen at around 25-40 mph-ish (for Europeans, that's 40-65 kph).
Well, maybe we should ban speeds above 20mph to avoid having more fatal accidents and people being all-around safer.

Going 20mph will get you were you need to go, it's faster than walking, it's comfortable and really safe, there is no downside besides gas and you being impatient and not getting where you want fast enough. (exceptions for professional companies that need the extra speed and have licenses for it)

I honestly think if everyone in the US only went 20mph in vehicles, hundreds of thousands of lives would be saved every year. I also think it's impractical and that it should never be implemented countrywide, because it's pretty dumb.

Thoughts, anyone?
(Car accidents kill far more people than gun violence each year, btw)

#654 - cabbagemayhem (04/23/2013) [-]
That makes sense if you think of guns as a commodity or just for self-defense, but the purpose of the second amendment implies that most gun owners should have something to hide.
User avatar #660 - iamtheblackgoat (04/23/2013) [-]
True, true...yours is definitely the most level-headed response to my comment, and I don't implicitly disagree with you
#602 - anonexplains (04/23/2013) [-]
why do i always over think this argument..? You, sir, just put me to shame.
#597 - dumerveil has deleted their comment.
User avatar #607 - iamtheblackgoat (04/23/2013) [-]
'Cept there's a difference between being afraid of Uncle Sam finding your midget porn collection while tossing your hard drive and being afraid that your paranoid schizophrenia will be discovered while trying to purchase a firearm
#723 - anonexplains (04/23/2013) [-]
I don't know... I have generalized anxienty and a panic disorder, which involves passing out around blood/guts, when getting shots, etc. I don't think that makes me any less qualified to be a gun owner, but there is a good chance that many harmless (to anybody other than the person who has it) psychological disorders such as mine could keep people from getting a gun license if screening went too far.
#614 - dumerveil has deleted their comment.
#622 - iamtheblackgoat (04/23/2013) [-]
How's Philosophy 101 going?
#581 - ThePleasureman (04/23/2013) [-]
Im a proud gun owner too, thats completely for the background checks. The ones we already have. You know? The ones that already keep criminals from buying guns...
Being for any new gun registration or background check is arbitrarily ignorant. We already have gun registration and background checks. Being "for" background checks only means more of something we already have. What we need is to create things like better security in schools and other public buildings. Also actually hold people accountable for what they do and say.
#562 - anonexplains (04/23/2013) [-]
If youre not gonna take away my guns, why do you need to know which ones i have?
There's already background checks that keep criminals from buying firearms.
User avatar #526 - twofreegerbils (04/23/2013) [-]
confirmed for fewgunz
confirmed for fudd
confirmed for not knowing gun legislation history
confirmed for naive
confirmed for sheeple

Its way too easy to own a machine gun! Everyone who wants to buy a machine gun/suppressor/SBR/SBS/DD/AOW should have to go through a background check!
Said soccer moms of the 30's.

We'll get right on that! Said Uncle Sam. Thus the NFA was created. What Unkie Sam didn't tell us was that...
LOL GOTTA PAY $4000 (30's inflation adjusted) TO GET ONE

You want background checks on Every firearm transfer? The only way to ensure that happens is to create a registry for all guns. A registry that the ATF would keep open, in good faith... Or maybe they'll just decide to close it one day, and not accept new entries, just like in '68. See: de facto ban.

JIDF pls go.
User avatar #453 - kaitheguy (04/23/2013) [-]
as a non gun owner who plans to be one when i'm of age, i agree with you 100%. I know a fair bit of stuff, and I don't see why people are against this.
#402 - anonexplains (04/23/2013) [-]
its not about "having something to hide" you fuckwit
#334 - anonexplains (04/22/2013) [-]
go to hell, fudd.
#194 - Viggiator (04/22/2013) [-]
Thank you, for being both a gun owner, and a reasonable person.
There is so many shitty arguments from both sides, in these debates.
#482 - lamarisagoodname (04/23/2013) [-]
Seconded. I'm so tired of arbitrary arguments, there's no logical reason the bill had to be thrown out of the senate, lobbyists or otherwise.
#657 - cabbagemayhem (04/23/2013) [-]
It was thrown out? Thank god. Faith restored in our government and constitution.
User avatar #688 - deathstare (04/23/2013) [-]
Well, don't just take someone's word for it. Do some backup research and ssstuffff
#689 - cabbagemayhem (04/23/2013) [-]
I will.
User avatar #694 - deathstare (04/23/2013) [-]
Ok mom
User avatar #66 - wiseguytwo (04/22/2013) [-]
I am in the same boat mate. I am a proud gun owner and own multiple guns they want to ban. I have no problems with more background checks. The problem is with the recent attempt to get more background checks, they tried to throw the "assault weapons" ban and magazine limits in with it. That was why I wasn't a 100% supporter of the recent failed bill attempt. I want to see more background checks but where do they stop. Will a parking ticket prevent any future gun purchases? Would that be their way to stop gun sales. Consider that my friend and keep shooting!

User avatar #553 - captainrattrap (04/23/2013) [-]
What is your argument to not ban assault weapons for civilian use. (IE, people may still keep blot action rifles, shotguns, and hanguns)
#599 - wiseguytwo (04/23/2013) [-]
For starters, there are already millions out there. A ban would do nothing. As soon as the word gun control is mentions people flock to the gun shops to buy anything and everything they can. I can't buy one right now because my local shop can't keep them in stock so there is argument one, the ban won't do anything. Argument 2, the "assault rifles" and I put it in quotes for a reason as they aren't "assault weapons" are not used in as many crimes as you may think much less fully auto weapons. Last time I checked a reliable source (MSN, CNN, ABC, FOX don't count as they are all extreme left or right) AR-15's are used in gun related crimes a mere 2-4% of the time I think it was. Most of the remaining percentage points belongs to handguns. Example, Virgina Tech. Argument 2, they aren't used in crimes like MSN, CNN or ABC would lead you to believe. Argument 3, Amendment 2 of the Constitution. Anti gunners argument is that the amendment only applies to muskets as that is what they had back in the day. The amendment was created not only as a deterrent to prevent a hostile force from invading mainland America but a measure to prevent the Government from becoming tyrannical. As time has gone on, weapons have been modified and improved upon. Today's military is equipped with M4s and M16's. Should the Government ever consider doing some bad things, they would meet no resistance if all we as civilians were allowed to only have muskets. Naturally, as civilians we don't have access to aircraft, artillery or anything else of that nature but an AR-15 at least gives a somewhat equal footing be it so slight. Now, I know you are going to dismiss everything I just said and that is your right if you are a US citizen. Even if your not a US Citizen, I still respect your opinion completely. I hope this cleared up some confusion mate. Please feel free to ask me any specific questions you have!


P.S. I just love the gif, 'murica!!!!
User avatar #633 - captainrattrap (04/23/2013) [-]
I wanted to find reasons and that's what you gave me, so thanks.

1: Rifles, especially american rilfes, break. They won't last long without considerable upkeep and their value would go up greatly. Uncles wouldn't give them to their young nephews and insane people wouldn't be able to get them easily without spending alot of money on the black market and with time even those guns would be gone.

2: The dangerous shootings happen with assault rifles. A handgun conflict would be close up and people exercising their rights would be able to protect themselves in those situations, and an assault rifle wouldn't even be able to be used.

3: If there's a revolution, we're not gonna jump straight to huge gunfights on the street. Guerrillas will break into a concentration camp or army camp and arm the populace. Before then we can use sticks, stones, pistols, shotties, and stolen equipment from soldiers.

I'm not disregarding what you say. It's made me consider your side a little bit more, but I still don't think it's worth the risk.
User avatar #653 - wiseguytwo (04/23/2013) [-]
Seeing as we, unlike most of FJ, are being civil, here are my counter arguments to your arguments mate.

1) Personally, I consider American made guns to be of the utmost quality and reliability. I have an M1 Garand in my possession that fires just as well as it did back in the 40's. I also have an 1863 Springfield Musket used in the Civil War that fires like a champ. Our guns are so closely monitored during production phase to prevent any catastrophic failures. No gun manufacturer wants a lawsuit on their hands for an improperly made weapon.

2) Incorrect good sir. Most gun related crimes are with handguns. I kid you not with what I said up top. Most gun related crimes happen with handguns. "Assault Weapons" are rarely used in gun crimes. Democrats are literally just pissed off that the 1994 ban expired and they have been looking for a reason to get it reenacted since it expired. Sandy Hook offered that opportunity. However, by this time, the AR-15 has become the "American Gun." The AR-15 is consider this because of how many wars it has one and how reliable they can be.

3) This may be true, but the guerrillas will need to start somewhere. The AR-15 offers them that starting point. They start small. Knock over small targets and gather gear then move up to the big leagues when they have the supplies, knowledge and tactics to hit something like a heavily guarded armory to steal more supplies to arm more of the population. This scenario is EXTREMELY unlikely but it is one, if not the number one reason, why the 2nd amendment was created.

The door is open for more questions and/or comments!

#714 - stormtrooperface (04/23/2013) [-]
you two just made me a happy person, I would like very much to buy you both a drink.
User avatar #808 - wiseguytwo (04/23/2013) [-]
Why is that?
#809 - stormtrooperface (04/23/2013) [-]
the debate is well thought out and no one is jumping to conclusions.
User avatar #810 - wiseguytwo (04/23/2013) [-]
Well then, I'll gladly take that drink. What are you offering?
#811 - stormtrooperface (04/23/2013) [-]
whatever you are having.
#569 - anonexplains (04/23/2013) [-]
Because there isn't a reason to ban them at all.
User avatar #574 - captainrattrap (04/23/2013) [-]
Well there is, and that's to decrease the number of people that can get shot from a far range in a shooting. I'm asking for a legit reason why people need them.
User avatar #718 - eliteqtip (04/23/2013) [-]
The infamous AR-15 is only effective up to a few hundred yards. I could buy a 30-06 hunting rifle and kill something from 1000 yards. Range is a completely unrelated factor in the anti-gun argument.

More murders are committed with baseball bats than AR-15s. Banning something that millions of people own because some people use them improperly is moronic.

AR-15 are also extremely effective for coyote and hog hunting/extermination.
#668 - cabbagemayhem (04/23/2013) [-]
I'd give you the long list but it'd just be rehashing everything we talked about 3 months ago. Learn the purpose of the 2nd Amendment, and statistical research about the effects of gun bans (not what partial logic or gut feelings tell you).
#584 - anonexplains (04/23/2013) [-]
How does banning a rifle just because it has a adjustable stock prevent people from being shot? The "Ban" doesn't mean rounding up every semi aautomatic and putting them in a furnace, it just limits the attachments of the rifle.
User avatar #587 - captainrattrap (04/23/2013) [-]
I'm not going to argue with an anon that doesn't even read my whole comment.
#595 - anonexplains (04/23/2013) [-]
I did and my last comment goes back to my first, there isn't a reason for any of current legislation banning "assault rifles" to pass, maybe read up on this stuff before you blindly support it just because it says "hurr guns bad."
User avatar #664 - wiseguytwo (04/23/2013) [-]
You are not helping our case Anon. If we want the liberals to listen to our side so we can show them it won't work, we need to be proper and polite. Explain in a friendly manner why you think it won't work or give the reasons why it won't work.
#51 - anonexplains (04/22/2013) [-]
well no, they're actually gonna take things up a notch, which i find ridiculous, soon enough anyone that has committed a misdemeanor, won't be allowed to have a gun, those crimes include vandalism possession of marijuana etc. It's fucking ridiculous cause then pretty much a lot of people will be stripped from their rights for having a criminal record, for petty things that happened in the past. I'd agree with the law if it was at least a felony, but misdemeanor is too small of a crime to lose your 2nd amendment
User avatar #10 - localcatbarber (04/22/2013) [-]
I'm sorry... I totally respect and understand your wish to be allowed to own a gun, as it is a tool for protection... but why exactly are people proud gun owners? I mean, so many people are going to gun shows and buying lots of expensive guns and showing them off and shit. Isn't the deal with owning a gun that you hope you'll never have to use it? Like, apart from training?
User avatar #13 - iamtheblackgoat (04/22/2013) [-]
I own a hunting rifle, which I'm proud to use for hunting...if I live in a city and have a family and can afford one, I'll probably get a handgun to protect my family, but I won't like having it in the house
User avatar #16 - localcatbarber (04/22/2013) [-]
Yeah, hunting is purdy cool, and I get how people are proud of successfull hunting... but I just don't get how some people are so obsessed with this metal object designed to kill.
User avatar #20 - iamtheblackgoat (04/22/2013) [-]
And again, in the same way I was with gardenjustice about wanting registration, I'm with you about frowning upon gun worship...are guns, imo, still pretty cool? Yeah, otherwise I wouldn't have one. Are they still really scary? Also yes, and tools with that much power need to owned with a sense of somberness
User avatar #12 - therealtjthemedic (04/22/2013) [-]
Why is anyone a proud anything?
User avatar #15 - localcatbarber (04/22/2013) [-]
I get why people are proud of achievments, but why be proud of owning something that anyone can get and that pretty much has one purpose; to kill?
User avatar #17 - therealtjthemedic (04/22/2013) [-]
Let's imagine we are talking about those guys who FUCKING LOVE cars.
'but why be proud of owning something that anyone can get and that pretty much has one purpose; to drive?'
Or gamers
'but why be proud of owning something that anyone can get and that pretty much has one purpose; to play?'
User avatar #18 - localcatbarber (04/22/2013) [-]
Yeah, but driving can be a lovely experience that doesn't hurt anyone, and so can gaming. Killing people on the other hand, I believe should be something we wish to not do.
#128 - anonexplains (04/22/2013) [-]
yet you can get into a crash or run over a kid chasing a ball. cars can be lovely like guns and kill as well. they are massive unguided missiles and a bullet is small and has one path
User avatar #449 - ilovehitler (04/23/2013) [-]
A car has the purpose of transportation, and something getting hurt is usually an accident.
A gun has the purpose of causing harm, and something getting hurt is usually not an accident.
User avatar #19 - therealtjthemedic (04/22/2013) [-]
what is hunting
what is target shooting
User avatar #22 - localcatbarber (04/22/2013) [-]
As I replied to iamtheblackgoat I understand people liking to hunt, and yes, I can see how people can find target shooting fun, but I still don't get why so many people are proud of the gun itself. I just think it's unhealthy for a society to worship something that is made to destroy and kill.
#713 - anonexplains (04/23/2013) [-]
You could also question why people are proud of the car itself.
#373 - anonexplains (04/22/2013) [-]
I'm proud of my gun because it was passed down to me from my father, and his father before him. I am also proud because I put in the time and effort to become effective and competent with the safety and operation of firearms, and it shows very well whenever I shoot. I am also proud because it is an American tradition and part of my heritage that I am keeping alive. Lastly, I am proud because I know that if somebody tries to harm me or somebody that I care about I have the ability to defend against them.

I'm not trying to prove any point, I was just telling you why I am proud of my gun. I hope that gave a little bit of clarification, and I hope that you have a very nice day. God bless.
#716 - anonexplains (04/23/2013) [-]
I don't really understand why you got thumbs down... Because of the "God bless" maybe???
User avatar #23 - therealtjthemedic (04/22/2013) [-]
Well, that's your opinion, not mine, I guess.
#24 - localcatbarber (04/22/2013) [-]
Let's agree on diagreeing then.
#4 - anonexplains (04/22/2013) [-]
inb4 you anon pussy
I dont have anything to hide and who died and made you king to say i dont deserve a gun because i dont want everyone and their brother to have knowledge that i one one
User avatar #14 - therealtjthemedic (04/22/2013) [-]
Anon, come here bro.
We go to /k/, down some shots. You're cool.
#19 - I didn't think I deserved this many red thumbs, oh well. 04/21/2013 on FBI in action 0
#2 - **gardenjustice rolled a random image posted in comment #349…  [+] (6 new replies) 04/20/2013 on FBI in action -17
User avatar #19 - gardenjustice (04/21/2013) [-]
I didn't think I deserved this many red thumbs, oh well.
User avatar #14 - shaneac (04/21/2013) [-]
Even if it didn't swing open at the end of the gif (without him unlatching it,) it's still a fence with large gaps between the bars. He could've easily reached his hand through and opened it.
User avatar #10 - andywazowski (04/21/2013) [-]
if that was the case, they could have just opened it from the outside since it is a fence, so i don't think it was locked.
User avatar #5 - hybridxproject (04/21/2013) [-]
it opens as soon as his feet hit the ground
#4 - anonexplains (04/20/2013) [-]
you can see the gate get opened at the end of the gif
#3 - wheresthefudge (04/20/2013) [-]
**wheresthefudge rolled a random image posted in comment #150 at Atlas Moth ** Except that it wasn't. He didn't move to unlatch it, and indeed it starts to swing open before he's even left it. Also, the bars are far enough apart he could have reached through.
#3 - Shut up carlos 04/15/2013 on Too soon? +1
#5 - Sense, this picture makes nun  [+] (2 new replies) 04/13/2013 on Welll yes..... Yes i did 0
#10 - isoscelessandwich (04/14/2013) [-]
Other Carlos, I swear I will 'pun'ch you in the fucking face.
#19 - foerealzies (04/14/2013) [-]
Carlos started lifting.
#341 - **gardenjustice rolled a random image posted in comment #40 … 04/09/2013 on Appreciate Your Views! 0
#15 - What color am I. 04/07/2013 on If ever a quote was true.... -1
#313 - Peanut Butter 04/03/2013 on Oh Facebook 0
#364 - Alright, NO POST ON ED DAY? 04/03/2013 on Rest in Peace, voice actor... 0
#39 - WELL STOP IT. 03/18/2013 on Oh, Velma! 0
#17 - Don't like people saying that as the series progressed you did… 02/17/2013 on Title +6
#2119 - **gardenjustice rolls 6** 02/17/2013 on What Kind of FJ'er are You? 0
#726 - **gardenjustice rolls 47** Dubs and I too, will delete my account. 02/13/2013 on He Went Down with Honor 0
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #2 - aczzoh (07/27/2014) [-]
░░░░░░▐▌▀▄▀▄▀▐▄SPOOKY SKILENTON
User avatar #1 - fukkenname (01/13/2014) [-]
Please don't pass me on comment rank
 Friends (0)