Click to expand


Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 20
Facebook Profile: No
Steam Profile: ceco94
Consoles Owned: Game Boy, GBA, Nintendo DS, Nintendo 3DS
Video Games Played: Soooooo many
X-box Gamertag: hahahaha
Date Signed Up:1/28/2012
Last Login:2/26/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#9335
Comment Ranking:#179
Highest Content Rank:#8657
Highest Comment Rank:#106
Content Thumbs: 83 total,  168 ,  85
Comment Thumbs: 63251 total,  67254 ,  4003
Content Level Progress: 20% (1/5)
Level 6 Content: New Here → Level 7 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 4.6% (46/1000)
Level 354 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk → Level 355 Comments: Knight Of Funnyjunk
Content Views:23668
Times Content Favorited:11 times
Total Comments Made:10936
FJ Points:30257

Funny Pictures

Funny Gifs

latest user's comments

#18 - Picture 4 hours ago on LH facts 5 (bonus round... +8
#4 - YOUR DRILL IS THE DRILL THAT WILL PIERCE THE HEAVENS 02/25/2015 on Piercing her heavens +6
#10 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 02/22/2015 on Never run out of ideas +254
User avatar #54 - frogie (02/22/2015) [-]
#29 - hahahahaha. No. Read the manga, skip the fillers. 02/22/2015 on Anime Facts: Naruto Part 2 -2
#11 - Picture 02/21/2015 on doesnt afraid of anything +15
#2 - i'm going to ******* murder you for this 02/21/2015 on PIEP PIEP PIEP PIEP PIEP... +3
#28 - I didn't cry at merry's funeral. But I did tear up when *s… 02/21/2015 on Anime Comp: One Piece Part 3 0
#519 - Exactly. Muslims have waged wars for thousands of years, in a … 02/21/2015 on Perspective 0
#11 - Ah yes, I remember the crusades. Such an evil act of military …  [+] (26 new replies) 02/20/2015 on Perspective +147
#352 - anonexplains (02/21/2015) [-]
Remember the Crusades were in response to the Seljuk Turks capturing Jerusalem and murdering Christians. The previous owners were also Muslim, but they didn't have a tendency of burning Christian children alive in the streets.
User avatar #254 - elcreepo (02/20/2015) [-]
>Spanish inquisition and pretty much all the other inquisitions/witch hunts, if you want an example of Christians killing the literal shit out of each other

Also bloody mary, the Protestant vs. Catholic battles... the list goes on, Christians killed the shit out of each other before.
User avatar #205 - dvdstvns (02/20/2015) [-]
That picture is so misleading and biased it belongs on fox news.
#202 - anonexplains (02/20/2015) [-]
Crusades would've happened even if religion was not a factor.
User avatar #171 - lamarisagoodname (02/20/2015) [-]
I don't think you understand just how big the muslim empire was, or how long it lasted
User avatar #519 - ganjalf (02/21/2015) [-]
Exactly. Muslims have waged wars for thousands of years, in a territory that spanned from the Atlantic to India, while the crusades were, what 100 years not considering the pauses inbetween one another, all in Palestine/ Turkey.
#19 - magusto (02/20/2015) [-]
Oh and the Gold you pay for getting rid of your sins? that's not your own gold, just in case you still didn't get it.
#17 - magusto (02/20/2015) [-]
Oh yeah let's occupy and take over other peoples land for gold and more, but hey why not rape and pillage the villages while being at it?

For the Pope right? Ah yeah for the pope and if you pay a fine amount of Gold you can buy yourself off your sins, what a great, flawless and holy system. damn

take advice from Princess Monster truck here on this picture
User avatar #56 - captainfuckitall (02/20/2015) [-]
You seem to have forgotten the fact that the purpose of the Crusades was to take back land already conquered by the Muslims. Saying "Oh, those dang Christians, coming in and taking and stealing and pillaging!" means you must also say "Oh those dang Muslims, coming in-yadda yadda" was the Crusades were a reaction to the Jihad.
#294 - gerfox (02/21/2015) [-]
But Christians hadn't held Jerusalem since The Byzantine Emperor lost it in the 600s AD... 500 years. wasn't the real reason that suddenly the muslims refused pilgrims access to Jerusalem?
User avatar #296 - captainfuckitall (02/21/2015) [-]
There were many reasons. Under the leadership of Saladin, he DID allow Pilgrims of all faiths to enter and prey, however, as he held pieces of The True Cross (the cross jesus was hung on) he refused to give it up and let christians even see it, due to the moral he feared it would give them.

There were also economic and territorial reasons, political battles, and of course, the repelling of invading Muslim forces coming up the coast.
#504 - popeflatus (02/21/2015) [-]
True cross you say? How is it that there is no evidence for this?
User avatar #521 - captainfuckitall (02/21/2015) [-]
No evidence for what?
#528 - popeflatus (02/21/2015) [-]
There's no evidence that he had pieces of the 'the true cross'.
User avatar #15 - bojesus (02/20/2015) [-]
That's every Muslim conquest battle that happened in hundreds of years compared with the battles in the first crusade which lasted for 3 years.
#136 - shigiddy (02/20/2015) [-]
Nor does it include Christians killing the shit out of each other.
User avatar #258 - elcreepo (02/20/2015) [-]
Forgetting the crusades.

Let's think of the inquisitions and witch hunts, bloody marry, the protestant vs catholic fuckstorm that happened in the sixteenth and seventeenth century...

Christians killed the literal fuck out of each other, Spain did so much conquering in the name of God it's ridiculous, the Americans destroyed the Indians in the name of god (don't believe me, go look up manifest destiny)...

The crusades were holy wars and so not really an accurate depiction of what is really going on in the middle east now. It's not a holy war, it's a splintering of the religion itself as it goes into the modern world and starts having to answer modern questions such as those of scientific nature. The muslims pretty much condemned science even more violently than the church did after having gotten so far in a few decades... so that set them back into a dark age for a few thousand years, filled with as much fighting and pillaging as the Christian dark ages.

They need to settle down but a lot of fractions are set in their extremist ways and so, just like with Christianity, have to be slowly condemned and made to fizzle out, or killed by a ruler who doesn't believe in what they do.

It took Christians 300 or 400 years to settle down after Luther caused the first wave of what was to be a massive clusterfuck of battles and massacres and what I consider to be the first "modernization" attempt by Christianity- if the church's power was absolute than things like science couldn't flourish and of course the Royals did like the idea of themselves being absolute and not subject to the church, give em time and in the meanwhile shoot the extremists to help speed things up.
User avatar #70 - compared (02/20/2015) [-]
Thanks a lot for using a comparison, hope you are well.
User avatar #55 - captainfuckitall (02/20/2015) [-]
Actually, that's every 'Crusade' Vs. 'Jihad' that happened throughout an entire 300 or so years. Including the christian crusades. They didn't really take that long, nor were there many large scale battles.
User avatar #75 - bojesus (02/20/2015) [-]
>Every crusade
There were 43 crusader battles in total and that map has 13...
User avatar #76 - captainfuckitall (02/20/2015) [-]
Indeed, but all battles counted must follow these prerequisites:

1. They must be large scale battles, no skirmishes
2. They must be offensive battles, designed to take land and control over territory, not defensive battles, designed to keep the land currently held.

Both the Jihads and the Crusades follow these rules.
User avatar #77 - bojesus (02/20/2015) [-]
1. Where does this information come from?
2. How do you know the person who made this is following that convention?
3. Why doesn't it say that on the image, surely that would otherwise create confusion?
User avatar #81 - captainfuckitall (02/20/2015) [-]
Because I know the video it comes from. One moment:

Bill Warner, PhD:  Jihad vs Crusades
User avatar #85 - bojesus (02/20/2015) [-]
That hasn't answered any of my questions. Unless I missed something when watching that, he didn't mention anything about excluding battles based on their size. In terms of them being offensive battles, he did say that for the crusades, but when talking about the jihadists he included battles initiated by christians in Spain unless a misunderstood what he was saying .

Again, if that is what he did, he should have mentioned it.
User avatar #87 - captainfuckitall (02/20/2015) [-]
Eh, I would think going INTO a foreign land and spreading yourself out counts as a 'hostile take-over', especially since violence was indeed often used.

I swear I heard those rules for that map before, but since I cannot find them you are under no obligation to believe me. I can only hope that the sheer vast difference and the amount of time Jihads have been going on vs. the Crusades will speak for itself. Also, I'm pretty sure the word Jihad in itself implies aggression.
User avatar #89 - bojesus (02/20/2015) [-]
I don't know what the first sentence you put has to do with anything, as I already agree with it.

And, again, its not that I don't believe you. I would just rather he made it clear that he wasn't including every battle that happened. Someone watching that video who didn't know anything about the crusades would get the wrong idea from it.

Also, I never claimed that the christians were in the wrong with the crusades. I just think spreading misinformation to convince people of the fact is stupid.

And both crusade and jihad would imply aggression.

#4 - Comment deleted  [+] (1 new reply) 02/20/2015 on 4chan Comp #01 -5
User avatar #5 - therealtjthemedic (02/20/2015) [-]

user's channels

Join Subscribe dirty-secrets
Join Subscribe feels
Join Subscribe walkingdeadtime


Total unique items point value: 0 / Total items point value: 0
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#168 to #167 - ganjalf (06/24/2014) [-]
OP delivered.
gg;wp ave duce
User avatar #163 - doopleganger (04/09/2014) [-]
Duck is that you?
User avatar #164 to #163 - ganjalf (04/10/2014) [-]
Duck is dead man, you have to accept it, and let it go
#150 to #149 - hellscythe ONLINE (03/23/2014) [-]
why not?
#152 to #151 - hellscythe ONLINE (03/23/2014) [-]
maybe it will, so how are you doing today darling
#153 to #152 - ganjalf (03/23/2014) [-]
"absolutely nothing" wold be an euphemism
#154 to #153 - hellscythe ONLINE (03/23/2014) [-]
that doesnt sound like much fun darling, maybe you should find something to entertain yourself
#155 to #154 - ganjalf (03/23/2014) [-]
I accept suggestions
#156 to #155 - hellscythe ONLINE (03/23/2014) [-]
play a video game, read a book, watch a tv show, go seduce a cute girl
theres lots of things you can go do darling
#157 to #156 - ganjalf (03/23/2014) [-]
seduce a cute girl you say?
seduce a cute girl you say?
#158 to #157 - hellscythe ONLINE (03/23/2014) [-]
i dont see why not
#159 to #158 - ganjalf (03/23/2014) [-]
But where do i start?
But where do i start?
#160 to #159 - hellscythe ONLINE (03/23/2014) [-]
find a cute girl, who looks at you out of the corner of her eye and say "hello"
#161 to #160 - ganjalf (03/23/2014) [-]
heading out right now.   
Will be back as soon as I find one
heading out right now.
Will be back as soon as I find one
#162 to #161 - hellscythe ONLINE (03/23/2014) [-]
have fun
User avatar #146 - revengeforfreeze (12/02/2013) [-]
fagt love you
User avatar #145 - tittentei (11/06/2013) [-]
me (っ◕‿◕)っ ♥ (◡‿◡✿) you
User avatar #140 - ganjalf (06/18/2013) [-]
User avatar #141 to #140 - joshlol (06/18/2013) [-]
User avatar #144 to #141 - ganjalf (06/19/2013) [-]
dude, you ok? did you have a ******* seizure? do you want me to call an ambulance?
#143 to #141 - ganjalf (06/19/2013) [-]
dude, ******* again? I mean come on....
#142 to #141 - ganjalf (06/18/2013) [-]
stop mentioning me where I can't see the comment
stop mentioning me where I can't see the comment
 Friends (0)