Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

fruga    

Rank #20838 on Comments
no avatar Level 0 Comments: Untouched account
Offline
Send mail to fruga Block fruga Invite fruga to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 23
Date Signed Up:4/04/2011
Last Login:11/22/2014
Location:UK
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#20838
Highest Comment Rank:#18475
Comment Thumbs: 21 total,  57 ,  36
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 43.63% (24/55)
Level 0 Comments: Untouched account → Level 1 Comments: New Here
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:157
FJ Points:69

latest user's comments

#43 - I'd say these guys are better (I still love JD and Turk though) 12 hours ago on Admit it,you want something... -6
#167 - Hey how you doing? 08/09/2014 on paradox's profile 0
#36 - Comment deleted 07/04/2014 on Mysophobia 0
#149 - No it doesn't make those 10,000 murders magically disappear it…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/30/2014 on (untitled) 0
#330 - legomant (06/30/2014) [-]
My main problem is why focus on one tool that is used in an incredible minority of murders. A lot of these politicians pursuing gun control see it as a way to show that they are "doing something" rather than actually addressing the real issues behind "gun violence", which is nearly entirely gang related. The measures that these people propose such as universal background checks which the peddle with bullshit statistics and assault weapons bans which would do nothing to reduce gun violence, and actually failed to do anything over a ten year period on the federal level. The fact that a study done by the Center for Disease Control sponsored by the Obama administration stating that the gun control proposals that have been flying everywhere would have little to no impact on violent crime as a whole should tell an individual that these proposals are little more than feel good measures which do anything but actually address the root of the problem.
#146 - Of course it matters if the criminal was armed or not and what…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/30/2014 on (untitled) 0
#319 - legomant (06/30/2014) [-]
Vandalism however wouldn't be counted as a legal defensive gun use in the US, unless it is occurring on your property, at which point the laws vary from state to state. The majority of crimes stopped include things like mugging, robbery, rapes, etc. I still fail to see where a criminal being armed fits in here though if they are committing a crime such as those above.
#120 - That is completely wrong the level of violent crimes in Europe… 06/30/2014 on (untitled) -1
#112 - OK I was making a point about disagreeing with your priorities…  [+] (4 new replies) 06/30/2014 on (untitled) -1
User avatar #116 - vortisred (06/30/2014) [-]
Less gun violence, more violent other forms of murder, and that's not wrong. Stating something as fact does not make it fact, but stating fact is no different. And P.S. I did write about how you were a dipshit, but I don't like playing games, you still play the, "How little you know" card. Always it's "Your scenario" this, "Your refusal" that, a condescending tone. I say, so it is mine. If I am right, it is all of ours. I had a paragraph to say, and if you have more, don't hold back. I know I won't. As for now, I have a whole night I shouldn't waste arguing with you.
#120 - fruga (06/30/2014) [-]
That is completely wrong the level of violent crimes in European countries is considerably lower than it is in America, lack of guns doesn't equal increase in other crimes.
'Stating something as fact does not make it fact, but stating fact is no different' I have absolutely no idea what you are saying here.
Not sure what games specifically you are referring to here either...
I don't believe I once said 'how little you know'. Yes I said 'your scenario' ...because I was talking about the scenario you put forward and explaining where I disagree.
#117 - Womens Study Major (06/30/2014) [-]
Actually lower homicide rates are included, not just gun crimes, go to wikipedia if you care
User avatar #210 - vortisred (06/30/2014) [-]
Shame on you, weren't you ever taught that Wikipedia is not a credible source to cite from?
#105 - But that doesn't change the fact that you are refusing to comb…  [+] (8 new replies) 06/30/2014 on (untitled) -1
User avatar #109 - vortisred (06/30/2014) [-]
I like how you're attacking my integrity instead of my argument. This thread was about hypothetical invasion, as far as I was concerned, and the "real crimes" you are referring to are the availability heuristic that is shown on T.V. to make people feel sympathetic. Here's the truth, also answering your earlier questions, I am not refusing to combat real crimes in exchange for what-ifs, as the real problems you addressed are saving innocent lives in a 80 to 3 ratio. Sad that 3 die, but it is true, and criminals can kill without guns, murder has always existed. No one is capable of impossible shots, but impossible shots will not exist for an entire invasion for every man, and military coups are even more so a reason to keep guns, do you think a government will control it's citizens without one. If you think guns are just for killing, fine, believe it. But guns will never be un-invented, and not everyone will give up their guns. I have never called anyone on the internet a fuckwit, but someone who is not reasonable, sets personally set and emotionally bullshit boundaries, someone with a give up mentality, the person who'd rather be a flat stone instead of a round one. Some dipshit who discredits his adversary instead of challenging as an equal, and can't even stay on the right topic. Be logical, and realize this is a direct fuck you, instead of this pansy ass play around the bush. I may not be agreeable, but I am not wrong, and as soon as your childhood-mechanics world where armies can suffer no losses against citizens whatsoever, where guns create evil, and everyone is always willing to obey laws is recognized as stupid, feel free to fuck yourself with an oil rag. Fuckwit.
#112 - fruga (06/30/2014) [-]
OK I was making a point about disagreeing with your priorities you are the one to just wrote a paragraph on what a stupid dipshit I am...
Saying murder has always existed is not an argument against gun control; most developed countries have much stricter gun control and much less gun violence.
I agree that you are not agreeable and that you probably think you are not wrong but stating it as a fact does not make it one.
User avatar #116 - vortisred (06/30/2014) [-]
Less gun violence, more violent other forms of murder, and that's not wrong. Stating something as fact does not make it fact, but stating fact is no different. And P.S. I did write about how you were a dipshit, but I don't like playing games, you still play the, "How little you know" card. Always it's "Your scenario" this, "Your refusal" that, a condescending tone. I say, so it is mine. If I am right, it is all of ours. I had a paragraph to say, and if you have more, don't hold back. I know I won't. As for now, I have a whole night I shouldn't waste arguing with you.
#120 - fruga (06/30/2014) [-]
That is completely wrong the level of violent crimes in European countries is considerably lower than it is in America, lack of guns doesn't equal increase in other crimes.
'Stating something as fact does not make it fact, but stating fact is no different' I have absolutely no idea what you are saying here.
Not sure what games specifically you are referring to here either...
I don't believe I once said 'how little you know'. Yes I said 'your scenario' ...because I was talking about the scenario you put forward and explaining where I disagree.
#117 - Womens Study Major (06/30/2014) [-]
Actually lower homicide rates are included, not just gun crimes, go to wikipedia if you care
User avatar #210 - vortisred (06/30/2014) [-]
Shame on you, weren't you ever taught that Wikipedia is not a credible source to cite from?
User avatar #106 - mrnpc (06/30/2014) [-]
If their goal is anything less than annihilation, they'd fail. There'd be too many people with too many guns. air superiority doesn't mean shit if your people on the ground can't advance Plus, I wouldn't put it past America to employ a scorched earth policy.

Also, guns aren't the problem, its the people who have them that are the problem. A gun can't shoot someone if the trigger isn't pulled.
#118 - Womens Study Major (06/30/2014) [-]
Surely you don't think it helps though do you? I can't go buy an abrams tank or a rocket propelled grenade because that makes it obscenely easier.
#100 - 1) I didn't know that, although was there any actual support t…  [+] (7 new replies) 06/30/2014 on (untitled) 0
#207 - Womens Study Major (06/30/2014) [-]
Oh we didn't even really reduce the drug trade. We made it worse. We made it something for the mobs and gangs to make money off of.
#123 - legomant (06/30/2014) [-]
Also;
1) While at the time they did not stand a chance at succeeding, it shows the true mindset of these politicians and their end goal.
2) You also need people willing to enforce the laws. Look at Colorado where a large part of the population, including most of the state sheriffs, are opposed to the gun control laws passed recently. The sheriffs have refused to enforce the laws which remove a large part of the governments ability to actually enforce these ill fated laws.
3) Does it matter whether or not the criminal was armed? A criminal being armed does not denote whether or not they are dangerous based solely on that fact alone. What is important is that an armed citizen stopped a crime and potentially saved the loss of life and limb. I also fail to see how one million defensive gun uses constitutes a "small percentage of crimes" being prevented.
#146 - fruga (06/30/2014) [-]
Of course it matters if the criminal was armed or not and what the crime was; vandalism for example is a crime if someone stopped a vandal with a gun that didn't save lives. 'Crime' isn't limited to violent attacks so 1 million violent crimes may be a lot but all you said was 1 million crimes which is a small percentage.
#319 - legomant (06/30/2014) [-]
Vandalism however wouldn't be counted as a legal defensive gun use in the US, unless it is occurring on your property, at which point the laws vary from state to state. The majority of crimes stopped include things like mugging, robbery, rapes, etc. I still fail to see where a criminal being armed fits in here though if they are committing a crime such as those above.
#122 - legomant (06/30/2014) [-]
"UK and Europe in general have much stricter gun laws and much lower gun crimes rates!"

Well no shit, you remove firearms from circulation and you reduce the rate of crimes committed with that particular tool. Banning guns doesn't magically make 10,000 murders (most of which are gang related anyways) disappear, the tool just changes. So yes while the UK may have lower "gun crime rates" than the US, their overall violent crime rates are nothing to be proud of. Hell, England has degenerated to the point where stabbings are such a common occurrence that people are calling for bans on pointed knives in some ill fated attempt to end the stabbings. All of this comes about purely from emotional reactions, which is a terrible basis for creating laws in any situation, regardless of the subject.
#149 - fruga (06/30/2014) [-]
No it doesn't make those 10,000 murders magically disappear it does make them more difficult though; it is much easier to run away from a knife than a gun and very difficult to do a drive by stabbing. UK overall violent crime rates may not be excellent but they are better than US ones. For example in 2010 US had 4.8 murders per 100,000 compared to UK's 1.2.
I agree laws shouldn't be based purely on emotions but they should take them into account and in some cases be somewhat informed by emotions.
#330 - legomant (06/30/2014) [-]
My main problem is why focus on one tool that is used in an incredible minority of murders. A lot of these politicians pursuing gun control see it as a way to show that they are "doing something" rather than actually addressing the real issues behind "gun violence", which is nearly entirely gang related. The measures that these people propose such as universal background checks which the peddle with bullshit statistics and assault weapons bans which would do nothing to reduce gun violence, and actually failed to do anything over a ten year period on the federal level. The fact that a study done by the Center for Disease Control sponsored by the Obama administration stating that the gun control proposals that have been flying everywhere would have little to no impact on violent crime as a whole should tell an individual that these proposals are little more than feel good measures which do anything but actually address the root of the problem.
#99 - So in your scenario are the invaders committing genocide again…  [+] (10 new replies) 06/30/2014 on (untitled) -1
User avatar #102 - vortisred (06/30/2014) [-]
Mild inconvenience and dying is better than laying down and dying. Certainly asking for miracle shots are extremely stupid, but just as stupid as waiting for help that may or may not come. Believing that you have lost invites failure. And when did I brag about being a good shot, or even owned a gun? I never said that invasion of America would also be a genocide, but it can be inferred. Overcoming the military and crippling our economy can be done outside the U.S., if they want purely American lives, then the ideal strategy would be to invade.
#105 - fruga (06/30/2014) [-]
But that doesn't change the fact that you are refusing to combat real crimes to ensure you go down fighting in a hypothetical invasion.
OK not you but do you really think there is anyone capable of making those shots?
Invasion is not automatically genocidal they may be seeking to occupy or just take resources. Also the invasion may not even be an invasion it could be a military coup!
User avatar #109 - vortisred (06/30/2014) [-]
I like how you're attacking my integrity instead of my argument. This thread was about hypothetical invasion, as far as I was concerned, and the "real crimes" you are referring to are the availability heuristic that is shown on T.V. to make people feel sympathetic. Here's the truth, also answering your earlier questions, I am not refusing to combat real crimes in exchange for what-ifs, as the real problems you addressed are saving innocent lives in a 80 to 3 ratio. Sad that 3 die, but it is true, and criminals can kill without guns, murder has always existed. No one is capable of impossible shots, but impossible shots will not exist for an entire invasion for every man, and military coups are even more so a reason to keep guns, do you think a government will control it's citizens without one. If you think guns are just for killing, fine, believe it. But guns will never be un-invented, and not everyone will give up their guns. I have never called anyone on the internet a fuckwit, but someone who is not reasonable, sets personally set and emotionally bullshit boundaries, someone with a give up mentality, the person who'd rather be a flat stone instead of a round one. Some dipshit who discredits his adversary instead of challenging as an equal, and can't even stay on the right topic. Be logical, and realize this is a direct fuck you, instead of this pansy ass play around the bush. I may not be agreeable, but I am not wrong, and as soon as your childhood-mechanics world where armies can suffer no losses against citizens whatsoever, where guns create evil, and everyone is always willing to obey laws is recognized as stupid, feel free to fuck yourself with an oil rag. Fuckwit.
#112 - fruga (06/30/2014) [-]
OK I was making a point about disagreeing with your priorities you are the one to just wrote a paragraph on what a stupid dipshit I am...
Saying murder has always existed is not an argument against gun control; most developed countries have much stricter gun control and much less gun violence.
I agree that you are not agreeable and that you probably think you are not wrong but stating it as a fact does not make it one.
User avatar #116 - vortisred (06/30/2014) [-]
Less gun violence, more violent other forms of murder, and that's not wrong. Stating something as fact does not make it fact, but stating fact is no different. And P.S. I did write about how you were a dipshit, but I don't like playing games, you still play the, "How little you know" card. Always it's "Your scenario" this, "Your refusal" that, a condescending tone. I say, so it is mine. If I am right, it is all of ours. I had a paragraph to say, and if you have more, don't hold back. I know I won't. As for now, I have a whole night I shouldn't waste arguing with you.
#120 - fruga (06/30/2014) [-]
That is completely wrong the level of violent crimes in European countries is considerably lower than it is in America, lack of guns doesn't equal increase in other crimes.
'Stating something as fact does not make it fact, but stating fact is no different' I have absolutely no idea what you are saying here.
Not sure what games specifically you are referring to here either...
I don't believe I once said 'how little you know'. Yes I said 'your scenario' ...because I was talking about the scenario you put forward and explaining where I disagree.
#117 - Womens Study Major (06/30/2014) [-]
Actually lower homicide rates are included, not just gun crimes, go to wikipedia if you care
User avatar #210 - vortisred (06/30/2014) [-]
Shame on you, weren't you ever taught that Wikipedia is not a credible source to cite from?
User avatar #106 - mrnpc (06/30/2014) [-]
If their goal is anything less than annihilation, they'd fail. There'd be too many people with too many guns. air superiority doesn't mean shit if your people on the ground can't advance Plus, I wouldn't put it past America to employ a scorched earth policy.

Also, guns aren't the problem, its the people who have them that are the problem. A gun can't shoot someone if the trigger isn't pulled.
#118 - Womens Study Major (06/30/2014) [-]
Surely you don't think it helps though do you? I can't go buy an abrams tank or a rocket propelled grenade because that makes it obscenely easier.
[ 72 Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2200

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#60 - daerkxp (06/30/2013) [-]
Hey, I got your message.(x I just thought I'd give you another for the hell of it.
#61 to #60 - fruga (07/01/2013) [-]
Thanks You are cute ;)
How old are you?
#62 to #61 - daerkxp (07/01/2013) [-]
19 in November (;
#63 to #62 - fruga (07/13/2013) [-]
Huh I would have guessed slightly older based on the first one I saw;)
You look like you are in pretty good shape in this one...
User avatar #52 - paradox (06/13/2013) [-]
want more pix?
#53 to #52 - fruga (06/13/2013) [-]
Of course!!
User avatar #54 to #53 - paradox (06/13/2013) [-]
i will have them posted in the next hour.
#55 to #54 - fruga (06/13/2013) [-]
Looking forward to it, sexy;)
#56 to #55 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#57 to #56 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#58 to #57 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#59 to #58 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #38 - paradox (04/16/2013) [-]
would you like more pix?
#39 to #38 - fruga (04/16/2013) [-]
Yes please!! :)
User avatar #40 to #39 - paradox (04/16/2013) [-]
i should have some posted in the next hour
#41 to #40 - fruga (04/16/2013) [-]
Awesome!!! Looking forward to it ;)
User avatar #42 to #41 - paradox (04/16/2013) [-]
so do you have any request before i get started?
#43 to #42 - fruga (04/16/2013) [-]
Would love to see full nudes, but whatever you want to share will be great.
User avatar #44 to #43 - paradox (04/16/2013) [-]
im sorry but i dont do nudes somethings just need to be seen in person ;)
#45 to #44 - fruga (04/16/2013) [-]
wish I could see it in person.......one day.......
#46 to #45 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#50 to #46 - fruga (04/16/2013) [-]
Very Sexy!!!
(No I've not)
#47 to #46 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#48 to #47 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#49 to #48 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#51 to #49 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #32 - paradox (01/25/2013) [-]
Hey there sexy.
#33 to #32 - fruga (01/25/2013) [-]
Hey back :)
What's up?

my email is flibbler@yahoo.co.uk
#37 to #33 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#36 to #33 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#35 to #33 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#21 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#34 to #21 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#64 to #34 - Womens Study Major (02/02/2014) [-]
#25 to #21 - fruga (11/21/2012) [-]
DAMN!!! That is a hot ass :D
Wish I was there so I could give it a spank ;)
Any pics of your cock and balls?
User avatar #26 to #25 - paradox (11/21/2012) [-]
im sorry friend but thats actually where i will have to draw the line. i gave up my life of stripping when i became a father.
#27 to #26 - fruga (11/21/2012) [-]
Aww, nevermind then, what you have already posted is amazing anyway!! (though i certainly wouldnt object to any more ass shots you want to share ;))
Really, you're a dad?
Huh, guess i probably shouldn't hunt you down and have my way with you then, lol
User avatar #28 to #27 - paradox (11/21/2012) [-]
have fun. my adress is 162 east 10st fond du lac, wisconsin. my bedroom is on the 2nd floor right above the front porch. come & get me.
#29 to #28 - fruga (11/21/2012) [-]
Damn, you horrible tease!!!
Though I may be studying in the us next year so.....you might be woken up unexpectedly ;)
User avatar #30 to #29 - paradox (11/21/2012) [-]
its not teasin its an offer.
#31 to #30 - fruga (11/22/2012) [-]
That just makes it meaner, you're soooo far away :(
Though it does give me more reason to go to america....
#24 to #23 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #20 - paradox (11/19/2012) [-]
the next time your online send me an email & ill be online with in the next 45 mins to send you some sexy pix. dont be afraid to ask for any requests from me.

4147504091@ You need to login to view this link
#19 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#7 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#8 to #7 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#9 to #8 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#10 to #9 - fruga (10/18/2012) [-]
OH MY GOD YOU ARE SOOO HOT!!!!!
I wish I could lick you all over!!!!

and with that body you are, of course, totally forgiven:)
User avatar #11 to #10 - paradox (10/19/2012) [-]
thank you :3
#12 to #11 - fruga (10/19/2012) [-]
you are very welcome :)

don't suppose you could post some more?
would love to see your ass!!
User avatar #13 to #12 - paradox (10/19/2012) [-]
do you mean my literal ass or you like to see more pix of me??
#14 to #13 - fruga (10/19/2012) [-]
hmm, both;)
#16 to #14 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
#18 to #17 - fruga (10/19/2012) [-]
.........that is HOT!!!! Please show more;)
#15 to #14 - paradox has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #1 - paradox (09/14/2012) [-]
im sorry but my accout is ****** up so i cant read pm's. what did that message you sent me say??
#2 to #1 - fruga (09/14/2012) [-]
Hey just figured you would probably not be online again till after yuor pic was off the gay board, so thought i would tell you what I think:)
10/10, for sure!!!! Sooo hot!!!
Please post more:)
User avatar #4 to #2 - paradox (09/14/2012) [-]
where do you want me to post them?
#5 to #4 - fruga (09/14/2012) [-]
gay board would be fine;)
Btw how old are you?
User avatar #6 to #5 - paradox (09/14/2012) [-]
19
User avatar #3 to #2 - paradox (09/14/2012) [-]
i can do that.
 Friends (0)