it's a % chance increase, not a guarantee.

"The core concept of capitalism is that every individual should be free to pursue wealth as they see fit and keep the fruits of their labor. More critically, if you want something from society, you have to give something back in return."

That's been the principle of every post-feudal economic ideology, not just capitalism, which is defined by capital and growth through surplus value.

Currently 59-60 out of every 100 is the rate, lowest in decades.

Taking the unemployment rate without factoring in labor force participation is pointless, that's the idea behind my exaggerated example. No government uses labor force participation as a factor in their "unemployment rate". Realistically about 55% of people who can work actually do so. Also USGOV says unemployment is 5.1% currently.

Lol. How does that kool-aid taste?

100 people in a country. 50 are too young or too old or infirm for work.
of the remaining 50, 2 have jobs. The rest to not, and are not looking.

According to the interpretation used by politicians- 0% unemployment rate.

2 have jobs, one looking- 33% unemployment rate.

It doesn't refer to people without jobs, it only refers to people looking for jobs. Also, if you have had a job in the last 6 months you are called employed even if you lost the job.

The ideal unemployment rate for a healthy economy is around 3 to 5 percent, this accounts for children, retirees, normal layoff rates, and people changing careers. The current unemployment rate sits somewhere between 10 and 14 percent, depending on how you choose to crunch the numbers (it has been going down though, so that is good). A higher unemployment rate is generally a sign that there are less jobs available or a lack of proper information exchange between employers and job seekers. You also have to factor in the underemployed and people who have stopped looking for work.

Also your example is a bit skewed. The proportion of people working is much higher than 2 out of every 100, the economy wouldn't survive if so few people were doing the lions share of the work (That's part of the reason the Roman Empire fell).

Currently 59-60 out of every 100 is the rate, lowest in decades.

Taking the unemployment rate without factoring in labor force participation is pointless, that's the idea behind my exaggerated example. No government uses labor force participation as a factor in their "unemployment rate". Realistically about 55% of people who can work actually do so. Also USGOV says unemployment is 5.1% currently.

Because all pro-lifers are radical right?
Christians too right?
It's all crazy Christians.

Get fucked, do some actual research.

like 9 out of thr 10 largest charities are Christian. this idea that christians only care about the baby in the womb and then abandon the mother is just bogus and i have no idea how it started

Perhaps I should have been clearer. I don't mean to say that all Christians are like this, not by a long shot. I was just commenting on the hypocritical nature of 'Christians' who are quick to judge and condemn but slow to show compassion and forgiveness where it is needed most.

Because all pro-lifers are radical right?
Christians too right?
It's all crazy Christians.

Get fucked, do some actual research.