|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #8671 on CommentsLevel 233 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
OfflineSend mail to freddyhollensen Block freddyhollensen Invite freddyhollensen to be your friend flag avatar
latest user's comments
|#22 - I don't get this, is this an add for some fruit? Wher… [+] (3 new replies)||02/08/2014 on Magic Fruit||0|
#52 - broorb (02/08/2014) [-]
"worst" is not a buzzword to be used in a small, online advert of 8 words or less, in order to advertise beneficial foods, really.
For example, www.webmd.boots.com/diet/best-worst-foods-belly-fat-rm-quiz
|#8 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||02/01/2014 on painting a wall||+23|
|#51 - Comment deleted||01/28/2014 on Bubbles||0|
|#131 - Shouldn't there be a downside to this?||01/21/2014 on I would||0|
|#91 - But you're pretty smart for not having an opinion though. … [+] (5 new replies)||01/21/2014 on God||0|
#103 - drainbramage (01/21/2014) [-]
#106 - ruebezahl (01/21/2014) [-]
So this is like Schroedinger's cat? You can have an opinion, but it only becomes stupid when you reveal it?
I'm an atheist, and I have had many discussions on religion, and not once have I tried to "prove" that there is no god, seeing how that is an impossibility. And I have very rarely seen any atheist who tried to do that. So that kinda invalidates at least 50% of your statement.
And I also wonder: If I meet an adult who believes in Santa Claus and who thinks that every Christmas, all the presents he gets were actually built by Santa's elves and delivered by Santa Claus, and if I point out to him that in my opinion, this belief is pretty stupid (even if I can't prove Santa's non-existence), how exactly does that make me come off as moronic?
#136 - drainbramage (01/21/2014) [-]
Perhaps I should have taken more care with my wording, but people are very set in their ways about beliefs, so you usually look stupid to those who are observing. That's all I really meant. And talking about a group never applies to the entire group, but is just a general statement, if it doesn't apply to you, you don't have to take it seriously.
|#6 - Didn't muhammed like, marry an 11 year old girl? Apologies… [+] (3 new replies)||01/16/2014 on a beautiful religion||+2|
#16 - kurtr (01/17/2014) [-]
Im too damn tired to write and write it again, so i'm gonna copy/paste it...
At first, marrying with multiple womans was allowed because womans needed protection, since it was already hard for a man to live in a desert at 650s, a woman alone had very hard time living alone.
Now its just an excuse for getting more pussy.
BTW OP is a faggot second to phanact and content is complete bullshit.
deleted the first post due to numerous grammar errors
|#196 - Comment deleted||01/16/2014 on Jinx cosplay||0|
|#2 - Comment deleted||01/15/2014 on HOLY FUCK||0|
|#22 - Young(er) earther... ******* really? T… [+] (14 new replies)||01/13/2014 on Flanders at the museum||+4|
#43 - sanguinesolitude (01/13/2014) [-]
young earth creationists believe the earth is between 5 and 10 thousand years old depending on the math used. "how on earth would they arrive at that number", you might ask. Why obviously they just add up the ages of everyone chronoligically listed in the bible.
"Boy that sounds retarded" you might scoff, "dont we have clear evidence of more than 10,000 years of human history, let alone dinosaurs, geology, radiocarbon dating, canyons carved by rivers, etc. I mean how could you even begin to be so monumentally stupid as to believe that," to which a young earther would respond "have fun burning in hell heretic. The bible is the absolute word of God, and anything that it says is true, provided it fits the narrative we like."
#66 - chimpaflimp (01/13/2014) [-]
Are...are you telling the truth or just bullshitting? Because I have seen you comment on here a lot before, and you seemed like a pretty smart guy. But if you ACTUALLY believe in that load of trollop, well, let's just say that my opinion of you will be a tad bit skewed.
#195 - douthit (01/14/2014) [-]
As far as my political comments, don't trust my opinion, only what I can logically prove. My political opinions are what they are because I heard others discussing politics and found their points to be logical, consistent, and universal. But in religious matters, there is no proof because it's faith. It's about how you were raised and what you believe, not what you can prove to yourself.
#221 - sanguinesolitude (01/15/2014) [-]
Scientologists are batshit crazy and nobody even takes them seriously, that said they are definitely worthy of being mocked and ridiculed.
Thor worshipers are basically extinct, but nobody takes them seriously either because they keep to themselves.
Young Earth creationists are quite common and extremely problematic for modern society. Scientologists arent trying to push their bullshit Xenu theory into public schools, Creationists are. Thor worshipers aren't trying to ban abortions because of some book, creationists are. None of the other groups you mentioned is currently pushing it's demonstrably false beliefs on children. I mean creationists are so fucked up that they homeschool their kids, teaching them absolute bullshit that even the catholic church has backed away from. This is tantamount to child abuse. I mean would it not be cruel to not teach your children basic history, or how to do math? Of course it would be, so why is holding back the past few thousand years of science from them? I mean sure if the biblical claims weren't demonstrably false you could hold to your retarded views, but they are.
If it were a personalized belief I could accept it and let it be, though not respect it since willfully holding a position of ignorance is never worthy of respect. But the creationist agenda is to push their beliefs onto others, making people dismiss scientific achievements, and providing a mindless and empty version of faith. And it isnt like you guys even follow everything in the bible literally, which is the most frustrating part. You still pick and choose the shit you like. For example, you probably don't hold to old testament law, keeping saturday sabbath, not wearing mixed cloth, bathing in prescribed ways, etc. despite Matthew 5:17-18. You also probably don't believe the earth is flat (please for the love of god tell me you arent a flat earth creationist too,) despite the fact the bible says it is. It's the hypocrisy that really gets my goat.
#222 - douthit (01/15/2014) [-]
You mentioned forcing beliefs on others via public schools and other public policy, but this assumes all creationists are statists. I think it's immoral to initiate violence, including endorsing such violence on others through the government. There are atheist and other non-creationist statists, just as there are creationist anarchists as well as atheist anarchists. These are two separate issues.
|#54 - how does this work exactly.||01/11/2014 on 4chan and unsecured cams||+1|
|#14 - Picture [+] (2 new replies)||01/08/2014 on Horrible Tattoo Compilation...||-7|
|#13 - Picture||01/08/2014 on Horrible Tattoo Compilation...||+17|
|#12 - Picture||01/08/2014 on Horrible Tattoo Compilation...||+2|
|#11 - Picture [+] (4 new replies)||01/08/2014 on Horrible Tattoo Compilation...||+36|
|#101 - I like Richard Dawkins. I think he's an intelligent g… [+] (1 new reply)||01/06/2014 on Theory of Revolution||+8|
#107 - yologdog (01/06/2014) [-]
Not because you didn't make sense. But because you made the reader search for their own proof instead of giving them the proof to debunk them right then and there. "If you can find him doing so, go ahead. " That can and probably will lead to a lengthy drawn out "I'm right, you're wrong" fest.
I also dislike it for this; "I'll go ahead and accuse you of being a hippocrit who can't deal with a real argument, and throws mud when you got nothing left to do." Everyone knows that he probably does, but now you opened the door for him to say that he doesn't and to be cautious about not admitting it when he would have otherwise admitted it over the course of the conversation.
Also, how is Denmark? Is it better then the USA? I'm thinking of leaving the US forever.
|#16 - Great White Release ** Shane Cox**||12/29/2013 on YT comp||0|
|#6 - Come on Funnyjunk, where is the dota community at, can't… [+] (10 new replies)||12/29/2013 on Memorable Gaming Quotes Comp 4||+5|
#213 - spankyy (12/30/2013) [-]
I play League primarily, but have played DOTA2 and I agree that LoL is definitely more casual. DOTA2 is geared towards competition. There's so many little things that make it harder than LoL. So much more to master. I played HoN before LoL and I thought LoL was easier. DOTA2 is even harder than HoN. The fact that mana bars aren't visible without clicking them is enough alone to make the game way harder. Let alone all the little mechanics in play (Denying, loss of gold on death, towers aren't as safe, and I understand "Bat Rider" has a mechanic that screws the turn radius on your hero?). It's an insane game and I play it occasionally, but I still prefer league because it's more casual. Easier to do well, and have fun than when I have a Faceless Void laning with me (who i'm trying to support) and he dies 3 times in the first 8 minutes despite the fact he has an escape mechanism. I WAS playing slardar (I think, pestilence is his HoN equivalent), but he still had no excuse to die so many times.
|#31 - At least twice, wasn't that bad actually. [+] (2 new replies)||12/29/2013 on Jamie Hyneman||+8|
#47 - 4chan refugee (12/29/2013) [-]
what . the . fuck,
|#369 - Not if they found something sinister inside the first. [+] (2 new replies)||12/29/2013 on Found on Imgur||+1|
|#1 - Comment deleted||12/27/2013 on Driving||0|
|#5 - Dad thought this through, learn to take a hint.||12/27/2013 on Title||+139|
|#51 - Comment deleted||12/27/2013 on Hypocrisy||+11|
|#22 - Anyone got a good quality link for the last episode? [+] (4 new replies)||12/26/2013 on That explains Everything||0|
|#9 - Picture||12/26/2013 on Epona||+1|
|#73 - Plot twist, OP just wrote random stuff, all happened to be correct.||12/26/2013 on Plot Twist||+4|