| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
frankiethekneeman
| Rank #19829 on Comments Offline Send mail to frankiethekneeman Block frankiethekneeman Invite frankiethekneeman to be your friend |
|
- Views: 771
12
3
Total: +9
Comments: 1
Favorites: 1
Uploaded: 09/07/11
Original Rage - Views: 817
21
3
Total: +18
Comments: 0
Favorites: 1
Uploaded: 07/31/11
The thought process behind comps - Views: 712
20
1
Total: +19
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Uploaded: 07/31/11
Getting Ready - Views: 748
15
2
Total: +13
Comments: 0
Favorites: 1
Uploaded: 07/18/11
Grammar
Show:
Sort by:
Order:
user favorites
latest user's comments
| #14 - That... that's not weird at all. That's what alcohol does to … [+] (1 new reply) | 05/17/2013 on Hooked on beer | 0 |
| #29 - Just... not even close. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o… | 05/06/2013 on A galaxy passing by a black... | +2 |
| #93 - Picture | 05/03/2013 on Head Nudge | 0 |
| #92 - I'm guessing that's because the one who "likes" you … | 05/03/2013 on Head Nudge | 0 |
| #7 - It's less a sign of affection and more one of territory. Watc… [+] (6 new replies) | 05/02/2013 on Head Nudge | +10 |
| #63
-
N. Korean citizen (05/02/2013) [-] DOGS PEE ALL OVER THEIR OWNERS TO SAY THAT THAT OWNER IS THEIR TERRITORY. OH SHIT SON DID SOMEONE SAY TERRITORY? QUICK JESSIE WE HAVE TO COOK. True, but they know the difference between furniture and people, and so when rubbing against us, it is a sign of affection and trust. For example, I have one cat who adores me and one that doesn't like me. The adoring one marks me all the time, and will bounce up just to do it, but my other cat won't. #92
-
frankiethekneeman (05/03/2013) [-] I'm guessing that's because the one who "likes" you is the dominant animal. Only one animal can own territory, and it makes sense that the other one avoids you if you're the territory of the dominant animal. I had five cats growing up - three male and two female. You learn a lot. Nah, it means they love you. They only rub their heads against furniture to scratch the top of their head, which they can't reach with their back feet. My cat rubs her head against my hair somethings and then licks my hair clean because she sees me as someone she cares for. #51
-
N. Korean citizen (05/02/2013) [-] Or she is trying if she can eventually eat you after you die. | ||
| #25 - Virtually no employer in the restaurant space actually does th… | 04/30/2013 on papa john | 0 |
| #24 - Sure, but it's a question of the categorical imperative. I us… [+] (3 new replies) | 04/30/2013 on papa john | +1 |
| I am not obligated to tip. They make just as much or more than everyone else. I will tip and I normally do but, to say I'm obligated to just isn't true. I wouldn't ever pay a contractor for anything like that for that fact that's what I do myself. Also, that's not even close to the same thing comparing the two jobs like that is pretty retarded. Contractors (unless part of a company or in carpentry union ) only make money off the jobs they do unlike drivers and waiters that sill get payed minimum wage. A lot of contractors do charge an hourly fee but most won't even touch a job until the first payment is made. And people always try to get out of paying for shit like that why you have to have them sings a contract. I think he means that you pay for materials AND labor, not just materials. When you take food to go, you pay for the food and the time spent preparing it. When you are served, you pay for the food, the time spent preparing it, and the time spent waiting on you. That's the whole point of the reason I said you have them sign a contract. They first pay for materials then when you are done because of the contract they legally have to pay you. I don't legally have to tip someone. Like I've said a million fucking times. I have no issues with tipping people I don't remember the last time I didn't tip a waiter or driver. I appreciate the fact that there are jobs out there like that that keep my lazy ass from having to go pick up my own food someways. The fact that people seem to think tipping is mandatory is fucking dumb and if it was I wouldn't ever order out again. They are already getting payed to do the job I tip them for doing the job well. | ||
| #14 - You live in Pittsburgh, where the minimum wage for tipped empl… [+] (13 new replies) | 04/30/2013 on papa john | +1 |
| Also, if anyone actually looks at the laws. If you are getting payed the 2.83$ if you take all the hours you worked pulse the tips if at the end of the month you made less than someone who worked the same hours as you and gets payed 7.25$ the employer has to make up the difference. So even if you make no money on tips at all you still get payed the same just a bigger check at the end of the month. #25
-
frankiethekneeman (04/30/2013) [-] Virtually no employer in the restaurant space actually does that. It's too hard to prove, and it encourages employees to under-report their tips (which many of them do anyway, to get away from paying taxes on it). Even if they do, you might get that for one or two paychecks, but thereafter you're in danger of being let go. The minimum wage might be lower for them but most of them make 7.25$ an hour or more got a few friends that are waiters make 10.50$ an hour some delivery drivers make 9$ an hour . Most waiters and drives around here make more than most other people. As for the vehicle thing most pizza place( they are the only ones I really know about) give a certain amount of money for ever order to pay for gas and vehicle maintenance. Waiters and drives are not as bad off as everyone likes to make it seem like they are. #24
-
frankiethekneeman (04/30/2013) [-] Sure, but it's a question of the categorical imperative. I used to have nights where I made $20/hour - but I was good at my job and those were busy nights. And besides, that money is made off of tips. It's made off of people knowing they're obligated to tip. Making the argument "I don't have to tip because other people will tip for me" is fallacious. You received a service, and you should pay for it. You shouldn't order delivery if you can't pay the driver. You shouldn't go to a restaurant if you can't pay a waiter. You'd never think of getting a contractor to put in the kitchen cabinets you bought, then saying "Sorry, I could only afford the cabinets. Other people pay you, though, right?" I am not obligated to tip. They make just as much or more than everyone else. I will tip and I normally do but, to say I'm obligated to just isn't true. I wouldn't ever pay a contractor for anything like that for that fact that's what I do myself. Also, that's not even close to the same thing comparing the two jobs like that is pretty retarded. Contractors (unless part of a company or in carpentry union ) only make money off the jobs they do unlike drivers and waiters that sill get payed minimum wage. A lot of contractors do charge an hourly fee but most won't even touch a job until the first payment is made. And people always try to get out of paying for shit like that why you have to have them sings a contract. I think he means that you pay for materials AND labor, not just materials. When you take food to go, you pay for the food and the time spent preparing it. When you are served, you pay for the food, the time spent preparing it, and the time spent waiting on you. That's the whole point of the reason I said you have them sign a contract. They first pay for materials then when you are done because of the contract they legally have to pay you. I don't legally have to tip someone. Like I've said a million fucking times. I have no issues with tipping people I don't remember the last time I didn't tip a waiter or driver. I appreciate the fact that there are jobs out there like that that keep my lazy ass from having to go pick up my own food someways. The fact that people seem to think tipping is mandatory is fucking dumb and if it was I wouldn't ever order out again. They are already getting payed to do the job I tip them for doing the job well. If you order from Dominoes, you get charged something like a $2 delivery fee. It also says, "Delivery fee is not a tip." And it's not. My old roommate used to work there and he did not get those $2. And if he didn't get tips, he couldn't put gas in his car and without gas he couldn't work. On the other hand, I've worked at a country club, making $1.25/hour above minimum wage plus a guaranteed 20% tip. It really depends where you work. He should get them $2 That's the whole point of a delivery fee. He provably did get them in his checks they don't' just give you the $2 and if he wasn't he really should like tell someone that cause then his is probably owed quite a lot of back pay. Pizza hut,little nippers, Aprimo Pizza, Aiello's Pizza. Those are all the places I know people that are delivery drives around here. Everyone of them gets payed more than $7.25 and everyone of them gets the money form the delivery charge pules the tips. the drives make more money then pretty much anyone else other than the owners and managers. No, the company charges the delivery fee to offset having to pay the drivers their hourly wage. So, yes, it does show up in their paycheck. As their normal wage. And when I worked at Jerry's Subs and Pizza as a delivery driver, I was paid minimum wage. But without tips, I had to pay for all the extra gas and car maintenance out of what little I made. Well then you worked for some shitty places cause that ain't how it is here. Thumbed you up to break even. You shouldn't be down-thumbed for your opinion, even if I don't agree with it. | ||
| #160 - I was in initially wrong, that's true. But so were you. The … | 04/12/2013 on My penis | 0 |
| #157 - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollow_Earth#Gravity Wikipedi… [+] (2 new replies) | 04/12/2013 on My penis | 0 |
| #158
-
wadofwade (04/12/2013) [-] You have come to a classic contradiction, haven't you? Initially, you said an object would decelerate, suggesting a net gravitational force, now you incorrectly call on theories that assume a HOLLOW Earth, which is not being debated, which states that there would be NO net gravity inside and disproves your previous incorrect statement. The information in your sources is correct, you just don't know how to apply it. For instance, "A corollary is that inside a solid sphere of constant density the gravitational force varies linearly with distance from the centre." (A difference in alloy densities, like the irrelevant point you made, would only allow for a negligible variation in acceleration.) I don't care much to continue giving you a free education, so take this as you like. Good bye. #160
-
frankiethekneeman (04/12/2013) [-] I was in initially wrong, that's true. But so were you. The rest of the sentence you quoted was "becoming zero by symmetry at the centre of mass." - which is the opposite of what you said in your initial post. The acceleration due to gravity half way to the center of the earth would thus be half of the acceleration on the surface (4.9m/s^2), and not related by the inverse square law. Through reasoned debate and a little research, we've both been proven wrong and come to a more correct place of understanding. Don't turn your nose up at that, it makes you seem petty and small. | ||
user's friends
funnyjunk.com/channel/ponytime/Party+Time/rqbNGed/ I figured this would be a better way to send it.


OC Joke