Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

fragman    

Rank #3505 on Content
no avatar Level 295 Comments: Post Master
Online
Send mail to fragman Block fragman Invite fragman to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:10/03/2010
Last Login:7/22/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#3505
Comment Ranking:#5173
Highest Content Rank:#1376
Highest Comment Rank:#583
Content Thumbs: 10391 total,  13547 ,  3156
Comment Thumbs: 9951 total,  12143 ,  2192
Content Level Progress: 5% (5/100)
Level 200 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 201 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 7% (7/100)
Level 295 Comments: Post Master → Level 296 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:19
Content Views:432034
Times Content Favorited:1438 times
Total Comments Made:2238
FJ Points:19733
Favorite Tags: it (2) | Lost (2) | the (2)

latest user's comments

#30 - Haven't scanned Lucky yet, huh? 05/31/2014 on [autism intensifies] 0
#85 - Well performance and controls are what really shows how this g… 05/30/2014 on U just went full retard 0
#84 - that's why I said open world. BF4 is not open world, you can f… 05/30/2014 on U just went full retard 0
#44 - Visually: WatchDogs graphics on medium (PC) are better than th…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/30/2014 on U just went full retard -1
User avatar #79 - dantemp (05/30/2014) [-]
I play it on absolute ultra settings without a single setting turned off. I bought my rig recently for the equivalent of $1300. It isn't that beautiful, the new BF looks way better.

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the game, but I believe the people that feel let down have every right to be.
#84 - fragman (05/30/2014) [-]
that's why I said open world. BF4 is not open world, you can focus more heavily on graphics because the world is ridiculously small in comparison. Also doesn't really include AI.
#78 - thelastelephant (05/30/2014) [-]
I always expect there to be bugs and issues that need patching, but when my computer components exceed the recommended (recommended,, not minimum) specs needed and I can't run the game on more than Medium quality, then there's a problem. You're not wrong, but Ubisoft could've done better with releasing Watch Dogs.

Also, if you run uPlay online while playing the game, your performance drops. If you play in offline mode--which I'd prefer not to because I'd like to try the Online Invasion modes but of course can't because of how much frame drop uPlay causes--the game tends to run much better. Why? Steam's overlay works flawlessly when I run games and multiplayer through it. Why can't uPlay be the same?

TL;DR Version: Being online in Watch Dogs significantly hampers your performance even on a rig that meets or exceeds the requirements, and that's bad.
#85 - fragman (05/30/2014) [-]
Well performance and controls are what really shows how this game was originally planned for console. And tbh I think this is a bad move, especially if you're going for flagship-graphics-awesomeness as they tried.

No doubt Steam is a better service than uPlay or Origin. More stable, better overlay and all. But I have to say, people completely overwank Valve. Valve is in essence a reseller that occasionally produces a good quality game (occasionally not meaning most games are bad, just that they only ever release something once in a blue moon) while raking in mad cash by selling products others made and sticking their own DRM on it. This is exactly why uPlay and Origin came to exist in the first place, because neither Ubisoft nor EA are willing to let Valve make a fuckton of money off their products. And I completely understand that.

This does not mean their solutions are at a good level yet and I'm not even saying they didn't fail hard with the golive of WatchDogs, but Steam has been around for much longer and has a higher budget for developing that platform since... well Valve doesn't seem to actually make games anymore while EA and Ubisoft keep releasing good titles with awesome concepts and some issues.
#50 - plaguehammer (05/30/2014) [-]
um i have everything on ultra and a good framerate. including shadows and water
#179 - that is exactly what I've found out in the meantime as well. n…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/29/2014 on Glorious nippon steel. I... +1
User avatar #181 - killerliquid (05/29/2014) [-]
Yea I guess.

It is what I thought before looking into it so it's more like a perspective thing
#174 - Which is exactly what happens in other languages as well and t…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/29/2014 on Glorious nippon steel. I... +2
User avatar #175 - killerliquid (05/29/2014) [-]
See, I did a little bit mroe research and the reason why words are takin' into negative offense is because of an incomplete understanding of how another's language works.

For example, gaijin isn't really negative; it's just that foreigners (mainly the Europeans who came to Japan to do some trading) believed that since they were not using the full word (gaikokujin), they thought that the Japanese were looking down on them. And so, from then on they slapped a temperance on it.
#179 - fragman (05/29/2014) [-]
that is exactly what I've found out in the meantime as well. nice going man.
so in essence the stickied one is kinda wrong.
User avatar #181 - killerliquid (05/29/2014) [-]
Yea I guess.

It is what I thought before looking into it so it's more like a perspective thing
#15 - indeed. yet not even a hint of beard. 05/29/2014 on silly chinese animango figure 0
#31 - EvaBridged is pure gold 05/29/2014 on Evangelion +2
#24 - PS3 cluster consumes 90% less power, costs 10 times less... an…  [+] (6 new replies) 05/29/2014 on Video game fact comp +70
#172 - devout feminist (06/04/2014) [-]
You have no idea what you're talking about. The usefulness of the super computer architecture depends on the task.
#153 - xnotcreative (05/30/2014) [-]
Perhaps the Air Force just wanted to use their budgets to get some free PS3s for their soldiers.
#83 - keybladewarrior (05/30/2014) [-]
I guess they wanted to leave those numbers, Uncharted.
User avatar #57 - thebaseballexpert (05/29/2014) [-]
In fairness, the post just said they developed it, not that they use it as a viable mean to process tons of data
User avatar #47 - rockamekishiko (05/29/2014) [-]
you should have told those guys at the air force
User avatar #26 - kennyh (05/29/2014) [-]
Hey look, someone who actually did their homework instead of worshiping a retarded idea.
#41 - > purchase right 05/29/2014 on Seems like a real issue +1
#15 - but what if you live in England?  [+] (4 new replies) 05/29/2014 on Life Advice +5
User avatar #28 - kanatana (05/29/2014) [-]
Then you are forever, eternally doomed to flat pillows.
#20 - zebrawaffles (05/29/2014) [-]
The sun is currently absorbing it's way through the clouds right now, please leave your pillows after the rain.
User avatar #19 - killerjhtwo (05/29/2014) [-]
I was just about to post a picture of what it looks like outside my house now....
Let me just say, it's been raining on and off for a week. The sky isn't blue, it's just cloud. No patches that sunlight seeps through, just block white/grey as far as the eye can see.
User avatar #17 - sunnyday (05/29/2014) [-]
Then I guess the sun can't "absorb" shit!
#101 - While I agree with what you're probably trying to say here... …  [+] (1 new reply) 03/13/2014 on My man +2
#104 - devout feminist (03/13/2014) [-]
Aristotle didn't define equality.
#62 - Comment deleted 03/08/2014 on (untitled) 0
#61 - Family Guy the XXX Parody, shockingly... 03/08/2014 on (untitled) 0
#131 - scishow was featured in part two which noone seemed to give ha… 03/05/2014 on LearningJunk - YouTube... 0
#39 - wtf that is about twice as much as when you have to be on the … 02/22/2014 on American health care 0
#33 - cutting down onto steel with a 32° angle blade going for >…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/22/2014 on 2muchwork wouldnt do it 0
User avatar #38 - jackmanagan (02/22/2014) [-]
i have a knife identical to that. and its from a shitty 60$ set
#69 - It doesn't make any bloody difference whether you have to run … 02/20/2014 on (untitled) 0
#67 - Yes and yet, everyone does it. Literally everyone. I do no…  [+] (2 new replies) 02/20/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #68 - soupkittenagain (02/20/2014) [-]
True, but soccer requires much more physical movement than sitting in one place for a game.
#69 - fragman (02/20/2014) [-]
It doesn't make any bloody difference whether you have to run around all day to play your game or you stand around or just sit. All you do is shifting the focus of what you're gaining from it from physical to mental.

Golf isn't much more than standing and driving around, yet it is considered a sport, not just a game. Chess would be another great example.

FPS players in general have a better reaction time, the ability to track around twice as many moving objects in their field of vision and better eyesight compared to non-players (assuming a similar baseline before they started to play). In a society where we spend countless more hours driving a car than walking around this has a much higher potential to save your life than physical fitness (not saying fitness isn't important).
#65 - The thing is, content like that is sending the wrong message. …  [+] (4 new replies) 02/20/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #66 - soupkittenagain (02/20/2014) [-]
But that's all that people think of them, which are games. It's that line of thought that people will call a movie a work of art but a video game just as something to pass the time.
#67 - fragman (02/20/2014) [-]
Yes and yet, everyone does it. Literally everyone.
I do not know a single person who doesn't play games, whatever kind it might be. And because of that it would be a great common ground to start in my opinion.

There's a good reason why we do it and there are amazing resources on that topic (e.g. Vsauce's video on "why do we play games" or pretty much everything by Jane McGonigal). I think this would be the most promising approach to change the (very weird) thought pattern stuck in many people's heads that "games are a waste of time", while in turn they drive their kids to soccer practice or whatever twice a week. Which is a fucking game!
User avatar #68 - soupkittenagain (02/20/2014) [-]
True, but soccer requires much more physical movement than sitting in one place for a game.
#69 - fragman (02/20/2014) [-]
It doesn't make any bloody difference whether you have to run around all day to play your game or you stand around or just sit. All you do is shifting the focus of what you're gaining from it from physical to mental.

Golf isn't much more than standing and driving around, yet it is considered a sport, not just a game. Chess would be another great example.

FPS players in general have a better reaction time, the ability to track around twice as many moving objects in their field of vision and better eyesight compared to non-players (assuming a similar baseline before they started to play). In a society where we spend countless more hours driving a car than walking around this has a much higher potential to save your life than physical fitness (not saying fitness isn't important).
#59 - Yeah, because as history shows, misdirected anger is always su…  [+] (1 new reply) 02/20/2014 on (untitled) 0
#60 - Zyklone (02/20/2014) [-]
You're saying blaming video games for violence is wrong?
So is the content you ming
keep your "hints" to yourself
#55 - I just think the assumption is wrong. Usually once proof e…  [+] (6 new replies) 02/20/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #56 - soupkittenagain (02/20/2014) [-]
Well the problem with this is that pretty much every news site other than video game news sites only talks about how video games are the one to blame. There is proof that it's nonsense but the people that do think video games cause all of that stuff don't frequent places that show the proof.
#65 - fragman (02/20/2014) [-]
The thing is, content like that is sending the wrong message.
Instead of focusing on "video games", it would be much easier to actually convince people to open their minds a bit if we were to generalize games as a concept. But instead we are jerking around a specific detailed technological piece. This is stupid because how do you get someone who doesn't understand video games to even properly listen in the first place? Pick them up at a concept they are familiar with: games. The human nature of creating unnecessary obstacles. And move along from there.
User avatar #66 - soupkittenagain (02/20/2014) [-]
But that's all that people think of them, which are games. It's that line of thought that people will call a movie a work of art but a video game just as something to pass the time.
#67 - fragman (02/20/2014) [-]
Yes and yet, everyone does it. Literally everyone.
I do not know a single person who doesn't play games, whatever kind it might be. And because of that it would be a great common ground to start in my opinion.

There's a good reason why we do it and there are amazing resources on that topic (e.g. Vsauce's video on "why do we play games" or pretty much everything by Jane McGonigal). I think this would be the most promising approach to change the (very weird) thought pattern stuck in many people's heads that "games are a waste of time", while in turn they drive their kids to soccer practice or whatever twice a week. Which is a fucking game!
User avatar #68 - soupkittenagain (02/20/2014) [-]
True, but soccer requires much more physical movement than sitting in one place for a game.
#69 - fragman (02/20/2014) [-]
It doesn't make any bloody difference whether you have to run around all day to play your game or you stand around or just sit. All you do is shifting the focus of what you're gaining from it from physical to mental.

Golf isn't much more than standing and driving around, yet it is considered a sport, not just a game. Chess would be another great example.

FPS players in general have a better reaction time, the ability to track around twice as many moving objects in their field of vision and better eyesight compared to non-players (assuming a similar baseline before they started to play). In a society where we spend countless more hours driving a car than walking around this has a much higher potential to save your life than physical fitness (not saying fitness isn't important).
#37 - that is a pretty retarded argument... It will not kill you…  [+] (4 new replies) 02/20/2014 on snoopy_snoops.gif +3
User avatar #105 - Faz (02/20/2014) [-]
Literally everything in the world is bad for you if you over use it, drink too much water and your brain swells and you die, eat too much fruit and you will kill your kidneys, do too much exercise and you die of exhaustion. The actual good thing about weed is that it will make you pass out before you could ever get to a lethal amount.
#198 - padorak (02/21/2014) [-]
Everything is good in moderation, especially murder oh wt
User avatar #199 - Faz (02/21/2014) [-]
Because substances and actions are the same thing right? Fucking moron.
#200 - padorak (02/21/2014) [-]
"The action of smoking weed."
I could eat a whole bucket of chicken and it would be bad for me. Or...I could just eat a leg some green beans and a bottle of water( I don't but that's not the point, it's usually like 2 thighs and a whole cup of green beans and three bottles of water).
When speaking in moderation substances and actions are the same thing, it's a matter of choice and morality.

You are also defending a fucking plant, but whatever. I guess I'm the moron here. I have to be wrong and you won't stop replying to you feel like you won today's internet argument, over this cluster fuck of a comment section.
#47 - Could we please stop with the ******** ? All r…  [+] (11 new replies) 02/20/2014 on (untitled) 0
User avatar #57 - Zyklone (02/20/2014) [-]
you dont understand WHY a mother gets mad. its because of her children spout obscenities and enjoy violence. it has nothing to do with everyone TALKING about it
#59 - fragman (02/20/2014) [-]
Yeah, because as history shows, misdirected anger is always such a great idea.
Hint: Some people once believed the poor state of their country was all the jews' fault. That turned out well.

It doesn't matter why someone gets mad, blindly assigning blame without considering that observable facts completely oppose that theory is fucking stupid.
#60 - Zyklone (02/20/2014) [-]
You're saying blaming video games for violence is wrong?
So is the content you ming
keep your "hints" to yourself
User avatar #54 - soupkittenagain (02/20/2014) [-]
I really don't think us shutting up about it would do anything. They are just going to keeping circlejerking so much that soon everyone will think video games are wrong. Then video games will go through a period of time like movies did where everything is censored as fuck.
#55 - fragman (02/20/2014) [-]
I just think the assumption is wrong.
Usually once proof exists that something that has been claimed for years is nonsense, most people will stop believing that shit. Nutjobs will continue to exist, but you can't fix that anyway.
User avatar #56 - soupkittenagain (02/20/2014) [-]
Well the problem with this is that pretty much every news site other than video game news sites only talks about how video games are the one to blame. There is proof that it's nonsense but the people that do think video games cause all of that stuff don't frequent places that show the proof.
#65 - fragman (02/20/2014) [-]
The thing is, content like that is sending the wrong message.
Instead of focusing on "video games", it would be much easier to actually convince people to open their minds a bit if we were to generalize games as a concept. But instead we are jerking around a specific detailed technological piece. This is stupid because how do you get someone who doesn't understand video games to even properly listen in the first place? Pick them up at a concept they are familiar with: games. The human nature of creating unnecessary obstacles. And move along from there.
User avatar #66 - soupkittenagain (02/20/2014) [-]
But that's all that people think of them, which are games. It's that line of thought that people will call a movie a work of art but a video game just as something to pass the time.
#67 - fragman (02/20/2014) [-]
Yes and yet, everyone does it. Literally everyone.
I do not know a single person who doesn't play games, whatever kind it might be. And because of that it would be a great common ground to start in my opinion.

There's a good reason why we do it and there are amazing resources on that topic (e.g. Vsauce's video on "why do we play games" or pretty much everything by Jane McGonigal). I think this would be the most promising approach to change the (very weird) thought pattern stuck in many people's heads that "games are a waste of time", while in turn they drive their kids to soccer practice or whatever twice a week. Which is a fucking game!
User avatar #68 - soupkittenagain (02/20/2014) [-]
True, but soccer requires much more physical movement than sitting in one place for a game.
#69 - fragman (02/20/2014) [-]
It doesn't make any bloody difference whether you have to run around all day to play your game or you stand around or just sit. All you do is shifting the focus of what you're gaining from it from physical to mental.

Golf isn't much more than standing and driving around, yet it is considered a sport, not just a game. Chess would be another great example.

FPS players in general have a better reaction time, the ability to track around twice as many moving objects in their field of vision and better eyesight compared to non-players (assuming a similar baseline before they started to play). In a society where we spend countless more hours driving a car than walking around this has a much higher potential to save your life than physical fitness (not saying fitness isn't important).
#53 - Probably why people from developed countries don't understand … 02/20/2014 on Warms my cold heart +1
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2100

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#39 - myitems (07/04/2014) [-]
I've been advertising your channel skipper a lot lately, and someone suggested uploading a content for it. I did re-host it on userscripts, but if you don't mind I would like to upload a post about it. And yes, I have been making sure to give credit where it's due for you <3 It is an awesome thing.
#40 to #39 - fragman ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
sure, go ahead
#38 - suckittrebek ONLINE (12/14/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #35 - DisgruntledTomato (10/16/2013) [-]
Just a quick reminder, I still use your channel skipper <3
#36 to #35 - fragman ONLINE (10/17/2013) [-]
woah that is still a thing?
awesome, thanks
User avatar #37 to #36 - DisgruntledTomato (10/17/2013) [-]
I don't know if others use it, but I still do. Probably going to write a UI for it as well. Pretty useful.
User avatar #33 - akkere (06/19/2012) [-]
I decided to do an EZ setup
www.mediafire.com/?b5qdg8cez3563db

I wasn't able to finish it in time before the post was out of its 24 hour slot, but it has a readme with some instructions so you don't have to keep repeating yourself

What do you think?
User avatar #26 - venumb (06/18/2012) [-]
Is it alright if I take what you have so far and edit it and repost the results as long as I mention your name? I plan on adding GUI and other features other than Skipper. The auto thumb/thumb down will probably be in there too.

Really good work on the idea :)
#27 to #26 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I really wouldn't recommend the thumb down feature, there is a vote limit for a certain timespan which could have negative impact on functionality and would also motivate people to post their content outside the channel.
But expanding it in general, sure.
User avatar #28 to #27 - venumb (06/18/2012) [-]
I guess your right. I'll leave the thumbing out of the expanded release. I have other ideas that I'm am way more motivated on accomplishing anyway.
#21 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
If you want, I can make a quick step by step guide for you to post for Chrome users and how to edit the skipped channels.
#22 to #21 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
this would be really nice. but since my 24 hour frame is almost done and this content will go back to the depths of *************** I dont think it will be necessary.
#23 to #22 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Ah I truly doubt that. This was a huge step forward for FJ today, it'll be remembered for a while. And you could upload a Firefox guide and a Chrome guide for newbies in the following days. Especially probably around Thursday or Friday since a lot of Bendingtime posts will come about Saturday. There will be tons of bitchin about it. :P
#24 to #23 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
good idea. I like it.
In this case it'd be wonderful if you could provide the chrome guide :)
#29 to #24 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Rawr, this should be good.
Here is the Tampermonkey Beta link
chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/gcalenpjmijncebpfijmoaglllgpjagf
#31 to #29 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
big yay for you, thx.
I think I'll have it ready by around thursday
#32 to #31 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Sorry it took so long, I was PMing some people tryin to help them
#30 to #29 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I'll have a friend try it out later with that when he gets home though
#25 to #24 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I'll get to workin on it here in a few minutes :)
User avatar #12 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Which page did you fond the source code that showed the channels in an array?
User avatar #13 to #12 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
find*
#14 to #13 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I don't quite get what you mean...
the code is fully hand-written
User avatar #15 to #14 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Oh, I thought you said that there was a way to edit the source code.
#16 to #15 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
ah now I get it.
Depends on your browser. You might want to check out this if you're using chrome:
stackoverflow [DOT] com/questions/5258989/manually-adding-a-userscript-to-google-chrome
#17 to #16 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
rest should be in the content description.
User avatar #18 to #17 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
If you're referring to adding the channel skipper, don't worry about that it installed automatically :). I was just wondering about when you said that you could edit the source code so it only skips certain channels.
#19 to #18 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
actually that's what I meant...
you'll need to find where the script is stored in order to edit it. that should be explained in the description pretty much, on the stackoverflow site you'll find the various user-datadir defaults for chrome.
then edit the file script.js in notepad++ or something like that
User avatar #20 to #19 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Ohhh ok now I get it :). Thank you, Sir.
User avatar #9 - missladyhalmighty (06/18/2012) [-]
You are a god. << Seriously, thank you.
#10 to #9 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
you're welcome
User avatar #8 - fjdesign (06/18/2012) [-]
Good work my friend. I am truly proud of what you have done. If you ever need anything from us please do ask.
#11 to #8 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
thank you.
#6 - devout feminist (06/18/2012) [-]
i ahve no ******* idea what a user scrpt is. how do i use it. inb4 newfag
#7 to #6 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I don't know you, and this is crazy...
but read the damn description maybe?

seriously the manual in there should be pretty straightforward
#34 to #7 - devout feminist (06/25/2012) [-]
**** you you, you analnutbag. go die in a ******* fire
#1 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#2 to #1 - fragman ONLINE (06/16/2012) [-]
depends on your browser. if you're using firefox with greasemonkey, you can simply create a new user script (after you've defined a default userscript editor, e.g. notepad++) and paste the source code. then edit the array defined in line 9 to be filled with all the channels you'd like skipped, like this:
var skipit = new Array("channel1", "channel2", "channel3");
#3 to #2 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#4 to #3 - fragman ONLINE (06/16/2012) [-]
this is a little ugly, but I don't know of any better way at this moment.
you'll find the script in C:\Users\%username%\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default\Extensions\xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\1_0\script.js
while "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" is a random string. I don't know how that's generated but if it's based on the script source code it should be "camaaaeklepkjffjiookkjabipiidofl".
In this folder there are two files, manifest.json and script.js (which is the one you can edit using any text editor and just save it)
#5 to #4 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)