x
Click to expand

fragman

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:10/03/2010
Last Login:2/28/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#3083
Comment Ranking:#3026
Highest Content Rank:#1376
Highest Comment Rank:#583
Content Thumbs: 11181 total,  14433 ,  3252
Comment Thumbs: 12667 total,  15332 ,  2665
Content Level Progress: 2% (2/100)
Level 206 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 207 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 99.8% (499/500)
Level 310 Comments: Wizard → Level 311 Comments: Wizard
Subscribers:20
Content Views:472337
Times Content Favorited:1488 times
Total Comments Made:2684
FJ Points:22322
Favorite Tags: it (2) | Lost (2) | the (2)

latest user's comments

#1 - you tried.  [+] (3 new replies) 10/12/2013 on Yep 0
User avatar #2 - tormain (10/12/2013) [-]
He's been trying for a while now.
User avatar #3 - kanpai (10/12/2013) [-]
is that seriously 1 person who spends his days spamming this stuff... or are they organized?
User avatar #4 - tormain (10/12/2013) [-]
Well it's been going on for so long maybe they formed some sort of anti-DBZ Cult to come up with this nonsense.
#43 - this is by far the dumbest argument in that entire debate. pre… 10/11/2013 on more politics 0
#4 - It's an amazing structure. If you're ever in Scotland you shou…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/11/2013 on The Falkirk Wheel 0
User avatar #11 - kikkelikeiju (10/11/2013) [-]
Visited this year. It´s pretty intriguing. Preferred the more historical buildings and monuments, though.
#15 - So... doing something that would reduce the amount of firearm …  [+] (9 new replies) 10/11/2013 on more politics +1
User avatar #112 - pawnman (10/12/2013) [-]
im on your side. People who say"he is going to take your guns away" are fucking stupid. He just wants to make sure all that buy guns are all sane well minded people.
User avatar #71 - thradrenaa (10/12/2013) [-]
So the First amendment only applies to Town Criers, parchment documents and other things they had in 1776. The writers of the bill of rights didn't know that we would have internet or cell phones so then by your logic the government can restrict your freedoms on the internet and cell phones because our founding fathers couldn't foresee the advent of internet and other such technology
#50 - anonexplains (10/11/2013) [-]
That's the thing though, it will reduce only the firearm related deaths. Other things such as death by stabbings and beatings are much more common already, and historically those crimes have gone up as more gun restrictions and bans. See Australia's crime stats after their gun ban in the 90's. And they're an independent landmass with no border to any other country, so they can't even claim it's criminals from across their border. There have also been numerous surveys and reaserches that claim that citizens have used firearms in confrontations against criminals more than a million times in a year on average. Some say it can be even higher than 2 million, but that's already many times more than gun crimes and I prefer to lowball it.

The reason alot of people think that's what Obama is leading to is because he has pushed for bans and restrictions in the past, as have many of his supporters.

Besides which, I think the idea that passing a law will stop the breaking of laws is kinda dumb.
#42 - anonexplains (10/11/2013) [-]
the people that break the law will still have there guns and use em more cause the people that follow the law wont be able to defend them selves cause they gave up there guns
User avatar #63 - kamusioso (10/11/2013) [-]
people who haven't commited a crime would still be able to buy a gun, right?
User avatar #45 - fargtwo (10/11/2013) [-]
So you're saying that because people that break the law will still have guns, we shouldn't stop people who have broken the law from legally obtaining guns?
User avatar #65 - Ruspanic (10/11/2013) [-]
You're talking about background checks. He's arguing against a gun ban.
User avatar #67 - fargtwo (10/11/2013) [-]
In that case, he's got a point. A gun ban would cause exactly that problem.
#43 - fragman (10/11/2013) [-]
this is by far the dumbest argument in that entire debate. premeditated gun-related deaths don't decrease that much. but they still do. even more improvement is found in impulse-based actions since guns aren't abundantly available.

People do/own/distribute illegal stuff. sure. but the amount of used/owned/moved product is lower than in a system where it's legal. Procuring illegal items always requires greater effort and poses a higher risk than purchasing something legal. Of course the ones dedicated to it will still find a way, but filtering the "casuals" in that case is already a step towards security.

For example the chance of a redneck idiot shooting his wife in an argument lowers significantly when guns aren't available at fucking WalMart.

tl;dr: think before you make idiotic remarks following no logic but the one you desperately try to present.
#6 - So the Malfoys are jews?  [+] (3 new replies) 10/11/2013 on Wanker Granger +52
#185 - anonexplains (10/12/2013) [-]
No, but the goblins are.
#44 - ifsaz (10/11/2013) [-]
Irish?
#38 - Virt (10/11/2013) [-]
#14 - If you'd like to have it un-ruined just listen to this: …  [+] (1 new reply) 10/07/2013 on peekaboo +2
#20 - Pooru (10/07/2013) [-]
thank you for this still i have a hard time listening to it without remembering the lyrics
#16 - Yeah except it's wrong. The so-called "friendzone" i…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/07/2013 on Palcatraz 0
User avatar #19 - brrigg (10/07/2013) [-]
so is alcatraz
#21 - It isn't. Actually, there's a theory out there which really ma…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/05/2013 on One Piece 0
User avatar #41 - thyxin (10/06/2013) [-]
Whats it called
#76 - patterns which relate to the fibonacci sequence or closely rel…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/05/2013 on Multi color 0
User avatar #78 - thetom (10/05/2013) [-]
yea, ive seen how its found in nature. i just didn't see why it had anything to do with the colors. i expected the colors to swirl in a way that gave that spiral
#11 - the fibonacci sequence doesn't "do" it. It's just a …  [+] (4 new replies) 10/05/2013 on Multi color 0
User avatar #72 - thetom (10/05/2013) [-]
what pattern? it just sucked different colored water to the 4 corners... the petals are offset so they overlap a little but if you look at the flower its one color per side.
User avatar #77 - thetom (10/05/2013) [-]
yea, ive seen how its found in nature. i just didn't see why it had anything to do with the colors. i expected the colors to swirl in a way that gave that spiral
#76 - fragman (10/05/2013) [-]
patterns which relate to the fibonacci sequence or closely related golden spiral can be found in many places in nature. an example would be seedarrangement on a pinecone. doesn't have anything to do with this post...
User avatar #78 - thetom (10/05/2013) [-]
yea, ive seen how its found in nature. i just didn't see why it had anything to do with the colors. i expected the colors to swirl in a way that gave that spiral
#5 - oh would you just shut up and stop being a neckbeard about it?…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/05/2013 on This is just mean +12
#13 - acidreign (10/05/2013) [-]
Well shit, I'm sorry for posting a comment that directly relates to the content. Is there anything else I can do for you, princess?
User avatar #8 - dedaluminus (10/05/2013) [-]
But jeans are denim. They're all denim, or dungaree, which is another type of denim. Part of the definition of jeans is that they are made out of denim. If they weren't made out of denim, they wouldn't be jeans. And all the various cosmetics are sub-types of make-up, as a whole. To call lipstick or eye shadow make-up is correct in both cases. You are right about Jeep and iPhone though, both of those are super annoying.
#7 - arandomanon (10/05/2013) [-]
NOO DUDE YOU DON'T REALIZE THE MISTAKE?! OUR MOTHERS ARE RETARDED BECAUSE THEY DON'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE TO WHAT LOOKS EXACTLY THE SAME TO THEM!
As you said, only neckbeards get mad because their parents call an xbox play station.
#13 - It's almost been a week, come on... too soon doesn't count… 10/05/2013 on description -6
#78 - It was a different form of crazy. Also, season 3 might be a st…  [+] (1 new reply) 10/02/2013 on hctib 0
User avatar #79 - frohtastic (10/03/2013) [-]
there was a 5th series of fringe?

I thought there was only 4 seasons? or wait.

season 1, "normal"
season 2, alternate dimensions.
season 3, screwing with timeline.
season 4, the observers ?
#76 - Thanks. I might check that out. Supernatural never really caug…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/02/2013 on hctib 0
#77 - frohtastic (10/02/2013) [-]
you're saying fringe wasnt crazy already in season 2?
what what?

but yeah, supernatural aint that bad.

though accordingly the first two seasons are considered the best seasons.
#78 - fragman (10/02/2013) [-]
It was a different form of crazy. Also, season 3 might be a stretch... to me fringe was like:

S01 - oh that's pretty neat
S02 - ok I think I still get the basic idea here...
S03 - wailt... what?
S04 - ...dude
didn't watch S05 because seriously...
User avatar #79 - frohtastic (10/03/2013) [-]
there was a 5th series of fringe?

I thought there was only 4 seasons? or wait.

season 1, "normal"
season 2, alternate dimensions.
season 3, screwing with timeline.
season 4, the observers ?
#42 - Picture 10/02/2013 on American Government -4
#272 - You spend more than 20% (>800 billion dollars) of your not …  [+] (1 new reply) 10/02/2013 on freedom is temporarily closed 0
User avatar #283 - durkadurka (10/03/2013) [-]
It's common knowledge that these problems have persisted for quite some time now, but they've only been getting worse.

Much more money is spent on entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Those programs should have been fixed long ago. You fix those (not necessarily eliminating them, just changing them into programs that don't hemorrhage money).

The military isn't really inefficient. It's the most efficient part of the government. You also have to be very careful about how much you cut out of your armed forces.

What should happen is that every single item in the budget should be scrutinized. Nothing should be off the table, and as much should be cut as possible.

I'd be willing to be that we could take average people of differing opinions, sit them down, and get further on fixing the big problems than the federal government has to date.
#267 - Uh, yeah. Because cutting down CDC and at the same time not pr…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/02/2013 on freedom is temporarily closed 0
User avatar #268 - durkadurka (10/02/2013) [-]
Ugh, so you're going to use the arguments that require me to put a million disclaimers into everything I type. Fine, here we go.

Garbage disposal/street cleaning is done at a local level. Local governments have not shut down (unless you live in Detroit, lol).
Insurance is not the responsibility of the government. That responsibility is yours.

Obviously there are a number of government offices/jobs that do provide services that we want and thus pay for (I'll note that MANY of these are on a local level and are thus not affected by this at the moment). But there is also a lot of waste, redundancy and corruption. Generally, when one talks about reducing the size of government, they are not referring to the working/necessary parts. They're generally referring to the parts that cause heaps of paperwork and extra aggravation.

Even military spending should be looked in I think we should avoid laying off soldiers if possible though, and instead focus on determining if certain programs/projects/weapons contracts are necessary. It's important to note that many of the soldiers in the military are not the ones involved in direct combat. There is an incredible amount of logistics involved, and many troops are employed in that area.

The fact that we're so heinously in debt is the reason why we should be cutting large parts out of the government until it is once again solvent. Yeah it may hurt, but people need to start learning to support themselves again.

Can you imagine what the greatest generation thinks about us when we whine about part of the government being shutdown for two days?
#272 - fragman (10/02/2013) [-]
You spend more than 20% (>800 billion dollars) of your not even owned money yearly on military-related departments, not even counting Homeland Security and intelligence agencies. You spend more than 200 billion dollars per year on your loan's interest alone. Something is seriously fubar in your management and no, that's not a "new thing, thanks Obama" situation.
The issue would never be a two day shutdown but if the US government keeps doing business the way they are now it will hardly be over with that...
Of course there are positions in the government that could (and should) be cut down in order to fix the country's financial situation. This applies to almost every country. But the first thing that would need to go down in that case would be debt and a clearly oversized and inefficient military. It has the biggest potential to reduce cost without making the situation for the country much worse in the long run, mainly due to not even having anything like a ROI.
User avatar #283 - durkadurka (10/03/2013) [-]
It's common knowledge that these problems have persisted for quite some time now, but they've only been getting worse.

Much more money is spent on entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Those programs should have been fixed long ago. You fix those (not necessarily eliminating them, just changing them into programs that don't hemorrhage money).

The military isn't really inefficient. It's the most efficient part of the government. You also have to be very careful about how much you cut out of your armed forces.

What should happen is that every single item in the budget should be scrutinized. Nothing should be off the table, and as much should be cut as possible.

I'd be willing to be that we could take average people of differing opinions, sit them down, and get further on fixing the big problems than the federal government has to date.
#74 - On the realistic chance of getting smacked for that question..…  [+] (5 new replies) 10/02/2013 on hctib 0
#75 - frohtastic (10/02/2013) [-]
supernatural season 5.
they had an episode where they parodied many popular tv-shows.
like greys anatomy (dr.sexy) csi, knight rider and 80's sitcom
#76 - fragman (10/02/2013) [-]
Thanks. I might check that out. Supernatural never really caught my attention (after seeing about 15 minutes of a random episode one time), but I guess it's probably similar to other shows I like, e.g. Lost Girl, Sanctuary, Alphas or Fringe (well, the first 3 seasons, before shit got too crazy).
#77 - frohtastic (10/02/2013) [-]
you're saying fringe wasnt crazy already in season 2?
what what?

but yeah, supernatural aint that bad.

though accordingly the first two seasons are considered the best seasons.
#78 - fragman (10/02/2013) [-]
It was a different form of crazy. Also, season 3 might be a stretch... to me fringe was like:

S01 - oh that's pretty neat
S02 - ok I think I still get the basic idea here...
S03 - wailt... what?
S04 - ...dude
didn't watch S05 because seriously...
User avatar #79 - frohtastic (10/03/2013) [-]
there was a 5th series of fringe?

I thought there was only 4 seasons? or wait.

season 1, "normal"
season 2, alternate dimensions.
season 3, screwing with timeline.
season 4, the observers ?
#8 - ...fun? 10/02/2013 on Poor Billy +2
#34 - and how is she feeling? 10/02/2013 on Take notes guys. 0
#56 - And thus he became the terrifying *********** ... 10/02/2013 on READ DESCRIPTION +4
#48 - True. Unlike other shows they knew when to stop instead of bre…  [+] (10 new replies) 10/02/2013 on hctib +5
#50 - tobe (10/02/2013) [-]
I happen to have a perfect example for that.
#59 - frohtastic (10/02/2013) [-]
theres also this

should have ended at season 5, as kripke intended
#74 - fragman (10/02/2013) [-]
On the realistic chance of getting smacked for that question... what's this from?
#75 - frohtastic (10/02/2013) [-]
supernatural season 5.
they had an episode where they parodied many popular tv-shows.
like greys anatomy (dr.sexy) csi, knight rider and 80's sitcom
#76 - fragman (10/02/2013) [-]
Thanks. I might check that out. Supernatural never really caught my attention (after seeing about 15 minutes of a random episode one time), but I guess it's probably similar to other shows I like, e.g. Lost Girl, Sanctuary, Alphas or Fringe (well, the first 3 seasons, before shit got too crazy).
#77 - frohtastic (10/02/2013) [-]
you're saying fringe wasnt crazy already in season 2?
what what?

but yeah, supernatural aint that bad.

though accordingly the first two seasons are considered the best seasons.
#78 - fragman (10/02/2013) [-]
It was a different form of crazy. Also, season 3 might be a stretch... to me fringe was like:

S01 - oh that's pretty neat
S02 - ok I think I still get the basic idea here...
S03 - wailt... what?
S04 - ...dude
didn't watch S05 because seriously...
User avatar #79 - frohtastic (10/03/2013) [-]
there was a 5th series of fringe?

I thought there was only 4 seasons? or wait.

season 1, "normal"
season 2, alternate dimensions.
season 3, screwing with timeline.
season 4, the observers ?
#64 - baboonishyapper (10/02/2013) [-]
damn it im still waiting for season 8 to come out on Netflix
User avatar #66 - palmsspaghetti (10/02/2013) [-]
watch it on megashare.info
I'm all caught up and ready fro season 9 to come out in 4 days!
#200 - I'm well aware of the fact that some amerifags will probably w…  [+] (5 new replies) 10/02/2013 on freedom is temporarily closed +1
User avatar #261 - durkadurka (10/02/2013) [-]
You're assuming that all suspended employees are actually doing something useful.
It's the government, so it's likely that employees that are "non essential" aren't helping much of anything.

Our government is not our parent. It doesn't need to "take care of us." That's not the government's role, that's our own responsibility. I have no clue how this concept is so lost on people today.
#267 - fragman (10/02/2013) [-]
Uh, yeah. Because cutting down CDC and at the same time not providing proper garbage disposal / street cleaning AND suspending toxic waste cleanup is such a very great idea, especially in combination (as seen in '95). Reducing healthcare for resident citizens and hurting the tourist industry (which would provide income which might be a good idea since you know, you're kinda broke at the moment...). But hey who cares, as long as we can keep going pew-pew on the other side of the planet without even generating results... awesome.
User avatar #268 - durkadurka (10/02/2013) [-]
Ugh, so you're going to use the arguments that require me to put a million disclaimers into everything I type. Fine, here we go.

Garbage disposal/street cleaning is done at a local level. Local governments have not shut down (unless you live in Detroit, lol).
Insurance is not the responsibility of the government. That responsibility is yours.

Obviously there are a number of government offices/jobs that do provide services that we want and thus pay for (I'll note that MANY of these are on a local level and are thus not affected by this at the moment). But there is also a lot of waste, redundancy and corruption. Generally, when one talks about reducing the size of government, they are not referring to the working/necessary parts. They're generally referring to the parts that cause heaps of paperwork and extra aggravation.

Even military spending should be looked in I think we should avoid laying off soldiers if possible though, and instead focus on determining if certain programs/projects/weapons contracts are necessary. It's important to note that many of the soldiers in the military are not the ones involved in direct combat. There is an incredible amount of logistics involved, and many troops are employed in that area.

The fact that we're so heinously in debt is the reason why we should be cutting large parts out of the government until it is once again solvent. Yeah it may hurt, but people need to start learning to support themselves again.

Can you imagine what the greatest generation thinks about us when we whine about part of the government being shutdown for two days?
#272 - fragman (10/02/2013) [-]
You spend more than 20% (>800 billion dollars) of your not even owned money yearly on military-related departments, not even counting Homeland Security and intelligence agencies. You spend more than 200 billion dollars per year on your loan's interest alone. Something is seriously fubar in your management and no, that's not a "new thing, thanks Obama" situation.
The issue would never be a two day shutdown but if the US government keeps doing business the way they are now it will hardly be over with that...
Of course there are positions in the government that could (and should) be cut down in order to fix the country's financial situation. This applies to almost every country. But the first thing that would need to go down in that case would be debt and a clearly oversized and inefficient military. It has the biggest potential to reduce cost without making the situation for the country much worse in the long run, mainly due to not even having anything like a ROI.
User avatar #283 - durkadurka (10/03/2013) [-]
It's common knowledge that these problems have persisted for quite some time now, but they've only been getting worse.

Much more money is spent on entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Those programs should have been fixed long ago. You fix those (not necessarily eliminating them, just changing them into programs that don't hemorrhage money).

The military isn't really inefficient. It's the most efficient part of the government. You also have to be very careful about how much you cut out of your armed forces.

What should happen is that every single item in the budget should be scrutinized. Nothing should be off the table, and as much should be cut as possible.

I'd be willing to be that we could take average people of differing opinions, sit them down, and get further on fixing the big problems than the federal government has to date.
#15 - and it was educational. strictly for academic purposes of course.  [+] (1 new reply) 10/01/2013 on Can't believe that's it 0
User avatar #16 - fauxshores (10/01/2013) [-]
Of course
#13 - Absolutely. The last season is watchable, it really even has i…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/01/2013 on Can't believe that's it 0
User avatar #14 - fauxshores (10/01/2013) [-]
Yeah, i really liked that. It let you in on what the thouht process was and you could see how it would work.
#15 - fragman (10/01/2013) [-]
and it was educational. strictly for academic purposes of course.
User avatar #16 - fauxshores (10/01/2013) [-]
Of course

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2100
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #39 - myitems (07/04/2014) [-]
I've been advertising your channel skipper a lot lately, and someone suggested uploading a content for it. I did re-host it on userscripts, but if you don't mind I would like to upload a post about it. And yes, I have been making sure to give credit where it's due for you <3 It is an awesome thing.
#40 to #39 - fragman (07/04/2014) [-]
sure, go ahead
User avatar #35 - DisgruntledTomato (10/16/2013) [-]
Just a quick reminder, I still use your channel skipper <3
#36 to #35 - fragman (10/17/2013) [-]
woah that is still a thing?
awesome, thanks
User avatar #37 to #36 - DisgruntledTomato (10/17/2013) [-]
I don't know if others use it, but I still do. Probably going to write a UI for it as well. Pretty useful.
User avatar #33 - akkere (06/19/2012) [-]
I decided to do an EZ setup
www.mediafire.com/?b5qdg8cez3563db

I wasn't able to finish it in time before the post was out of its 24 hour slot, but it has a readme with some instructions so you don't have to keep repeating yourself

What do you think?
User avatar #26 - venumb ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Is it alright if I take what you have so far and edit it and repost the results as long as I mention your name? I plan on adding GUI and other features other than Skipper. The auto thumb/thumb down will probably be in there too.

Really good work on the idea :)
#27 to #26 - fragman (06/18/2012) [-]
I really wouldn't recommend the thumb down feature, there is a vote limit for a certain timespan which could have negative impact on functionality and would also motivate people to post their content outside the channel.
But expanding it in general, sure.
User avatar #28 to #27 - venumb ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I guess your right. I'll leave the thumbing out of the expanded release. I have other ideas that I'm am way more motivated on accomplishing anyway.
User avatar #21 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
If you want, I can make a quick step by step guide for you to post for Chrome users and how to edit the skipped channels.
#22 to #21 - fragman (06/18/2012) [-]
this would be really nice. but since my 24 hour frame is almost done and this content will go back to the depths of *************** I dont think it will be necessary.
User avatar #23 to #22 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Ah I truly doubt that. This was a huge step forward for FJ today, it'll be remembered for a while. And you could upload a Firefox guide and a Chrome guide for newbies in the following days. Especially probably around Thursday or Friday since a lot of Bendingtime posts will come about Saturday. There will be tons of bitchin about it. :P
#24 to #23 - fragman (06/18/2012) [-]
good idea. I like it.
In this case it'd be wonderful if you could provide the chrome guide :)
#29 to #24 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Rawr, this should be good.
Here is the Tampermonkey Beta link
chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/gcalenpjmijncebpfijmoaglllgpjagf
#31 to #29 - fragman (06/18/2012) [-]
big yay for you, thx.
I think I'll have it ready by around thursday
User avatar #32 to #31 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Sorry it took so long, I was PMing some people tryin to help them
User avatar #30 to #29 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I'll have a friend try it out later with that when he gets home though
User avatar #25 to #24 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I'll get to workin on it here in a few minutes :)
User avatar #12 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Which page did you fond the source code that showed the channels in an array?
User avatar #13 to #12 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
find*
#14 to #13 - fragman (06/18/2012) [-]
I don't quite get what you mean...
the code is fully hand-written
User avatar #15 to #14 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Oh, I thought you said that there was a way to edit the source code.
#16 to #15 - fragman (06/18/2012) [-]
ah now I get it.
Depends on your browser. You might want to check out this if you're using chrome:
stackoverflow [DOT] com/questions/5258989/manually-adding-a-userscript-to-google-chrome
#17 to #16 - fragman (06/18/2012) [-]
rest should be in the content description.
User avatar #18 to #17 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
If you're referring to adding the channel skipper, don't worry about that it installed automatically :). I was just wondering about when you said that you could edit the source code so it only skips certain channels.
#19 to #18 - fragman (06/18/2012) [-]
actually that's what I meant...
you'll need to find where the script is stored in order to edit it. that should be explained in the description pretty much, on the stackoverflow site you'll find the various user-datadir defaults for chrome.
then edit the file script.js in notepad++ or something like that
User avatar #20 to #19 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Ohhh ok now I get it :). Thank you, Sir.
User avatar #9 - missladyhalmighty (06/18/2012) [-]
You are a god. << Seriously, thank you.
#10 to #9 - fragman (06/18/2012) [-]
you're welcome
User avatar #8 - fjdesign (06/18/2012) [-]
Good work my friend. I am truly proud of what you have done. If you ever need anything from us please do ask.
#11 to #8 - fragman (06/18/2012) [-]
thank you.
#6 - anonexplains (06/18/2012) [-]
i ahve no ******* idea what a user scrpt is. how do i use it. inb4 newfag
#7 to #6 - fragman (06/18/2012) [-]
I don't know you, and this is crazy...
but read the damn description maybe?

seriously the manual in there should be pretty straightforward
#34 to #7 - anonexplains (06/25/2012) [-]
**** you you, you analnutbag. go die in a ******* fire
#1 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#2 to #1 - fragman (06/16/2012) [-]
depends on your browser. if you're using firefox with greasemonkey, you can simply create a new user script (after you've defined a default userscript editor, e.g. notepad++) and paste the source code. then edit the array defined in line 9 to be filled with all the channels you'd like skipped, like this:
var skipit = new Array("channel1", "channel2", "channel3");
#3 to #2 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#4 to #3 - fragman (06/16/2012) [-]
this is a little ugly, but I don't know of any better way at this moment.
you'll find the script in C:\Users\%username%\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default\Extensions\xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\1_0\script.js
while "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" is a random string. I don't know how that's generated but if it's based on the script source code it should be "camaaaeklepkjffjiookkjabipiidofl".
In this folder there are two files, manifest.json and script.js (which is the one you can edit using any text editor and just save it)
#5 to #4 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)