Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

fragman    

Rank #3499 on Content
no avatar Level 295 Comments: Post Master
Online
Send mail to fragman Block fragman Invite fragman to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:10/03/2010
Last Login:7/25/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#3499
Comment Ranking:#5184
Highest Content Rank:#1376
Highest Comment Rank:#583
Content Thumbs: 10394 total,  13550 ,  3156
Comment Thumbs: 9951 total,  12143 ,  2192
Content Level Progress: 6% (6/100)
Level 200 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 201 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 7% (7/100)
Level 295 Comments: Post Master → Level 296 Comments: Post Master
Subscribers:19
Content Views:432308
Times Content Favorited:1440 times
Total Comments Made:2238
FJ Points:19734
Favorite Tags: it (2) | Lost (2) | the (2)

latest user's comments

#113 - Except people generally use a knife for other things than kill…  [+] (6 new replies) 01/28/2014 on guns +2
User avatar #115 - eightbitlegend (01/28/2014) [-]
An item that makes something easier is a tool you fucking retard, just because what it does is against what you believe doesn't mean it isn't a tool. And I'm sure that if Tim Allen was to go kill something the gun would make be the first thing out on Tool Time.

Next think we know you will tell us that only the police should have guns.
#122 - fragman (01/28/2014) [-]
Therefore nukes are tools as well. Interesting.
Zyklon B is a tool as well, since it makes killing a bunch of Jews at the same time hell a lot easier.

Guns are tools, that's really too hilarious.
User avatar #129 - eightbitlegend (01/28/2014) [-]
Arguing with you over this is like arguing evolution with a creationist, the only thing you can do is try to demonize what I say instead of say that it is wrong. You are the debate equivalent of a 3rd grader.

and Zyklon B and a nuke would be tools as well, one again just because there purpose is not a cuddly like ball off cats doesn't make them any less of a tool.

So why don't you try to find a no gun zone that actually works or something that is contrary to the fact that cities who have strict gun laws, like Chicago, have the highest gun murders.

Argue like an adult and not a child.
#192 - Kulthozuer (01/28/2014) [-]
Suddenly everything in the world becomes a tool thanks to eightbitlegend revolutionizing the criteria as "An item that makes something easier is a tool". House are tools due to making survival easier, oxygen is a tool due to making life easier. People are now tools (Well you already were a tool) because they make producing TV shows easier, going to restaurants easier and a plethora of other things.

Anyway you could classify a gun as a tool but I think the word weapon describes it much better.
#137 - fragman (01/28/2014) [-]
Well I live in a country with stricter gun laws than America...
I'll use countries here, because arguing about different cities in the same country is plain riddiculous when discussing something that should be implemented on a national scale.
And for comparison's sake, the UK would be one with even stricter gun laws. So let's take a look at the average firearm related deaths per 100k people.
The UK has 0.25
We in Switzerland are already at a whooping 3.84, mainly due to the fact that everyone who was in the military (which on the other hand is every able adult male by default, with some exceptions) can keep their gun at home.
And the winner is.... the US, with 10.3

Over 40 times as many as in the UK.
So yeah, I guess having more guns certainly decreases the amount of gun related murders. (oh yeah, the stats before were deaths, so since you seem to insist on homicide: UK 0.04, Switzerland 0.52, USA 3.6)
User avatar #149 - eightbitlegend (01/28/2014) [-]
First, I apologize for my typos in my previous post, I posted without spell/grammar checking, and that is unacceptable.
Second, if you don't live in America then why are you arguing about American gun laws.
And third, here in America we have these things called states, and almost every one of our stats is just as big if not bigger than your home country of Switzerland, so we let each state have there own laws. That is why I talk about different cities, because they all have different laws. And the cities with the strictest gun laws like Chicago and Washington DC, have the highest amount of gun violence.
#92 - So, people really believe that carrying a gun makes you safer?…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/28/2014 on guns +1
User avatar #172 - lean (01/28/2014) [-]
I firmly believe that if you can't kill them with one shot then you wont with 10 either, but that being said, there is no reason not to have an AR15. Its a rifle like any other. I can get a 30 round magazine for my deer rifle. Its a 50 year old remington woodsmaster semi automatic 30-06. How is that worse than one that "looks dangerous"?
#89 - > taking guns away from law abiding citizens Becau…  [+] (8 new replies) 01/28/2014 on guns +1
User avatar #105 - eightbitlegend (01/28/2014) [-]
I agree that people do need to secure there firearms, but on the flip side if we didn't demonize them and actually teach our children to use them safely then people aren't going to see them as anything more then just a tool. Just like how having a knife set in you kitchen doesn't mean your going to start stabbing people.

I think that you're just afraid that if you had a gun you would not be able to stop yourself from shooting someone because you have homicidal tendencies, but that does not mean that I want to kill my wife with one.
#113 - fragman (01/28/2014) [-]
Except people generally use a knife for other things than killing.
I mean how the fuck can you describe it as a tool? The only purpose of a gun that actually justifies the use of a gun (i.e. can't be replaced with something of equal value for the task) is to kill, severely injure or intimidate. Plain and simple.
10/10 would make a feature episode on Tool Time

are you even serious?
User avatar #115 - eightbitlegend (01/28/2014) [-]
An item that makes something easier is a tool you fucking retard, just because what it does is against what you believe doesn't mean it isn't a tool. And I'm sure that if Tim Allen was to go kill something the gun would make be the first thing out on Tool Time.

Next think we know you will tell us that only the police should have guns.
#122 - fragman (01/28/2014) [-]
Therefore nukes are tools as well. Interesting.
Zyklon B is a tool as well, since it makes killing a bunch of Jews at the same time hell a lot easier.

Guns are tools, that's really too hilarious.
User avatar #129 - eightbitlegend (01/28/2014) [-]
Arguing with you over this is like arguing evolution with a creationist, the only thing you can do is try to demonize what I say instead of say that it is wrong. You are the debate equivalent of a 3rd grader.

and Zyklon B and a nuke would be tools as well, one again just because there purpose is not a cuddly like ball off cats doesn't make them any less of a tool.

So why don't you try to find a no gun zone that actually works or something that is contrary to the fact that cities who have strict gun laws, like Chicago, have the highest gun murders.

Argue like an adult and not a child.
#192 - Kulthozuer (01/28/2014) [-]
Suddenly everything in the world becomes a tool thanks to eightbitlegend revolutionizing the criteria as "An item that makes something easier is a tool". House are tools due to making survival easier, oxygen is a tool due to making life easier. People are now tools (Well you already were a tool) because they make producing TV shows easier, going to restaurants easier and a plethora of other things.

Anyway you could classify a gun as a tool but I think the word weapon describes it much better.
#137 - fragman (01/28/2014) [-]
Well I live in a country with stricter gun laws than America...
I'll use countries here, because arguing about different cities in the same country is plain riddiculous when discussing something that should be implemented on a national scale.
And for comparison's sake, the UK would be one with even stricter gun laws. So let's take a look at the average firearm related deaths per 100k people.
The UK has 0.25
We in Switzerland are already at a whooping 3.84, mainly due to the fact that everyone who was in the military (which on the other hand is every able adult male by default, with some exceptions) can keep their gun at home.
And the winner is.... the US, with 10.3

Over 40 times as many as in the UK.
So yeah, I guess having more guns certainly decreases the amount of gun related murders. (oh yeah, the stats before were deaths, so since you seem to insist on homicide: UK 0.04, Switzerland 0.52, USA 3.6)
User avatar #149 - eightbitlegend (01/28/2014) [-]
First, I apologize for my typos in my previous post, I posted without spell/grammar checking, and that is unacceptable.
Second, if you don't live in America then why are you arguing about American gun laws.
And third, here in America we have these things called states, and almost every one of our stats is just as big if not bigger than your home country of Switzerland, so we let each state have there own laws. That is why I talk about different cities, because they all have different laws. And the cities with the strictest gun laws like Chicago and Washington DC, have the highest amount of gun violence.
#200 - Exactly what I think when I hear the term "proud American… 01/28/2014 on I'm sorry, did I rape you... 0
#18 - Just by looking at her you can tell this already happened. … 01/28/2014 on (untitled) 0
#57 - Of course guns don't kill people. They just make it easier. …  [+] (13 new replies) 01/28/2014 on guns +10
User avatar #90 - CHUCKNORRiO (01/28/2014) [-]
Now imagine if North Korea could get nukes that work anyway, and we all decided to take all the nukes and destroy them so no one could have them.
Leaving North Korea with the only nukes.
Now if we all had our own nukes, that's a slightly different story.
Think about what would have happened in all the places where shootings occurred if the people were armed.
#92 - fragman (01/28/2014) [-]
So, people really believe that carrying a gun makes you safer?
Because, well... it doesn't. Carrying any sort of weapon in today's society doesn't make you any safer. You may feel safer, sure, but in fact the opposite is the case. Conflict escalation rates amongst armed people are significantly higher. Now if you have one in your home in case someone breaks in, ok fine. Why not. You might one day snap and shoot your wife in the head but who am I to judge, bitch maybe had it coming.

But you as well fail to see that the only logical thing to do is neither carrying on like this nor banning guns, but proper regulations and precautions regarding owners.

It's just like with the nukes. If every country had them we'd all be fucked big time. The more people you take as a sample (in this case, gun owners), the higher the chance that there are utter morons, psychopaths and mentally instable ones amongst them. I don't think noone should be able to own them, but access is way too easy these days.

Also, you don't need a fucking AR-15 to defend your home. Unless there's zombies of course...
User avatar #172 - lean (01/28/2014) [-]
I firmly believe that if you can't kill them with one shot then you wont with 10 either, but that being said, there is no reason not to have an AR15. Its a rifle like any other. I can get a 30 round magazine for my deer rifle. Its a 50 year old remington woodsmaster semi automatic 30-06. How is that worse than one that "looks dangerous"?
User avatar #81 - eightbitlegend (01/28/2014) [-]
If you're trying to imply that taking nukes away from a government that has brainwashed its people into thinking that there ruler is god is the same as taking guns away from law abiding citizens is the same then you clearly are not smart enough to make a comment on this issue. You are talking about giving one person the ability to kill thousands versus one person being able to protect them selves and there families.

and before you make the usual "he's just a southern conservative" joke I will let you know that I live in Michigan.
#89 - fragman (01/28/2014) [-]
> taking guns away from law abiding citizens

Because the reason for the entire fucking debate is that law abiding citizens shouldn't own guns... not maybe the fucktards that aren't capable of securing them properly resulting in their faggot emo kids who got bullied for a reason getting access and being able to shoot up their school. Sure thing.
The idea is called gun control, not ban.
User avatar #105 - eightbitlegend (01/28/2014) [-]
I agree that people do need to secure there firearms, but on the flip side if we didn't demonize them and actually teach our children to use them safely then people aren't going to see them as anything more then just a tool. Just like how having a knife set in you kitchen doesn't mean your going to start stabbing people.

I think that you're just afraid that if you had a gun you would not be able to stop yourself from shooting someone because you have homicidal tendencies, but that does not mean that I want to kill my wife with one.
#113 - fragman (01/28/2014) [-]
Except people generally use a knife for other things than killing.
I mean how the fuck can you describe it as a tool? The only purpose of a gun that actually justifies the use of a gun (i.e. can't be replaced with something of equal value for the task) is to kill, severely injure or intimidate. Plain and simple.
10/10 would make a feature episode on Tool Time

are you even serious?
User avatar #115 - eightbitlegend (01/28/2014) [-]
An item that makes something easier is a tool you fucking retard, just because what it does is against what you believe doesn't mean it isn't a tool. And I'm sure that if Tim Allen was to go kill something the gun would make be the first thing out on Tool Time.

Next think we know you will tell us that only the police should have guns.
#122 - fragman (01/28/2014) [-]
Therefore nukes are tools as well. Interesting.
Zyklon B is a tool as well, since it makes killing a bunch of Jews at the same time hell a lot easier.

Guns are tools, that's really too hilarious.
User avatar #129 - eightbitlegend (01/28/2014) [-]
Arguing with you over this is like arguing evolution with a creationist, the only thing you can do is try to demonize what I say instead of say that it is wrong. You are the debate equivalent of a 3rd grader.

and Zyklon B and a nuke would be tools as well, one again just because there purpose is not a cuddly like ball off cats doesn't make them any less of a tool.

So why don't you try to find a no gun zone that actually works or something that is contrary to the fact that cities who have strict gun laws, like Chicago, have the highest gun murders.

Argue like an adult and not a child.
#192 - Kulthozuer (01/28/2014) [-]
Suddenly everything in the world becomes a tool thanks to eightbitlegend revolutionizing the criteria as "An item that makes something easier is a tool". House are tools due to making survival easier, oxygen is a tool due to making life easier. People are now tools (Well you already were a tool) because they make producing TV shows easier, going to restaurants easier and a plethora of other things.

Anyway you could classify a gun as a tool but I think the word weapon describes it much better.
#137 - fragman (01/28/2014) [-]
Well I live in a country with stricter gun laws than America...
I'll use countries here, because arguing about different cities in the same country is plain riddiculous when discussing something that should be implemented on a national scale.
And for comparison's sake, the UK would be one with even stricter gun laws. So let's take a look at the average firearm related deaths per 100k people.
The UK has 0.25
We in Switzerland are already at a whooping 3.84, mainly due to the fact that everyone who was in the military (which on the other hand is every able adult male by default, with some exceptions) can keep their gun at home.
And the winner is.... the US, with 10.3

Over 40 times as many as in the UK.
So yeah, I guess having more guns certainly decreases the amount of gun related murders. (oh yeah, the stats before were deaths, so since you seem to insist on homicide: UK 0.04, Switzerland 0.52, USA 3.6)
User avatar #149 - eightbitlegend (01/28/2014) [-]
First, I apologize for my typos in my previous post, I posted without spell/grammar checking, and that is unacceptable.
Second, if you don't live in America then why are you arguing about American gun laws.
And third, here in America we have these things called states, and almost every one of our stats is just as big if not bigger than your home country of Switzerland, so we let each state have there own laws. That is why I talk about different cities, because they all have different laws. And the cities with the strictest gun laws like Chicago and Washington DC, have the highest amount of gun violence.
#236 - I'm not disappoint. 01/28/2014 on WHOOOO! 0
#283 - Welcome to the internet. We are the bad people we've been warn… 01/28/2014 on Something to think about. 0
#57 - > have you ever said it > no seems legit 01/27/2014 on Try it 0
#89 - that was too fucking good. 01/27/2014 on death bears +3
#135 - ...why the fuck not? Sure, she's nowhere near the hottest … 01/27/2014 on now thats smart marketing! 0
#113 - you already are. 01/27/2014 on Alphas of the alphas 0
#128 - why am I not surprised 01/27/2014 on Illegally downloading a dress +1
#27 - Comment deleted  [+] (1 new reply) 01/26/2014 on Smashing!!! 0
#29 - randomituseddie Comment deleted by fragman
#51 - fun fact: playing NES/SNES/N64 on CRT TV's actually looks bett… 01/26/2014 on 7th heaven +1
#30 - Picture 01/26/2014 on Yep +5
#38 - Saturday? fucking casual... I need help 01/26/2014 on S - A - T - U - R - D - A -... +1
#23 - >hfw 01/26/2014 on Tacticool badger +17
#75 - > home to the United States' monetary assets so it…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/26/2014 on 10 Most Secure Locations On... +2
User avatar #85 - kingrayne (01/26/2014) [-]
not how it works
#208 - > 2014 > still surprised that mass media show faggy … 01/26/2014 on Interesting +3
#45 - Have fun never using your hand again... 01/25/2014 on come at me dinosaur 0
#108 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 01/25/2014 on sorry guys +10
#120 - jouten (01/25/2014) [-]
#33 - 4th one is borderline nsfw, dude... 01/24/2014 on blank space compilation +6
#13 - inb4 "soon" 01/24/2014 on Goats 0
#38 - what's that from?  [+] (1 new reply) 01/24/2014 on Titslap 0
User avatar #39 - zombierules (01/24/2014) [-]
Lime-iro Senkitan
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2100

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#39 - myitems (07/04/2014) [-]
I've been advertising your channel skipper a lot lately, and someone suggested uploading a content for it. I did re-host it on userscripts, but if you don't mind I would like to upload a post about it. And yes, I have been making sure to give credit where it's due for you <3 It is an awesome thing.
#40 to #39 - fragman ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
sure, go ahead
User avatar #35 - DisgruntledTomato (10/16/2013) [-]
Just a quick reminder, I still use your channel skipper <3
#36 to #35 - fragman ONLINE (10/17/2013) [-]
woah that is still a thing?
awesome, thanks
User avatar #37 to #36 - DisgruntledTomato (10/17/2013) [-]
I don't know if others use it, but I still do. Probably going to write a UI for it as well. Pretty useful.
User avatar #33 - akkere ONLINE (06/19/2012) [-]
I decided to do an EZ setup
www.mediafire.com/?b5qdg8cez3563db

I wasn't able to finish it in time before the post was out of its 24 hour slot, but it has a readme with some instructions so you don't have to keep repeating yourself

What do you think?
User avatar #26 - venumb (06/18/2012) [-]
Is it alright if I take what you have so far and edit it and repost the results as long as I mention your name? I plan on adding GUI and other features other than Skipper. The auto thumb/thumb down will probably be in there too.

Really good work on the idea :)
#27 to #26 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I really wouldn't recommend the thumb down feature, there is a vote limit for a certain timespan which could have negative impact on functionality and would also motivate people to post their content outside the channel.
But expanding it in general, sure.
User avatar #28 to #27 - venumb (06/18/2012) [-]
I guess your right. I'll leave the thumbing out of the expanded release. I have other ideas that I'm am way more motivated on accomplishing anyway.
#21 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
If you want, I can make a quick step by step guide for you to post for Chrome users and how to edit the skipped channels.
#22 to #21 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
this would be really nice. but since my 24 hour frame is almost done and this content will go back to the depths of noonegivesafuck I dont think it will be necessary.
#23 to #22 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Ah I truly doubt that. This was a huge step forward for FJ today, it'll be remembered for a while. And you could upload a Firefox guide and a Chrome guide for newbies in the following days. Especially probably around Thursday or Friday since a lot of Bendingtime posts will come about Saturday. There will be tons of bitchin about it. :P
#24 to #23 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
good idea. I like it.
In this case it'd be wonderful if you could provide the chrome guide :)
#29 to #24 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Rawr, this should be good.
Here is the Tampermonkey Beta link
chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/gcalenpjmijncebpfijmoaglllgpjagf
#31 to #29 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
big yay for you, thx.
I think I'll have it ready by around thursday
#32 to #31 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Sorry it took so long, I was PMing some people tryin to help them
#30 to #29 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I'll have a friend try it out later with that when he gets home though
#25 to #24 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I'll get to workin on it here in a few minutes :)
User avatar #12 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Which page did you fond the source code that showed the channels in an array?
User avatar #13 to #12 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
find*
#14 to #13 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I don't quite get what you mean...
the code is fully hand-written
User avatar #15 to #14 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Oh, I thought you said that there was a way to edit the source code.
#16 to #15 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
ah now I get it.
Depends on your browser. You might want to check out this if you're using chrome:
stackoverflow [DOT] com/questions/5258989/manually-adding-a-userscript-to-google-chrome
#17 to #16 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
rest should be in the content description.
User avatar #18 to #17 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
If you're referring to adding the channel skipper, don't worry about that it installed automatically :). I was just wondering about when you said that you could edit the source code so it only skips certain channels.
#19 to #18 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
actually that's what I meant...
you'll need to find where the script is stored in order to edit it. that should be explained in the description pretty much, on the stackoverflow site you'll find the various user-datadir defaults for chrome.
then edit the file script.js in notepad++ or something like that
User avatar #20 to #19 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Ohhh ok now I get it :). Thank you, Sir.
User avatar #9 - missladyhalmighty (06/18/2012) [-]
You are a god. << Seriously, thank you.
#10 to #9 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
you're welcome
User avatar #8 - fjdesign (06/18/2012) [-]
Good work my friend. I am truly proud of what you have done. If you ever need anything from us please do ask.
#11 to #8 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
thank you.
#6 - anonymous (06/18/2012) [-]
i ahve no fucking idea what a user scrpt is. how do i use it. inb4 newfag
#7 to #6 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I don't know you, and this is crazy...
but read the damn description maybe?

seriously the manual in there should be pretty straightforward
#34 to #7 - anonymous (06/25/2012) [-]
fuck you you, you analnutbag. go die in a fucking fire
#1 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#2 to #1 - fragman ONLINE (06/16/2012) [-]
depends on your browser. if you're using firefox with greasemonkey, you can simply create a new user script (after you've defined a default userscript editor, e.g. notepad++) and paste the source code. then edit the array defined in line 9 to be filled with all the channels you'd like skipped, like this:
var skipit = new Array("channel1", "channel2", "channel3");
#3 to #2 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#4 to #3 - fragman ONLINE (06/16/2012) [-]
this is a little ugly, but I don't know of any better way at this moment.
you'll find the script in C:\Users\%username%\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default\Extensions\xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\1_0\script.js
while "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" is a random string. I don't know how that's generated but if it's based on the script source code it should be "camaaaeklepkjffjiookkjabipiidofl".
In this folder there are two files, manifest.json and script.js (which is the one you can edit using any text editor and just save it)
#5 to #4 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)