Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

fragman    

Rank #2173 on Comments
no avatar Level 303 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Online
Send mail to fragman Block fragman Invite fragman to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:10/03/2010
Last Login:10/02/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#3017
Comment Ranking:#2173
Highest Content Rank:#1376
Highest Comment Rank:#583
Content Thumbs: 10563 total,  13730 ,  3167
Comment Thumbs: 11110 total,  13763 ,  2653
Content Level Progress: 51% (51/100)
Level 201 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 202 Content: Comedic Genius
Comment Level Progress: 73% (73/100)
Level 303 Comments: Lord Of Laughs → Level 304 Comments: Lord Of Laughs
Subscribers:21
Content Views:447351
Times Content Favorited:1452 times
Total Comments Made:2523
FJ Points:20745
Favorite Tags: it (2) | Lost (2) | the (2)

latest user's comments

#14 - All that stuff is not unhealty as long as you don't overdo it …  [+] (1 new reply) 1 hour ago on DYK Comp #82 0
User avatar #19 - flyingfisherman (19 minutes ago) [-]
processed->do not buy anything at all
move to china farm your own rice and drink only purest water from some mountain
sounds good but not everyone have this opinion

My plan how to do not get fat is simple: do not eat 40 hamburgers every morning
and lift some heavy dumbbells 2minutes/day
If you can not find those 2 minutes that you would spend probably by watching some retarded show at mtv just go die

#21 - 'cause they were too lazy to look for actual pictures of pink … 1 hour ago on Tubby Custard 0
#38 - derp. Of course I mean dramatizing the lethality, not the … 1 hour ago on Black Twitter is best Twitter 0
#37 - What the honest **** are you talking about? O…  [+] (1 new reply) 1 hour ago on Black Twitter is best Twitter 0
#38 - fragman (1 hour ago) [-]
derp.
Of course I mean dramatizing the lethality, not the severity.
#60 - meh... I don't think less than 13% is that significant. 2 hours ago on 8 most incorrect... 0
#66 - Kind of, yeah. Vista was 6.0, Win7 went to 6.1.7, Win8 to … 8 hours ago on Math 0
#64 - >ME >Better than 2000 mfw 8 hours ago on Math +3
#122 - I'm not saying your intelligence is lacking. I'm just saying y…  [+] (1 new reply) 23 hours ago on Koreans 0
User avatar #123 - sciencexplain (23 hours ago) [-]
And once again, you're assuming. I HAVE been in crashes. I've been in nasty crashes before, once as a child and once recently. The recent one as the driver, and I know what I'm talking about. My intelligence is largely theory, but theory is equivalent to experience because it is applicable. You need to pull your head out of your ass and stop thinking that I have experience that you don't.
#105 - oh just shut up will you? Obviously you don't know cars at…  [+] (3 new replies) 10/01/2014 on Koreans -1
User avatar #108 - sciencexplain (10/01/2014) [-]
>seatbelt elasticity is negligible

HOLY FUCK. HOW ARE YOU SO RETARDED. PLEASE, TELL ME YOU'RE TROLLING.

Are you seriously fucking retarded? Seatbelts have stretching properties to them. I know what the fuck a pretensioner is, but you're on something completely different. I was not talking about a pretensioner. Those are for preventing the failure of the restricting property of a seatbelt and ensures that the passenger or driver is prevented from flying into the dash. ALL seatbelts are made of a material with a slight elastic stretch in them. This elastic stretch increases the time it takes for the passenger to move forward, and as I have explained before, the passenger then experiences vastly less force.

You are aware that "throwing around terminology" is irrelevant in this, right? The communication is key. Just because I "talk" a certain way doesn't mean my intelligence is lacking. You simply can't read and infer logical data from a paragraph and assume you think you know what I'm talking about when you just want the first chance to throw around terminology to make you sound smart. Pretensioners were irrelevant in my point, and if you seriously think that seatbelts don't have an elastic and slight stretching property, then you need to shoot yourself in the head.
#122 - fragman (23 hours ago) [-]
I'm not saying your intelligence is lacking. I'm just saying your experience is lacking. Having been in a few crashes, one of them while driving myself, I know the effects on your body and how useless someone trying to hold you back from an awkward position is.

But since it's pretty obvious that you can't teach experience to a fucking theorist, I'm ending this discussion here on my part.
User avatar #123 - sciencexplain (23 hours ago) [-]
And once again, you're assuming. I HAVE been in crashes. I've been in nasty crashes before, once as a child and once recently. The recent one as the driver, and I know what I'm talking about. My intelligence is largely theory, but theory is equivalent to experience because it is applicable. You need to pull your head out of your ass and stop thinking that I have experience that you don't.
#84 - If by that you mean promoting useful safety procedures (wearin…  [+] (9 new replies) 10/01/2014 on Koreans -1
User avatar #87 - sciencexplain (10/01/2014) [-]
I'm the troll? You're the one who thinks he knows fucking science. You've not bothered to consider the seatbelt elasticity, crumple zones or the reduction of force as a value represented by KE. You think you know what you're talking about, but you know absolutely fuck all about car crash science. You've not proven once to me that you actually are capable of consistent and logical science approaches.
#105 - fragman (10/01/2014) [-]
oh just shut up will you?
Obviously you don't know cars at all if your argument is seatbelt elasticity. Every halfway decent car built in the last 20 years has something called a pretensioner which in most cases is a gas capsule which in the event a crash sensor is triggered opens, causing the gas to expand explosively which in turn drives a piston to retract the belt, tightening it almost instantaneously. Therefore seat belt elasticity is absolutely negligible in the event of a crash.

While your theoretical knowledge probably exceeds mine, I really suggest doing some sort of car safety training because the way you talk, you shouldn't be allowed to have passengers in your car.
User avatar #108 - sciencexplain (10/01/2014) [-]
>seatbelt elasticity is negligible

HOLY FUCK. HOW ARE YOU SO RETARDED. PLEASE, TELL ME YOU'RE TROLLING.

Are you seriously fucking retarded? Seatbelts have stretching properties to them. I know what the fuck a pretensioner is, but you're on something completely different. I was not talking about a pretensioner. Those are for preventing the failure of the restricting property of a seatbelt and ensures that the passenger or driver is prevented from flying into the dash. ALL seatbelts are made of a material with a slight elastic stretch in them. This elastic stretch increases the time it takes for the passenger to move forward, and as I have explained before, the passenger then experiences vastly less force.

You are aware that "throwing around terminology" is irrelevant in this, right? The communication is key. Just because I "talk" a certain way doesn't mean my intelligence is lacking. You simply can't read and infer logical data from a paragraph and assume you think you know what I'm talking about when you just want the first chance to throw around terminology to make you sound smart. Pretensioners were irrelevant in my point, and if you seriously think that seatbelts don't have an elastic and slight stretching property, then you need to shoot yourself in the head.
#122 - fragman (23 hours ago) [-]
I'm not saying your intelligence is lacking. I'm just saying your experience is lacking. Having been in a few crashes, one of them while driving myself, I know the effects on your body and how useless someone trying to hold you back from an awkward position is.

But since it's pretty obvious that you can't teach experience to a fucking theorist, I'm ending this discussion here on my part.
User avatar #123 - sciencexplain (23 hours ago) [-]
And once again, you're assuming. I HAVE been in crashes. I've been in nasty crashes before, once as a child and once recently. The recent one as the driver, and I know what I'm talking about. My intelligence is largely theory, but theory is equivalent to experience because it is applicable. You need to pull your head out of your ass and stop thinking that I have experience that you don't.
User avatar #89 - faimbot (10/01/2014) [-]
Wait hold the phone, how many pounds of pressure can a human arm exert when pushed up against a surface like a car door? Im sure its more than enough to prevent a 90lb chick from hurtling forwards considering A) she is probably trying to stop her self moving forward also and B) the initial force needed to stop said girl will gradually reduce as the car slows down. it is completely feasible.

Anyone arguing against the physics of this needs to taken outside and spanked with a wooden spoon.
User avatar #92 - sciencexplain (10/01/2014) [-]
Well, you've made an excellent point there. The human arm can exert a LOT of pressure, but one thing: A human will have hardly any control over stopping themselves in a car crash. The seatbelt helps, another person's arm will help, but given their momentum and their natural kinetic energy forwards, they really can't do as much as the arm or belt can.
User avatar #93 - faimbot (10/01/2014) [-]
Well muscles for one, like the ones used to do sit ups, her feet will be firmly planted on the floor, sure the force she puts in trying to keep her body upright is nowhere near the amount of G's her body is trying to counter, but it is enough to at least push back as the car slows down. Whose to say she didnt extend her arms when she seen the impending accident, or at least lock her legs to force herself back into the seat?

so many things to consider, it's not like "perfect" scenarios crafted in a physics book for the purpose of teaching. How quickly did the car come to a stop? does driver lift? did the car turn/skid as it stopped? we dont know these things. but it is more likely that arm pressure (or even if he reached across and grabbed the seatbelt meaning it was grip strength) would be enough to prevent a more serious injury to a passenger, than simply being useless altogether.
User avatar #95 - sciencexplain (10/01/2014) [-]
Exactly my point. Subjective experiences mean that you cannot be certain, but can only teach as much to do as best as possible at reducing force.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2100

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #39 - myitems (07/04/2014) [-]
I've been advertising your channel skipper a lot lately, and someone suggested uploading a content for it. I did re-host it on userscripts, but if you don't mind I would like to upload a post about it. And yes, I have been making sure to give credit where it's due for you <3 It is an awesome thing.
#40 to #39 - fragman ONLINE (07/04/2014) [-]
sure, go ahead
User avatar #35 - DisgruntledTomato (10/16/2013) [-]
Just a quick reminder, I still use your channel skipper <3
#36 to #35 - fragman ONLINE (10/17/2013) [-]
woah that is still a thing?
awesome, thanks
User avatar #37 to #36 - DisgruntledTomato (10/17/2013) [-]
I don't know if others use it, but I still do. Probably going to write a UI for it as well. Pretty useful.
User avatar #33 - akkere (06/19/2012) [-]
I decided to do an EZ setup
www.mediafire.com/?b5qdg8cez3563db

I wasn't able to finish it in time before the post was out of its 24 hour slot, but it has a readme with some instructions so you don't have to keep repeating yourself

What do you think?
User avatar #26 - venumb ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Is it alright if I take what you have so far and edit it and repost the results as long as I mention your name? I plan on adding GUI and other features other than Skipper. The auto thumb/thumb down will probably be in there too.

Really good work on the idea :)
#27 to #26 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I really wouldn't recommend the thumb down feature, there is a vote limit for a certain timespan which could have negative impact on functionality and would also motivate people to post their content outside the channel.
But expanding it in general, sure.
User avatar #28 to #27 - venumb ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I guess your right. I'll leave the thumbing out of the expanded release. I have other ideas that I'm am way more motivated on accomplishing anyway.
#21 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
If you want, I can make a quick step by step guide for you to post for Chrome users and how to edit the skipped channels.
#22 to #21 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
this would be really nice. but since my 24 hour frame is almost done and this content will go back to the depths of *************** I dont think it will be necessary.
#23 to #22 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Ah I truly doubt that. This was a huge step forward for FJ today, it'll be remembered for a while. And you could upload a Firefox guide and a Chrome guide for newbies in the following days. Especially probably around Thursday or Friday since a lot of Bendingtime posts will come about Saturday. There will be tons of bitchin about it. :P
#24 to #23 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
good idea. I like it.
In this case it'd be wonderful if you could provide the chrome guide :)
#29 to #24 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Rawr, this should be good.
Here is the Tampermonkey Beta link
chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/gcalenpjmijncebpfijmoaglllgpjagf
#31 to #29 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
big yay for you, thx.
I think I'll have it ready by around thursday
#32 to #31 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
Sorry it took so long, I was PMing some people tryin to help them
#30 to #29 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I'll have a friend try it out later with that when he gets home though
#25 to #24 - negrocop ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I'll get to workin on it here in a few minutes :)
User avatar #12 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Which page did you fond the source code that showed the channels in an array?
User avatar #13 to #12 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
find*
#14 to #13 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I don't quite get what you mean...
the code is fully hand-written
User avatar #15 to #14 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Oh, I thought you said that there was a way to edit the source code.
#16 to #15 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
ah now I get it.
Depends on your browser. You might want to check out this if you're using chrome:
stackoverflow [DOT] com/questions/5258989/manually-adding-a-userscript-to-google-chrome
#17 to #16 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
rest should be in the content description.
User avatar #18 to #17 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
If you're referring to adding the channel skipper, don't worry about that it installed automatically :). I was just wondering about when you said that you could edit the source code so it only skips certain channels.
#19 to #18 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
actually that's what I meant...
you'll need to find where the script is stored in order to edit it. that should be explained in the description pretty much, on the stackoverflow site you'll find the various user-datadir defaults for chrome.
then edit the file script.js in notepad++ or something like that
User avatar #20 to #19 - natedimes (06/18/2012) [-]
Ohhh ok now I get it :). Thank you, Sir.
User avatar #9 - missladyhalmighty (06/18/2012) [-]
You are a god. << Seriously, thank you.
#10 to #9 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
you're welcome
User avatar #8 - fjdesign (06/18/2012) [-]
Good work my friend. I am truly proud of what you have done. If you ever need anything from us please do ask.
#11 to #8 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
thank you.
#6 - mr skeltal (06/18/2012) [-]
i ahve no ******* idea what a user scrpt is. how do i use it. inb4 newfag
#7 to #6 - fragman ONLINE (06/18/2012) [-]
I don't know you, and this is crazy...
but read the damn description maybe?

seriously the manual in there should be pretty straightforward
#34 to #7 - mr skeltal (06/25/2012) [-]
**** you you, you analnutbag. go die in a ******* fire
#1 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#2 to #1 - fragman ONLINE (06/16/2012) [-]
depends on your browser. if you're using firefox with greasemonkey, you can simply create a new user script (after you've defined a default userscript editor, e.g. notepad++) and paste the source code. then edit the array defined in line 9 to be filled with all the channels you'd like skipped, like this:
var skipit = new Array("channel1", "channel2", "channel3");
#3 to #2 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
#4 to #3 - fragman ONLINE (06/16/2012) [-]
this is a little ugly, but I don't know of any better way at this moment.
you'll find the script in C:\Users\%username%\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default\Extensions\xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\1_0\script.js
while "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" is a random string. I don't know how that's generated but if it's based on the script source code it should be "camaaaeklepkjffjiookkjabipiidofl".
In this folder there are two files, manifest.json and script.js (which is the one you can edit using any text editor and just save it)
#5 to #4 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)