Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

footballmaniac    

Rank #4482 on Content
footballmaniac Avatar Level 218 Comments: Comedic Genius
Online
Send mail to footballmaniac Block footballmaniac Invite footballmaniac to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:3/03/2011
Last Login:7/24/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#4482
Comment Ranking:#37660
Highest Content Rank:#1874
Highest Comment Rank:#2725
Content Thumbs: 4074 total,  5868 ,  1794
Comment Thumbs: 1837 total,  7407 ,  5570
Content Level Progress: 18% (18/100)
Level 137 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 138 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 15% (15/100)
Level 218 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:4
Content Views:224430
Times Content Favorited:110 times
Total Comments Made:2649
FJ Points:5536

latest user's comments

#43 - Cool story bro. Tell it to someone who cares.  [+] (5 new replies) 05/08/2014 on Click to Expand (or enlarge) -1
User avatar #45 - mephistesulfurion (05/08/2014) [-]
You out of all people should care.
Stop drinking or stop driving, Either one is good.
User avatar #44 - mephistesulfurion (05/08/2014) [-]
You out of all people should care.
It's for your own good and the good of people, Stop driving or drinking, Either one.
User avatar #46 - footballmaniac (05/08/2014) [-]
I don't need your permission to drink, or to drive.
User avatar #47 - mephistesulfurion (05/08/2014) [-]
Clearly you think and act like a child so you'd need someone's permission.
I bet your parents really regret that leftover condom on the night desk.
User avatar #48 - footballmaniac (05/08/2014) [-]
Nice comeback. lmfao

I hope your parents get killed by a drunk driver. That would be so hilarious.
#321 - Because I fail to find the humor in a man eating his breakfast…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/06/2014 on Chicken and waffles -5
#339 - anonymous (05/06/2014) [-]
noone said anything about him being black except you
#330 - theseustheminotaur (05/06/2014) [-]
You can disagree with Obama all you want, but he is no way near as bad as bush. Bush isn't the worst president of all time, but Obama isn't near him at all.

To dismiss adulation as "because he's black" is failing to see the point. You can't just assume it is "because he is black" when no one said anything relatively close to that. You're making a grand assumption and arguing against it, which is a logical fallacy.

If I were to say you disagree with him only because he is black, and then tell you that he is the black Reagan, I would be just as wrong.
User avatar #323 - kinginyellow (05/06/2014) [-]
It's not because he's black, it's him actually making a kinda good point, reporter's being a dick for not leaving him alone to eat.
#317 - Oooohh!!!! Obama is eating breakfast!!!! Whooopee!!!! …  [+] (5 new replies) 05/06/2014 on Chicken and waffles -12
User avatar #320 - quicksilveralicorn (05/06/2014) [-]
Your fun at parties, aren't you?

Cause you seem like a nice person
User avatar #321 - footballmaniac (05/06/2014) [-]
Because I fail to find the humor in a man eating his breakfast, so that makes me a mean person? Well, I AM usually a dick, but this isn't the reason..

I'm just sick of everyone who doesn't know shit about politics riding Obama's jock because he's 'a black president'. If he were white, everyone would already hate him. You know what? George Bush was like a white Obama.
#339 - anonymous (05/06/2014) [-]
noone said anything about him being black except you
#330 - theseustheminotaur (05/06/2014) [-]
You can disagree with Obama all you want, but he is no way near as bad as bush. Bush isn't the worst president of all time, but Obama isn't near him at all.

To dismiss adulation as "because he's black" is failing to see the point. You can't just assume it is "because he is black" when no one said anything relatively close to that. You're making a grand assumption and arguing against it, which is a logical fallacy.

If I were to say you disagree with him only because he is black, and then tell you that he is the black Reagan, I would be just as wrong.
User avatar #323 - kinginyellow (05/06/2014) [-]
It's not because he's black, it's him actually making a kinda good point, reporter's being a dick for not leaving him alone to eat.
#141 - I've noticed a problem. Figured I'd might as well benefit from it too. 05/05/2014 on You'll get no title and... +1
#69 - My buddy has a cat named Dog. 05/03/2014 on Freeing a Prisoner 0
#126 - Fair enough. I guess I should have specified 'toast with butte…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/02/2014 on You'll get no title and... -1
#127 - eddymolly (05/02/2014) [-]
God damn it, I looked and now i'm really hungry!
#123 - Thank you. I specifically made sure to use the best piece of t…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/02/2014 on You'll get no title and... -1
#125 - eddymolly (05/02/2014) [-]
Well its not the best piece, As I said, could have used some butter.

But yeah, pretty tasty, now i'm hungry
User avatar #126 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Fair enough. I guess I should have specified 'toast with butter' in my search query.
#127 - eddymolly (05/02/2014) [-]
God damn it, I looked and now i'm really hungry!
#118 - Well excuse me if I don't understand a reference to a show I d…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/02/2014 on You'll get no title and... 0
User avatar #130 - captainfuckitall (05/02/2014) [-]
So why would you ask them to explain a joke anyways? You don't watch the show, you're not gonna find it funny.

I play Demons/Dark Souls, so I look at that content. I don't play League of Legends, so I skip that content. See?
#117 - Well, my +170 thumbs beg to differ. u mad?  [+] (1 new reply) 05/02/2014 on You'll get no title and... -1
User avatar #129 - sobir (05/02/2014) [-]
ungrateful faggot
#115 - Maybe that's a bad example, but people WILL thumb you down for…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/02/2014 on You'll get no title and... 0
User avatar #116 - captainfuckitall (05/02/2014) [-]
1: No it's not, that's why we have the Explains here. We WANT people to ask questions
2: People only get thumbed down for asking about the joke if it's insanely obvious
User avatar #118 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Well excuse me if I don't understand a reference to a show I don't watch.
User avatar #130 - captainfuckitall (05/02/2014) [-]
So why would you ask them to explain a joke anyways? You don't watch the show, you're not gonna find it funny.

I play Demons/Dark Souls, so I look at that content. I don't play League of Legends, so I skip that content. See?
#108 - No I don't watch Game of Thrones. Ooooooopo…  [+] (3 new replies) 05/02/2014 on You'll get no title and... -1
#110 - tarnis (05/02/2014) [-]
#121 - anonymous (05/02/2014) [-]
well i dont have any wine..
#122 - tarnis (05/02/2014) [-]
#36 - So by that same logic, I shouldn't be allowed to walk upon the…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/02/2014 on Click to Expand (or enlarge) -1
User avatar #37 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
When you are in public, i.e. walking on public streets, there are laws you must obey as well. This is how legislation works, laws are passed in the public interest on publicly funded areas, like streets and parks.

No one has a right to use anything publicly funded, they have the privilege of using it if they follow the grounds of whatever legislative requirements there are to make use of said publicly funded space. None of those people have the right to use the road, they have to follow the laws in order to use it, and so the fuck do you.
#34 - I paid for my car. I'll drive it whether the law says I can or not.  [+] (3 new replies) 05/02/2014 on Click to Expand (or enlarge) -1
User avatar #35 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
You paid for the car, but other people paid for the roads along with you. You do not privately own the space upon which you drive your car, and must therefore follow the laws implemented on those spaces. Own a parking lot? Drive in it to your heart's content, you can't be pulled over. But driving on public roads is a privilege, not a right, and you will respect the lives of others or you will go to jail.
User avatar #36 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
So by that same logic, I shouldn't be allowed to walk upon the roads?

And you just said it yourself, I helped pay for the roads too. So I have the right to them too. Idc if the government disagrees.
User avatar #37 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
When you are in public, i.e. walking on public streets, there are laws you must obey as well. This is how legislation works, laws are passed in the public interest on publicly funded areas, like streets and parks.

No one has a right to use anything publicly funded, they have the privilege of using it if they follow the grounds of whatever legislative requirements there are to make use of said publicly funded space. None of those people have the right to use the road, they have to follow the laws in order to use it, and so the fuck do you.
#32 - I don't need yours or anyone else's permission to drive, sober…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/02/2014 on Click to Expand (or enlarge) -2
User avatar #33 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
Actually, yes you do, it is a privilege not a right. You require the permission of the state to drive your vehicle. I'm a libertarian, I get the mentality, but since this is a service provided to you by the state, they have every right to manage it. If the roads were all privately funded, then you would need the permission of those private forces to drive on their roads. It's the same principle.
User avatar #34 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
I paid for my car. I'll drive it whether the law says I can or not.
User avatar #35 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
You paid for the car, but other people paid for the roads along with you. You do not privately own the space upon which you drive your car, and must therefore follow the laws implemented on those spaces. Own a parking lot? Drive in it to your heart's content, you can't be pulled over. But driving on public roads is a privilege, not a right, and you will respect the lives of others or you will go to jail.
User avatar #36 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
So by that same logic, I shouldn't be allowed to walk upon the roads?

And you just said it yourself, I helped pay for the roads too. So I have the right to them too. Idc if the government disagrees.
User avatar #37 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
When you are in public, i.e. walking on public streets, there are laws you must obey as well. This is how legislation works, laws are passed in the public interest on publicly funded areas, like streets and parks.

No one has a right to use anything publicly funded, they have the privilege of using it if they follow the grounds of whatever legislative requirements there are to make use of said publicly funded space. None of those people have the right to use the road, they have to follow the laws in order to use it, and so the fuck do you.
#29 - Time?  [+] (1 new reply) 05/02/2014 on Click to Expand (or enlarge) -2
User avatar #30 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
im good for whenever
#27 - Yeah faggot? Give me an address and I'll meet you there.  [+] (3 new replies) 05/02/2014 on Click to Expand (or enlarge) -1
#28 - bigfootluke has deleted their comment.
User avatar #29 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Time?
User avatar #30 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
im good for whenever
#25 - Yeah real easy to talk shit on the internet. I know for a fact…  [+] (5 new replies) 05/02/2014 on Click to Expand (or enlarge) -2
User avatar #26 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
your talking shit too. bet you wouldnt be able to do shit against me
User avatar #27 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Yeah faggot? Give me an address and I'll meet you there.
#28 - bigfootluke has deleted their comment.
User avatar #29 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Time?
User avatar #30 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
im good for whenever
#23 - You're a fucking retard. That has nothing to do with it. If yo…  [+] (14 new replies) 05/02/2014 on Click to Expand (or enlarge) -1
User avatar #31 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
What part of driving is a privilege, not a right, are you not getting? They can demand that due to the fact that you were driving on public-funded streets, in a conveyance for which there is a required license. Don't want to have the risk of your blood being drawn? Don't fucking drive. Don't want it to be an issue either way? Don't drink and drive.
User avatar #32 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
I don't need yours or anyone else's permission to drive, sober or drunk.
User avatar #33 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
Actually, yes you do, it is a privilege not a right. You require the permission of the state to drive your vehicle. I'm a libertarian, I get the mentality, but since this is a service provided to you by the state, they have every right to manage it. If the roads were all privately funded, then you would need the permission of those private forces to drive on their roads. It's the same principle.
User avatar #34 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
I paid for my car. I'll drive it whether the law says I can or not.
User avatar #35 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
You paid for the car, but other people paid for the roads along with you. You do not privately own the space upon which you drive your car, and must therefore follow the laws implemented on those spaces. Own a parking lot? Drive in it to your heart's content, you can't be pulled over. But driving on public roads is a privilege, not a right, and you will respect the lives of others or you will go to jail.
User avatar #36 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
So by that same logic, I shouldn't be allowed to walk upon the roads?

And you just said it yourself, I helped pay for the roads too. So I have the right to them too. Idc if the government disagrees.
User avatar #37 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
When you are in public, i.e. walking on public streets, there are laws you must obey as well. This is how legislation works, laws are passed in the public interest on publicly funded areas, like streets and parks.

No one has a right to use anything publicly funded, they have the privilege of using it if they follow the grounds of whatever legislative requirements there are to make use of said publicly funded space. None of those people have the right to use the road, they have to follow the laws in order to use it, and so the fuck do you.
User avatar #24 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
i hope your drunk ass dies in the most horrific crash ever
User avatar #25 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Yeah real easy to talk shit on the internet. I know for a fact you wouldn't say that to my face. Go back to 9gag, fucking 12 year old.
User avatar #26 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
your talking shit too. bet you wouldnt be able to do shit against me
User avatar #27 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Yeah faggot? Give me an address and I'll meet you there.
#28 - bigfootluke has deleted their comment.
User avatar #29 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Time?
User avatar #30 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
im good for whenever
#93 - Doesn't look like it's reaching front page. But I'll take my 1…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/02/2014 on You'll get no title and... -1
User avatar #94 - yaboybtrue (05/02/2014) [-]
I show 160, so you're on my frontpage at least.
#91 - Oh no. Your comment is so hurtful. My ego is shattered.  [+] (3 new replies) 05/02/2014 on You'll get no title and... -2
User avatar #92 - yaboybtrue (05/02/2014) [-]
Then my plan went perfectly! That out of the way, yes literally anything can get thumbed.
Go av a beer m8, and wait for front page toast.
User avatar #93 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Doesn't look like it's reaching front page. But I'll take my 150 thumbs any day.
User avatar #94 - yaboybtrue (05/02/2014) [-]
I show 160, so you're on my frontpage at least.
#21 - A BIT too strict? If you get arrested for a DUI and refuse a b…  [+] (16 new replies) 05/02/2014 on Click to Expand (or enlarge) -1
User avatar #22 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
there's a reason why dipshit. if you refuse a blood test then you know in the back of your mind that you were too drunk. and the court knows it too. thats why its fucking strict.
User avatar #23 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
You're a fucking retard. That has nothing to do with it. If you refuse, you're automatically tried for the highest tier. You're not saving yourself by refusing.
Have you considered that maybe there's a philosophical principle behind it and the concept of being forced to have your blood drawn pisses you off?
User avatar #31 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
What part of driving is a privilege, not a right, are you not getting? They can demand that due to the fact that you were driving on public-funded streets, in a conveyance for which there is a required license. Don't want to have the risk of your blood being drawn? Don't fucking drive. Don't want it to be an issue either way? Don't drink and drive.
User avatar #32 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
I don't need yours or anyone else's permission to drive, sober or drunk.
User avatar #33 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
Actually, yes you do, it is a privilege not a right. You require the permission of the state to drive your vehicle. I'm a libertarian, I get the mentality, but since this is a service provided to you by the state, they have every right to manage it. If the roads were all privately funded, then you would need the permission of those private forces to drive on their roads. It's the same principle.
User avatar #34 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
I paid for my car. I'll drive it whether the law says I can or not.
User avatar #35 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
You paid for the car, but other people paid for the roads along with you. You do not privately own the space upon which you drive your car, and must therefore follow the laws implemented on those spaces. Own a parking lot? Drive in it to your heart's content, you can't be pulled over. But driving on public roads is a privilege, not a right, and you will respect the lives of others or you will go to jail.
User avatar #36 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
So by that same logic, I shouldn't be allowed to walk upon the roads?

And you just said it yourself, I helped pay for the roads too. So I have the right to them too. Idc if the government disagrees.
User avatar #37 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
When you are in public, i.e. walking on public streets, there are laws you must obey as well. This is how legislation works, laws are passed in the public interest on publicly funded areas, like streets and parks.

No one has a right to use anything publicly funded, they have the privilege of using it if they follow the grounds of whatever legislative requirements there are to make use of said publicly funded space. None of those people have the right to use the road, they have to follow the laws in order to use it, and so the fuck do you.
User avatar #24 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
i hope your drunk ass dies in the most horrific crash ever
User avatar #25 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Yeah real easy to talk shit on the internet. I know for a fact you wouldn't say that to my face. Go back to 9gag, fucking 12 year old.
User avatar #26 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
your talking shit too. bet you wouldnt be able to do shit against me
User avatar #27 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Yeah faggot? Give me an address and I'll meet you there.
#28 - bigfootluke has deleted their comment.
User avatar #29 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Time?
User avatar #30 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
im good for whenever
#19 - It's not like I get fucking trashed and go driving. I do have …  [+] (18 new replies) 05/02/2014 on Click to Expand (or enlarge) -2
User avatar #20 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
The content and your earlier comments paint a different picture, but I'm glad you have limits. Also, driving is a privilege not a right, and in this instance government is actually totally in the right to make and enforce laws against intoxicated driving. I agree they're a bit too strict on the levels of intoxication, but they are dealing with an epidemic killer that kills more young people than anything else in the country. You have to be strict against such things.
User avatar #21 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
A BIT too strict? If you get arrested for a DUI and refuse a blood test, you get more jail time than Casey Anthony got for murdering her kid.
User avatar #22 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
there's a reason why dipshit. if you refuse a blood test then you know in the back of your mind that you were too drunk. and the court knows it too. thats why its fucking strict.
User avatar #23 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
You're a fucking retard. That has nothing to do with it. If you refuse, you're automatically tried for the highest tier. You're not saving yourself by refusing.
Have you considered that maybe there's a philosophical principle behind it and the concept of being forced to have your blood drawn pisses you off?
User avatar #31 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
What part of driving is a privilege, not a right, are you not getting? They can demand that due to the fact that you were driving on public-funded streets, in a conveyance for which there is a required license. Don't want to have the risk of your blood being drawn? Don't fucking drive. Don't want it to be an issue either way? Don't drink and drive.
User avatar #32 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
I don't need yours or anyone else's permission to drive, sober or drunk.
User avatar #33 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
Actually, yes you do, it is a privilege not a right. You require the permission of the state to drive your vehicle. I'm a libertarian, I get the mentality, but since this is a service provided to you by the state, they have every right to manage it. If the roads were all privately funded, then you would need the permission of those private forces to drive on their roads. It's the same principle.
User avatar #34 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
I paid for my car. I'll drive it whether the law says I can or not.
User avatar #35 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
You paid for the car, but other people paid for the roads along with you. You do not privately own the space upon which you drive your car, and must therefore follow the laws implemented on those spaces. Own a parking lot? Drive in it to your heart's content, you can't be pulled over. But driving on public roads is a privilege, not a right, and you will respect the lives of others or you will go to jail.
User avatar #36 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
So by that same logic, I shouldn't be allowed to walk upon the roads?

And you just said it yourself, I helped pay for the roads too. So I have the right to them too. Idc if the government disagrees.
User avatar #37 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
When you are in public, i.e. walking on public streets, there are laws you must obey as well. This is how legislation works, laws are passed in the public interest on publicly funded areas, like streets and parks.

No one has a right to use anything publicly funded, they have the privilege of using it if they follow the grounds of whatever legislative requirements there are to make use of said publicly funded space. None of those people have the right to use the road, they have to follow the laws in order to use it, and so the fuck do you.
User avatar #24 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
i hope your drunk ass dies in the most horrific crash ever
User avatar #25 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Yeah real easy to talk shit on the internet. I know for a fact you wouldn't say that to my face. Go back to 9gag, fucking 12 year old.
User avatar #26 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
your talking shit too. bet you wouldnt be able to do shit against me
User avatar #27 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Yeah faggot? Give me an address and I'll meet you there.
#28 - bigfootluke has deleted their comment.
User avatar #29 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Time?
User avatar #30 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
im good for whenever
#50 - Hey guess what? I don't give a flying fuck what you think. 05/02/2014 on Mean Girls -2
#17 - I have tremendous reflexes, so your point is moot. So while my…  [+] (20 new replies) 05/02/2014 on Click to Expand (or enlarge) -2
User avatar #18 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
You're being cute right now, and your ego is quite well developed I see. But it's irrelevant. Alcohol dulls the senses far more than just a relatively slow person, and as I said you will find out sooner or later. Is it really such a hassle to avoid such an unneccesary risk? No, you just don't want to admit there is any risk because your ego can't take it.

Keep being superman, I'm sure you'll save someone from living sooner or later.
User avatar #19 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
It's not like I get fucking trashed and go driving. I do have my limits. I can judge for myself when I'm too fucked up to drive; I don't need the government doing it for me.
User avatar #20 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
The content and your earlier comments paint a different picture, but I'm glad you have limits. Also, driving is a privilege not a right, and in this instance government is actually totally in the right to make and enforce laws against intoxicated driving. I agree they're a bit too strict on the levels of intoxication, but they are dealing with an epidemic killer that kills more young people than anything else in the country. You have to be strict against such things.
User avatar #21 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
A BIT too strict? If you get arrested for a DUI and refuse a blood test, you get more jail time than Casey Anthony got for murdering her kid.
User avatar #22 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
there's a reason why dipshit. if you refuse a blood test then you know in the back of your mind that you were too drunk. and the court knows it too. thats why its fucking strict.
User avatar #23 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
You're a fucking retard. That has nothing to do with it. If you refuse, you're automatically tried for the highest tier. You're not saving yourself by refusing.
Have you considered that maybe there's a philosophical principle behind it and the concept of being forced to have your blood drawn pisses you off?
User avatar #31 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
What part of driving is a privilege, not a right, are you not getting? They can demand that due to the fact that you were driving on public-funded streets, in a conveyance for which there is a required license. Don't want to have the risk of your blood being drawn? Don't fucking drive. Don't want it to be an issue either way? Don't drink and drive.
User avatar #32 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
I don't need yours or anyone else's permission to drive, sober or drunk.
User avatar #33 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
Actually, yes you do, it is a privilege not a right. You require the permission of the state to drive your vehicle. I'm a libertarian, I get the mentality, but since this is a service provided to you by the state, they have every right to manage it. If the roads were all privately funded, then you would need the permission of those private forces to drive on their roads. It's the same principle.
User avatar #34 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
I paid for my car. I'll drive it whether the law says I can or not.
User avatar #35 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
You paid for the car, but other people paid for the roads along with you. You do not privately own the space upon which you drive your car, and must therefore follow the laws implemented on those spaces. Own a parking lot? Drive in it to your heart's content, you can't be pulled over. But driving on public roads is a privilege, not a right, and you will respect the lives of others or you will go to jail.
User avatar #36 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
So by that same logic, I shouldn't be allowed to walk upon the roads?

And you just said it yourself, I helped pay for the roads too. So I have the right to them too. Idc if the government disagrees.
User avatar #37 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
When you are in public, i.e. walking on public streets, there are laws you must obey as well. This is how legislation works, laws are passed in the public interest on publicly funded areas, like streets and parks.

No one has a right to use anything publicly funded, they have the privilege of using it if they follow the grounds of whatever legislative requirements there are to make use of said publicly funded space. None of those people have the right to use the road, they have to follow the laws in order to use it, and so the fuck do you.
User avatar #24 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
i hope your drunk ass dies in the most horrific crash ever
User avatar #25 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Yeah real easy to talk shit on the internet. I know for a fact you wouldn't say that to my face. Go back to 9gag, fucking 12 year old.
User avatar #26 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
your talking shit too. bet you wouldnt be able to do shit against me
User avatar #27 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Yeah faggot? Give me an address and I'll meet you there.
#28 - bigfootluke has deleted their comment.
User avatar #29 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Time?
User avatar #30 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
im good for whenever
#15 - I know how to drive, retard.  [+] (22 new replies) 05/02/2014 on Click to Expand (or enlarge) -1
User avatar #16 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
knowing how to drive does not render alcohol meaningless, it does not reduce one iota it's effects on the judgement center of your brain, your reduced reaction speed, all of which is compounded with the more you drink. Yes, you can safely arrive at your destination while drunk, but you will ALWAYS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION react more slowly to things on the road. Your vision, ability to determine signage and predict the actions of others on the road, all of it becomes impaired. Don't think that a baseline of driving ability will save you from the effects of intoxication, it will catch up to you one day.

But you'll find that out on your own, one way or another.
User avatar #17 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
I have tremendous reflexes, so your point is moot. So while my reflexes may be slowed when drunk, they're still as good as the average sober person. I once dodged a deer in the road, yes, while drunk.
But even if that wasn't the point, should anyone with slow reflexes not be allowed to drive? They naturally slow down over time, so should anyone older than 45 not be allowed to drive?
User avatar #18 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
You're being cute right now, and your ego is quite well developed I see. But it's irrelevant. Alcohol dulls the senses far more than just a relatively slow person, and as I said you will find out sooner or later. Is it really such a hassle to avoid such an unneccesary risk? No, you just don't want to admit there is any risk because your ego can't take it.

Keep being superman, I'm sure you'll save someone from living sooner or later.
User avatar #19 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
It's not like I get fucking trashed and go driving. I do have my limits. I can judge for myself when I'm too fucked up to drive; I don't need the government doing it for me.
User avatar #20 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
The content and your earlier comments paint a different picture, but I'm glad you have limits. Also, driving is a privilege not a right, and in this instance government is actually totally in the right to make and enforce laws against intoxicated driving. I agree they're a bit too strict on the levels of intoxication, but they are dealing with an epidemic killer that kills more young people than anything else in the country. You have to be strict against such things.
User avatar #21 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
A BIT too strict? If you get arrested for a DUI and refuse a blood test, you get more jail time than Casey Anthony got for murdering her kid.
User avatar #22 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
there's a reason why dipshit. if you refuse a blood test then you know in the back of your mind that you were too drunk. and the court knows it too. thats why its fucking strict.
User avatar #23 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
You're a fucking retard. That has nothing to do with it. If you refuse, you're automatically tried for the highest tier. You're not saving yourself by refusing.
Have you considered that maybe there's a philosophical principle behind it and the concept of being forced to have your blood drawn pisses you off?
User avatar #31 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
What part of driving is a privilege, not a right, are you not getting? They can demand that due to the fact that you were driving on public-funded streets, in a conveyance for which there is a required license. Don't want to have the risk of your blood being drawn? Don't fucking drive. Don't want it to be an issue either way? Don't drink and drive.
User avatar #32 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
I don't need yours or anyone else's permission to drive, sober or drunk.
User avatar #33 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
Actually, yes you do, it is a privilege not a right. You require the permission of the state to drive your vehicle. I'm a libertarian, I get the mentality, but since this is a service provided to you by the state, they have every right to manage it. If the roads were all privately funded, then you would need the permission of those private forces to drive on their roads. It's the same principle.
User avatar #34 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
I paid for my car. I'll drive it whether the law says I can or not.
User avatar #35 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
You paid for the car, but other people paid for the roads along with you. You do not privately own the space upon which you drive your car, and must therefore follow the laws implemented on those spaces. Own a parking lot? Drive in it to your heart's content, you can't be pulled over. But driving on public roads is a privilege, not a right, and you will respect the lives of others or you will go to jail.
User avatar #36 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
So by that same logic, I shouldn't be allowed to walk upon the roads?

And you just said it yourself, I helped pay for the roads too. So I have the right to them too. Idc if the government disagrees.
User avatar #37 - teranin (05/02/2014) [-]
When you are in public, i.e. walking on public streets, there are laws you must obey as well. This is how legislation works, laws are passed in the public interest on publicly funded areas, like streets and parks.

No one has a right to use anything publicly funded, they have the privilege of using it if they follow the grounds of whatever legislative requirements there are to make use of said publicly funded space. None of those people have the right to use the road, they have to follow the laws in order to use it, and so the fuck do you.
User avatar #24 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
i hope your drunk ass dies in the most horrific crash ever
User avatar #25 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Yeah real easy to talk shit on the internet. I know for a fact you wouldn't say that to my face. Go back to 9gag, fucking 12 year old.
User avatar #26 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
your talking shit too. bet you wouldnt be able to do shit against me
User avatar #27 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Yeah faggot? Give me an address and I'll meet you there.
#28 - bigfootluke has deleted their comment.
User avatar #29 - footballmaniac (05/02/2014) [-]
Time?
User avatar #30 - bigfootluke (05/02/2014) [-]
im good for whenever
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2200

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#6 - ithumbdownall (09/02/2013) [-]
I changed my mind. I don't want to get thumbed down to the point where I can't thumb down everyone else. Here's the picture you wanted.
User avatar #8 to #6 - footballmaniac ONLINE (10/29/2013) [-]
*looks at username*

You hypocrite!
#9 to #8 - ithumbdownall (11/14/2013) [-]
Fuck you.
User avatar #5 - mycatthenazi (07/05/2012) [-]
**mycatthenazi rolled user lunasshadow **
User avatar #1 - TardytheTurtle (09/03/2011) [-]
i just took your comment virginity against your will
do you feel like a dirty whore now?
User avatar #2 to #1 - footballmaniac ONLINE (09/03/2011) [-]
lol. I could always delete. :P
User avatar #3 to #2 - TardytheTurtle (09/03/2011) [-]
and i could keep commenting until you block me
 Friends (0)