Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

fogglebeast    

Rank #6871 on Comments
fogglebeast Avatar Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius
Offline
Send mail to fogglebeast Block fogglebeast Invite fogglebeast to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:11/23/2011
Last Login:7/23/2014
Location:Heemscreeble
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#6871
Highest Comment Rank:#3204
Comment Thumbs: 1483 total,  1803 ,  320
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 20% (20/100)
Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 214 Comments: Comedic Genius
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:187
FJ Points:1336

latest user's comments

#218 - I honestly have no idea how this game sells. It's the same as …  [+] (6 new replies) 09/28/2012 on FIFA -2
#228 - vassia (09/28/2012) [-]
<--- You belong here
#221 - bacabac (09/28/2012) [-]
Says the guy that probably plays CoD or Halo.
User avatar #243 - cosmicoverdose (09/28/2012) [-]
I was agreeing with you, as soon as you brought Halo into it, i thumbed you down, Look at the difference between Halo 3 and Halo 4, then say that.
#271 - sitodaboss (09/28/2012) [-]
thank you my good sir,if you hate halo its simply because you are terrible at it
User avatar #231 - fogglebeast (09/28/2012) [-]
Well, you see - even with CoD and Halo, there are significant changes. There are new maps, where as Fifa has the same square area over and over again. There are new wapons and mechanics in CoD and Halo, where in Fifa, they add new footballers that do the exact same thing all the other ones do. I haven't played a Halo game in a while, and it's been a very long time since I've played Cod (I think the fourth one was the last one I had), but all I'm saying is that there's a notable difference in those games, but not in Fifa.
#249 - pointblanc (09/28/2012) [-]
#113 - Setting themselves on fire isn't the same as setting others on… 09/27/2012 on religion of peace 0
#6 - Exactly - I've always thought so when I see posts like this on… 09/26/2012 on art vs vandalism +11
#233 - May I assume that you're one of those hyper-patriotic American…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/26/2012 on hybrid obesity 0
#236 - youarenotme (09/26/2012) [-]
i wouldn't say hyper-patriotic but i am patriotic yes. but my main issue with this is i just think 'murica sounds and looks dumb..
#10 - I've never understood why in America it's known as gas when it…  [+] (2 new replies) 09/25/2012 on FJ > Homework +2
#14 - applejackownage has deleted their comment.
#12 - darthtomale (09/25/2012) [-]
it never occurred to me
#20 - I quite like that one. However, if we consider a version of th…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/20/2012 on Bedtime Paradox 0
User avatar #21 - cryingchicken (09/20/2012) [-]
Please read comment number 7.
#430 - The one about the Soviets on Venus - if that one's true, then … 08/26/2012 on did you know? 6 0
#48 - Interesting. However, I think you misread a few things I menti…  [+] (1 new reply) 08/19/2012 on gens 0
#49 - ilwylltwo (08/20/2012) [-]
All right, then. I find that Gen 5 pokemon are pretty well designed, but we're just going to have to agree to disagree as this is a subject of opinion and I would like to settle this argument "as sirs" if you wouldn't mind.
#33 - I've heard this argument too many times now. Whenever the subj…  [+] (3 new replies) 08/16/2012 on gens +3
#47 - ilwylltwo (08/18/2012) [-]
May I direct your attention to Machoke, Machamp, Hitmonchan, and Jynx. While it's true that there are many more pokemon from Gen 5 that do wear clothes, there have been pokemon that wear clothes since Gen I so don't act as if it's a new thing, it isn't. And to believe that everyone imagined the same things you do is just, how should I put this, heaps of rubbish. I, for one, did not imagine blob monsters lurking and I'll bet there are many more that didn't. Everyone imagines different things.

I did some quick math; there are 10 pokemon in Gen I based on "unnatural" objects (this includes ghosts and man-made objects) which is roughly 7% of pokemon introduced in Gen I, and there are 16 pokemon based on "unnatural" from Gen 5 which makes up roughly 10% of pokemon introduced in Gen 5. With 3% difference, the ratio between "naturally-based" and "unnaturally-based" pokemon in each generation is not different enough for it to be of much significance. Also, I wouldn't say that Golem's design is simple as it has a boulder that has multiple cracks and mini plateaus on it. And for someone who wants to give Grimer and Muk a break, you should learn how to spell Muk.

TL;DR: This argument fails to mention clothed pokemon in Kanto and he didn't do research.
#48 - fogglebeast (08/19/2012) [-]
Interesting. However, I think you misread a few things I mentioned. First of all, you presumed that just because the clothed Pokemon such as Hitmonchan, Jynx, Machoke, etc. are generation one Pokemon, I think they're well designed - oh contraire. In fact, I hate them - I think they look terrible. I stated, 'I can't imagine many people having Mr. Mime as their favourite Pokemon, nor can I imagine Garbodor filling that slot, either'. By this, I meant that there are some terribly designed generation Pokemon out there - and Mr. Mime, with its gloves and clown ensemble, is one of the worst. You made an error - everyone does (yes, I accidently misspelled Muk, just as easily as I may go about spelling Gastly as 'Ghastly'). There are many gen. five Pokemon I consider as terribly designed for reasons such as, many of them are just furniture with eyes slapped on them. Or food. Or rubbish. There are many gen. one Pokemon like this too. However, Golem and Grimer are at least based on things that weren't just lying around in someone's lounge.
#49 - ilwylltwo (08/20/2012) [-]
All right, then. I find that Gen 5 pokemon are pretty well designed, but we're just going to have to agree to disagree as this is a subject of opinion and I would like to settle this argument "as sirs" if you wouldn't mind.
#35 - Well, I say... What I'd give to be a part of that - playing an… 07/07/2012 on Classy as fuck Flash Mob 0
#18 - I spent AGES trying to figure it out until I gave up and check…  [+] (3 new replies) 07/07/2012 on Epic Paradox +40
User avatar #45 - luakazuki (07/07/2012) [-]
Or Australian aha
User avatar #21 - heinnlinn (07/07/2012) [-]
Para also means "side by side". So side by side docks.
User avatar #19 - willowpuff (07/07/2012) [-]
Had no idea what I was looking at until your comment. Parra-docks.
#29 - Not necessarily. The chances are that the random person will h… 07/06/2012 on pro-life because.... +4
#23 - Simple - ask, "My skin colour, or your skin colour?"… 06/29/2012 on Art Class +2
#1 - Indeed. 06/24/2012 on Hmm. Quite. +1
#39 - Comment deleted 06/20/2012 on Grocery shopping 0
#38 - Comment deleted 06/20/2012 on Grocery shopping 0
#22 - Picture 06/16/2012 on Morbid for Animal lovers +2
#22 - I just can't stand spineless people like this.  [+] (1 new reply) 06/16/2012 on FML +1
User avatar #25 - adirtysmuggler (06/20/2012) [-]
I'll be honest, the kid sounds like a pushover. He could have simply said "I just got on, stupid sister is just putting on an act" etc.
#3 - I've been doing this for as long as I can remember, with one e… 06/10/2012 on Best Decision Maker +11
#21 - Step 1: Get a Ditto. Step 2: Catch a legendary. Step 3…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/07/2012 on Ditto vs. Ditto +60
User avatar #72 - kashaku (06/08/2012) [-]
please better explain this...
#47 - atma (06/08/2012) [-]
#26 - Step aside, rookies... 06/07/2012 on Eternal Rivals... +6
#1201 - I'm sorry, but it's hard to find an army that fights fair, nev…  [+] (1 new reply) 06/07/2012 on Why USA wins wars +4
#1216 - anonymous (06/07/2012) [-]
there are no rules in war
#19 - I respectfully disagree. Just because one doesn't know if some…  [+] (2 new replies) 06/04/2012 on Science at its finest. -2
#23 - emotep (06/04/2012) [-]
Well obviously a cat can't be both alive and dead at the same time (which was Schrödingers point exactly) But assuming that the information is unattainable it is not completely wrong to think of it as such. Anyway Quantum Mechanics deals with matters where you need to apply concepts such as randomness to a deterministic universe. Think of a dice. Is the roll random? or is it just about being the best at predicting the outcome through calculating the exact height and surface needed to land a 6 all the time (or whatever you want to roll). Well it is possible to measure all these data needed to predict to roll, but in an everyday sense probably not. If we preform a roll in a cup, before we lift it you can say that the dice has landed all outcomes as we are not in possession of the required variables to determine what actually happened. The same goes for the decaying atom in Schrödinger's thought experiment, we don't know so we must assume both. But yea, it's a kinda sketchy concept.
User avatar #21 - AcidFlux (06/04/2012) [-]
It's not meant to be taken literally, but as a manner of explaining how quantum mechanics works. Google that shit, son. Learn about the topic before commenting on it.
#12 - This theory really is retarded. Something is EITHER dead or al…  [+] (7 new replies) 06/04/2012 on Science at its finest. -9
User avatar #18 - techketzer (06/04/2012) [-]
It's not a theory but a thought experiment designed to show a logical flaw in a specific concept.

It's intended to be a paradox.
#16 - lolfire has deleted their comment.
User avatar #14 - laredon (06/04/2012) [-]
Oh and you should be familiar with the Copenhagen interpretation to understand it i guess. It holds that quantum mechanics does not yield a description of an objective reality but deals only with probabilities of observing, or measuring, various aspects of energy quanta, entities which fit neither the classical idea of particles nor the classical idea of waves. According to the interpretation, the act of measurement causes the set of probabilities to immediately and randomly assume only one of the possible values.(Yeah the last sentence was Wikipedia.)
User avatar #13 - laredon (06/04/2012) [-]
Well, while the cat is in the box, you do not know if the gas was released or not.(But im sure you are familiar with the theory) So you can think of the cat as both dead and alive. Sorry, i can't really explain it. I just "get it". Still might be that im wrong.
User avatar #19 - fogglebeast (06/04/2012) [-]
I respectfully disagree. Just because one doesn't know if something is dead or alive, doesn't mean it is both. That's impossible and illogical. For example, by that logic, I could say that my neighbour is both out walking the dog, but is still in his house, because I'm not sure which of the two it is. Human ignorance is not an excuse to make the impossible possible.
#23 - emotep (06/04/2012) [-]
Well obviously a cat can't be both alive and dead at the same time (which was Schrödingers point exactly) But assuming that the information is unattainable it is not completely wrong to think of it as such. Anyway Quantum Mechanics deals with matters where you need to apply concepts such as randomness to a deterministic universe. Think of a dice. Is the roll random? or is it just about being the best at predicting the outcome through calculating the exact height and surface needed to land a 6 all the time (or whatever you want to roll). Well it is possible to measure all these data needed to predict to roll, but in an everyday sense probably not. If we preform a roll in a cup, before we lift it you can say that the dice has landed all outcomes as we are not in possession of the required variables to determine what actually happened. The same goes for the decaying atom in Schrödinger's thought experiment, we don't know so we must assume both. But yea, it's a kinda sketchy concept.
User avatar #21 - AcidFlux (06/04/2012) [-]
It's not meant to be taken literally, but as a manner of explaining how quantum mechanics works. Google that shit, son. Learn about the topic before commenting on it.
#2 - When people claiming to be British spell it 'motorized' instea… 05/28/2012 on British people are awesome +1
[ 187 Total ]
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2200

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - soundofwinter (06/23/2014) [-]
fuck you
#1 - brndlrt (11/05/2013) [-]
lolwtfbbqryan molests little children.
#2 to #1 - anonymous (11/05/2013) [-]
Yes it's true, i saw him.
 Friends (0)