x
Click to expand

fogglebeast

Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 22
Date Signed Up:11/23/2011
Last Login:5/27/2015
Location:Heemscreeble
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#2074
Highest Comment Rank:#1891
Comment Thumbs: 3935 total,  4382 ,  447
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 74% (74/100)
Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:0
Total Comments Made:314
FJ Points:2990

latest user's comments

#28 - And that guy in the shirt's just scooting along on his back go… 03/20/2015 on The Undertaker be like... +3
#37 - Well, because your own home isn't a public place . And so wha…  [+] (4 new replies) 03/20/2015 on German Trains +4
User avatar #47 - norkas (03/20/2015) [-]
You WANT Big Brother to spy on you? In your own home?!
User avatar #49 - fogglebeast (03/20/2015) [-]
What? No - it's okay in public places, though. As I stated - one's own home isn't a public place.
User avatar #50 - norkas (03/20/2015) [-]
>And so what if a CCTV camera wants to record me walking by and doing nothing of interest - what's the harm?
Then what does this mean exactly? Read some fucking Orwell.
User avatar #54 - fogglebeast (03/20/2015) [-]
I stand by that - there's no harm in me being recorded at all. As long as it's a public place, no-one should be banned from recording. And Orwell's 1984 pictured a world where EVERYTHING at ALL TIMES was watched. CCTV isn't what you may think it is - it's there to reference crimes - there's no malevolent man rubbing his evil hands together behind the screen waiting for you to slip up. Take of that tin foil hat - you'll sleep easier.
#35 - Preventing crime before it would happen would be a bad thing t…  [+] (6 new replies) 03/20/2015 on German Trains -4
User avatar #46 - norkas (03/20/2015) [-]
You want to limit freedom to "stop crime"
This whole "if you have nothing to fear you have nothing to hide" thing is bullshit, we have a right to privacy
User avatar #51 - fogglebeast (03/20/2015) [-]
The shit are you talking about? Having CCTV in public areas isn't limiting the freedom of anyone. Tell me - what does CCTV in a public place stop you from doing that you would do in a place without it? In fact, it seems you want to limit freedom - the freedom to film in public areas. I'm probably more of a libertarian than you are, old chap - trust me, I'd say that people should have as much freedom as possible, warranting that no harm would be caused to any unconsenting others. CCTV doesn't infringe on this if it's in a public place.
User avatar #52 - norkas (03/20/2015) [-]
Why the fuck do I bother, I'm gonna go fap.
User avatar #55 - fogglebeast (03/20/2015) [-]
Good question - why do you bother indeed.
#88 - anonymous (03/20/2015) [-]
He means talking to you walking hypocrisies never yielded any sort of understanding from you blinded self-righteous bigots.


All you do all day is go around talking about a bunch of shit you don't understand or simply REFUSE to understand.

You are literally LITERALLY (not figuratively) selling your country into slavery AND YOU DON'T CARE
User avatar #160 - fogglebeast (03/20/2015) [-]
Though this is anonymous I'll respond in case others are reading: it's you who are the hypocrites. You want freedom yet want to ban people from recording in public. I understand this very well - contrary to your belief - and find it laughable how people like you argue against reasonable statements with statements that contradict themselves. I'm aware that this anonymous is probably just kidding around - I can't take what they said seriously, to be honest, though I responded just in case.
#11 - Honestly, what's wrong with CCTV everywhere? The only people w…  [+] (16 new replies) 03/20/2015 on German Trains +1
User avatar #66 - niggernazi (03/20/2015) [-]
Because you cant do the basic shit anymore like taking a piss in the park because NOPE a fucking camera is watching you and will report yo as to the police, instead you have to walk to some fucking run down meth-lab aka ''public'' toilet that you need to PAY to even enter. I did that once on the train station because i really needed to take a piss but there where people everywhere and i paid only to be greeted with broken lights, graffitti and a nasty smelling toilet that probably had piss absolutely everywhere.
#81 - anonymous (03/20/2015) [-]
oh well, shit. You taking a piss definitely takes precedent over public safety. Down with cameras!
#34 - anonymous (03/20/2015) [-]
Well, why not let them record you inside your own home? I mean, as long as you're not doing anything illegal you should have no problem with that, right?

Believe it or not, you can have a certain level of privacy in a public place. Walking down a street and being seen by random passerby who will never remember or care =/= walking down the street and being recorded by cameras that keep a record of absolutely everywhere you go and everything you do. Imagine if, instead of cameras, there was a man waiting outside your house, following you and mapping out your route until you returned home. Shit would be creepy as fuck and you know it, but since the stalker in question is a series of mechanical eyes instead of a person it's suddenly okay? No.
User avatar #37 - fogglebeast (03/20/2015) [-]
Well, because your own home isn't a public place. And so what if a CCTV camera wants to record me walking by and doing nothing of interest - what's the harm?

"[S]ince the stalker in question is a series of mechanical eyes instead of a person it's suddenly okay?" - Of course it is! Do you honestly think there's someone behind that camera constantly watching you just for fun? CCTV is used for reference after a crime has been committed. The paranoia is strong with you folks.
User avatar #47 - norkas (03/20/2015) [-]
You WANT Big Brother to spy on you? In your own home?!
User avatar #49 - fogglebeast (03/20/2015) [-]
What? No - it's okay in public places, though. As I stated - one's own home isn't a public place.
User avatar #50 - norkas (03/20/2015) [-]
>And so what if a CCTV camera wants to record me walking by and doing nothing of interest - what's the harm?
Then what does this mean exactly? Read some fucking Orwell.
User avatar #54 - fogglebeast (03/20/2015) [-]
I stand by that - there's no harm in me being recorded at all. As long as it's a public place, no-one should be banned from recording. And Orwell's 1984 pictured a world where EVERYTHING at ALL TIMES was watched. CCTV isn't what you may think it is - it's there to reference crimes - there's no malevolent man rubbing his evil hands together behind the screen waiting for you to slip up. Take of that tin foil hat - you'll sleep easier.
#26 - infinitereaper (03/20/2015) [-]
We should also chip people and read their minds to prevent thought crime and all crime before it ever happens.
People like you are why the police states and tyrannical governments come to power.
User avatar #35 - fogglebeast (03/20/2015) [-]
Preventing crime before it would happen would be a bad thing to you? Why on earth would you think that?
User avatar #46 - norkas (03/20/2015) [-]
You want to limit freedom to "stop crime"
This whole "if you have nothing to fear you have nothing to hide" thing is bullshit, we have a right to privacy
User avatar #51 - fogglebeast (03/20/2015) [-]
The shit are you talking about? Having CCTV in public areas isn't limiting the freedom of anyone. Tell me - what does CCTV in a public place stop you from doing that you would do in a place without it? In fact, it seems you want to limit freedom - the freedom to film in public areas. I'm probably more of a libertarian than you are, old chap - trust me, I'd say that people should have as much freedom as possible, warranting that no harm would be caused to any unconsenting others. CCTV doesn't infringe on this if it's in a public place.
User avatar #52 - norkas (03/20/2015) [-]
Why the fuck do I bother, I'm gonna go fap.
User avatar #55 - fogglebeast (03/20/2015) [-]
Good question - why do you bother indeed.
#88 - anonymous (03/20/2015) [-]
He means talking to you walking hypocrisies never yielded any sort of understanding from you blinded self-righteous bigots.


All you do all day is go around talking about a bunch of shit you don't understand or simply REFUSE to understand.

You are literally LITERALLY (not figuratively) selling your country into slavery AND YOU DON'T CARE
User avatar #160 - fogglebeast (03/20/2015) [-]
Though this is anonymous I'll respond in case others are reading: it's you who are the hypocrites. You want freedom yet want to ban people from recording in public. I understand this very well - contrary to your belief - and find it laughable how people like you argue against reasonable statements with statements that contradict themselves. I'm aware that this anonymous is probably just kidding around - I can't take what they said seriously, to be honest, though I responded just in case.
#13 - I think it was Thunder Smash.  [+] (2 new replies) 03/19/2015 on it only took them 700 episodes +57
User avatar #64 - glesh (03/20/2015) [-]
Good thing they dodged then, or they would've had some really sore knees
#43 - anonymous (03/20/2015) [-]
You glorious magnificent bastard take my thumbs holy haven't laughed that hard in so long
#136 - Though my knowledge of the lore isn't exactly brilliant, I thi…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/18/2015 on Warhammer 40k dump 0
User avatar #137 - nustix (03/18/2015) [-]
Oh, I thought they were just regular space marine's but they got a mutation which resulted in the oldest marines having some wolf like chareteristics, but I'm by no means a lore expert I just read it in the codex.
#132 - I'm not entirely sure. Half will say they're badass space-viki…  [+] (3 new replies) 03/18/2015 on Warhammer 40k dump 0
User avatar #133 - nustix (03/18/2015) [-]
Well, I always thought they looked pretty awesome, but besides the long fangs who have slightly more hair and longer teeth, none of them are actually wolf like right?
User avatar #136 - fogglebeast (03/18/2015) [-]
Though my knowledge of the lore isn't exactly brilliant, I think they're somehow part wolf - or have wolf blood, or something. There's a 13th legion in the Warp who are werewolves, I think. Does this site have a Warhammerexplain? I think we could use one.
User avatar #137 - nustix (03/18/2015) [-]
Oh, I thought they were just regular space marine's but they got a mutation which resulted in the oldest marines having some wolf like chareteristics, but I'm by no means a lore expert I just read it in the codex.
#9 - Not anymore. Libya done revolution'd. 03/18/2015 on The red cross 0
#105 - The work of Lord Ward is never done.  [+] (6 new replies) 03/18/2015 on Warhammer 40k dump +1
User avatar #130 - nustix (03/18/2015) [-]
I don't actually play 40k, but are the space wolves actually something people don't like?
User avatar #150 - captainwow (03/18/2015) [-]
They like 'em, they just don't like how the 5th edition codex went balls-to-the-wall crazy with all the WOLF OF TEH WOLF WOLF stuff. Plus the writer made the faction extremely broken, and from what I've heard, the latest 7th edition book wasn't all that stellar.
User avatar #132 - fogglebeast (03/18/2015) [-]
I'm not entirely sure. Half will say they're badass space-vikings and the rest will claim they're just there to get furries to play the game.
User avatar #133 - nustix (03/18/2015) [-]
Well, I always thought they looked pretty awesome, but besides the long fangs who have slightly more hair and longer teeth, none of them are actually wolf like right?
User avatar #136 - fogglebeast (03/18/2015) [-]
Though my knowledge of the lore isn't exactly brilliant, I think they're somehow part wolf - or have wolf blood, or something. There's a 13th legion in the Warp who are werewolves, I think. Does this site have a Warhammerexplain? I think we could use one.
User avatar #137 - nustix (03/18/2015) [-]
Oh, I thought they were just regular space marine's but they got a mutation which resulted in the oldest marines having some wolf like chareteristics, but I'm by no means a lore expert I just read it in the codex.
#39 - This is a topic that is very important to me so I think I may … 03/17/2015 on one blow from caving in? 0
#35 - I liked the part where the wurms showed up. That was a brillia…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/17/2015 on Fuck your love +4
User avatar #37 - undeadmaus (03/17/2015) [-]
It hadn't crossed my mind until now but yeah. I remember thinkging ''Oh they're gonna fight the wurms now'' but then they just did nothing and I never questioned it.
#25 - Okay, there's a lot that's wrong with your argument. … 03/16/2015 on bronies 0
#23 - Well, **** ; I'm really about to defend bronies, aren't …  [+] (2 new replies) 03/16/2015 on bronies 0
#24 - bluemagebrilly (03/16/2015) [-]
Because they aren't attracted to 'pixels', they're attracted to the horse itself.

That is... well, wrong. It's not that it's unnatural, it's that it's ... not exactly humane. Humans weren't made to mate with horses, and even more so, we weren't made to, you know, fantasize about them. It's socially wrong as well, but that depends more on the location, I guess.

It isn't okay to sexualise a horse.

Now, if they turn them into human forms, as I said in my original comment, that's fine. That's natural. Even if it's just the type where they're like... 50% human, that's fine. They're still humans in a way, just with 'added' parts. Like a horn or something.

But can you really justify them finding a horse that attractive? They don't even keep the characters as themselves, so it's got nothing to do with that.

There's no actual harm except for the communities that have to put up with people spamming or going on about how they'd like to do things with a horse. Then there's the spam of other things and actual products for people to think they're "using" the horses to stimulate themselves.

So... I dunno. You did come on a bit strong, but you also kind of missed a point, I think. You asked me why it was wrong, but you didn't really say what was right about it either. Simply saying we're fine with being attracted to cartoon humans isn't enough to really justify being attracted to cartoon horses... Especially when the horses aren't even kept to their personality code.

It's like... It's like saying "Oh, it's okay to want to bend that dog over because you're attracted to the person who owns it." It's not right.
User avatar #25 - fogglebeast (03/16/2015) [-]
Okay, there's a lot that's wrong with your argument.

"Humans weren't made to mate with horses" No, but humans aren't "made" to do anything specifically; it just happens that evolution has gone on to make humans compatible partners with other humans. Why isn't it okay to sexualise a horse? What harm does it do?

"If they turn them into human forms, as I said in my original comment, that's fine. That's natural." - But it's also natural for some people to be attracted to horses (some to inanimate objects, even). It's just the way they've been programmed, and to say it's unnatural just doesn't make sense.

"But can you really justify them finding a horse that attractive?" - Yes, easily - they just do. Can you justify why person X likes the colour blue? Other people like red, or green - it's the same with what people happen to be attracted to; no one way is correct.

"There's no actual harm except for the communities that have to put up with people spamming or going on about how they'd like to do things with a horse." - Then there's a problem with spamming - not with their attraction to horses. One could spam anything and people would find it annoying.

"[Y]ou didn't really say what was right about it either." - No attraction is right, but none are wrong, either. It's all neutral. Saying one is right or wrong suggests that humans are designed in a certain way, like someone's designed a Sim character. People can't choose what they like. And if your argument is that it's okay to be attracted to humans but nothing else, I'll refer to the pixels again - even a picture of a real human isn't a real human - it's a group of pixels.
#6 - Picture 03/14/2015 on Attack on pikmin +32
#52 - Picture 03/14/2015 on Anal tentacle +2
#17 - But surely they should have a right to mock it, no? To say oth…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/11/2015 on Political Correctness Comp +1
#36 - anonymous (03/11/2015) [-]
This is FJ, you criticize religion in a non-respectful way then everyone thinks you wear a fedora, watch MLP, and never move from your seat.
#14 - "Feel a lot good." 03/10/2015 on Arms of a Starving Ebola... 0
#44 - It's Sargon of Akkad. He comments on feminist stuff and on ret… 03/10/2015 on Yeah art +18
#23 - It's a bit more effort, but worth not looking like a backgroun…  [+] (1 new reply) 03/09/2015 on Super Sexy 0
#25 - thatmetalguy (03/09/2015) [-]
I had long hair all through high school and honestly I was just ready for a change. I was becoming my own background character so I decided to try a new look. I used to have kind of a stoner/hippie look and now I'm going more towards this. This was taken last night by my roommate
#19 - Short hair is for peasants with lice.  [+] (3 new replies) 03/09/2015 on Super Sexy 0
User avatar #20 - thatmetalguy (03/09/2015) [-]
Short hair is for people who get sick of dealing with long hair. I got sick of dealing with my hair. My opinion stands
User avatar #23 - fogglebeast (03/09/2015) [-]
It's a bit more effort, but worth not looking like a background character. Some like to work out, but they have to maintain the look. If you like a look, why not spend a little bit of effort?
#25 - thatmetalguy (03/09/2015) [-]
I had long hair all through high school and honestly I was just ready for a change. I was becoming my own background character so I decided to try a new look. I used to have kind of a stoner/hippie look and now I'm going more towards this. This was taken last night by my roommate
#12 - You can't see what you've lost to diabeetus. 03/08/2015 on Perhaps society is the real... +2
#7 - Good gods, people - it's a joke. He's basically saying that th… 03/06/2015 on Mark Twain +3
#11 - "Laying in bed" 03/06/2015 on Being lazy +43
#15 - Picture 03/05/2015 on Animals being dicks pt3 +8
#36 - Agreed, but I don't think they did. It would have been fair to… 03/04/2015 on Cant wait for the robots to... +2
[ 314 Total ]

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2200
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - soundofwinter ONLINE (06/23/2014) [-]
**** you
User avatar #1 - brndlrt (11/05/2013) [-]
lolwtfbbqryan molests little children.
#2 to #1 - anonymous (11/05/2013) [-]
Yes it's true, i saw him.
 Friends (0)