Rank #5409 on Comments
fogglebeast Avatar Level 218 Comments: Comedic Genius
Send mail to fogglebeast Block fogglebeast Invite fogglebeast to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 22
Date Signed Up:11/23/2011
Last Login:1/28/2015
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#5409
Highest Comment Rank:#3204
Comment Thumbs: 2226 total,  2601 ,  375
Content Level Progress: 6.77% (4/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 14% (14/100)
Level 218 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 219 Comments: Comedic Genius
Total Comments Made:231
FJ Points:1830

latest user's comments

#8 - Laying: Fitting - The laying of carpet Prepa… 01/25/2015 on (untitled) -2
#26 - You have to see it, then. Reading the quotes may make him seem… 01/25/2015 on FJ Crowd? +2
#9 - Nulls these arguments? I'm not arguing anything - I'm merely s… 01/22/2015 on I don't need feminism +1
#7 - Damn gremlins. Yeah, I seem to have the dates wrong -…  [+] (1 new reply) 01/22/2015 on I don't need feminism 0
User avatar #10 - timmywankenobi (01/22/2015) [-]
most likely.
#5 - I'm bored, so here are some interesting informations in regard…  [+] (5 new replies) 01/22/2015 on I don't need feminism +2
User avatar #8 - civilizedwasteland (01/22/2015) [-]
Yes but you also have to take into account the advancement of technology, which essentially nulls these arguments.

A huge amount of jobs were rather labor intensive in this era and as a result men were already in shape to obligations such as fighting a war. Now it can be done in a chair from the other side of earth.

Advances like rivet guns and drill presses for instance made jobs much less physically demanding, making a man's pay that much more enticing to a woman.

I dont think today there would be any economic benefit of having purely woman stay at home and do nothing but care for a family( not including at least a standard education). Especially not when the birth rate of the country is only two children per family.
User avatar #9 - fogglebeast (01/22/2015) [-]
Nulls these arguments? I'm not arguing anything - I'm merely stating what the social structure was back then. Unless you mean that the social norms back then are now nullified, and to that I agree completely, hence my ending statement.
User avatar #6 - timmywankenobi (01/22/2015) [-]
Fun Fact: In pre-1830 times Most men couldn't vote either.
User avatar #7 - fogglebeast (01/22/2015) [-]
Damn gremlins.

Yeah, I seem to have the dates wrong - women's suffrage was some time in the early 1900s or something, wasn't it? I was thinking of the reform act, I believe.
User avatar #10 - timmywankenobi (01/22/2015) [-]
most likely.
#18 - When I see someone who names their Sandslash/Hippowdon/Excadri… 01/22/2015 on songname? +1
#53 - There is a banana there for scale. That's how big it is. 01/22/2015 on Damn You Big Africa! 0
#35 - Lacrimosa by Mozart. 01/17/2015 on dank WebM compilation (pt... +20
#30 - The English chap has been represented in a rather dapper fashi… 01/16/2015 on Old National lampoon drawings +3
#5 - Picture 01/13/2015 on CHEEKI BREEKI COMPLATION 0
[ 231 Total ]
Sort by:


Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2200

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - brndlrt (11/05/2013) [-]
lolwtfbbqryan molests little children.
#2 to #1 - anonymous (11/05/2013) [-]
Yes it's true, i saw him.
 Friends (0)