Upload
Login or register

foamytesquirrel

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:9/02/2012
Location:London Britain
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#344
Highest Content Rank:#789
Highest Comment Rank:#92
Content Thumbs: 4955 total,  5489 ,  534
Comment Thumbs: 46601 total,  48623 ,  2022
Content Level Progress: 65% (65/100)
Level 139 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 140 Content: Faptastic
Comment Level Progress: 98.4% (984/1000)
Level 333 Comments: Practically Famous → Level 334 Comments: Practically Famous
Subscribers:5
Content Views:285714
Times Content Favorited:225 times
Total Comments Made:4788
FJ Points:37615
Favorite Tags: Porn (2)

Text Posts

HD Gifs / WebMs

latest user's comments

#3 - Picture  [+] (1 new reply) 2 hours ago on whatsalewd mandy +1
User avatar
#4 - ChromedDragon (2 hours ago) [-]
thanks
#5 - Picture  [+] (2 new replies) 15 hours ago on Handy Dad +45
User avatar
#11 - itssakamoto (4 hours ago) [-]
Ne, dad-san, are we kawaii?
#13 - arandomanon (4 hours ago) [-]
the whole thing
#11 - You posted a pony and didn't cite any of your facts. You don't…  [+] (49 new replies) 17 hours ago on 'Murica! +122
#199 - anon (1 hour ago) [-]
Randomly sampling the scariest looking links on that page everything thats been linked is a real stretch. "Trump said "yes" and "Absolutely" during a statement he made where we mentioned Hitler (at some point) during the conversation! THAT MEANS HE'S YES!!! ABSOLUTELY HITLER!"

NATURALLY lib media is in a panic because he wants to change laws regarding slander in media. Some how saying "If someone lies and makes a false slanderous report we should be able to sue them." is a terrible thing. Heaven forbid we hold shitty news and reporting accountable. This of course would be a terrible thing for a party whose sole ability to control stupid poor people is by slamming their field of view with as many lies and half truths as they can.
#101 - anon (7 hours ago) [-]
Holy shit. Most of these "links" are just biased news sites.
User avatar
#17 - thematthew (16 hours ago) [-]
i hear hitler liked breathing, maybe you should stop doing it then.
User avatar
#55 - thematthew (13 hours ago) [-]
before you read the rest it turns out he thought i was saying torture was ok, he's not an idiot in this situation, we were just having two different arguments at the same time.
#18 - bronywiseman (15 hours ago) [-]
How is that relevant to anything I said?
What, do you think torture is good? You think it gets a bad rap because Stalin was big on it?
#37 - anon (14 hours ago) [-]
Please stop with your advanced autism.

You genuinely expect anyone to give you an ounce of political respect while you obsess over a girls children show for years?

Yeah no.
#26 - illior (15 hours ago) [-]
And why exactly is torture bad? Just want to make you realize that your opinions are not yours, but copied from the liberal mainstream.
User avatar
#65 - cadencee (12 hours ago) [-]
Because advocating it in any sense is advocating it in every sense. Is it okay to torture a criminal or terrorist for information? What about torturing them for a confession? When exactly would it be okay to torture someone and when not to?
#179 - anon (2 hours ago) [-]
"People die in the margins." -Some guy i don't remember the name of or even know if he's real
#31 - bronywiseman (15 hours ago) [-]
Are you serious?
"Why exactly was the holocaust bad? Just want to make you realize that your opinions are not yours, but copied from the zionist media"

Torture is bad because it's cruel and unnecessary punishment, by definition.
Not to mention it's barbaric, and has been outmoded by modern means of intelligence collection.


Let's say torture is legalized, and is deemed a form of federal punishment.
"Terrorist" is America's current trigger word.
Anyone will do anything to kill a terrorist.
Eventually, the regressive left will figure that out. Instead of doxxing people, they'll find it's much easier to fake that they're a part of ISIS. A little inspect element here, a little confirmation bias there, and you have just been marked as a potential terrorist by the NSA.

Suppose this happened to you.
Suppose that you were taken in by the FBI, and taken to an interrogation room.
Would you rather spend several hours explaining to that that you aren't a terrorist?
Or would you rather spend several days being branded, cut, broken, and having your teeth ripped out, by a man who demands you give him information?
Information that you don't have.
The thing about torture is people assume that it couldn't happen to them. Only bad people. Well I have news for you. The government makes mistakes. Specifically the courts.
Several people have been sentenced to the death penalty, killed, and found innocent.
Torture can happen just as easy.
And they can cut, break, and mangle any every part of your body.
And they know that teeth, eyes, fingers, and genitals especially, are very, very sensitive.
#107 - illior (6 hours ago) [-]
Torture is unnecessary punishment by definition? Is it unnecessary when a terrorist won't talk and thousands of lives are at stake? You just took this out of your ass.

"they'll find it's much easier to fake that they're a part of ISIS" if you are so retarded that you fake being a part of ISIS you deserve to be tortured man.

See you haven't given me any argument, just trying to win me over with emotional talk, "suppose this happened to you", "several people have been sentenced to the death penalty, killed, and found innocent", which is what every liberal does, instead of using logic and thinking, they fixate on an idea and use emotions to try and get the upperhand, well, I wouldn't mind if my country tortured people with information that could save thousands of lives.
#176 - anon (2 hours ago) [-]
Look up the de-classified files from the CIA, they proved that torture does not help and it can even be harmful to act on information gathered from torture because it is more often than not false. See, when fearing for your life you will pretty much say anything to save yourself, even if it's complete lies, which they usually are. And that's completely ignoring the moral issue.
#82 - anon (10 hours ago) [-]
what the fuck when did the holocaust get into this get the fuck out
#69 - anon (11 hours ago) [-]
the holocaust wasn't real, so that's not a good metaphor
#218 - bronywiseman (1 hour ago) [-]
You know, I actually kind of like that /pol/ wannabe factor of Funnyjunk.
Because if you ever compare something to a Nazi for a negative effect, then people always swooce in and say "Lawl but hidler was rihd XDDD", which really trains you out of using cliche things like "Worse than Hitler/The Holocaust".
#224 - anon (1 hour ago) [-]
thing is, i'm mainly a /pol/ user lmao
the gas chambers weren't real lol
#225 - bronywiseman (1 hour ago) [-]
You're...
You're not serious, are you?
#227 - anon (1 hour ago) [-]
i am
have you ever done any research on it, besides your 8th grade history class?
#228 - bronywiseman (1 hour ago) [-]
Have you ever considered that /pol/ is not only not a news site, but is entirely ironic?
No-one there actually thinks Hitler was right, you know.
It's an in-joke.
Like /b/s chocolate milk.
#231 - anon (1 hour ago) [-]
when did i say hitler was right
i said the holocaust wasn't real lmao
User avatar
#19 - thematthew (15 hours ago) [-]
no, i'm saying something isn't bad just because someone bad likes it, sure torture is bad, but someone bad liking it shouldn't be the proof that it's bad.
#21 - bronywiseman (15 hours ago) [-]
What the actual fuck are you talking about?
User avatar
#23 - subejio (15 hours ago) [-]
You're arguing against the funnyjunk machine. They don't know why they like Trump, only that they do. That said, if you feel like persisting in trying to argue against it (and more power to ya), you might consider linking the sources directly, rather than a master tumblr list. It's less likely to get them to dismiss your argument out-of-hand.

Personally, the issue looks to me like microwaving a baby or shoving a lit full stick of dynamite up its ass. Sure, both kill the baby, but given what's at stake I'm going to pick the one that leaves my house intact.
User avatar
#152 - SoraDono (4 hours ago) [-]
you're free to think that I've done no research, but I've spent somewhere between 20 and 40 hours for both trump and hillary, and not more than 10 on bernie

so i'll take my opinion and stand by it, thank you very much
User avatar
#116 - seniorawesomesauce (6 hours ago) [-]
Um... I know exactly why I like Trump? I've been following the political cycle since August of last year on both sides (all four if you include the third parties) and yeah, I know why I like Trump over every other candidate.
#45 - bronywiseman (14 hours ago) [-]
Someone's gotta break this stupid fucking circlejerk sometime. Might as well be someone they hate.
#127 - anon (5 hours ago) [-]
gg my dude.
I respect you for attempting that and I agree with you.
User avatar
#49 - thematthew (14 hours ago) [-]
i don't hate you, i used to watch the show, i don't even care if trump is bad or not, i just think a bad person liking something is not good proof that that something is bad.
User avatar
#51 - bronywiseman (14 hours ago) [-]
Well no, of course it's not.
Torture's not proven bad because Trump likes it, I never claimed it was.
Torture's bad because it's... Well, I just replied to you with why.
User avatar
#22 - thematthew (15 hours ago) [-]
say you never heard or have any idea what the cure for cancer is, but a nazi-KKK member supports it, with the only proof that it's good or not being a nazi-KKK member liking it, do you think the cure for cancer is good?
#25 - bronywiseman (15 hours ago) [-]
That's completely irrelevant because it's common knowledge that torture is bad, and unnecessary.
User avatar
#27 - thematthew (15 hours ago) [-]
answer the question.
User avatar
#28 - bronywiseman (15 hours ago) [-]
Yes. Yes I do think the cure for cancer is good.
Because cures are objective. A cure doesn't really have an upside and a downside, unless it also gives you another disease, and even then not much can be worse than cancer.
User avatar
#177 - thefunnylaughter (2 hours ago) [-]
Cures are objective? the cure for ISIS is killing all muslims Yes objective good mate
User avatar
#226 - mirukawa (1 hour ago) [-]
that's semantics
User avatar
#30 - thematthew (15 hours ago) [-]
but you don't know that it's a cure, all you know is that the nazi-KKK member supports it.

let me rephrase it since you are too dense to get a metaphore.

say there is a box, you don't know what the box does, but hitler supports the box, now, the question is, is the box good?
User avatar
#32 - bronywiseman (15 hours ago) [-]
I wouldn't assume so, no.
Your point?
#41 - anon (14 hours ago) [-]
Dude, you're normally a cool guy, even as a pony poster.

Pls stop while you're behind.
User avatar
#34 - thematthew (15 hours ago) [-]
why isn't it good?
User avatar
#43 - bronywiseman (14 hours ago) [-]
You know damn well why.
Because the only evidence you've allowed me is that someone with questionable morals approves of it.
Hell, that's not even fair because there's nothing to compare it too.
What does Winston Churchill think of it? Or Stain? Or Roosevelt?
You're demanding I make a decision on something based on one point of data, and now you're going to scolding me for assuming, right?
I have no choice but to jump to conclusions, when you put me in an informational pit.
You know what? No. If all I knew bout that box was that Hitler liked it, I would wait to form an opinion until I had more evidence.

You are inventing scenarios which don't exist, and don't further your point at all.
Torture is bad. Is that what we're arguing over?
If so, then you have serious problems.
User avatar
#46 - thematthew (14 hours ago) [-]
that's my point, bad people liking something makes bad proof that said thing is bad, if you have more proof then you can make a conclusion, but even if you have 1,000,000 bad people supporting the cure for cancer it's not good enough proof that the cure for cancer is bad.

hitler liking breathing is a real scenario that you were to dumb to understand so i had to make fake dumbed down versions of the same scenario and you still don't get it.

no, we're not arguing over if torture is bad, we are arguing over if someone bad liking something is proof that said thing is bad.

User avatar
#48 - bronywiseman (14 hours ago) [-]
Shoot, did I not explain that?
I actually thought I had, my bad.

Torture is bad because it's cruel and unnecessary punishment, by definition.
Not to mention it's barbaric, and has been outmoded by modern means of intelligence collection.


Let's say torture is legalized, and is deemed a form of federal punishment.
"Terrorist" is America's current trigger word.
Anyone will do anything to kill a terrorist.
Eventually, the regressive left will figure that out. Instead of doxxing people, they'll find it's much easier to fake that they're a part of ISIS. A little inspect element here, a little confirmation bias there, and you have just been marked as a potential terrorist by the NSA.

Suppose this happened to you.
Suppose that you were taken in by the FBI, and taken to an interrogation room.
Would you rather spend several hours explaining to that that you aren't a terrorist?
Or would you rather spend several days being branded, cut, broken, and having your teeth ripped out, by a man who demands you give him information?
Information that you don't have.
The thing about torture is people assume that it couldn't happen to them. Only bad people. Well I have news for you. The government makes mistakes. Specifically the courts.
Several people have been sentenced to the death penalty, killed, and found innocent.
Torture can happen just as easy.
And they can cut, break, and mangle any every part of your body.
And they know that teeth, eyes, fingers, and genitals especially, are very, very sensitive.
User avatar
#52 - thematthew (13 hours ago) [-]
i know torture is bad, i'm saying that the link you posted has examples of bad people supporting trump as if it's good proof that trump is evil, i'm arguing it's not, i just realized the reason you're focusing on me supporting torture so much is because you didn't know that the other things you linked to is what i was arguing against.
#53 - bronywiseman (13 hours ago) [-]
Oh...
Shit.
User avatar
#108 - TheBigGummyBear (6 hours ago) [-]
You know your argument wasn't half bad when you stopped posting the pony pictures and just wrote text posts. Like you actually nailed some points and they were plausible, justified by commonsense and decency.

I don't get why you started with pony pictures though, were you initially planning on trolling then decided you actually want to have a proper discussion? Well either way it's nice to see you're capable of logical thinking and you're not an idiot. But seriously in future, lay off the pony pictures. You might genuinely be a MLP fan and that's your problem nobody elses, but no one will ever take you seriously on this site when you post those pictures because we hate it, whether you intend to piss us off or not.
User avatar
#97 - edgeworthy (8 hours ago) [-]
There there. It happens to me more than enough too. Take my.thumbs, for you both atleast had a satisfying conclusion.
User avatar
#54 - thematthew (13 hours ago) [-]
well, sorry for the confusion, i'll try to undo at least some of the reds this argument has caused.
#12 - anon (17 hours ago) [-]
Can't spell foamytesquirrel without Rearmost Liquefy
#9 - Imgur meme 17 hours ago on Crying laughing guy emoticon +2
#5 - Jennifer Lawrence before she retardedly took nudes, but like, … 07/25/2016 on Who would it be? +7
#3 - This isn't a themed account, I was just really edgy 5 years ago. 07/25/2016 on 'cuz Chuck Norris is 'murikuh! +7
#1 - Oh my God! My time machine worked! I'm back in 2007! I'm a…  [+] (2 new replies) 07/25/2016 on 'cuz Chuck Norris is 'murikuh! +6
#2 - hektoroftroy (07/25/2016) [-]
>themed account based on foamy the squirrel
>complaining about memes not being relevant
User avatar
#3 - foamytesquirrel (07/25/2016) [-]
This isn't a themed account, I was just really edgy 5 years ago.
#19 - Yeah, her name is Katey Sagal.Did you seriously not recognise …  [+] (1 new reply) 07/25/2016 on He lucked out 0
#20 - vegasstoner (07/25/2016) [-]
didnt watch married with children
#9 - 8 comments and nobody's mentioned cutegif? For shame. 07/24/2016 on Furry potato 0
#40 - Look up Brodual on YouTube. He's not a fan of anime tiddies, s… 07/24/2016 on give me mod for skyrim. -1