Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

floppicus

Rank #12655 on Content
floppicus Avatar Level 134 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Offline
Send mail to floppicus Block floppicus Invite floppicus to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 25
Date Signed Up:6/03/2012
Last Login:12/19/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Ranking:#12655
Comment Ranking:#15593
Highest Content Rank:#4151
Highest Comment Rank:#7542
Content Thumbs: 341 total,  394 ,  53
Comment Thumbs: 452 total,  554 ,  102
Content Level Progress: 50% (5/10)
Level 24 Content: Peasant → Level 25 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 70% (7/10)
Level 134 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 135 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:0
Content Views:22011
Times Content Favorited:6 times
Total Comments Made:162
FJ Points:592

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny text/links

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny gifs

latest user's comments

#119 - Kind of relevant 12/14/2014 on Money +1
#73 - party with me like one of your french girls 11/29/2014 on Steam giveaway 0
#9 - I think we can both judge them, plebs having a gf and *…  [+] (1 new reply) 11/28/2014 on Who could it be? 0
User avatar #14 - alfonshister (11/28/2014) [-]
It's OK. I keep telling myself there is plenty of time.

Having oriental parents has the advantage that they will find candidates.
#7 - "That's not of my business" He's ditching her  [+] (21 new replies) 11/28/2014 on Who could it be? +9
User avatar #8 - alfonshister (11/28/2014) [-]
I could say that he should not have hit on a girlfriend with a bf, on the other side she shouldn't cheat if she has one.
But who am I to judge.
#12 - fuckyosixtyminutes (11/28/2014) [-]
He didn't do anything wrong. Her relatoinship and her commitment is between her and her bf. the guy she cheated with isn't responsible for that.
User avatar #13 - alfonshister (11/28/2014) [-]
Hitting on a gf of a bf is OK?
#15 - fuckyosixtyminutes (11/28/2014) [-]
Why wouldn't it be? Let me explain it without genders so it doesn't became a gender issue (unless you think it should be one):

A and B are in a relation, C has the hots for B. A and B have made promises to each other (in some form) not to do anything that falls under their definition of "cheating" (which can vary, some relationships are more open than others). C has made no such promises and has no obligation to either A or B.

In order for B to cheat on C, that requires a decision on B's part as well, not C, and it's B who is breaking the trust, not C. All C is doing is expressing an interest. B has every right in the world to reject C if B doesn't want to cheat on A. As long as B has complete control over not cheating on A (and B does, since B can say no to C), then it doesn't make sense to put any of the responsibility for A and B's commitment to each other on C.

tl;dr: If two people have promised each other commitment, it's illogical to put any ethical responsibility on a third party to preserve that commitment.
#18 - xxwarwolfxx (11/28/2014) [-]
Its still a freaking sleeze ball thing to do.
User avatar #52 - amuter (11/29/2014) [-]
This guy obviously didn't know that she already had a girlfriend
User avatar #53 - amuter (11/29/2014) [-]
boyfriend*
#19 - fuckyosixtyminutes (11/28/2014) [-]
I don't agree, per se. I think it's a sleeze ball thing to continue advances when the other party has made it clear they aren't and won't be interested, which often correlates with being in a relationship, i.e. "No thanks, I have a boyfriend"
#20 - xxwarwolfxx (11/28/2014) [-]
I dunno, I think its sleezey to hit on some one you know is in a relationship. To me, when you do that you're saying you don't respect them enough to be faithful to their current relationship and disrespecting their partner. Now, its another thing entirely if you don't know.
#22 - fuckyosixtyminutes (11/28/2014) [-]
"Respect" isn't always an important factor in romantic/sexual interactions (which is a term I'm using to include something as minor as flirting). The cheater might not care about getting respect and the third party might not be offering respect. Sometimes people just wanna fuck.

If you're looking for a boyfriend/girlfriend of your own though, then yeah, I do think it's stupid to pursue anyone already with somebody else.
#31 - shadowrated (11/28/2014) [-]
when your comments start arguements
#32 - fuckyosixtyminutes (11/28/2014) [-]
Eh it's only an argument in the verbal discourse sense. I've certainly not experienced anything unpleasant in either line of conversation that my original comment spawned.
User avatar #17 - alfonshister (11/28/2014) [-]
So C is not prohibited of giving someone the opportunity to cheat on their partner / fulfil a morally inacceptable act?
#21 - fuckyosixtyminutes (11/28/2014) [-]
No, because C doesn't have any obligation to that relationship.

The morality of an action, IMO and probably to some extent universally, aren't the same for each person. For example, if I eat the last cupcake, is that inherently wrong? No. What if my brother explicitly promises my mother that he'll save her a cupcake, then eats the last one anyway? Yes, that is wrong, because he committed to not eating the last one.

Having sex with someone who is not in a relatinoship is not *inherently* wrong. There are plenty of people out there with open relationships. What makes it wrong is if the two people, as two people in a relationship are best known to do, make a promise to one another not to date/fuck/whatever other people. It's a violation of that promise that makes it immoral, not some objective universal moral laws about "being in a relationship", and the third party, C in my example, isn't bound by that promise. Only A and B are.

If you still think it's wrong, let me ask you this: Do you think it's immoral for people to be in an "open" relationship where they sleep with other people sometimes? If you don't think that's immoral, then what makes an open relationship different from a "cheating" situation from an ethical standpoint?
User avatar #24 - alfonshister (11/28/2014) [-]
Yes. I think it is immoral.
But I also think that you should not help others do wrong stuff, because I am responsible for the act. Without me, the woman would not have been able to cheat. I helped her do wrong stuff.
I think that all humans are responsible for each other in things they can easily control.
By your opinion someone is able to indirectly, but actively makepeople feel bad without being guilty by your definition .
After all this is just my silly opinion and I am not in the position to force my ideas upon others.
Thanks for your input!
#25 - fuckyosixtyminutes (11/28/2014) [-]
Eh... there's definitely some merit to what you're saying. I have to admit I wouldn't feel right if I was knowingly helping someone break a commitment, even if I wasn't a party to that commitment. I don't like the idea that someone can "create" a moral obligation for me without my consent - "I'm in a relationship, so you can't pursue me" - but the fact that I would feel bad being the third party is evidence that I know it's wrong deep down.

Maybe what I"m really trying to say is "it shouldn't be wrong, but it kinda is" lol.
User avatar #26 - alfonshister (11/28/2014) [-]
thanks for your input
#23 - fuckyosixtyminutes (11/28/2014) [-]
Ugh typo again. Third paragraph should read "Having sex with someone who is not in THE relationship"
#16 - fuckyosixtyminutes (11/28/2014) [-]
The beginning of hte third paragraph should read "In order for B to cheat on A", my mistake
#9 - floppicus (11/28/2014) [-]
I think we can both judge them, plebs having a gf and shit
tfw no gf
User avatar #14 - alfonshister (11/28/2014) [-]
It's OK. I keep telling myself there is plenty of time.

Having oriental parents has the advantage that they will find candidates.
#13 - M'yeeeees science the good kind of science  [+] (1 new reply) 11/15/2014 on Sesame Street +4
User avatar #14 - crazyolitis (11/15/2014) [-]
Well, I can't say much, but... yes.
#11 - i need to know man, for research  [+] (3 new replies) 11/15/2014 on Sesame Street +1
#12 - crazyolitis (11/15/2014) [-]
Oh, for "Science" eh?
#13 - floppicus (11/15/2014) [-]
M'yeeeees science the good kind of science
User avatar #14 - crazyolitis (11/15/2014) [-]
Well, I can't say much, but... yes.
#9 - does Mr Noodle have any connection with the flying spaghetti monster  [+] (5 new replies) 11/15/2014 on Sesame Street +3
#10 - crazyolitis (11/15/2014) [-]
I'm not telling anything!
#11 - floppicus (11/15/2014) [-]
i need to know man, for research
#12 - crazyolitis (11/15/2014) [-]
Oh, for "Science" eh?
#13 - floppicus (11/15/2014) [-]
M'yeeeees science the good kind of science
User avatar #14 - crazyolitis (11/15/2014) [-]
Well, I can't say much, but... yes.
#7 - **floppicus rolled user crazyolitis ** where is Mr Noodle  [+] (7 new replies) 11/15/2014 on Sesame Street +7
#8 - crazyolitis (11/15/2014) [-]
I ain't telling anything bitch! I'd be dead before my lips would even finish the sentence. Don't fuck with Mr. Noodle.
#9 - floppicus (11/15/2014) [-]
does Mr Noodle have any connection with the flying spaghetti monster
#10 - crazyolitis (11/15/2014) [-]
I'm not telling anything!
#11 - floppicus (11/15/2014) [-]
i need to know man, for research
#12 - crazyolitis (11/15/2014) [-]
Oh, for "Science" eh?
#13 - floppicus (11/15/2014) [-]
M'yeeeees science the good kind of science
User avatar #14 - crazyolitis (11/15/2014) [-]
Well, I can't say much, but... yes.
#77 - Who is this transgirl that's global and why isn't she dating … 11/09/2014 on "Majority Gamergate are cis... 0
#11 - Here's a link to a site you may find interesting. Rel… 11/04/2014 on some mecha and kaiju size... 0
[ 162 Total ]

Comments(0):

 

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
No comments!
 Friends (0)