fiveblackmen
Rank #1721 on Comments
Level 253 Comments: Contaminated Win Offline
Send mail to fiveblackmen Block fiveblackmen Invite fiveblackmen to be your friend flag avatar
| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Date Signed Up: | 6/24/2014 |
| Last Login: | 1/14/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #1721 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #767 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 7549 total,
8537 ,
988 |
| Content Level Progress: | 6.77% (4/59) Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here |
| Comment Level Progress: | 76% (76/100) Level 253 Comments: Contaminated Win → Level 254 Comments: Contaminated Win |
| Subscribers: | 0 |
| Total Comments Made: | 1591 |
| FJ Points: | 5376 |
latest user's comments
| #107 - There certainly is evidence after date rape, such as having th… | 12/16/2015 on This made me so happy | -1 |
| #163 - Completely agree. Of the three I have known to not be giant di… | 12/16/2015 on Canada on arming retards | 0 |
| #18 - It isn't so much how the marines treat the other branches, it … [+] (14 new replies) | 12/15/2015 on Canada on arming retards | +8 |
| #57 -
shigiddy (12/15/2015) [-] Honestly man, it's part of espirit de corps; when the Army lost control of Fallujah in 2004, who was called in to take it back? The Marines. When the Army was driven out of Chosin Reservoir, who was called in to cover their asses and held off the Chinese while taking all the Army's wounded back to safety? The Marines. Of course we talk that shit up, wouldn't you? The problem is that shit like this goes both ways. The marines have had plenty of loses over the years and had to be bailed on from time to time as well. The job of the marines is literally to storm in and conquer and the army's job is to hold the conquered territory. Sometimes the marines fail at taking something and sometimes the army gets overwhelmed and fails to hold it. In a situation where a town/city is lost and is important enough, the marines will be sent back in to take it again. That is their fucking job. It is a dangerous job, but that is what they signed up for. The army's job is also dangerous because they are literally a sitting target. Stop acting like the marines are a bunch of bad asses because they have occasionally had to retake something they had taken once before. War is messy and never goes as planned. #165 -
shigiddy (12/16/2015) [-] The reason Marines are badasses is because our job is the most dangerous part of warfare. Attacking an entrenched position is way harder than defending one, so the men doing the attacking have to be better than the ones defending. The tip of the spear is the part that sees the most action, and takes the most wear. But when it comes down to it, Marines have a really shitty job; breaching enemy defenses is one of the hardest parts of warfare tactics-wise. And we prepare our bodies for that by having the toughest training and the highest standards. And we prepare our minds for it by talking big shit and acting like we're better than everyone else. #76 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/15/2015) [-] I bet there have been other times where the marines had to be rescued. or perhaps their specialty is to be deployed, fresh, while the other branches have already taken the beating. #86 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] It's actually usually the opposite. The Marines are a quick deploy expeditionary force with almost solely an offensive focus. They usually come take something, then the Army holds it. Then sometimes the Army loses it and cant get it back, so the Marines take it again.  Army, but I shared a post with Marines. We'll give them shit when they're around for a little banter, but they'll shit-talk any branch no matter who's around. Probably because they feel like it comes with the title, I guess. Never really took the time to ask one. #172 -
wallsbad (12/16/2015) [-]  | ||
| #80 - That depends on the comic really. Although he is usually alrea… | 12/15/2015 on UFC FIGHTERS HATE HIM | 0 |
| #10 - I doubt he'd lose his job unless a large portion of his class … [+] (2 new replies) | 12/15/2015 on Advice dealing with a SJW | +5 |
 I think you underestimate the power of SJWs these days. Worse shit has happened. I'm just saying that it is very difficult to get a tenured professor fired. Especially if it is only a small number of complaints. Chances are all that will happen is someone will tell him he has to lay off the Cosby jokes. | ||
| #11 - From my experience, the marines seems to attract the stupidest… [+] (92 new replies) | 12/15/2015 on Canada on arming retards | +58 |
| #173 -
anon (12/16/2015) [-] **anonymous rolled image**I agree we are arrogant but its towards other branches. yes we think we're the best. yes we think we're badass. yes we think we are the shit and of course our dicks are bigger than everyone else's . but it comes with the territory. There's nothing like a good old fashioned brawl between the services. but at the same time because we are so small, we treat each other a helluva lot better than those in the other services. we have small unit leadership and our own traditions. It's just second nature to make fun of everybody else. Competitiveness between the branches is fine, but I am talking about how most marines I have met act around civilians. They act like they are better than everyone, not just members of the other military branches. They act like it is difficult to get into the marines, and judging by a number of former classmates of mine from high school, they seem to take just about everyone. I understand they do a dangerous job, but the decision to do that job is on them. Nobody forced them to enlist with the marines and simply being a marine does not make you better than anyone else. All I'm saying is that the members of other military branches that I have met have generally been far less douchey about their service than the bulk of the marines I have met and I really don't understand why. My best guess is that it is either that the marines tends to attract douche bags or they somehow instill this arrogance in them during training. Personally, I think they just attract more douche bags because I have met a small number of marines that have been extremely polite and just all around descent people, but they are a very small minority. #102 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] My neighbor was a marine. He's had the cops called on him multiple times for domestic abuse. #81 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] Everyone comes out of boot as an asshole...that's an "18 year old that thinks he's cool" thing, not a USMC thing (seen fcking national guardsmen even do the same crap). Ironically it's the fleet Marines that put them back in their place, and kindly (not really so kindly...) and make them stop being douchebags.  In my experience the higher ranked officers who have been in longer are usually kinder to civilians. It's the god damned PFCs that are the cuntiest of the bunch. Completely agree. Of the three I have known to not be giant dicks, one was a colonel before retiring, one was a lieutenant, and the third was drafted during Vietnam and was mostly left along by the enlisted marines. All of them served and retired/left the corps more than three decades ago, which may have something to do with it as well. The other several dozen I have met are mostly arrogant asses that make sure you know they were marines and seem to expect you to kiss their ass because they think they are heroes simply because they joined the marines.  They're the smallest because they're part of the Department of the Navy. There's no Department of the Marine Corps, after all.  "I just want to kill people, I don't care who" I replied to the recruit "I will go warm up the court martial" #44 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] Uhuh. Sure you did. I'm sure you have no bias, considering you said UN troops were worse than ISIS. You have a lot of fantastical tales with no source that everyone buys for some reason. #47 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] I was one, sooooo. Also, Comment #6 on your post Thank You ISIS, in response to thelizardlord. It is exactly what you said. "Who ISIS or the UN? ISIS is bad but the UN has killed WAAAAAY more innocent people" That is a fact not an opinion #74 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] Don't bother. You'll get no actual sources, just a bunch of conjecture and "personal experiences" from this total badass with like 3 quintillion confirmed kills who's seen every major event of the last century, especially the ones that didn't happen. #49 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] It's also irrelevant, and clearly shows an anti-Western bias. ISIS slaughters people who disagree with them, UN troops cause collateral damage. Considering the UN is around 30 times as old as ISIS, and has been involved in dozens of armed conflicts over those years, the statistics are a little lopsided. It's like saying "whites commit more terrorist attacks than Arabs in the U.S." when whites (including Hispanics) make up over 80% of the population, while Arabs make up less than .3%. You see how this skews things? #72 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] Yes, that's why they include them in crime stats for whites, and why Zimmerman was called white. They can't have it both ways, where only Europeans are termed white when it's convenient, but Hispanics are included if it makes whites look bad. #71 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] What? UN protectorates, which have no special history of violence or anything, and are primarily interim governments set up during transitional periods that have been largely successful? Is that what you're talking about? You may actually be retarded. You just throw out single words (again with none of your own sources) and expect me to find something negative where there is none. #36 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-]  **anonymous rolled image**Heres a story a Canadian soldier told me, his group was with a group of American soldiers and they raided a hide out, one of the Americans was about to throw a grenade into the basement but the Canadian soldier said that isn't how they do it and told him not to throw it, much to the dismay of the American. It turns out there was a shit ton of explosive materials that would have killed everyone had they thrown the grenade. Americans are so use to fighting that they don't know it's smarter to check before you attack even if there's no "bad guys" there, Canadian soldiers are use to peace keeping so they don't have the reflex to shoot first ask later. #128 -
jdrinfantry (12/15/2015) [-]  Canadians, British, Danish, US, Latvian etc. etc. infantry soldiers ALL follow the same doctrins, ESPECIALLY in joint operations. Some are more experienced than others, and that shows exactly in situations like this. Deployments often run at a faster pace than you train for. Hence, you don't always check before 'nading the fuck out of a compound. I've seen enough men and women killed, to know that I probably half my chances of getting back alive, if I stick my head into every room in a compound without throwing in a grenade first. Unless we're talking about possible civilians or hostages inside. Also I'm a danish infantry soldier, and to me, US marines are some of the best men I've fought besides. Pic of Canadian soldiers stacking up. Definitely gonna toss a 'nade in that hole. #136 -
humanityfckyeah (12/15/2015) [-] Theu are frequently ranked lowly at military exercises with other countries. The fact is, while America has a lot, and generally amongst the best armed. They are mostly of lower quality soldiers #77 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] Shit like that does happen. Shit like entering a basement without fragging it first and getting shot 12 times happens a lot more though. Just because the Canadians were right once about not fragging a basement doesn't mean it's suddenly tactically wise to go about clearing buildings without frags on a regular basis.  Yeah? Here's the thing, I've heard similar stories told about troops from almost every NATO nation by people from other ones. Everyone wants to make themselves look better. You know what they all have in common? They're made up; yours in particular goes against have a hundred military doctrines, so either you made it up or the person telling you the story did. #67 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/15/2015) [-] Actually, I read in a news story that NATO nations talked about how the Americans have the greatest incidence of friendly fire #84 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] No duh, they had something like 20x more troops there than the 2nd most contributing nation did. It's extremely statistically improbably that they WOULDN'T have the most incidents of it. It's hard to fire on another unit from your own nation when you're the only unit from your nation there. #89 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/15/2015) [-] sputniknews.com/world/20150720/1024825796.html keeps happening I understand what you say but it seems US troops have a history of not giving a fuck There have been 13 friendly fire incidents during the War in Iraq. Keep in mind the majority of troops in Iraq were Americans. 7 of them were committed by Americans, 2 of which were caused by mechanical errors, one of which was a faulty friend or foe tag in a British aircraft. Another was caused by Kurdish fighters hanging around a bomb-making facility and refusing to lower their weapons from the American troops. That leaves Americans at fault for 4 Friendly Fire incidents, unless you count the manufacturer of the anti-aircraft weapon that malfunctioned. British troops were responsible for another 5, they were far less numerous, and all of their incidents came from rifle or tank fire NOT from technical glitches. That shows American troops as more competent, if anything. Americans were responsible for 5 FF incidents in Afghanistan. Germans were responsible for one, New Zealanders for one, Afghans for two, Pakistanis for one, British for 13 (possibly 12), Canadians for 4, Dutch for one, and Danes for one. The U.S. made up two-thirds of the coalition in both conflicts, with the British contributing nearly another third. If anything, this shows Americans as ridiculously competent. One reason the U.S. may be viewed as responsible for more blue-on-blue incidents is that the British called American aircraft to incorrect coordinates on 4 separate occasions, which I counted as British responsibility. #129 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-]  naw baby this is why we hate on Americans this right here, becasue you know why its wrong yet off you go What are you even trying to say? Because you're not saying it. #82 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/15/2015) [-] No, those data shows that the British are the ones with most friendly fire, followed by their cousins, the Americans. Holy shit, that's because they make up the vast majority of troops (actually, the Americans, British, Australians, and a few Poles were the only ones in Iraq); everyone else in NATO put together made up less than 1/12 of coalition troops in Afghanistan and none in Iraq, while bearing responsibility for 8 of 26 FF incidents (I didn't include Afghan or Pakistani troops because they aren't NATO). Uhuh, sure. "I don't have any source, but I believe something because I want to; you should to." They're obviously hiding all those American FF incidents without hiding any others, just because. #133 -
humanityfckyeah (12/15/2015) [-] Yet you will happily believe your american based new. Big brother is pleased. I don't believe anyone's news, but privately run organizations with their own political views and interests are certainly more dependent on facts than state-run ones. #98 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/15/2015) [-] Corporate Mainstream News (western media) are way more controlled. At least sputnik is officially run by the government, and thus, accountable in the eyes of the world. This is talking about an incident which happened. A factual incident. You've bought in to propaganda if you believe our media is more controlled. But I shouldn't be surprised, because all of your news sources are government run. Also, that incident was on my list. #101 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/15/2015) [-] You haven't done any research (or have common sense or memory, apparently 9/11 war drums beating for Iraq. Intervention in Syria blaming Assad's government for chemical attacks) The people who put money for political campaigns are the ones who own the mainstream media corporations. And again, Sputnik isn't presenting their opinion. They're talking about a fact. #142 -
urmomsagrot (12/15/2015) [-]  As others have said. We had more troops than any other country there. This is the same with gun violence, people always scream that we have the most gun violence despite just ONE of our states having the same population as the average country. They just never want to accept that more numbers = more opportunities. The numbers aside, we also performed the most active roles within these theaters which put us in positions to make even more mistakes than the international fobbits and checkpoint guards. TLDR, no, you're wrong. #146 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/15/2015) [-] Putin is in allience with a number of people who want to get rid of "the Cabal" (secret government sindicates). That's why it's not the "same old story" between Russia and the US. Right now, actions are speaking for themselves in Syria. The reality of Daesh being a US creation is coming to light. I agree on your argument about the numbers. That's why people were convinced that pot was a gateway drug, by manipulating their perception of data making it seem that because a lot of heroin users started with the illegal drug marihuana, then marihuana leads to harder drugs, instead of considering what percentage of pot smokers went into harder drugs (or considering alcohol as the first drug in general and not excepting it for being legal). On the other hand, the US has shown time and time again that they don't care for civilian casualties. Which is why I don't think it is that far off that they commit more friendly fire than others.  "On the other hand, the US has shown time and time again that they don't care for civilian casualties. Which is why I don't think it is that far off that they commit more friendly fire than others. " War is war. Innocent people die. That being said, we had the most restrictive obscene ROE overseas that we lost a lot of good men and women because we weren't allowed to shoot at something so obviously hostile so that we -wouldn't- kill innocents, so much so it was a problem. Can you say the same for Russia in Syria right now? What about the regime that he is protecting? This isn't an accusation, I am asking a serious question. #156 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/16/2015) [-] Yeah. He is preventing Assad's regime from falling which is the last bastion of stability in that area. Remove him and you'll create another power vacuum and create yet another group like ISIL (I don't believe it was truly an accident, but according to their own narrative, they should know better by now). #85 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/15/2015) [-] I'm talking possibilities here. i don't even remember where I read the original article. Could end up not being true. your own data given here didn't support it that much. It only made it clear that British troops have more incidents of friendly fire Look at comment 93, it shows that other NATO nations are responsible for more than their share.  from what i've seen its the officers in the Marines that are tolerable and the regular soldiers are arrogant also my dad was in the military and he's never had a good thing to say about Marines that he was on training operations with ranging from "they can't do basic math in their heads" to "their most deadly weapons are their hands because they can't shoot straight" although he did say that they're useful for soaking up all the enemies ammo before the real soldiers come in  "my daddy said that marines are stupid cuz he's in the Army, that makes them stupid cuz my daddy would never B.S." You seriously sound like a 14 year old trying to base their argument on what their parents have said rather than any facts, or even your own personal observations. #87 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] Considering the Marine Corps doesn't have "soldiers" it's hard for any of us to take you seriously about how well you understand the Marine Corps when you call them "soldiers". well if they don't have soldiers that would explain why they're garbage #152 -
urmomsagrot (12/15/2015) [-]  actually i am a troll i just happen to also be legitimately funny sometimes its called shaking it up #144 -
seymourg (12/15/2015) [-] Nah but seriously I hate how people sh*t on Marines, or any of our armed forces. Everyone has bad people, of course. Either these guys are cherrypicking the bad marines or they happened to come across a small pocket of assholes. Either way, all this blatant disrespect, and the amount of positive support it gets on this website, is sickening. Jokes are fine, but that's all they are -- jokes. And you know what, judging by this comment section, I don't even know what kind of thumbs I'll get. But at least I'm speaking from the heart and not for the sake of ad hominem or having a well-liked opinion. Pic is comic relief because I'm such an Ensign Buzzkill. Hey Mo tard! Blood hurts grass! But blood dripping on the ground in the shade will make mushrooms grow in a few hours. If they run off and bleed out under a fruit tree when you find them there will be mushrooms every where they bleed in the shade of the tree. Trust me  The Marine Corp isn't even it's own branch the emblem reads "Department of the Navy" and it only becomes it's own branch during war and we haven't been in an official war since WWII #79 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] "Department of the Navy" isn't a branch, genius. The Navy, Marine Corps, and (during wartime) Coast Guard are 3 branches under 1 government department (which is what the "Department of the Navy" is) They belong to the Navy they aren't their own branch. the US Marine Corps has many close ties to the US Navy, and the Department of the Navy oversees both service "branches", each having its own autonomous leadership (Marine Corps has its Commandant, US Navy has its Chief of Naval Operations, both leaders are members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and both branches are under civilian oversight of the Secretary of the Navy). In other words they are the Navy's bitch. It isn't so much how the marines treat the other branches, it is more about how they treat everyone. They like to tell you that they are/were a marine as if you're going to drop to your knees and start sucking their dick. It isn't all of them but it is certainly a majority. I have also found that marine officers are far less likely to act like this and are usually far more dignified, so education/intelligence may be a factor in this. #57 -
shigiddy (12/15/2015) [-] Honestly man, it's part of espirit de corps; when the Army lost control of Fallujah in 2004, who was called in to take it back? The Marines. When the Army was driven out of Chosin Reservoir, who was called in to cover their asses and held off the Chinese while taking all the Army's wounded back to safety? The Marines. Of course we talk that shit up, wouldn't you? The problem is that shit like this goes both ways. The marines have had plenty of loses over the years and had to be bailed on from time to time as well. The job of the marines is literally to storm in and conquer and the army's job is to hold the conquered territory. Sometimes the marines fail at taking something and sometimes the army gets overwhelmed and fails to hold it. In a situation where a town/city is lost and is important enough, the marines will be sent back in to take it again. That is their fucking job. It is a dangerous job, but that is what they signed up for. The army's job is also dangerous because they are literally a sitting target. Stop acting like the marines are a bunch of bad asses because they have occasionally had to retake something they had taken once before. War is messy and never goes as planned. #165 -
shigiddy (12/16/2015) [-] The reason Marines are badasses is because our job is the most dangerous part of warfare. Attacking an entrenched position is way harder than defending one, so the men doing the attacking have to be better than the ones defending. The tip of the spear is the part that sees the most action, and takes the most wear. But when it comes down to it, Marines have a really shitty job; breaching enemy defenses is one of the hardest parts of warfare tactics-wise. And we prepare our bodies for that by having the toughest training and the highest standards. And we prepare our minds for it by talking big shit and acting like we're better than everyone else. #76 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/15/2015) [-] I bet there have been other times where the marines had to be rescued. or perhaps their specialty is to be deployed, fresh, while the other branches have already taken the beating. #86 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] It's actually usually the opposite. The Marines are a quick deploy expeditionary force with almost solely an offensive focus. They usually come take something, then the Army holds it. Then sometimes the Army loses it and cant get it back, so the Marines take it again. Army, but I shared a post with Marines. We'll give them shit when they're around for a little banter, but they'll shit-talk any branch no matter who's around. Probably because they feel like it comes with the title, I guess. Never really took the time to ask one. #172 -
wallsbad (12/16/2015) [-] #60 -
selfdenyingbeggar (12/15/2015) [-] i don't think he got angry. he just shared his experiences with them to add more informatio to the topic being discussed. | ||
| #11 - I think he admitted to purchasing drugs to give to women for s… [+] (4 new replies) | 12/15/2015 on This made me so happy | +10 |
 Thing is date rape usually isn't going to have any such concrete proof - if they're drugged there won't be any physical evidence or signs of a struggle in most cases so it ends up being a he said / she said ordeal. Cosby has been accused over and over again throughout the years but he always had the money, influence, and lawyers to stop anyone from taking meaningful action against him or going public with it. There's overwhelming evidence, most of it just happens to be anecdotal. I have zero doubt that he's guilty and the countersuit just seems like a last ditch effort to get the victims to back down once more. There certainly is evidence after date rape, such as having the drugs still in your system and signs of vaginal/anal penetration and possibly DNA. The victim may not be beaten to a pulp but there is still plenty of evidence if they go to the police immediately. Now, I don't know if Cosby actually did rape any of these women, and he very well may have, but it is certainly fishy that so many of them waited decades to come forward about it and that the number of women coming forward seems to keep growing. I also find it suspicious that this list includes women like Janice Dickinson, who is a known media whore and seems to be willing to do anything to get attention. If some of these women were in fact raped by Cosby, all these other women coming forward, so they can get their 15 minutes of fame or a paycheck, are doing nothing but hurting the case. His recent countersuit is a pretty standard reaction to such a blatant money grabbing defamation suit as the one filed against him by a group of his accusers when he denied their allegations. Are you telling me that you would not counter-sue if someone filed a defamation suit against you after you denied an accusation he/she made against you? If he did in fact rape any of these women than he absolutely deserves to be charged but at this point they are just trying to get money out of him. They should be doing stuff like getting the statute of limitations increased/removed for rape and actually filing charges against him, not suing him for defamation for denying their accusations. Innocent until proven guilty. This seems to be something the news media in this country has forgotten. #85 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] Taking drugs and then having sex was common in the 70's. I'm still skeptical that these women aren't 3rd wave feminists trying to make a quick buck off of him by screaming rape, the way feminists act these days | ||
| #25 - One leaves you money and the other takes your money. [+] (1 new reply) | 12/15/2015 on If You See This | +12 |
| | ||
| #22 - Considering they only live about 20 years, it probably isn't a… | 12/15/2015 on poor kitty | 0 |
| #49 - I can. Teenagers are retarded. I think it is because they all … | 12/15/2015 on Anons Christmas tree | +4 |
| #57 - I didn't say they didn't. All I said is that the people that u… | 12/15/2015 on vagina | +1 |
| #86 - That is because current kids/teens are still kids/teens and ve… | 12/15/2015 on Christmas of 1994 | 0 |
| #54 - I believe the problem there is that people think that they don… [+] (2 new replies) | 12/15/2015 on vagina | +3 |
| #56 -
anon (12/15/2015) [-] People who are active (sports and stuff) need deodorant, even with a daily bath. I didn't say they didn't. All I said is that the people that usually smell like BO and cologne are people that don't take regular showers. Most people that play sports or go to the gym will shower soon afterwards and don't smell like swamp ass. | ||
| #51 - It's baby boomers. They are mostly retarded,extremely hypocrit… [+] (4 new replies) | 12/14/2015 on Christmas of 1994 | +23 |
| #61 -
anon (12/14/2015) [-] lol current kids/teens are the worst they already blame everything on everything else but themselves That is because current kids/teens are still kids/teens and very few have gotten far enough to cause any actual problems. Also, they have been babied their entire lives, because of what the baby boomers did to the world, and are going to have serious problems when they finish school and try to function in the real world. Hell, shit has been getting more and more difficult for each generation after the baby boomers because of how much they fucked up. They got so preoccupied with making everyone happy and safe and tolerant that they over complicated everything and now nobody is happy and safe and tolerant.  Well I mean, many of them are literally too young to cause actual problems.  Honestly, Generation X (currently 35-55 years old) parents aren't really better. | ||
| #9 - The problem with this is that most of the stuff you find in st… [+] (1 new reply) | 12/13/2015 on Important reminder for this... | 0 |
| #10 -
anon (12/13/2015) [-] Same anon as in original post. People saying "gluten allergy" is a pet peeve of mine, you see. You can't be alergic to gluten because that would assume your immune system treats it as something bad while it isn't. Gluten is the plant's defensive mechanism and is there to discourage the plant's consumption as gluten can't be digested and can cause injuries and inflammations to your digestive system because it can't be digested, and quite literally scars the tissue while it travels down your intestines. It's not "gluten allergy", it's "gluten intolerance" since some people can tolerate it, while others are susceptible for said injuries. This is mostly caused by phytate which iirc weakens the structure of the cells your intestines are made of, so by frequent consumption of anything that has gluten and phytate, worst case scenario you get intestine leakage. Tl;Dr gluten is by it's nature a poison. | ||
| #114 - I'm not even 30 and I've probably already eaten 7000 animals. … | 12/13/2015 on wow | +4 |
| #64 - This is like a terrible mix of redneck and guido. | 12/13/2015 on Meanwhile in the motherland | 0 |
| #209 - Found the retard. | 12/11/2015 on Stump Trump The Can't | 0 |
| #31 - It also pushes kids through who should have and otherwise prob… [+] (2 new replies) | 12/10/2015 on Stump Trump The Can't | +35 |
| #49 -
anon (12/10/2015) [-] And at the same rate, kids who might normally excel at school and the subjects in question are being mitigated by the lower overall standard in the classroom, having a less competitive group of peers in the classroom, and not getting the material they need at an effective pace in order to truly shine. | ||
| #24 - I have a jackson's chameleon. He doesn't like being held or ev… | 12/10/2015 on Road Hard | 0 |
| #37 - Not only were they already dealing with the US bombing them fr… | 12/10/2015 on Russia is killing ISIS from... | +1 |
| #8 - There are more than two types (I think there are 9 subspecies … | 12/10/2015 on Oh, don't mind me. Just... | 0 |
| #80 - In NJ you would pay more than $600 a month for a ****** … | 12/09/2015 on Baby boomers | 0 |
| #81 - Square-Enix can't be trusted to not **** this up. They … [+] (1 new reply) | 12/08/2015 on Final Fantasy VII Remake | 0 |
| | ||
| #99 - Maybe after the first one. The first bankruptcy involved his p… | 12/08/2015 on I want to see this | 0 |
Anonymous comments allowed.
2 comments displayed.
#2
-
enragedonion (04/26/2015) [-] Can we be friends? I would love to befriend a shark made of five black men, that's just badass.
