Upload
YouTube Videos
Funny Pictures
Funny GIFs
Funny Text
Funny Movies
Channels
Search
Search
Login or register
Logout
Settings
I (
0
)
Subs (
0
)
Favs (
0
)
Friends (
0
)
Login or register
reset password
Stay logged in
Log in/Sign up using Facebook.
Log in/Sign up using Gmail/Google+.
CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Have the FunnyJunk newsletter emailed to you
Captcha Code:
PMs (
0
)
Create Channel
vidyagaems
funny
4chan
politics
animemanga
AnimeLewds
monstergirls
WholesomeMemes
trump
FJNN
cute
TumblrContent
kickassfactscom
dungeonsndrags
zawarldo
pokemon
videogames
overwatchtime
dankwebms
military
dccomics
occomicmakers
samuraijack
warhammer40k
stevenuniverse
rwby
CuteKemonomimis
TrapLewds
SVTFOE
CartoonGoodness
aww
polandball
feels
cuteasiangirls
cyoa
art
WorldCUP2018
erma
humanityfyeah
lordoftherings
marvel
cringechannel
wallpapers
ponytime
TouhouProject
gravityfalls
fhenix
Level 119 Comments: Funny Junkie
Offline
Send mail to fhenix
Block fhenix
Unblock fhenix
Invite fhenix to be your friend
Last status update:

Date Signed Up:
4/26/2013
Last Login:
11/11/2014
Stats
Content Thumbs:
72
total, 76
, 4
Comment Thumbs:
206
total, 223
, 17
Content Level Progress:
20% (1/5)
Level 4 Content: New Here → Level 5 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress:
20% (1/5)
Level 119 Comments: Funny Junkie → Level 120 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:
0
Content Views:
6874
Times Content Favorited:
3 times
Total Comments Made:
28
FJ Points:
277
Favorite Tags:
sam winchester (2)

supernatural (2)
What people say about fhenix
latest user's comments
#31
 It's a thing.
09/29/2014 on
23rd Century Logic
0
#124
 the ending is executed way better in the book imo
11/16/2013 on
let it begin
0
#78
 That's both an infinite regression paradox and a contradiction…
11/07/2013 on
i can make it work
0
#61
 That's why I said this paradox was flawed. But by the definiti…
[+]
(2 replies)
11/07/2013 on
i can make it work
+1
#75

newforomador
(11/07/2013)
[]
So, the type of paradox you're talking about, is like saying "Today's opposite day" on opposite day.
At least, if everything you said was true 100% of the time
If you say it's opposite day, that means it can't be opposite day because everything say has the opposite meaning, but that means that it would in fact be opposite day, and it continues forever.
#78

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
That's both an infinite regression paradox and a contradiction paradox. But, unlike the paradox axe, it is only a logical paradox
it's not, strictly speaking, a paradox
because it doesn't have a singular solution.
#57
 What you're talking about is a contradiction paradox, I'm talk…
[+]
(4 replies)
11/07/2013 on
i can make it work
+1
#58

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
Even then, you can cut wood with stuff other than an axe. You could just break a branch off with your bare hands, for fucks' sake.
#61

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
That's why I said this paradox was flawed. But by the definition of 'infinite regression' and 'paradox' the axe is still technically a paradox.
#75

newforomador
(11/07/2013)
[]
So, the type of paradox you're talking about, is like saying "Today's opposite day" on opposite day.
At least, if everything you said was true 100% of the time
If you say it's opposite day, that means it can't be opposite day because everything say has the opposite meaning, but that means that it would in fact be opposite day, and it continues forever.
#78

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
That's both an infinite regression paradox and a contradiction paradox. But, unlike the paradox axe, it is only a logical paradox
it's not, strictly speaking, a paradox
because it doesn't have a singular solution.
#52
 No, a paradox is only supposed to seem like it doesn't hav…
[+]
(6 replies)
11/07/2013 on
i can make it work
+1
#55

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
No, no, no. I said it
HAS
an answer. Two, in fact. You just can't pinpoint one.
#57

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
What you're talking about is a contradiction paradox, I'm talking about circular paradoxes. They're both paradoxes, just different kinds.
#58

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
Even then, you can cut wood with stuff other than an axe. You could just break a branch off with your bare hands, for fucks' sake.
#61

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
That's why I said this paradox was flawed. But by the definition of 'infinite regression' and 'paradox' the axe is still technically a paradox.
#75

newforomador
(11/07/2013)
[]
So, the type of paradox you're talking about, is like saying "Today's opposite day" on opposite day.
At least, if everything you said was true 100% of the time
If you say it's opposite day, that means it can't be opposite day because everything say has the opposite meaning, but that means that it would in fact be opposite day, and it continues forever.
#78

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
That's both an infinite regression paradox and a contradiction paradox. But, unlike the paradox axe, it is only a logical paradox
it's not, strictly speaking, a paradox
because it doesn't have a singular solution.
#48
 The idea behind the paradox in the paradox axe may be flawed b…
[+]
(8 replies)
11/07/2013 on
i can make it work
+1
#49

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
Uhm....................... doesn't solving a paradox mean it's no longer a paradox? Like I said, a paradox has two correct, but mutually exclusive answers. Finding the answers is easy, but you can't pick one, due to the nature of the paradox. If you solve a paradox, it ceases to be a paradox. That's how paradoxes work.
#52

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
No, a paradox is only supposed to
seem
like it doesn't have an answer. It can have a solution and still be a paradox.
#55

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
No, no, no. I said it
HAS
an answer. Two, in fact. You just can't pinpoint one.
#57

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
What you're talking about is a contradiction paradox, I'm talking about circular paradoxes. They're both paradoxes, just different kinds.
#58

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
Even then, you can cut wood with stuff other than an axe. You could just break a branch off with your bare hands, for fucks' sake.
#61

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
That's why I said this paradox was flawed. But by the definition of 'infinite regression' and 'paradox' the axe is still technically a paradox.
#75

newforomador
(11/07/2013)
[]
So, the type of paradox you're talking about, is like saying "Today's opposite day" on opposite day.
At least, if everything you said was true 100% of the time
If you say it's opposite day, that means it can't be opposite day because everything say has the opposite meaning, but that means that it would in fact be opposite day, and it continues forever.
#78

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
That's both an infinite regression paradox and a contradiction paradox. But, unlike the paradox axe, it is only a logical paradox
it's not, strictly speaking, a paradox
because it doesn't have a singular solution.
#46
 There are multiple different definitions to the word paradox, …
[+]
(10 replies)
11/07/2013 on
i can make it work
+1
#47

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
It's still not a paradox.
#48

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
The idea behind the paradox in the paradox axe may be flawed but it still shares a common theme with popular logical paradoxes (that theme being infinite regression). Just because this specific logical paradox has an answer to it, doesn't make it not a paradox, paradoxes have been solved before.
#49

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
Uhm....................... doesn't solving a paradox mean it's no longer a paradox? Like I said, a paradox has two correct, but mutually exclusive answers. Finding the answers is easy, but you can't pick one, due to the nature of the paradox. If you solve a paradox, it ceases to be a paradox. That's how paradoxes work.
#52

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
No, a paradox is only supposed to
seem
like it doesn't have an answer. It can have a solution and still be a paradox.
#55

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
No, no, no. I said it
HAS
an answer. Two, in fact. You just can't pinpoint one.
#57

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
What you're talking about is a contradiction paradox, I'm talking about circular paradoxes. They're both paradoxes, just different kinds.
#58

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
Even then, you can cut wood with stuff other than an axe. You could just break a branch off with your bare hands, for fucks' sake.
#61

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
That's why I said this paradox was flawed. But by the definition of 'infinite regression' and 'paradox' the axe is still technically a paradox.
#75

newforomador
(11/07/2013)
[]
So, the type of paradox you're talking about, is like saying "Today's opposite day" on opposite day.
At least, if everything you said was true 100% of the time
If you say it's opposite day, that means it can't be opposite day because everything say has the opposite meaning, but that means that it would in fact be opposite day, and it continues forever.
#78

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
That's both an infinite regression paradox and a contradiction paradox. But, unlike the paradox axe, it is only a logical paradox
it's not, strictly speaking, a paradox
because it doesn't have a singular solution.
#36
 Or, more likely, because an axe was used to cut down the wood …
[+]
(14 replies)
11/07/2013 on
i can make it work
3
#64

neokun
(11/07/2013)
[]
You can tell you are one of the tumblr people.
#41

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
THAT'S NOT A BLOODY PARADOX! A paradox is a question with two correct, mutually exclusive answers. No one ever follows the damn definition. Just like with irony.
#46

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
There are multiple different definitions to the word paradox, the one being used here is the idea behind logical paradoxes. This specific example involves infinite regression ('A' must be true in order for 'B' to be true, but 'B' must be true in order for 'A' to be true.)
#47

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
It's still not a paradox.
#48

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
The idea behind the paradox in the paradox axe may be flawed but it still shares a common theme with popular logical paradoxes (that theme being infinite regression). Just because this specific logical paradox has an answer to it, doesn't make it not a paradox, paradoxes have been solved before.
#49

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
Uhm....................... doesn't solving a paradox mean it's no longer a paradox? Like I said, a paradox has two correct, but mutually exclusive answers. Finding the answers is easy, but you can't pick one, due to the nature of the paradox. If you solve a paradox, it ceases to be a paradox. That's how paradoxes work.
#52

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
No, a paradox is only supposed to
seem
like it doesn't have an answer. It can have a solution and still be a paradox.
#55

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
No, no, no. I said it
HAS
an answer. Two, in fact. You just can't pinpoint one.
#57

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
What you're talking about is a contradiction paradox, I'm talking about circular paradoxes. They're both paradoxes, just different kinds.
#58

thechosentroll
(11/07/2013)
[]
Even then, you can cut wood with stuff other than an axe. You could just break a branch off with your bare hands, for fucks' sake.
#61

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
That's why I said this paradox was flawed. But by the definition of 'infinite regression' and 'paradox' the axe is still technically a paradox.
#75

newforomador
(11/07/2013)
[]
So, the type of paradox you're talking about, is like saying "Today's opposite day" on opposite day.
At least, if everything you said was true 100% of the time
If you say it's opposite day, that means it can't be opposite day because everything say has the opposite meaning, but that means that it would in fact be opposite day, and it continues forever.
#78

fhenix
(11/07/2013)
[]
That's both an infinite regression paradox and a contradiction paradox. But, unlike the paradox axe, it is only a logical paradox
it's not, strictly speaking, a paradox
because it doesn't have a singular solution.
#39

ericforeman
(11/07/2013)
[]
Are we overlooking the fact that most axes have
wooden handles
#157
 It's actually kind of impressive you noticed that...
10/19/2013 on
You're Special
+6
First
2
3
Last
Next
[
28
Total
]
Show Comments (0)