Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a commission on everything you buy.

ewowo    

Rank #25883 on Subscribers
ewowo Avatar Level 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to ewowo Block ewowo Invite ewowo to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 21
Consoles Owned: NDSLite/PS2
Date Signed Up:5/25/2011
Last Login:4/01/2014
Location:Belgium
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 2543 total,  3212 ,  669
Comment Thumbs: 3707 total,  6484 ,  2777
Content Level Progress: 42% (42/100)
Level 125 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 126 Content: Respected Member Of Famiry
Comment Level Progress: 47% (47/100)
Level 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 237 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:2
Content Views:146168
Times Content Favorited:58 times
Total Comments Made:3475
FJ Points:6384
Favorite Tags: magic the gather (9) | magic (5) | tcg (5) | channel (4) | MTG (4) | one (4) | the (4) | fucking (3) | Time (3) | metal (2) | Nothing (2) | octgn (2)

latest user's comments

#683 - You're trying to convince me of your pro-gun points. That'…  [+] (17 new replies) 01/25/2013 on Scary Shit +1
User avatar #687 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
It's ok as long as you don't want them taken away. Were cool.
User avatar #690 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
But seriously for a second. Don't you ever look at the arguments the pro-gun side uses and just want to hit yourself in the fucking face over and over again?

Like with every issue in the states EVER, both sides are voiced equally loudly by equally retarded people.
Untide Stats pls
User avatar #925 - doodogger (01/29/2013) [-]
What pro gun arguments make you want to "hit yourself in the fucking face over and over again"?
User avatar #927 - ewowo (01/29/2013) [-]
I can't bring myself to type them out.
User avatar #696 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Well I think the NRA has gone a little far at worst in their views.
User avatar #699 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Not even talking about the NRA itself, they can manage to be... pretty moderate, at times.

Just. Every issue ever. Angry Americans on facebook voicing their opinions.

I just sit back, read the arguments and I'm like: "Do people REALLY believe this?"

EVERY ISSUE EVER has both sides claiming the world will ACTUALLY END if they don't get what they want.
User avatar #703 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
I believe that in most arguments, both sides have ground in their opinions, but I just don't believe that in gun control. I believe that if someone wants to have any gun they want to defend themselves, even if it's black and evil looking. And the people that don't believe in that have the choice not to own a gun. Most guns are owned by law abiding citizens.
User avatar #709 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
The problem is that most people who don't believe in guns aren't comfortable with other people owning guns.
Since the dawn of time, humanity has been in a contest of 'who has the biggest stick', and some people just don't want to do that anymore. Some people want nobody to have sticks.

I have to say I'm one of those people. I truly believe that this world would be better without guns.

I'm also not stupid, and I know that as long as ANYONE is allowed to own a gun, everyone should be.
User avatar #714 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Do you count governments as one of those people who have a stick?
User avatar #715 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Definitely.
Though I don't think in this debate it really matters. Their stick is bigger anyways. I don't think if they take away your sticks they'll gain any significant advantage they don't already have.
User avatar #723 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
The main reason we were allowed to own guns was to replace a tyrannical government if the time comes. Even though we can't really win a war or attrition against the U.S. Army, it would still be a guerrilla war. And as you probably know, it's very difficult to win a guerrilla war. The same thing would happen that happened in Afghanistan. The erosion of the U.S. military is happening there, unless we pull out. Afghanistan is where armies go to die. I don't see a second civil war in America, but if the government continues to erode our freedoms, we, as we were brought up, are paranoid about freedom, and we will defend them if the time comes. Is this ridiculous? I can't say.
User avatar #728 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
But don't you think you should slowly, but steadily, work towards a world were you won't NEED those guns anymore? I'm not saying that you should hand them over today, but just start getting to it.
User avatar #735 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
I don't really know, because it's so normal and there is a correlation between more guns and less crime in the United States. Shooting them is very fun and can be very safe if you are properly trained. Perhaps when we can 100% trust our government. Then and only then can it be considered in America.
User avatar #736 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
I know it can't change now, but really, it's sort of like the cold war, isn't it? Not an ideal situation.
Still, it works for now.

Also, this thread has provided me with some serious pro-gun arguments. I can continue to go about my favourite business of shutting people up when they use retarded agrguments on EITHER SIDE of this debate.

Hah I feel so smugly superior right now I fart cigar smoke.
User avatar #741 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
I might have to use that cigar smoke thing it's hilarious lol. Yes, it is a cold-war-like situation, but we are humans and as you know humans aren't perfect.
User avatar #746 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
I'd still say both sides have grounded arguments though.
User avatar #757 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Yeah.
#682 - Ok... still if you start compairing your opponent in a debate …  [+] (25 new replies) 01/25/2013 on Scary Shit +2
User avatar #691 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
We're not necessarily saying that Obama will put people into extermination camps and kill millions of Americans, but I am saying that it's setting the stage for martial law and the possibility of the latter. We never seem to learn from the past. That is what is killing America.
User avatar #694 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Eh, I think you're all overreacting. Gun restriction has been applied in Europe, and we don't live every day of our lives in fear of our government.

We're mainly trying to scam our government out of as much money as possible.
And they do the same to us, it's a mutual understanding.
User avatar #700 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Americans have owned guns for hundreds of years, it is ingrained into so much of us. It is part of our culture and our way of life. It's our check/balance to the government. Most if not all governments in the world have a "positive powers" government/population, where the government tells the citizens what they can and can't do, basically gives them a list of their rights, and the rest belongs to the government. Here in America, it's the opposite of that, we have a "negative powers" which means that we the people tell the government what they can do. We basically give the government a list of their rights, and the rest is ours.
User avatar #702 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
I know your culture is different, and respect that. It's the main reason why I don't pick a side. If you guys were europeans, I'd be on the anti-gun side. Heck, if you guys were European, you wouldn't even have guns anymore.
User avatar #708 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
I'm sure if I was raised in live in Europe, my opinion would probably be different. Because as far as I know, and correct me if I'm wrong... Most European countries have had strong gun control for a long time and never were able to develop that gun culture we have in America, and there was never much of a chance for many guns to circulate in the population for criminals to easily get their hands on. Just in America, we had to use guns to fight a government that was trying to rule us from across the world and we really really didn't agree with.
User avatar #713 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
That's very true. But even today, although I'm absolutely positively sure that your government (like all governments everywhere) is doing its very best to screw you over big time, I don't think they want to restrict guns so they can start subjugating the people to their evil will. They honestly want lower crime rates. Or at least cut down on the numberof casualties those crimes are causing.
User avatar #717 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
For Americans, taking guns away is just slowly eroding our freedom which we are very paranoid about (look at how our revolution started and went). For us, owning guns is a basic normality. Which it isn't for you I'm guessing, and respect that.
User avatar #726 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
That's kind of the point, owning guns is part of your cultural identity.
#727 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Yes, owning guns is the choice of the people of each country. If you are not confortable owning them, then that's fine, if we aren't confortable not owning them then that's fine. I'm glad we were able to come to an understanding on FJ/the internet. It's not that common.
User avatar #731 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Also, to get back to your original comment, the post with the hitler comparison is a little ridiculous. If you want to convince people of your point, use solid arguments the ones in this thread.

People won't want to listen to you if you just stand around and shout 'SERIOUSLY PEOPLE OBAMA IS TOTALLY THE NEXT HITLER' at them.
User avatar #739 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
You are right, Obama is not the next hitler and I highly doubt that he would do anything comparable to hitler. It's just the fact that Hitler took away guns. The theme of what I am saying is that we must learn from the past or it will repeat its self, definitely not as drastically as I doubt the American government is close to being bad enough to commit those atrocities commited by the nazis. I know the whole Hitler example is ridiculous and exaggerated.
User avatar #743 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Is it even relevant? Would people have risen up against him if he'd freely allowed to use of guns?

Well the jews would have, but there's no way he'd let THEM have any guns. He hardly let them have any food, so that's that.

Anyways Obama is a pretty OK guy and I definitely prefer him to Bush. He's actually doing stuff. I agree, a lot of people don't like what he's doing, and some things might not work out, but he's seriously doing his best to make the USA a better place to live.

I mean seriously I think the USA is the only country in the entire world that actually actively OPPOSES health care.
It's not a bad thing!
User avatar #753 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
That's why I called the hitler example exaggerated. (and no autocorrect, I will NOT capitalize the H in hiter)

I don't really mind him, it's just that he wants to sign executive orders to force gun control, almost as if he's a king. Congress didn't even approve of it, and he didn't want them or the bill of rights to get in the way. That's my only big problem with him.
User avatar #758 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
That is kind of a dick move. Can he do that?

Also capitalising the H in Hitler doesn't mean you acknowledge his importance or anything, it's just proper spelling, no big deal.
User avatar #762 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Yeah, proper noun. But in my opinion hitler wasn't a proper person ;P, but I understand the grammar thing, it's basically an eff you to hitler even though it doesn't matter, just for the hell of it.

That's one thing I don't know much about, executive orders. Basically, the president can put things into action himself if he feels it is absolutely necessary. As if he's more wise than the rest of America put together. There are repercussions to that though, it makes the president less popular, and if he were to do something drastic, we'd have widespread riots at best.
User avatar #773 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Well there are worse things he could be doing with that power in my opinion.


By the way exactly are they banning? No details please, just the big lines. I've heard of the assault-weapon thingy they use for 'ILLICIT LIBERALIST PROPUHGANDURRR'; so no need to explain that, just tell me what kind of firearms are effectively being banned.
User avatar #777 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Assault weapon is just a concept. The popular term for say, an m4 is an assault rifle, but in reality it's just a rifle.
User avatar #776 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
It's not that simple, because there is no fixed definition of an assault rifle/weapon. What they want to ban are models of guns that are basically black, very ergonomic, and "evil" looking, some have called them. Does that make the weapon more deadly? Not really. They are also wanting to ban magazines over 10 rounds, bayonets, and collapsible stocks. In New York, the magazines are down to 7 rounds.
User avatar #729 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
It's not that common for two people to be sensible at the same time.

Now I'm gonna thumb up everything you posted in this thread, hang on.
User avatar #759 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Wtf some guy thumbed down that comment you just wrote. As if to make you think I did it. I don't know. I'll thumb everything you do to lol.
User avatar #761 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Don't stress, I know it wasn't you.
Also I don't really care, thumbs don't mean anything, words do. Your words bring me more joy than any amount of green thumbs ever could (or any amount of red thumbs could ever take away. Unless, you know, I get banned and shit, that'd be a bummer.)
User avatar #763 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Yeah. How would you get banned? Besides putting child porn and such on here.
User avatar #770 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
If you get too much red thumbs you get auto-banned. Safety procedure against troll accounts.
User avatar #774 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Is it about how many red thumbs one post gets, or the total you accumulate over time?
User avatar #788 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Total over time. In relation to your green thumbs of course.
This is not going to happen to you man, don't worry.
#672 - Yeah because Hitler... Tried to restrict the use of g…  [+] (46 new replies) 01/25/2013 on Scary Shit +2
User avatar #680 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Yes, he was able to get them banned from the German population. The people who believe guns should be outlawed really need to do some thinking, check the FBI crime statistics with guns, and just be more down to earth, instead of just wanting to ban assault weapons. The only thing they will get from banning assault weapons is a "feel good" feeling, that they did something about it. But from stats and common sense, banning weapons does nothing. Gun crime has gone down about 50% since the early 1980s believe it or not, and not to mention there are a LOT more guns in circulation now too. The liberal dominated media just wants everyone to think that gun crime is abnormally high to push a ban on guns. Because you know, only the government needs them right?
User avatar #683 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
You're trying to convince me of your pro-gun points.
That's basically what it boils down to every time, huh? I have no strong feelings one way or the other. I really don't care what happens. I don't use guns. I don't think people NEED guns. But, if you really want those guns, I'm not gonna be the one to say you can't have them.
User avatar #687 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
It's ok as long as you don't want them taken away. Were cool.
User avatar #690 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
But seriously for a second. Don't you ever look at the arguments the pro-gun side uses and just want to hit yourself in the fucking face over and over again?

Like with every issue in the states EVER, both sides are voiced equally loudly by equally retarded people.
Untide Stats pls
User avatar #925 - doodogger (01/29/2013) [-]
What pro gun arguments make you want to "hit yourself in the fucking face over and over again"?
User avatar #927 - ewowo (01/29/2013) [-]
I can't bring myself to type them out.
User avatar #696 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Well I think the NRA has gone a little far at worst in their views.
User avatar #699 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Not even talking about the NRA itself, they can manage to be... pretty moderate, at times.

Just. Every issue ever. Angry Americans on facebook voicing their opinions.

I just sit back, read the arguments and I'm like: "Do people REALLY believe this?"

EVERY ISSUE EVER has both sides claiming the world will ACTUALLY END if they don't get what they want.
User avatar #703 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
I believe that in most arguments, both sides have ground in their opinions, but I just don't believe that in gun control. I believe that if someone wants to have any gun they want to defend themselves, even if it's black and evil looking. And the people that don't believe in that have the choice not to own a gun. Most guns are owned by law abiding citizens.
User avatar #709 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
The problem is that most people who don't believe in guns aren't comfortable with other people owning guns.
Since the dawn of time, humanity has been in a contest of 'who has the biggest stick', and some people just don't want to do that anymore. Some people want nobody to have sticks.

I have to say I'm one of those people. I truly believe that this world would be better without guns.

I'm also not stupid, and I know that as long as ANYONE is allowed to own a gun, everyone should be.
User avatar #714 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Do you count governments as one of those people who have a stick?
User avatar #715 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Definitely.
Though I don't think in this debate it really matters. Their stick is bigger anyways. I don't think if they take away your sticks they'll gain any significant advantage they don't already have.
User avatar #723 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
The main reason we were allowed to own guns was to replace a tyrannical government if the time comes. Even though we can't really win a war or attrition against the U.S. Army, it would still be a guerrilla war. And as you probably know, it's very difficult to win a guerrilla war. The same thing would happen that happened in Afghanistan. The erosion of the U.S. military is happening there, unless we pull out. Afghanistan is where armies go to die. I don't see a second civil war in America, but if the government continues to erode our freedoms, we, as we were brought up, are paranoid about freedom, and we will defend them if the time comes. Is this ridiculous? I can't say.
User avatar #728 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
But don't you think you should slowly, but steadily, work towards a world were you won't NEED those guns anymore? I'm not saying that you should hand them over today, but just start getting to it.
User avatar #735 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
I don't really know, because it's so normal and there is a correlation between more guns and less crime in the United States. Shooting them is very fun and can be very safe if you are properly trained. Perhaps when we can 100% trust our government. Then and only then can it be considered in America.
User avatar #736 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
I know it can't change now, but really, it's sort of like the cold war, isn't it? Not an ideal situation.
Still, it works for now.

Also, this thread has provided me with some serious pro-gun arguments. I can continue to go about my favourite business of shutting people up when they use retarded agrguments on EITHER SIDE of this debate.

Hah I feel so smugly superior right now I fart cigar smoke.
User avatar #741 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
I might have to use that cigar smoke thing it's hilarious lol. Yes, it is a cold-war-like situation, but we are humans and as you know humans aren't perfect.
User avatar #746 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
I'd still say both sides have grounded arguments though.
User avatar #757 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Yeah.
User avatar #679 - Yardie (01/25/2013) [-]
But Hitler did restrict gun usage. He expanded on the citizens' Gun Regulations that the National Socialist Party set in place before he was elected and made it easier for government officials (ie. the SS) to carry firearms.
User avatar #682 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Ok... still if you start compairing your opponent in a debate to Adolf Hitler, you're not making a very convincing point.

Personally I understand both parties, I wouldn't keep a gun myself and Im not very fond of the idea that everyone has one, but I'm a democrat (and that's in the actual meaning of the word, not the political party) to the core, and if the majority of the people want to keep their guns, they should.
User avatar #691 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
We're not necessarily saying that Obama will put people into extermination camps and kill millions of Americans, but I am saying that it's setting the stage for martial law and the possibility of the latter. We never seem to learn from the past. That is what is killing America.
User avatar #694 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Eh, I think you're all overreacting. Gun restriction has been applied in Europe, and we don't live every day of our lives in fear of our government.

We're mainly trying to scam our government out of as much money as possible.
And they do the same to us, it's a mutual understanding.
User avatar #700 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Americans have owned guns for hundreds of years, it is ingrained into so much of us. It is part of our culture and our way of life. It's our check/balance to the government. Most if not all governments in the world have a "positive powers" government/population, where the government tells the citizens what they can and can't do, basically gives them a list of their rights, and the rest belongs to the government. Here in America, it's the opposite of that, we have a "negative powers" which means that we the people tell the government what they can do. We basically give the government a list of their rights, and the rest is ours.
User avatar #702 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
I know your culture is different, and respect that. It's the main reason why I don't pick a side. If you guys were europeans, I'd be on the anti-gun side. Heck, if you guys were European, you wouldn't even have guns anymore.
User avatar #708 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
I'm sure if I was raised in live in Europe, my opinion would probably be different. Because as far as I know, and correct me if I'm wrong... Most European countries have had strong gun control for a long time and never were able to develop that gun culture we have in America, and there was never much of a chance for many guns to circulate in the population for criminals to easily get their hands on. Just in America, we had to use guns to fight a government that was trying to rule us from across the world and we really really didn't agree with.
User avatar #713 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
That's very true. But even today, although I'm absolutely positively sure that your government (like all governments everywhere) is doing its very best to screw you over big time, I don't think they want to restrict guns so they can start subjugating the people to their evil will. They honestly want lower crime rates. Or at least cut down on the numberof casualties those crimes are causing.
User avatar #717 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
For Americans, taking guns away is just slowly eroding our freedom which we are very paranoid about (look at how our revolution started and went). For us, owning guns is a basic normality. Which it isn't for you I'm guessing, and respect that.
User avatar #726 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
That's kind of the point, owning guns is part of your cultural identity.
#727 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Yes, owning guns is the choice of the people of each country. If you are not confortable owning them, then that's fine, if we aren't confortable not owning them then that's fine. I'm glad we were able to come to an understanding on FJ/the internet. It's not that common.
User avatar #731 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Also, to get back to your original comment, the post with the hitler comparison is a little ridiculous. If you want to convince people of your point, use solid arguments the ones in this thread.

People won't want to listen to you if you just stand around and shout 'SERIOUSLY PEOPLE OBAMA IS TOTALLY THE NEXT HITLER' at them.
User avatar #739 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
You are right, Obama is not the next hitler and I highly doubt that he would do anything comparable to hitler. It's just the fact that Hitler took away guns. The theme of what I am saying is that we must learn from the past or it will repeat its self, definitely not as drastically as I doubt the American government is close to being bad enough to commit those atrocities commited by the nazis. I know the whole Hitler example is ridiculous and exaggerated.
User avatar #743 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Is it even relevant? Would people have risen up against him if he'd freely allowed to use of guns?

Well the jews would have, but there's no way he'd let THEM have any guns. He hardly let them have any food, so that's that.

Anyways Obama is a pretty OK guy and I definitely prefer him to Bush. He's actually doing stuff. I agree, a lot of people don't like what he's doing, and some things might not work out, but he's seriously doing his best to make the USA a better place to live.

I mean seriously I think the USA is the only country in the entire world that actually actively OPPOSES health care.
It's not a bad thing!
User avatar #753 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
That's why I called the hitler example exaggerated. (and no autocorrect, I will NOT capitalize the H in hiter)

I don't really mind him, it's just that he wants to sign executive orders to force gun control, almost as if he's a king. Congress didn't even approve of it, and he didn't want them or the bill of rights to get in the way. That's my only big problem with him.
User avatar #758 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
That is kind of a dick move. Can he do that?

Also capitalising the H in Hitler doesn't mean you acknowledge his importance or anything, it's just proper spelling, no big deal.
User avatar #762 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Yeah, proper noun. But in my opinion hitler wasn't a proper person ;P, but I understand the grammar thing, it's basically an eff you to hitler even though it doesn't matter, just for the hell of it.

That's one thing I don't know much about, executive orders. Basically, the president can put things into action himself if he feels it is absolutely necessary. As if he's more wise than the rest of America put together. There are repercussions to that though, it makes the president less popular, and if he were to do something drastic, we'd have widespread riots at best.
User avatar #773 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Well there are worse things he could be doing with that power in my opinion.


By the way exactly are they banning? No details please, just the big lines. I've heard of the assault-weapon thingy they use for 'ILLICIT LIBERALIST PROPUHGANDURRR'; so no need to explain that, just tell me what kind of firearms are effectively being banned.
User avatar #777 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Assault weapon is just a concept. The popular term for say, an m4 is an assault rifle, but in reality it's just a rifle.
User avatar #776 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
It's not that simple, because there is no fixed definition of an assault rifle/weapon. What they want to ban are models of guns that are basically black, very ergonomic, and "evil" looking, some have called them. Does that make the weapon more deadly? Not really. They are also wanting to ban magazines over 10 rounds, bayonets, and collapsible stocks. In New York, the magazines are down to 7 rounds.
User avatar #729 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
It's not that common for two people to be sensible at the same time.

Now I'm gonna thumb up everything you posted in this thread, hang on.
User avatar #759 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Wtf some guy thumbed down that comment you just wrote. As if to make you think I did it. I don't know. I'll thumb everything you do to lol.
User avatar #761 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Don't stress, I know it wasn't you.
Also I don't really care, thumbs don't mean anything, words do. Your words bring me more joy than any amount of green thumbs ever could (or any amount of red thumbs could ever take away. Unless, you know, I get banned and shit, that'd be a bummer.)
User avatar #763 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Yeah. How would you get banned? Besides putting child porn and such on here.
User avatar #770 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
If you get too much red thumbs you get auto-banned. Safety procedure against troll accounts.
User avatar #774 - doodogger (01/25/2013) [-]
Is it about how many red thumbs one post gets, or the total you accumulate over time?
User avatar #788 - ewowo (01/25/2013) [-]
Total over time. In relation to your green thumbs of course.
This is not going to happen to you man, don't worry.
#49 - I'll have you know that we're only seeing one side of this sto… 01/24/2013 on Only the Irish 0
#121 - I don't thiunk I need to add anything to this conversation any… 01/24/2013 on Gun Control 0
#38 - Oh dude. Have you ever seen Tyr?  [+] (7 new replies) 01/22/2013 on This is where i hang out. +4
#68 - jonst (04/04/2013) [-]
In fact when i was young, The bass player from TYR was or still is friends with my dad.
so he came by for coffee sometimes in 1997 when they just started. And my dad works at the airline so he helped them make a music video. you know flying around the Island ;D
User avatar #69 - ewowo (04/04/2013) [-]
Took you a long time to come up with that :p
#70 - jonst (04/04/2013) [-]
It's true
User avatar #71 - ewowo (04/04/2013) [-]
Why the sudden response? :p
User avatar #72 - jonst (04/04/2013) [-]
Cus i had time.. :P U know the Faroe islands is small
User avatar #73 - ewowo (04/04/2013) [-]
:p
User avatar #61 - jonst (01/23/2013) [-]
I love TYR!
#29 - As someone who has worked in a newspaper store, I sincerely ho…  [+] (3 new replies) 01/22/2013 on Only the Irish -8
User avatar #36 - PubLandlord (01/22/2013) [-]
fucking prick, surprisingly there are times when people only have notes and need to buy something, sometimes buy something so they can get change
#33 - traytray (01/22/2013) [-]
I also work in retail and if I heard one of my team speak to a customer like that they'd be counting out £18.97 in Jobseeker's Allowance.
User avatar #49 - ewowo (01/24/2013) [-]
I'll have you know that we're only seeing one side of this story, if OP wasn't actually involved in this situation I might be able to believe him more easily, but I think he's just degrading the cashier. OP is just a dickhead who got stepped on his toes when he was asked if he could pay with smaller cash (which EVERY cashier EVER regularly asks of customers) and then did everything he could to make her job more difficult.
#28 - chavs have been around since before the first swaggot was born… 01/22/2013 on Only the Irish +3
#114 - I'm not even talking about physical difficulty. I'm talking ab…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/22/2013 on Gun Control -1
#115 - anonymous (01/23/2013) [-]
Not really, with all the adrenaline you're barely conscious anyway, killing someone is killing someone, whether it be with a baseball bat or a gun.
User avatar #121 - ewowo (01/24/2013) [-]
I don't thiunk I need to add anything to this conversation anymore. I've made my point.
#106 - True. 01/21/2013 on Gun Control 0
#86 - Let me rephrase this, I sound like a serial killer. I…  [+] (6 new replies) 01/21/2013 on Gun Control 0
#111 - anonymous (01/22/2013) [-]
If you think shooting someone is easy, you've never been in a firefight.
User avatar #114 - ewowo (01/22/2013) [-]
I'm not even talking about physical difficulty. I'm talking about the decision-making. Pulling a trigger on some is easier than gutting them with your own two hands.
#115 - anonymous (01/23/2013) [-]
Not really, with all the adrenaline you're barely conscious anyway, killing someone is killing someone, whether it be with a baseball bat or a gun.
User avatar #121 - ewowo (01/24/2013) [-]
I don't thiunk I need to add anything to this conversation anymore. I've made my point.
User avatar #105 - mrhelmetman (01/21/2013) [-]
I strongly agree with, men (or women) should only need to fight if it is something they fully believe is worth dying for. Many would follow what you had stated, the protection of one's self, kin, and friends. Guns lower the standards of wars, as do nuclear weapons and missiles. Unfortunately, the time for melee combat has passed.
User avatar #106 - ewowo (01/21/2013) [-]
True.
#84 - Good point, but it's not what I meant. I meant that taking a l…  [+] (7 new replies) 01/21/2013 on Gun Control 0
User avatar #86 - ewowo (01/21/2013) [-]
Let me rephrase this, I sound like a serial killer.

I am by nature a pacifist, but wars are still fought every day, and I think it's wrong that such easy tools for killing exist. War is a serious thing and should only be taken up for the utmost serious causes, such as protecting the lives of yourself, your kin and your friends. It takes a lot of courage and determination to make a man take up a sword or axe and face other men in close combat. It doesn't take that much to pull the trigger. This, I believe, is very, VERY wrong.
#111 - anonymous (01/22/2013) [-]
If you think shooting someone is easy, you've never been in a firefight.
User avatar #114 - ewowo (01/22/2013) [-]
I'm not even talking about physical difficulty. I'm talking about the decision-making. Pulling a trigger on some is easier than gutting them with your own two hands.
#115 - anonymous (01/23/2013) [-]
Not really, with all the adrenaline you're barely conscious anyway, killing someone is killing someone, whether it be with a baseball bat or a gun.
User avatar #121 - ewowo (01/24/2013) [-]
I don't thiunk I need to add anything to this conversation anymore. I've made my point.
User avatar #105 - mrhelmetman (01/21/2013) [-]
I strongly agree with, men (or women) should only need to fight if it is something they fully believe is worth dying for. Many would follow what you had stated, the protection of one's self, kin, and friends. Guns lower the standards of wars, as do nuclear weapons and missiles. Unfortunately, the time for melee combat has passed.
User avatar #106 - ewowo (01/21/2013) [-]
True.
#62 - Don't write pegan, it look to much like vegan. And define 'God…  [+] (9 new replies) 01/21/2013 on Gun Control 0
User avatar #64 - mrhelmetman (01/21/2013) [-]
Fellow Pagan! Actually, everything you said just explains my view as well. I do think that anyone can pull a trigger to a weapon, but I think it takes a real master to wield a sword or melee weapon.
User avatar #84 - ewowo (01/21/2013) [-]
Good point, but it's not what I meant. I meant that taking a life is not something that should be easy. It may sometimes be necessary, but then you have be prepared to get blood on your hands. If that's too much, then it's not worth it.
User avatar #86 - ewowo (01/21/2013) [-]
Let me rephrase this, I sound like a serial killer.

I am by nature a pacifist, but wars are still fought every day, and I think it's wrong that such easy tools for killing exist. War is a serious thing and should only be taken up for the utmost serious causes, such as protecting the lives of yourself, your kin and your friends. It takes a lot of courage and determination to make a man take up a sword or axe and face other men in close combat. It doesn't take that much to pull the trigger. This, I believe, is very, VERY wrong.
#111 - anonymous (01/22/2013) [-]
If you think shooting someone is easy, you've never been in a firefight.
User avatar #114 - ewowo (01/22/2013) [-]
I'm not even talking about physical difficulty. I'm talking about the decision-making. Pulling a trigger on some is easier than gutting them with your own two hands.
#115 - anonymous (01/23/2013) [-]
Not really, with all the adrenaline you're barely conscious anyway, killing someone is killing someone, whether it be with a baseball bat or a gun.
User avatar #121 - ewowo (01/24/2013) [-]
I don't thiunk I need to add anything to this conversation anymore. I've made my point.
User avatar #105 - mrhelmetman (01/21/2013) [-]
I strongly agree with, men (or women) should only need to fight if it is something they fully believe is worth dying for. Many would follow what you had stated, the protection of one's self, kin, and friends. Guns lower the standards of wars, as do nuclear weapons and missiles. Unfortunately, the time for melee combat has passed.
User avatar #106 - ewowo (01/21/2013) [-]
True.
#41 - TWO physicists with PhDs. 01/21/2013 on Mo' Mony Mo' Probelms +4
#44 - I prefer Wiki Tom to Moitkiw :p. 01/21/2013 on Cannot unsee 0
#60 - I approve of this. As a pagan I believe it is wrong to kill a …  [+] (13 new replies) 01/21/2013 on Gun Control +3
#66 - anonymous (01/21/2013) [-]
My last name is Pagan.
#61 - anonymous (01/21/2013) [-]
"pegan" lel so how many gods you have?
#74 - anonymous (01/21/2013) [-]
Talos.
User avatar #62 - ewowo (01/21/2013) [-]
Don't write pegan, it look to much like vegan. And define 'God'. Also I can tell you that I have more than I care to count and I don't really believe in any of them. There isn't a thor in the sky making thunder with his hammer. I identify as a pagan because I like pagan culture and ethics. Theologically I'm more of a pantheist.
User avatar #64 - mrhelmetman (01/21/2013) [-]
Fellow Pagan! Actually, everything you said just explains my view as well. I do think that anyone can pull a trigger to a weapon, but I think it takes a real master to wield a sword or melee weapon.
User avatar #84 - ewowo (01/21/2013) [-]
Good point, but it's not what I meant. I meant that taking a life is not something that should be easy. It may sometimes be necessary, but then you have be prepared to get blood on your hands. If that's too much, then it's not worth it.
User avatar #86 - ewowo (01/21/2013) [-]
Let me rephrase this, I sound like a serial killer.

I am by nature a pacifist, but wars are still fought every day, and I think it's wrong that such easy tools for killing exist. War is a serious thing and should only be taken up for the utmost serious causes, such as protecting the lives of yourself, your kin and your friends. It takes a lot of courage and determination to make a man take up a sword or axe and face other men in close combat. It doesn't take that much to pull the trigger. This, I believe, is very, VERY wrong.
#111 - anonymous (01/22/2013) [-]
If you think shooting someone is easy, you've never been in a firefight.
User avatar #114 - ewowo (01/22/2013) [-]
I'm not even talking about physical difficulty. I'm talking about the decision-making. Pulling a trigger on some is easier than gutting them with your own two hands.
#115 - anonymous (01/23/2013) [-]
Not really, with all the adrenaline you're barely conscious anyway, killing someone is killing someone, whether it be with a baseball bat or a gun.
User avatar #121 - ewowo (01/24/2013) [-]
I don't thiunk I need to add anything to this conversation anymore. I've made my point.
User avatar #105 - mrhelmetman (01/21/2013) [-]
I strongly agree with, men (or women) should only need to fight if it is something they fully believe is worth dying for. Many would follow what you had stated, the protection of one's self, kin, and friends. Guns lower the standards of wars, as do nuclear weapons and missiles. Unfortunately, the time for melee combat has passed.
User avatar #106 - ewowo (01/21/2013) [-]
True.
#6 - **** yeah Belgium. 01/21/2013 on Good one Henk! +16
#64 - Lol Dutch ****** .  [+] (1 new reply) 01/21/2013 on Absolutely Splendid 0
User avatar #69 - arrederre (01/21/2013) [-]
Allochtoon
#13 - It's the original quote. 01/20/2013 on Famous quote +2
#11 - A cynic is someone who knows the price of everything and the v… 01/20/2013 on Famous quote +2
#39 - Detecting a serious lack of 4/20 jokes in the comments. 01/20/2013 on Jimmy Kimmel -7
#4 - You're on to something. 01/19/2013 on But they're green :/ +1
#63 - Good point. 01/19/2013 on pokemon logic +1
#61 - Possible. Still pretty retarded if you want to actually catch mewtwo.  [+] (2 new replies) 01/19/2013 on pokemon logic +1
User avatar #62 - pokedan (01/19/2013) [-]
I hear you. Might as well just try and enjoy the joke.
User avatar #63 - ewowo (01/19/2013) [-]
Good point.
#2 - They're still called white grapes. And the purple ones are red…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/19/2013 on But they're green :/ +3
User avatar #3 - guavaaddict (01/19/2013) [-]
So if there was white grape soda instead of just grape soda?
User avatar #4 - ewowo (01/19/2013) [-]
You're on to something.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 2050 / Total items point value: 2200

Comments(101):

[ 101 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #102 - huehuehuepster (01/16/2014) [-]
it's the Netherlands, not Holland
User avatar #103 to #102 - ewowo (01/17/2014) [-]
Maybe it's Maybelline
User avatar #100 - dupu (04/19/2013) [-]
WHY IS EVERYONE COMMENTING "IT'S PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME" ON YOUR PAGE?
That Gaius Baltar joke though. Honestly, bravo.
User avatar #101 to #100 - ewowo (04/19/2013) [-]
Someone rolled my username on a peanut butter jelly thread.
User avatar #92 - fayyzor (11/11/2012) [-]
Won't let me reply to you on there anymore.
And I've seen itttt c:
User avatar #93 to #92 - ewowo (11/11/2012) [-]
I'm European. I have to download it still.
User avatar #94 to #93 - fayyzor (11/11/2012) [-]
Oh D:
User avatar #95 to #94 - ewowo (11/11/2012) [-]
Indeed.
User avatar #96 to #95 - fayyzor (11/12/2012) [-]
Get it yet?! :D
User avatar #97 to #96 - ewowo (11/12/2012) [-]
Yes, but I decided to rewatch season 2 with my sister first. She hasn't seen it yet, and then we cans tart s3 together.
User avatar #98 to #97 - fayyzor (11/14/2012) [-]
B'aaaaaaw :3 cutie
User avatar #99 to #98 - ewowo (11/14/2012) [-]
Lol
#90 - anonymous (11/05/2012) [-]
white knight
you aint getting no kitty
with that attidude.
User avatar #91 to #90 - ewowo (11/05/2012) [-]
Dude, what the **** ? The girl wouldn't even see the damn comment. Also I'm not defending her. I don't give a **** about her. I'm just saying the guy's a douche.
#84 - kiwimidget (09/04/2012) [-]
ITS PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME BITCH
ITS PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME BITCH
#83 - xxfireflyxx (09/04/2012) [-]
IT'S PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME!
IT'S PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME!
User avatar #82 - impossiblemyazz (09/04/2012) [-]
its peanut butter jelly time
User avatar #79 - supamario (09/04/2012) [-]
IT"S PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME!
#78 - anonymous (09/04/2012) [-]
YOU'RE A ******
User avatar #77 - solidsnakehomicide (09/04/2012) [-]
IT"S PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME!
#76 - eutherin (09/04/2012) [-]
IT'S PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME
#75 - joshuamckane (09/04/2012) [-]
IT'S PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME
IT'S PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME
User avatar #73 - clockworkchaos (09/04/2012) [-]
IT'S PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME!
User avatar #72 - derrickrose **User deleted account** (09/04/2012) [-]
ITS PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME!
#71 - lujan (09/04/2012) [-]
IT'S PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME!!!
#70 - undeadpyro (09/04/2012) [-]
PEANUT BUTTER DICK TIME
User avatar #69 - bloodbathmcbullet (09/04/2012) [-]
PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME
#68 - anonymous (09/04/2012) [-]
PEANUT BUTTER DICK TIME
#67 - xmegustax (09/04/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
[ 101 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)