No. The only swedish I know other than "I like..." is from this song here. BAMSE SAGA FUCK YEAH!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaNI0Mt_kLY

Jag älskar ett skägg!

Talar du också svenska?

No. The only swedish I know other than "I like..." is from this song here. BAMSE SAGA FUCK YEAH!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaNI0Mt_kLY

No, not gen1 elitism. But I mean, Totodile, charmander, and pikachu and even Torchik sound pretty and good. But now you have Gogoat, trashy, krookodile, luvdisk...

"Trashy" isn't a pokemon.
There are tons of shit pokemon names from gen 1, too.
In my opinion, the worst pokemon name is muk.

Or at least don't you agree that the names get noticeable worse?

I disagree. I think it's just because gen1 was your childhood personally, but I don't really know.

Trubbish than.. But don't you agree that the names get worse?

oh we have this pokemon here, kinda looks like a caterpillar, what're we gonna name 'im?

Caterpie.

what movie...

i wanna know too

Zoolander

oh thaks

Nah, I probably deserved that red thumb. Green one for you anyway

Lol already thumbed you.

It's still bloody fantastic though. I'm still chuckling.

but if they're NOT in a relationship*

Not just a typo, forgot the entire damn word on that one.

I could guess, man.

I personally don't care but I can see why some people would.

And I agree that dis guy is an asshole.

If you roll 42, i'll give you thumbs

Shut up. I got comment 42.

Yeah but it does say something as to character if they're in a relationship and they cheat, as it shows weakness in commitment and such, but if they're in a relationship, sure, they can go and do all the fucking they want as long as it's consensual and between two adults.

But yeah, those are basicly the facts on Mark Sandford, and his case in my opinion, is a complete disgrace and I'd almost trust a junkie to do a better job than him.

Absolutely true.

but if they're NOT in a relationship*

Not just a typo, forgot the entire damn word on that one.

I could guess, man.

I personally don't care but I can see why some people would.

And I agree that dis guy is an asshole.

Oh and by the way, Mark Sandford also voted yes to remove Clinton from office because he cheated and look how Sandford now crawls back into congress himself and seeing nothing wrong with it.

Add giant mother fucking hypocrit to the list.

Sandford used US tax dollars to fund his adventure up a hookers arse crack, no one knew where he was, and he cheated on someone who emotionaly should mean alot to him.

1: He shouldn't be trusted with money in any case.

2: You can't trust him to do his job

3: You can't trust him to stay commited even when he have emotional ties to the subject.

That and he runs for party that is supposedly based on family values.

I don't even know this guy, I'm talking about politicians in general. Like, I don't care what they stick their dicks in, as long as it's legal, it's fine by me.

Using taxpayer money to pay hookers is a different thing altogether.

Yeah but it does say something as to character if they're in a relationship and they cheat, as it shows weakness in commitment and such, but if they're in a relationship, sure, they can go and do all the fucking they want as long as it's consensual and between two adults.

But yeah, those are basicly the facts on Mark Sandford, and his case in my opinion, is a complete disgrace and I'd almost trust a junkie to do a better job than him.

Absolutely true.

but if they're NOT in a relationship*

Not just a typo, forgot the entire damn word on that one.

I could guess, man.

I personally don't care but I can see why some people would.

And I agree that dis guy is an asshole.

I definitely see your point but I, for one, wouldn't want someone who can't keep a promise to their spouse in any position of power. It's just a reflection on their moral character, and someone making such large decisions should definitely have a good moral character.

since when has ANY politician EVER had "good moral character." Even the ones that do this country right (and other countries around the world) are still corrupt in a way, because their driving force to do this is not for the good of the people, but the good of themselves.