i was just trying to help out a fellow brony

All you've said about him is that he basically doesn't try to solve any problems and is just sittin by crackin' a cold one. If that were the case, he wouldn't be voted into office for ANOTHER TERM. It's one thing to criticize someone, but with just a bold and generalized statement is ridiculous.

The reason he was voted in for a second term was for two reasons:

1: People were sold on a brand. It's generally how political advertisement works these days, and last election had more money spent on it than anything. If you actually ask people about the issues, their knowledge is very basic, nonexistent or false. And lets face it: there are a lot of gullible, dumb, ignorant, and simple people who can vote.

2: the other guy, Romney was one of the worst candidates they possibly could have got. Nearly everyone I know personally who voted for Obama said they did it because they thought "well he's not as bad as the other guy." This sentiment echoes across a lot of people. Unfortunately, many of these voters believe that there are only 2 parties, and choose for the lesser of two evils. To quote Jerry Garcia on the problem with this: "Constantly choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil."

I've addressed more in the response comments to this, so fair enough that I shouldn't have expected you to have read them.

His efforts convince me that he's not even trying to fix the debt, and that if he is he's doing a pretty shit tastic job.

Of course, on this site if you even try to make criticism of things people here don't agree with you get met with down thumbs, and most of the comments here have done nothing but either try to insult me, divert off to other issues or just plain use poor logic and fallacies.

Fair enough on that note however. I should have worded my comment "Not like you're doing anything that's actually fixing it." Because that's more my sentiment about it.

It's too bad we didn't vote you for president. It seems like apparently you could turn around everything in an instant. How did you become so smart???

It doesn't take the president of the United States to figure that out.

You act like the president has all the power in the world, when in fact, he doesn't really have as much as what most common folk believe.

I never said he was all powerful. But he holds the single most individual power of any single politician in the country. And that still doesn't change my point that it's bullshit to say that I can't criticize his policies just because I'm not him.

All you've said about him is that he basically doesn't try to solve any problems and is just sittin by crackin' a cold one. If that were the case, he wouldn't be voted into office for ANOTHER TERM. It's one thing to criticize someone, but with just a bold and generalized statement is ridiculous.

The reason he was voted in for a second term was for two reasons:

1: People were sold on a brand. It's generally how political advertisement works these days, and last election had more money spent on it than anything. If you actually ask people about the issues, their knowledge is very basic, nonexistent or false. And lets face it: there are a lot of gullible, dumb, ignorant, and simple people who can vote.

2: the other guy, Romney was one of the worst candidates they possibly could have got. Nearly everyone I know personally who voted for Obama said they did it because they thought "well he's not as bad as the other guy." This sentiment echoes across a lot of people. Unfortunately, many of these voters believe that there are only 2 parties, and choose for the lesser of two evils. To quote Jerry Garcia on the problem with this: "Constantly choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil."

I've addressed more in the response comments to this, so fair enough that I shouldn't have expected you to have read them.

His efforts convince me that he's not even trying to fix the debt, and that if he is he's doing a pretty shit tastic job.

Of course, on this site if you even try to make criticism of things people here don't agree with you get met with down thumbs, and most of the comments here have done nothing but either try to insult me, divert off to other issues or just plain use poor logic and fallacies.

Fair enough on that note however. I should have worded my comment "Not like you're doing anything that's actually fixing it." Because that's more my sentiment about it.

Rather I should say, I can't criticise a director/writer for their work just because I'm not one?

You act like the president has all the power in the world, when in fact, he doesn't really have as much as what most common folk believe.

I never said he was all powerful. But he holds the single most individual power of any single politician in the country. And that still doesn't change my point that it's bullshit to say that I can't criticize his policies just because I'm not him.

All you've said about him is that he basically doesn't try to solve any problems and is just sittin by crackin' a cold one. If that were the case, he wouldn't be voted into office for ANOTHER TERM. It's one thing to criticize someone, but with just a bold and generalized statement is ridiculous.

The reason he was voted in for a second term was for two reasons:

1: People were sold on a brand. It's generally how political advertisement works these days, and last election had more money spent on it than anything. If you actually ask people about the issues, their knowledge is very basic, nonexistent or false. And lets face it: there are a lot of gullible, dumb, ignorant, and simple people who can vote.

2: the other guy, Romney was one of the worst candidates they possibly could have got. Nearly everyone I know personally who voted for Obama said they did it because they thought "well he's not as bad as the other guy." This sentiment echoes across a lot of people. Unfortunately, many of these voters believe that there are only 2 parties, and choose for the lesser of two evils. To quote Jerry Garcia on the problem with this: "Constantly choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil."

I've addressed more in the response comments to this, so fair enough that I shouldn't have expected you to have read them.

His efforts convince me that he's not even trying to fix the debt, and that if he is he's doing a pretty shit tastic job.

Of course, on this site if you even try to make criticism of things people here don't agree with you get met with down thumbs, and most of the comments here have done nothing but either try to insult me, divert off to other issues or just plain use poor logic and fallacies.

Fair enough on that note however. I should have worded my comment "Not like you're doing anything that's actually fixing it." Because that's more my sentiment about it.

LMAO! Yeah, so the multi billion dollar surplus that Bush Jr started with, that's a myth right?

Seriously, you say I'm juvinile for insulting you, but then you can't keep the most basic of facts straight!

Go back to highschool political education and try to actually stay awake and learn something this time, mmmkay?

And that's to say nothing about his Gun Control shenanigans, the GitMo issues or any of the Public Privacy violation laws Amendment violation bills he's either been a part of, suppoted or done nothing to prevent, in his 4+ years.

LMAO! More debt that Bush? Wait, so the 11 trillion debt that accrued before Obama took office just magically appeared on the day he was sworn in? Two wars that were started with out raising taxes (unlike EVERY OTHER SINGLE WAR THIS NATION HAS FOUGHT) had anything to do with that? Its not like the reconstruction of those nations in accordance with the Geneva Convention added ANYTHING to those debts!

Its not like Bush hadn't already pushed through many of those bailouts? Its not like most of the banks and manufacturing companies that Obama bailed out have not only paid back the money lent to them by the federal government, but with interest too!

Its not like drone strikes weren't done by previous itemsistrations, smart bombs dropped on civilian targets, soldiers torturing under executive orders, the Attorney General issuing statements about how the Geneva Convention doesn't apply any more...

Its not like he hasn't pulled us out of Iraq and is handling a transfer of power over to Afghanistan Forces, but wait! He could just snap his fingers and they'd be ready to take over with out starting all out war in that nation! Its not like according to the Geneva convention, as an invading force, we don't have obligations to make sure the area is stable before we leave!

HERP DA DERP!

And the minute you start name calling, you lose the argument, as an FYI, because you are so insecure in your points that you feel you have to diminish the person you're talking to and that your own argument is insufficient in proving them "stupid"/

I never said Bush was better.

Also, look up your facts: the debt under the Bush itemsistration increased by 5.2 trillion, it was already 5.9 trillion from all the previous itemsistrations. Obama's is 5.5 trillion so far.

LMAO! Yeah, so the multi billion dollar surplus that Bush Jr started with, that's a myth right?

Seriously, you say I'm juvinile for insulting you, but then you can't keep the most basic of facts straight!

Go back to highschool political education and try to actually stay awake and learn something this time, mmmkay?

And that's to say nothing about his Gun Control shenanigans, the GitMo issues or any of the Public Privacy violation laws Amendment violation bills he's either been a part of, suppoted or done nothing to prevent, in his 4+ years.

Very true. I'm not a member of any political parties, but it seems that the more extreme views of the Republicans have taken hold. (Notice I said extreme, I don't want any Republicans claiming I am insulting them.)

You'd do such a better job.

but on a more serious note i like the pic. well played. for that you get one thumb

im sure obama is gonna make it better. i mean the sequester was a good idea at the time. obama is a great president

>ignoring the fact that it was shoved down his throat by a republican controlled congress.

Yeah, try having some facts to back up what you say. Mmmkay?

the dems control congress now

Also, any and all budgets are dealt with purely by the senate, and the republicans have enough seats in the senate to fuck things up.

Yet again, try knowing what you are talking about. Mmmmkay?

>ignoring republican filibusters.

Seriously, did you pay attention in highschool during government class? We literally had one republican read the dictionary for several hours just to fill time so that a vote couldn't be called.

Seriously, try knowing what you are talking about. It helps you look like you aren't retarded.

a filibuster only requires one person you dolt. you dont need a majority. all you need is the floor

And that contradicts what I said how?

Seriously, try reading and thinking things through. It helps you look intelligent.

oh man. disliking my comments. you hurt me bad man...cock bag.

And still you can't prove me wrong.

ill try again in an hour or two. im not exactly in the greatest state of mind...i need to let the state of mind wear itself off....if ya picking up what im putting down. much love aaand im stealing this gif

no insult, just handing out more gifs cause I'm bored.

and it goes on.

not a gif, but still funny

you probably have this one already

this one is pretty old

always makes me laugh

this one always makes me giggle.

another one I'm pretty sure everyone has.

I'm pretty sure everyone has this one, or a version of it...

the obligatory "do you even lift"

Get me a few years in Law School, and some Mayoral then subsequent Gubernatorial experience, and I could.

That's an absolutely atrocious and fallacious argument. Do I not have the right to complain when the man with more individual power than anyone in the entire nation is doing a crap job? So I should just shut up with criticism because I'm not in his shoes? I can't call a film bad because I'm not a director? I can't call a book bad because I'm not a writer?

Rather I should say, I can't criticise a director/writer for their work just because I'm not one?

You act like the president has all the power in the world, when in fact, he doesn't really have as much as what most common folk believe.

I never said he was all powerful. But he holds the single most individual power of any single politician in the country. And that still doesn't change my point that it's bullshit to say that I can't criticize his policies just because I'm not him.

All you've said about him is that he basically doesn't try to solve any problems and is just sittin by crackin' a cold one. If that were the case, he wouldn't be voted into office for ANOTHER TERM. It's one thing to criticize someone, but with just a bold and generalized statement is ridiculous.

The reason he was voted in for a second term was for two reasons:

1: People were sold on a brand. It's generally how political advertisement works these days, and last election had more money spent on it than anything. If you actually ask people about the issues, their knowledge is very basic, nonexistent or false. And lets face it: there are a lot of gullible, dumb, ignorant, and simple people who can vote.

2: the other guy, Romney was one of the worst candidates they possibly could have got. Nearly everyone I know personally who voted for Obama said they did it because they thought "well he's not as bad as the other guy." This sentiment echoes across a lot of people. Unfortunately, many of these voters believe that there are only 2 parties, and choose for the lesser of two evils. To quote Jerry Garcia on the problem with this: "Constantly choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil."

I've addressed more in the response comments to this, so fair enough that I shouldn't have expected you to have read them.

His efforts convince me that he's not even trying to fix the debt, and that if he is he's doing a pretty shit tastic job.

Of course, on this site if you even try to make criticism of things people here don't agree with you get met with down thumbs, and most of the comments here have done nothing but either try to insult me, divert off to other issues or just plain use poor logic and fallacies.

Fair enough on that note however. I should have worded my comment "Not like you're doing anything that's actually fixing it." Because that's more my sentiment about it.

Its not like he has politicians in congress who have publicly stated that their goal isn't to fix anything, but to do everything they can to block anything he tries to do...

OH WAIT, these people called republicans elected a bunch of douche bags who have publicly stated (god only knows how many times) that their goal isn't to fix the economy, their goal isn't to pay off the nation's debt, NO, their goal is to stop Obama from doing anything because he's a Kenyan Muslim Socialist extremist who's goal is to destroy America.

It's not like the debt has risen by more money in his terms than the entirety of the Bush itemsistration.

It's not like he hasn't authorized trillions of dollars in Bailouts to companies, a number of whom that abused the money, fell anyways, or just downright weren't worth spending on.

It's not like he authorized a faulty trillion dollar health care plan when the United States spends more money on the Health department than any other nation by a wide margin despite us being beneath many of them in life expectancy.

It's not like he pretended to care about a tragedy of a school shooting while simultaneously conducting numerous drone strikes on a country with tan people, many of which had numerous civilian casualties including children.

It's not like he put more focus on the war in Afghanistan and kept it going after killing a target who wasn't even there, that continues to lead to unnecessary deaths of American troops and afghani civilians.

It's not like he's involved a drone program where each drone costs millions and is notoriously faulty and kills innocents.


OH WAIT

LMAO! More debt that Bush? Wait, so the 11 trillion debt that accrued before Obama took office just magically appeared on the day he was sworn in? Two wars that were started with out raising taxes (unlike EVERY OTHER SINGLE WAR THIS NATION HAS FOUGHT) had anything to do with that? Its not like the reconstruction of those nations in accordance with the Geneva Convention added ANYTHING to those debts!

Its not like Bush hadn't already pushed through many of those bailouts? Its not like most of the banks and manufacturing companies that Obama bailed out have not only paid back the money lent to them by the federal government, but with interest too!

Its not like drone strikes weren't done by previous itemsistrations, smart bombs dropped on civilian targets, soldiers torturing under executive orders, the Attorney General issuing statements about how the Geneva Convention doesn't apply any more...

Its not like he hasn't pulled us out of Iraq and is handling a transfer of power over to Afghanistan Forces, but wait! He could just snap his fingers and they'd be ready to take over with out starting all out war in that nation! Its not like according to the Geneva convention, as an invading force, we don't have obligations to make sure the area is stable before we leave!

HERP DA DERP!

And the minute you start name calling, you lose the argument, as an FYI, because you are so insecure in your points that you feel you have to diminish the person you're talking to and that your own argument is insufficient in proving them "stupid"/

I never said Bush was better.

Also, look up your facts: the debt under the Bush itemsistration increased by 5.2 trillion, it was already 5.9 trillion from all the previous itemsistrations. Obama's is 5.5 trillion so far.

LMAO! Yeah, so the multi billion dollar surplus that Bush Jr started with, that's a myth right?

Seriously, you say I'm juvinile for insulting you, but then you can't keep the most basic of facts straight!

Go back to highschool political education and try to actually stay awake and learn something this time, mmmkay?

And that's to say nothing about his Gun Control shenanigans, the GitMo issues or any of the Public Privacy violation laws Amendment violation bills he's either been a part of, suppoted or done nothing to prevent, in his 4+ years.

Oh, so because he tried not to be a partisan prick, and tried to play ball with the Republicans who just shifted further and further to the right, that doesn't matter at all does it?

Herp da derp!

Also, it was only two years of his first term, that HARDLY counts as the majority of his first term.

herp da derp!

If you knew as much about politics as you claim, you would know that first off, he was trying to compromise with them, but instead of coming to the table, they shifted farther and farther to the right demanding that he do what they wanted.

Second, you would know that as a first term president (just like every other first term president back before Nixon) he didn't want to throw his weight around and just do what ever we wanted, due to the negative feedback that causes. As a politician, he made a political choice to try to involve republicans in his agenda by seeking compromise.

Then republicans went off the deep end and refused, so he got his act together and forced a few things through, only for the balance to shift. Now, the republicans refuse to compromise, while Obama has a record of seeking compromise, there for making republican politicians look like partisan assholes.

So, yeah, suck on it anon.

If you say "herp da derp" one more fucking time....

So in other words you admit you know nothing about what you are talking about and are just talking shit to make yourself feel important?

Thanks for letting me know that anon!

Obama is bad and stuff

*whose goal

You can either work on the economy, which requires spending, or work on the national debt, which requires budgeting. Far be it for the President to try and work on the thing that actually affects the daily lives of the populace.

There are ways to work on both.

And I can tell you this much: thinking for the now instead of the future will ensure there is no future. Sure we might help the economy in the immediate future, but at the same time, the debt will soon have a far greater effect on the public's daily life if nothing is done about it. Hell, you probably don't know this, but it DOES have an effect on our daily life. It's just a little more subtle.

It's too bad we didn't vote you for president. It seems like apparently you could turn around everything in an instant. How did you become so smart???

It doesn't take the president of the United States to figure that out.

This

Ohhh. That makes sense.

still i don't see it... he's telling her she's gonna get her muffin creamed, and that's all there is to it, don't try to turn it around into a family safe thing...

OH DEAR GOD TELL ME HOW TO ERASE IT.

you keep month old browser history?

Download Google Chrome
CTRL + Shit + N
Porn won't show up on your history
Enjoy

all browsers have that.
safari's probably the best cuz you can keep the tabs you were browsing with when you go to private browsing

You can do that in firefox too.

you can do that in chrome, it just opens a new window