epicalania
Rank #963 on Comments
Offline
Send mail to epicalania Block epicalania Invite epicalania to be your friend flag avatar| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Gender: | male |
| Date Signed Up: | 9/12/2011 |
| Last Login: | 1/14/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Content Ranking: | #9011 |
| Comment Ranking: | #963 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #1379 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #889 |
| Content Thumbs: | 5367 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 5683 |
| Content Level Progress: | 59% (59/100) Level 153 Content: Faptastic → Level 154 Content: Faptastic |
| Comment Level Progress: | 31% (31/100) Level 246 Comments: Doinitrite → Level 247 Comments: Doinitrite |
| Subscribers: | 10 |
| Content Views: | 174210 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 189 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 3436 |
| FJ Points: | 10178 |
http://40hf.com/tomwilliams
latest user's comments
| #26 - Has a new episode came out or something? I haven't heard of ep… [+] (2 new replies) | 12/26/2015 on tfw this show is about to... | 0 |
| | ||
| #5 - I both want and abhor evidence | 12/26/2015 on Fat Shaming Friday | +87 |
| #79 - Picture | 12/25/2015 on You feel it too, don't you? | 0 |
| #35 - Well now we have both | 12/25/2015 on Taking a Dump | +4 |
| #555 - yay <3 Recettear is best game | 12/25/2015 on Christmas Giveaway | 0 |
| #19 - Yeah, I realised that and replied to you again. I think bo… | 12/25/2015 on 4chan master ruse | 0 |
| #17 - I just read the small text and realised what you meant. It… | 12/25/2015 on 4chan master ruse | 0 |
| #16 - Did you even read my comment? [+] (2 new replies) | 12/25/2015 on 4chan master ruse | 0 |
| Yeah, I realised that and replied to you again. I think both our brains died | ||
| #9 - Because I know you guys wanted it. I got rid of Odin and h… [+] (9 new replies) | 12/25/2015 on Taking a Dump | +38 |
| | ||
| #15 - Well, for a large part, having one was the main thing, even ju… [+] (1 new reply) | 12/25/2015 on Chainmail | 0 |
| #25 -
galanorth (12/26/2015) [-] " I've never heard of "hammer hardening" And while I'm not a blacksmith, I do have what could be considered bardic knowledge of it" Yeah? Well I'm an armorer. So sit down. Yes, Hammer hardening is is thing (Price, p. 219), it is pretty significant, actually. The fact that you have never even heard of it proves just how little you know. "A standard modern hauberk would weigh about 10kg, classical & medieval era mail would weigh significantly more. So half a kilo weight off would be really helpful in battle" Lol, no. You seem to be the type who thinks everything back then sucked. A medieval hauberk also only weighed about 20 pounds (Price, p.114). As a matter of fact, modern replicas of both weapons and armor tend to weight more than medieval examples (Price, p.116) "Now, although the bows themselves had a draw weight of 100 pounds, I doubt the archers did. Consider, the average english bowman was a serf, and therefore malnourished and likely a large portion of their numbers sickly. We can safely reduce this to perhaps 90 pounds, perhaps less but 90 seems hard to dispute. " Actually, 100 pounds is low for a English/Welsh warbow, the examples found on the mary rose, which were perfectly preserved, were 100–185 lbs with a 30 draw, and tend to be in the 140-160 range (Strickland, p.17). And considering how an Archer in English employ during 1346 was paid 3 pence a day, compared to the 2 pence a day given to Welsh infantry(Norman, p.79), the 3 pence a day given to thatchers, and the 1.25 given to thatcher's mates(Dyer,. p.306) that means that every day an Archer would be given enough money to buy a gallon of the best ale (Myers, p.201), 2 whole chickens, and a dozen eggs (Norman, p.78) using only one days pay. Some pretty good protein right there. The rest of your little tangent is, as you have admitted, irrelevant, and will be ignored. It was painfully wrong, anyways. Sources: Dyer, C. (1989). Standards of living in the later Middle Ages: Social change in England, c. 1200-1520. Cambridge [England: Cambridge University Press. Myers, A. (1972). London in the age of Chaucer,. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. Norman, A., & Pottinger, D. (1979). English weapons & warfare, 449-1660. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Price, B., & Edge, D. (2000). Techniques of medieval armour reproduction: The 14th century. Boulder, Colo.: Paladin Press. Strickland, M., & Hardy, R. (2005). The great warbow: From Hastings to the Mary Rose. Thrupp, Stroud, Gloucestershire: Sutton Pub. | ||
| #35 - But seriously, theres probably tonnes of porn of RWBY and the … [+] (10 new replies) | 12/25/2015 on You feel it too, don't you? | +9 |
| for fuck sake, does anyone has the x-ray Googles this days? | ||
| #34 - Picture | 12/25/2015 on You feel it too, don't you? | +1 |
| #13 - I'd try LARP but theres no groups near me, so I've never had a… [+] (3 new replies) | 12/25/2015 on Chainmail | +1 |
| #14 -
barundin (12/25/2015) [-] One of the perks living in Europe, larps are always kinda at hand. Well I am not even going to pretend that I do really understand what kind of chainmail is better or not. (I personally am not really fan of them. I know they were an important/usefull part of armor. But in larps they are not really needed and more of an burden most of the time.) But I guess that when enemy has a good hit on you, most of the time you are still fucked one way or another no matter what type of chainmail you have. Although I can see a situations where it would definitely mean difference between a death/survived. Just not entirely sure if in those situations would really matter what type of chainmail you had instead of if you had one at all. Well, for a large part, having one was the main thing, even just a toughened leather over a thick padding garment was an effective armour, capable of reducing damage from concussive strikes and giving limited protection against slashing strikes. That being said, low quality chainmail was bad. If the links separated and/or broke to easily, they would likely pierce you an increase chances of infection. But low quality chainmail was rarely made, any armourer worth the title would make decent chainmail, the quality you'd need for it to not be worth it is extremely low and actually probably harder to get than regular quality chainmail. After that, the benefit of higher quality chainmail was that it would increase its protectiveness, obviously, meaning that in those situations you truly needed it, it did more for you. And a warrior would find himself in those situations way too frequently to risk not having the best armour he could. The other main benefit of better, and extremely expensive in this case, mail was that weight could be reduced through better, and more expensive, alloys and different weaves/gauges/ring diameters. In larp the main benefits would likely be, awesomeness and I guess fitness, mail isn't light, even if you got those weight reductions I talked about. A standard modern hauberk would weigh about 10kg, classical & medieval era mail would weigh significantly more. So half a kilo weight off would be really helpful in battle. #25 -
galanorth (12/26/2015) [-] " I've never heard of "hammer hardening" And while I'm not a blacksmith, I do have what could be considered bardic knowledge of it" Yeah? Well I'm an armorer. So sit down. Yes, Hammer hardening is is thing (Price, p. 219), it is pretty significant, actually. The fact that you have never even heard of it proves just how little you know. "A standard modern hauberk would weigh about 10kg, classical & medieval era mail would weigh significantly more. So half a kilo weight off would be really helpful in battle" Lol, no. You seem to be the type who thinks everything back then sucked. A medieval hauberk also only weighed about 20 pounds (Price, p.114). As a matter of fact, modern replicas of both weapons and armor tend to weight more than medieval examples (Price, p.116) "Now, although the bows themselves had a draw weight of 100 pounds, I doubt the archers did. Consider, the average english bowman was a serf, and therefore malnourished and likely a large portion of their numbers sickly. We can safely reduce this to perhaps 90 pounds, perhaps less but 90 seems hard to dispute. " Actually, 100 pounds is low for a English/Welsh warbow, the examples found on the mary rose, which were perfectly preserved, were 100–185 lbs with a 30 draw, and tend to be in the 140-160 range (Strickland, p.17). And considering how an Archer in English employ during 1346 was paid 3 pence a day, compared to the 2 pence a day given to Welsh infantry(Norman, p.79), the 3 pence a day given to thatchers, and the 1.25 given to thatcher's mates(Dyer,. p.306) that means that every day an Archer would be given enough money to buy a gallon of the best ale (Myers, p.201), 2 whole chickens, and a dozen eggs (Norman, p.78) using only one days pay. Some pretty good protein right there. The rest of your little tangent is, as you have admitted, irrelevant, and will be ignored. It was painfully wrong, anyways. Sources: Dyer, C. (1989). Standards of living in the later Middle Ages: Social change in England, c. 1200-1520. Cambridge [England: Cambridge University Press. Myers, A. (1972). London in the age of Chaucer,. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. Norman, A., & Pottinger, D. (1979). English weapons & warfare, 449-1660. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Price, B., & Edge, D. (2000). Techniques of medieval armour reproduction: The 14th century. Boulder, Colo.: Paladin Press. Strickland, M., & Hardy, R. (2005). The great warbow: From Hastings to the Mary Rose. Thrupp, Stroud, Gloucestershire: Sutton Pub. | ||
| #14 - Acutally, OP wasn't retarded. Gift games are always non tradea… [+] (5 new replies) | 12/25/2015 on 4chan master ruse | +12 |
| I just read the small text and realised what you meant. It's still possible to "trade" gift games on steam, its just a gift not a trade Yeah, I realised that and replied to you again. I think both our brains died | ||
| #150 - **epicalania used "*roll 1, 00-99*"** **epicalania rolls 69… [+] (2 new replies) | 12/25/2015 on Christmas Giveaway | 0 |
| | ||
| #11 - To be honest at some point I forgot what I was meant to be goi… [+] (13 new replies) | 12/25/2015 on Chainmail | +2 |
| #12 -
barundin (12/25/2015) [-] Yeah, but still kudos to you for putting guy with his passive agresive knowledge back on his chair. I mean like, that guy from a post bought it and was obviously fukken thrilled from it. He doesn't care that he has super proper attire, he is happy because of it and it doesnt matter. As a larper we call this type of people (the commenter) as Living-history fascists. And there is nothing more annoying, when a someone tries to roast somebody over 'bad' costume, when its not even relevant. Why's that? If i'd want an imaginary fight, counting up the damage dealt and casting spells - i'd go larping. If I'd want to fight full-contact in a set of heavy armour - i'd go visit HEMA. It's not what I expect, it's the goal that I pursue that matters. Thats why both of these exist separately - much like boxing and wrestling exists. #28 -
barundin (12/26/2015) [-] I would say there are few reasons. a) There are people like me who enjoy the coordinated fight, but are not really into getting into the mess fights. b) Safety reasons : because its not really enjoyable to be sent at 1st day of larp home with broken arm/concussion. Even having your finger hit in a bad way that it swells up and hurts for a week is a real nuisance and can really deteriorate your experience, especially if you are supposed to fight for the rest of the event. Also having an injury is bothersome as it makes harder to feel in the role you are playing. c) There is a vast amount of larps, where fighting isnt the core of the event. d) Some people just don't really need to get into a full on unbraked fight to enjoy the event. Even the larp-battles are sometimes focused on the story aspect. And as you have said, there are enough events that are just about bashing other people with iron swords and larps are just simply not about that most of the time. PS.: Also, there is huge variety of people attending larps with very various age and physical build. I mean like, can you imagine some 1.90 full plate armor tackling a 18 years old elf girl? Alright, first of, my previous message in a nutshell - pick the stuff that you prefer, dont mix them up. Do what you prefer, have you'r own pursuits. Second: a) coordinated fights are valued in HEMA as well - especially in 1v1 - we dont just run around flailing with out limbs just to inflict wounds, and well coordinated full-contact combat makes it look more realistic, rather than a staged fight with holding back; b) safety is of great concern in HEMA - quite a few of us actually want to "feel da pain", and we succeed in this rather well - you know, the armour? the one that PROTECTS from harm and severe damage? We get a couple of bruises and injuries from time to time - it ads up to the experience, the one that we crave and enjoy; c) HEMA isn't a stand-alone event, its mainly a part of the historical reconstruction - alongside with dances, music, cuisine, beverage, attire, atmosphere. There are exceptions though - Battle of Nations. d) we dont pair uneven combatants (who do you take us for? amateurs?) mostly there are two types of people at such get-togethers - little puny manlets that crave blood (such as myself), and big nasty hairy ruskie-like men. Even if we do mix, they (the bigger ones) go easy on us. Plus, physical characteristics play a huge role in combat style - I, being small (for now), am not heavily armoured - to evade instead of parrying - but have a bastard sword - to compensate my lack of reach. #30 -
barundin (12/27/2015) [-] Well dont get me wrong, I am not attackin HEMA or anything if it sounded like, then I am sorry. From what you have said you make it sound as a sport. A lot of focus on how the fight looks, players being paired in combats by other people. Larps (at least here) are more of and sandbox-ish DnD irl. Or you could say impro theatre. Its not reenactment, its not show for anybody except the people who are playing. People who want to get rougher in the fights can (and sometimes do) negotiate beforehand that their fight can get more contact-like. But most people are not seeking it anyway. I am not accusing you of this, yet there are times when you can hear someone on larp that "hurr durr if this was 'iron' I would bulldoze throu those, and this sucks because you cant get more into the fight and this is for kids with soft weapons harridy darridy." then I ask why would you even go on event like this when the persons focus is obviously just smashing folks and not roleplaying your character. Add.: Also larps have their "cosplaying" aspect that are about the creativity you put into your costume. Either if you are rich fuck buying it or making it on your own. Having a foam weapons and no contact fights can allow you to make wild fantasy armors and weapons. Like, I would hardly made this hammer from a iron or so. I'd try LARP but theres no groups near me, so I've never had a chance to try it out without a serious trek southwards. But, from what I know of it, butted mail would be more than enough seeing as I've seen some people on facebook using thick wool jumpers spray painted silver. And all of that besides, the guy got something he likes and will, hopefully, enjoy for a long time. So yeah, his mail is perfectly fine. Another thing I'd like to mention is how much he's talking out of his arse. A) I've never heard of "hammer hardening" And while I'm not a blacksmith, I do have what could be considered bardic knowledge of it and B) flattening links does not strengthen the mail, it strengthens the links along the axis they are thickened. IE they resist opening more, which is why flattening was more common with butted mail but still used in other sorts of mail, it does help against piercing attacks, as it's harder to open the rings to pierce, but overall it's greatest effect is that over years of use and countless battles, the links would be more likely to stay secure to each other. #14 -
barundin (12/25/2015) [-] One of the perks living in Europe, larps are always kinda at hand. Well I am not even going to pretend that I do really understand what kind of chainmail is better or not. (I personally am not really fan of them. I know they were an important/usefull part of armor. But in larps they are not really needed and more of an burden most of the time.) But I guess that when enemy has a good hit on you, most of the time you are still fucked one way or another no matter what type of chainmail you have. Although I can see a situations where it would definitely mean difference between a death/survived. Just not entirely sure if in those situations would really matter what type of chainmail you had instead of if you had one at all. Well, for a large part, having one was the main thing, even just a toughened leather over a thick padding garment was an effective armour, capable of reducing damage from concussive strikes and giving limited protection against slashing strikes. That being said, low quality chainmail was bad. If the links separated and/or broke to easily, they would likely pierce you an increase chances of infection. But low quality chainmail was rarely made, any armourer worth the title would make decent chainmail, the quality you'd need for it to not be worth it is extremely low and actually probably harder to get than regular quality chainmail. After that, the benefit of higher quality chainmail was that it would increase its protectiveness, obviously, meaning that in those situations you truly needed it, it did more for you. And a warrior would find himself in those situations way too frequently to risk not having the best armour he could. The other main benefit of better, and extremely expensive in this case, mail was that weight could be reduced through better, and more expensive, alloys and different weaves/gauges/ring diameters. In larp the main benefits would likely be, awesomeness and I guess fitness, mail isn't light, even if you got those weight reductions I talked about. A standard modern hauberk would weigh about 10kg, classical & medieval era mail would weigh significantly more. So half a kilo weight off would be really helpful in battle. #25 -
galanorth (12/26/2015) [-] " I've never heard of "hammer hardening" And while I'm not a blacksmith, I do have what could be considered bardic knowledge of it" Yeah? Well I'm an armorer. So sit down. Yes, Hammer hardening is is thing (Price, p. 219), it is pretty significant, actually. The fact that you have never even heard of it proves just how little you know. "A standard modern hauberk would weigh about 10kg, classical & medieval era mail would weigh significantly more. So half a kilo weight off would be really helpful in battle" Lol, no. You seem to be the type who thinks everything back then sucked. A medieval hauberk also only weighed about 20 pounds (Price, p.114). As a matter of fact, modern replicas of both weapons and armor tend to weight more than medieval examples (Price, p.116) "Now, although the bows themselves had a draw weight of 100 pounds, I doubt the archers did. Consider, the average english bowman was a serf, and therefore malnourished and likely a large portion of their numbers sickly. We can safely reduce this to perhaps 90 pounds, perhaps less but 90 seems hard to dispute. " Actually, 100 pounds is low for a English/Welsh warbow, the examples found on the mary rose, which were perfectly preserved, were 100–185 lbs with a 30 draw, and tend to be in the 140-160 range (Strickland, p.17). And considering how an Archer in English employ during 1346 was paid 3 pence a day, compared to the 2 pence a day given to Welsh infantry(Norman, p.79), the 3 pence a day given to thatchers, and the 1.25 given to thatcher's mates(Dyer,. p.306) that means that every day an Archer would be given enough money to buy a gallon of the best ale (Myers, p.201), 2 whole chickens, and a dozen eggs (Norman, p.78) using only one days pay. Some pretty good protein right there. The rest of your little tangent is, as you have admitted, irrelevant, and will be ignored. It was painfully wrong, anyways. Sources: Dyer, C. (1989). Standards of living in the later Middle Ages: Social change in England, c. 1200-1520. Cambridge [England: Cambridge University Press. Myers, A. (1972). London in the age of Chaucer,. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. Norman, A., & Pottinger, D. (1979). English weapons & warfare, 449-1660. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Price, B., & Edge, D. (2000). Techniques of medieval armour reproduction: The 14th century. Boulder, Colo.: Paladin Press. Strickland, M., & Hardy, R. (2005). The great warbow: From Hastings to the Mary Rose. Thrupp, Stroud, Gloucestershire: Sutton Pub. | ||
| #2251 - **epicalania used "*roll 1, 1-1000000*"** **epicalania rol… | 12/25/2015 on A very special giveaway | 0 |
| #9 - and B) the force they would hit with, thus altering their pene… [+] (16 new replies) | 12/25/2015 on Chainmail | +4 |
| #18 -
anon (12/25/2015) [-] That is nice theory you have there. However, only historical findings of butted mailles are either from Roman era or Japan. In both cases remains of both users show death by puncture wound. On the other hand, manuscripts and graves of riveted mail users show mostly death by ether blows to unprotected parts or death from infected lesser wounds after the battle. The reason for this is simple - in case of butted mail, all you have to do to penetrate with piercing strike is to "bend" a piece of wire to the point of disassembeling from rest of the suit. In case of riveted maille, you have to break it, which is much more hard to achieve. But there is one much stronger and mundane reason against the modern anachronistic butted replicas - and that is wear and tear. Ask about anybody who was actively using butted chainamail for longer period of time. The thing usually breakdown overtime itself, because each of the flexible wires have to endure stress of whole suit during march and not bend a milimeter. Every user of butted mail had problem with having to repair his suit after every action. Japanase solved it by sewing the maille in cloth or lackquering it. One legendare japanese armorsmith welded the rings by lead, making his armor much more durable then that of his peers. However, the replica shown in picture above is really a waste of money. Cannot be used in historical fencing, reenaction and will breakdown even during longer period of walkings. #12 -
barundin (12/25/2015) [-] Yeah, but still kudos to you for putting guy with his passive agresive knowledge back on his chair. I mean like, that guy from a post bought it and was obviously fukken thrilled from it. He doesn't care that he has super proper attire, he is happy because of it and it doesnt matter. As a larper we call this type of people (the commenter) as Living-history fascists. And there is nothing more annoying, when a someone tries to roast somebody over 'bad' costume, when its not even relevant. Why's that? If i'd want an imaginary fight, counting up the damage dealt and casting spells - i'd go larping. If I'd want to fight full-contact in a set of heavy armour - i'd go visit HEMA. It's not what I expect, it's the goal that I pursue that matters. Thats why both of these exist separately - much like boxing and wrestling exists. #28 -
barundin (12/26/2015) [-] I would say there are few reasons. a) There are people like me who enjoy the coordinated fight, but are not really into getting into the mess fights. b) Safety reasons : because its not really enjoyable to be sent at 1st day of larp home with broken arm/concussion. Even having your finger hit in a bad way that it swells up and hurts for a week is a real nuisance and can really deteriorate your experience, especially if you are supposed to fight for the rest of the event. Also having an injury is bothersome as it makes harder to feel in the role you are playing. c) There is a vast amount of larps, where fighting isnt the core of the event. d) Some people just don't really need to get into a full on unbraked fight to enjoy the event. Even the larp-battles are sometimes focused on the story aspect. And as you have said, there are enough events that are just about bashing other people with iron swords and larps are just simply not about that most of the time. PS.: Also, there is huge variety of people attending larps with very various age and physical build. I mean like, can you imagine some 1.90 full plate armor tackling a 18 years old elf girl? Alright, first of, my previous message in a nutshell - pick the stuff that you prefer, dont mix them up. Do what you prefer, have you'r own pursuits. Second: a) coordinated fights are valued in HEMA as well - especially in 1v1 - we dont just run around flailing with out limbs just to inflict wounds, and well coordinated full-contact combat makes it look more realistic, rather than a staged fight with holding back; b) safety is of great concern in HEMA - quite a few of us actually want to "feel da pain", and we succeed in this rather well - you know, the armour? the one that PROTECTS from harm and severe damage? We get a couple of bruises and injuries from time to time - it ads up to the experience, the one that we crave and enjoy; c) HEMA isn't a stand-alone event, its mainly a part of the historical reconstruction - alongside with dances, music, cuisine, beverage, attire, atmosphere. There are exceptions though - Battle of Nations. d) we dont pair uneven combatants (who do you take us for? amateurs?) mostly there are two types of people at such get-togethers - little puny manlets that crave blood (such as myself), and big nasty hairy ruskie-like men. Even if we do mix, they (the bigger ones) go easy on us. Plus, physical characteristics play a huge role in combat style - I, being small (for now), am not heavily armoured - to evade instead of parrying - but have a bastard sword - to compensate my lack of reach. #30 -
barundin (12/27/2015) [-] Well dont get me wrong, I am not attackin HEMA or anything if it sounded like, then I am sorry. From what you have said you make it sound as a sport. A lot of focus on how the fight looks, players being paired in combats by other people. Larps (at least here) are more of and sandbox-ish DnD irl. Or you could say impro theatre. Its not reenactment, its not show for anybody except the people who are playing. People who want to get rougher in the fights can (and sometimes do) negotiate beforehand that their fight can get more contact-like. But most people are not seeking it anyway. I am not accusing you of this, yet there are times when you can hear someone on larp that "hurr durr if this was 'iron' I would bulldoze throu those, and this sucks because you cant get more into the fight and this is for kids with soft weapons harridy darridy." then I ask why would you even go on event like this when the persons focus is obviously just smashing folks and not roleplaying your character. Add.: Also larps have their "cosplaying" aspect that are about the creativity you put into your costume. Either if you are rich fuck buying it or making it on your own. Having a foam weapons and no contact fights can allow you to make wild fantasy armors and weapons. Like, I would hardly made this hammer from a iron or so. I'd try LARP but theres no groups near me, so I've never had a chance to try it out without a serious trek southwards. But, from what I know of it, butted mail would be more than enough seeing as I've seen some people on facebook using thick wool jumpers spray painted silver. And all of that besides, the guy got something he likes and will, hopefully, enjoy for a long time. So yeah, his mail is perfectly fine. Another thing I'd like to mention is how much he's talking out of his arse. A) I've never heard of "hammer hardening" And while I'm not a blacksmith, I do have what could be considered bardic knowledge of it and B) flattening links does not strengthen the mail, it strengthens the links along the axis they are thickened. IE they resist opening more, which is why flattening was more common with butted mail but still used in other sorts of mail, it does help against piercing attacks, as it's harder to open the rings to pierce, but overall it's greatest effect is that over years of use and countless battles, the links would be more likely to stay secure to each other. #14 -
barundin (12/25/2015) [-] One of the perks living in Europe, larps are always kinda at hand. Well I am not even going to pretend that I do really understand what kind of chainmail is better or not. (I personally am not really fan of them. I know they were an important/usefull part of armor. But in larps they are not really needed and more of an burden most of the time.) But I guess that when enemy has a good hit on you, most of the time you are still fucked one way or another no matter what type of chainmail you have. Although I can see a situations where it would definitely mean difference between a death/survived. Just not entirely sure if in those situations would really matter what type of chainmail you had instead of if you had one at all. Well, for a large part, having one was the main thing, even just a toughened leather over a thick padding garment was an effective armour, capable of reducing damage from concussive strikes and giving limited protection against slashing strikes. That being said, low quality chainmail was bad. If the links separated and/or broke to easily, they would likely pierce you an increase chances of infection. But low quality chainmail was rarely made, any armourer worth the title would make decent chainmail, the quality you'd need for it to not be worth it is extremely low and actually probably harder to get than regular quality chainmail. After that, the benefit of higher quality chainmail was that it would increase its protectiveness, obviously, meaning that in those situations you truly needed it, it did more for you. And a warrior would find himself in those situations way too frequently to risk not having the best armour he could. The other main benefit of better, and extremely expensive in this case, mail was that weight could be reduced through better, and more expensive, alloys and different weaves/gauges/ring diameters. In larp the main benefits would likely be, awesomeness and I guess fitness, mail isn't light, even if you got those weight reductions I talked about. A standard modern hauberk would weigh about 10kg, classical & medieval era mail would weigh significantly more. So half a kilo weight off would be really helpful in battle. #25 -
galanorth (12/26/2015) [-] " I've never heard of "hammer hardening" And while I'm not a blacksmith, I do have what could be considered bardic knowledge of it" Yeah? Well I'm an armorer. So sit down. Yes, Hammer hardening is is thing (Price, p. 219), it is pretty significant, actually. The fact that you have never even heard of it proves just how little you know. "A standard modern hauberk would weigh about 10kg, classical & medieval era mail would weigh significantly more. So half a kilo weight off would be really helpful in battle" Lol, no. You seem to be the type who thinks everything back then sucked. A medieval hauberk also only weighed about 20 pounds (Price, p.114). As a matter of fact, modern replicas of both weapons and armor tend to weight more than medieval examples (Price, p.116) "Now, although the bows themselves had a draw weight of 100 pounds, I doubt the archers did. Consider, the average english bowman was a serf, and therefore malnourished and likely a large portion of their numbers sickly. We can safely reduce this to perhaps 90 pounds, perhaps less but 90 seems hard to dispute. " Actually, 100 pounds is low for a English/Welsh warbow, the examples found on the mary rose, which were perfectly preserved, were 100–185 lbs with a 30 draw, and tend to be in the 140-160 range (Strickland, p.17). And considering how an Archer in English employ during 1346 was paid 3 pence a day, compared to the 2 pence a day given to Welsh infantry(Norman, p.79), the 3 pence a day given to thatchers, and the 1.25 given to thatcher's mates(Dyer,. p.306) that means that every day an Archer would be given enough money to buy a gallon of the best ale (Myers, p.201), 2 whole chickens, and a dozen eggs (Norman, p.78) using only one days pay. Some pretty good protein right there. The rest of your little tangent is, as you have admitted, irrelevant, and will be ignored. It was painfully wrong, anyways. Sources: Dyer, C. (1989). Standards of living in the later Middle Ages: Social change in England, c. 1200-1520. Cambridge [England: Cambridge University Press. Myers, A. (1972). London in the age of Chaucer,. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. Norman, A., & Pottinger, D. (1979). English weapons & warfare, 449-1660. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Price, B., & Edge, D. (2000). Techniques of medieval armour reproduction: The 14th century. Boulder, Colo.: Paladin Press. Strickland, M., & Hardy, R. (2005). The great warbow: From Hastings to the Mary Rose. Thrupp, Stroud, Gloucestershire: Sutton Pub. | ||
| #8 - You're showing some knowledge of mail but also appear to have … [+] (19 new replies) | 12/25/2015 on Chainmail | +8 |
| and B) the force they would hit with, thus altering their penetration rate. For the most part these alter the hit in favour of the target, as the arrow would be, partially (sometimes greatly) coming from above, making it harder to move towards but rather easy to move away from. and the deflection rate would increase if they had some perpendicular movement to the flight of the arrow and also if they didn't present their chest or back directly to the arrow, these being the largest, flattest areas of the mail. Now theres two more main points I'll go through, 1) other threats besides arrows and 2) the actual wearing of mail. 1) There would be numerous other threats on the battlefield, every enemy, some enemies multiple times, your allies, environmental hazards, etc. Seeing as mail was very effective against these, it stands to reason that a warrior would wear any mail he could, and while he would, of course, wear the best he could obtain, many warriors couldnt afford the best mail, so lesser mail would have been highly used even after armourers found better ways to create it, as a piece of mail was indeed expensive. There is evidence that, in a fight against one wearing mail, it was a common tactic to strike at the less protected legs. 2) Mail was not worn in isolation, it was worn with a gambeson underneath. Now I'll admit that a gambeson would have no chance of stopping a war arrow in full flight, but the arrows weren't in full flight, they were far less than full flight. If we follow the arrow from immediately before contact to where it finally lands, we'll see it, initially at full flight. Then it hits the mail, it loses some force as the mail, and the matter underneath if shifts, then the overall body will be forced backwards, further reducing the force. Now, if the arrow pierces the mail, it will loose an immense amount of force in doing so, more force the stronger the mail and the larger the head Which, in combat, was a broadhead. Which would lose significant force, . Now we've penetrated the armour and the arrow has lost the majority of it's force. The remainder is still a large amount and more than enough to cause great injury but, there is still padding between the target and the arrow, as well as the target still being forced along the path of the arrow, further reducing force. And a new element is involved now, the arrow is rubbing against the mail, which, while slight is yet another reduction to force, and this reduction will only grow and there is more substance for the arrow to rub against. The arrow, which is spinning as arrows do, will hit the gambeson, which is used to form padding to reduce concussive force and to prevent abrasion. The first property is what we want, the padding is substancial. It will greatly reduce the arrows force, despite the arrows, now slightly blunted, head shearing through it. And as it spins it will become tangled in the loose fibres, loosing more force. This results in the vast majority of the force being lost by the arrow before it gets through the armour layers. But theres more layers. Clothing would be worn underneath, and since we're talking about english bows, it would be used in the english climate. So thick clothing and sometimes leather would be worn underneath, this forms the final layer which will sometimes not be pierced, sometimes will be. If it is pierced the arrow will have lost the absolute majority of it's force and will, injury occurs at all, be far less grave and sometimes mearly scars. A half inch cut through your stomach muscle is far more survivable than a 5 inch cut that infects your organs. These estimations change little between riveted and butted mail #18 -
anon (12/25/2015) [-] That is nice theory you have there. However, only historical findings of butted mailles are either from Roman era or Japan. In both cases remains of both users show death by puncture wound. On the other hand, manuscripts and graves of riveted mail users show mostly death by ether blows to unprotected parts or death from infected lesser wounds after the battle. The reason for this is simple - in case of butted mail, all you have to do to penetrate with piercing strike is to "bend" a piece of wire to the point of disassembeling from rest of the suit. In case of riveted maille, you have to break it, which is much more hard to achieve. But there is one much stronger and mundane reason against the modern anachronistic butted replicas - and that is wear and tear. Ask about anybody who was actively using butted chainamail for longer period of time. The thing usually breakdown overtime itself, because each of the flexible wires have to endure stress of whole suit during march and not bend a milimeter. Every user of butted mail had problem with having to repair his suit after every action. Japanase solved it by sewing the maille in cloth or lackquering it. One legendare japanese armorsmith welded the rings by lead, making his armor much more durable then that of his peers. However, the replica shown in picture above is really a waste of money. Cannot be used in historical fencing, reenaction and will breakdown even during longer period of walkings. #12 -
barundin (12/25/2015) [-] Yeah, but still kudos to you for putting guy with his passive agresive knowledge back on his chair. I mean like, that guy from a post bought it and was obviously fukken thrilled from it. He doesn't care that he has super proper attire, he is happy because of it and it doesnt matter. As a larper we call this type of people (the commenter) as Living-history fascists. And there is nothing more annoying, when a someone tries to roast somebody over 'bad' costume, when its not even relevant. Why's that? If i'd want an imaginary fight, counting up the damage dealt and casting spells - i'd go larping. If I'd want to fight full-contact in a set of heavy armour - i'd go visit HEMA. It's not what I expect, it's the goal that I pursue that matters. Thats why both of these exist separately - much like boxing and wrestling exists. #28 -
barundin (12/26/2015) [-] I would say there are few reasons. a) There are people like me who enjoy the coordinated fight, but are not really into getting into the mess fights. b) Safety reasons : because its not really enjoyable to be sent at 1st day of larp home with broken arm/concussion. Even having your finger hit in a bad way that it swells up and hurts for a week is a real nuisance and can really deteriorate your experience, especially if you are supposed to fight for the rest of the event. Also having an injury is bothersome as it makes harder to feel in the role you are playing. c) There is a vast amount of larps, where fighting isnt the core of the event. d) Some people just don't really need to get into a full on unbraked fight to enjoy the event. Even the larp-battles are sometimes focused on the story aspect. And as you have said, there are enough events that are just about bashing other people with iron swords and larps are just simply not about that most of the time. PS.: Also, there is huge variety of people attending larps with very various age and physical build. I mean like, can you imagine some 1.90 full plate armor tackling a 18 years old elf girl? Alright, first of, my previous message in a nutshell - pick the stuff that you prefer, dont mix them up. Do what you prefer, have you'r own pursuits. Second: a) coordinated fights are valued in HEMA as well - especially in 1v1 - we dont just run around flailing with out limbs just to inflict wounds, and well coordinated full-contact combat makes it look more realistic, rather than a staged fight with holding back; b) safety is of great concern in HEMA - quite a few of us actually want to "feel da pain", and we succeed in this rather well - you know, the armour? the one that PROTECTS from harm and severe damage? We get a couple of bruises and injuries from time to time - it ads up to the experience, the one that we crave and enjoy; c) HEMA isn't a stand-alone event, its mainly a part of the historical reconstruction - alongside with dances, music, cuisine, beverage, attire, atmosphere. There are exceptions though - Battle of Nations. d) we dont pair uneven combatants (who do you take us for? amateurs?) mostly there are two types of people at such get-togethers - little puny manlets that crave blood (such as myself), and big nasty hairy ruskie-like men. Even if we do mix, they (the bigger ones) go easy on us. Plus, physical characteristics play a huge role in combat style - I, being small (for now), am not heavily armoured - to evade instead of parrying - but have a bastard sword - to compensate my lack of reach. #30 -
barundin (12/27/2015) [-] Well dont get me wrong, I am not attackin HEMA or anything if it sounded like, then I am sorry. From what you have said you make it sound as a sport. A lot of focus on how the fight looks, players being paired in combats by other people. Larps (at least here) are more of and sandbox-ish DnD irl. Or you could say impro theatre. Its not reenactment, its not show for anybody except the people who are playing. People who want to get rougher in the fights can (and sometimes do) negotiate beforehand that their fight can get more contact-like. But most people are not seeking it anyway. I am not accusing you of this, yet there are times when you can hear someone on larp that "hurr durr if this was 'iron' I would bulldoze throu those, and this sucks because you cant get more into the fight and this is for kids with soft weapons harridy darridy." then I ask why would you even go on event like this when the persons focus is obviously just smashing folks and not roleplaying your character. Add.: Also larps have their "cosplaying" aspect that are about the creativity you put into your costume. Either if you are rich fuck buying it or making it on your own. Having a foam weapons and no contact fights can allow you to make wild fantasy armors and weapons. Like, I would hardly made this hammer from a iron or so. I'd try LARP but theres no groups near me, so I've never had a chance to try it out without a serious trek southwards. But, from what I know of it, butted mail would be more than enough seeing as I've seen some people on facebook using thick wool jumpers spray painted silver. And all of that besides, the guy got something he likes and will, hopefully, enjoy for a long time. So yeah, his mail is perfectly fine. Another thing I'd like to mention is how much he's talking out of his arse. A) I've never heard of "hammer hardening" And while I'm not a blacksmith, I do have what could be considered bardic knowledge of it and B) flattening links does not strengthen the mail, it strengthens the links along the axis they are thickened. IE they resist opening more, which is why flattening was more common with butted mail but still used in other sorts of mail, it does help against piercing attacks, as it's harder to open the rings to pierce, but overall it's greatest effect is that over years of use and countless battles, the links would be more likely to stay secure to each other. #14 -
barundin (12/25/2015) [-] One of the perks living in Europe, larps are always kinda at hand. Well I am not even going to pretend that I do really understand what kind of chainmail is better or not. (I personally am not really fan of them. I know they were an important/usefull part of armor. But in larps they are not really needed and more of an burden most of the time.) But I guess that when enemy has a good hit on you, most of the time you are still fucked one way or another no matter what type of chainmail you have. Although I can see a situations where it would definitely mean difference between a death/survived. Just not entirely sure if in those situations would really matter what type of chainmail you had instead of if you had one at all. Well, for a large part, having one was the main thing, even just a toughened leather over a thick padding garment was an effective armour, capable of reducing damage from concussive strikes and giving limited protection against slashing strikes. That being said, low quality chainmail was bad. If the links separated and/or broke to easily, they would likely pierce you an increase chances of infection. But low quality chainmail was rarely made, any armourer worth the title would make decent chainmail, the quality you'd need for it to not be worth it is extremely low and actually probably harder to get than regular quality chainmail. After that, the benefit of higher quality chainmail was that it would increase its protectiveness, obviously, meaning that in those situations you truly needed it, it did more for you. And a warrior would find himself in those situations way too frequently to risk not having the best armour he could. The other main benefit of better, and extremely expensive in this case, mail was that weight could be reduced through better, and more expensive, alloys and different weaves/gauges/ring diameters. In larp the main benefits would likely be, awesomeness and I guess fitness, mail isn't light, even if you got those weight reductions I talked about. A standard modern hauberk would weigh about 10kg, classical & medieval era mail would weigh significantly more. So half a kilo weight off would be really helpful in battle. #25 -
galanorth (12/26/2015) [-] " I've never heard of "hammer hardening" And while I'm not a blacksmith, I do have what could be considered bardic knowledge of it" Yeah? Well I'm an armorer. So sit down. Yes, Hammer hardening is is thing (Price, p. 219), it is pretty significant, actually. The fact that you have never even heard of it proves just how little you know. "A standard modern hauberk would weigh about 10kg, classical & medieval era mail would weigh significantly more. So half a kilo weight off would be really helpful in battle" Lol, no. You seem to be the type who thinks everything back then sucked. A medieval hauberk also only weighed about 20 pounds (Price, p.114). As a matter of fact, modern replicas of both weapons and armor tend to weight more than medieval examples (Price, p.116) "Now, although the bows themselves had a draw weight of 100 pounds, I doubt the archers did. Consider, the average english bowman was a serf, and therefore malnourished and likely a large portion of their numbers sickly. We can safely reduce this to perhaps 90 pounds, perhaps less but 90 seems hard to dispute. " Actually, 100 pounds is low for a English/Welsh warbow, the examples found on the mary rose, which were perfectly preserved, were 100–185 lbs with a 30 draw, and tend to be in the 140-160 range (Strickland, p.17). And considering how an Archer in English employ during 1346 was paid 3 pence a day, compared to the 2 pence a day given to Welsh infantry(Norman, p.79), the 3 pence a day given to thatchers, and the 1.25 given to thatcher's mates(Dyer,. p.306) that means that every day an Archer would be given enough money to buy a gallon of the best ale (Myers, p.201), 2 whole chickens, and a dozen eggs (Norman, p.78) using only one days pay. Some pretty good protein right there. The rest of your little tangent is, as you have admitted, irrelevant, and will be ignored. It was painfully wrong, anyways. Sources: Dyer, C. (1989). Standards of living in the later Middle Ages: Social change in England, c. 1200-1520. Cambridge [England: Cambridge University Press. Myers, A. (1972). London in the age of Chaucer,. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. Norman, A., & Pottinger, D. (1979). English weapons & warfare, 449-1660. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Price, B., & Edge, D. (2000). Techniques of medieval armour reproduction: The 14th century. Boulder, Colo.: Paladin Press. Strickland, M., & Hardy, R. (2005). The great warbow: From Hastings to the Mary Rose. Thrupp, Stroud, Gloucestershire: Sutton Pub. | ||
| #120 - **epicalania used "*roll picture*"** **epicalania rolled image ** | 12/25/2015 on MORE FREE SHIT. GET IN HERE. | 0 |
| #18 - The rush - things will be dangerous rock - defence is impo… | 12/24/2015 on CYOA Stormheart | 0 |
| #34 - I know, but you also know that they will. | 12/24/2015 on Scandinavia and the World | 0 |
| #32 - Fair enough. Theres going to be people camping on the tip … [+] (2 new replies) | 12/24/2015 on Scandinavia and the World | 0 |
| | ||
| #1 - Picture | 12/24/2015 on haha | +27 |
| #30 - I'd have thought that would be claimed by the Finnish, its con… [+] (4 new replies) | 12/24/2015 on Scandinavia and the World | 0 |
| Fair enough. Theres going to be people camping on the tip if you don't stop them though. So they can wake up in a different country. | ||
Comments(13):
epicalania has disabled anonymous comments.
Refresh Comments Show GIFs 13 comments displayed.
since content was deleted
YOUR comment
« millionth rhyme4s with month,
chilver rhymes with silver and
hurple rhymes with purple »
MY RESONCE
hurple does rhyme and is a word tho i wasnt talking about the rhyme with purple jsut hunt and month
chilver is a noun so allthough it rhymes i can make an object name it durple and it rhymes with purple so nouns are usually left out.
millionth is another one that rhymes but its borderline a forced rhyme
this is because millionths rhyming sound is IONTH while month is just ONTH
YOUR comment
« millionth rhyme4s with month,
chilver rhymes with silver and
hurple rhymes with purple »
MY RESONCE
hurple does rhyme and is a word tho i wasnt talking about the rhyme with purple jsut hunt and month
chilver is a noun so allthough it rhymes i can make an object name it durple and it rhymes with purple so nouns are usually left out.
millionth is another one that rhymes but its borderline a forced rhyme
this is because millionths rhyming sound is IONTH while month is just ONTH
You didnt mention them but I included them as they are common ones to use with the 'fact' of certain words not having any rhymes, and as chilver is a common noun and not a proper noun it is usually counted, millionth is not a forced rhyme nor a borderline forced rhyme as the correct classical English pronunciation is mill-i-onth, with the onth rhyming with month, mill-i-onth.
Thank you
Thank you
well there you go i have no real arguements against you so i can no longer keep the conversation going (agree or not its always good to point out reasons against)
so you win
so you win
Thank you a value that you were willing to actually put your argument forward in this, i welcome any and all reasonable arguments to anything i say, this is reasonable as I have seen this sort of misconception alot and it may eventually become a large part of English, but for now it is still the same.
i believed you from the start but you know i cant jsut let you walk all over my comment
the issue i see with millionth is that when i say it at least i do the ionth as 1 syllable so when i say it it doesnt rhyme quite right so i say its a forced ryme because by definition it rhymes when u say it a little off (so if i spaced the i out)
the issue with most rhyming facts is just theres too many words and you cant really decide the rules of rhyming as i said i can make an object name it horange and it rhymes with orange so does that count
the issue i see with millionth is that when i say it at least i do the ionth as 1 syllable so when i say it it doesnt rhyme quite right so i say its a forced ryme because by definition it rhymes when u say it a little off (so if i spaced the i out)
the issue with most rhyming facts is just theres too many words and you cant really decide the rules of rhyming as i said i can make an object name it horange and it rhymes with orange so does that count
Like I said many people do pronounce it that way and I feel it is very likely it will become the proper pronunciation soon, English seems to be slowly evolving into a very fast language.
well english is a language based off other languages...words get added in all the time from other languages thats why origin is so useful in a spelling bee
True, it also evolves from its own words, both in useful ways (don't can't) and not so useful ways (lol, swag) although one could argue that the concept of contractions itself came from the Romans (Latin is the oldest language I know that has contractions, for example hodie is a contraction of hoc die).
im pretty sure 80% of latin words are pretty much 2 regular words put together to mean somehting new based on the words
NO, there are many compound words (which are different from contractions and many older languages have them as well) but contractions are alot rarer, I am a second year Latin student and the only one I can think of right now is hodie
idk much about language all i know is whenever im learning something they always go
*word* derives from the latin word *word* and *word*
where like the first part is a few letters and last part is a few letters
*word* derives from the latin word *word* and *word*
where like the first part is a few letters and last part is a few letters
