Nah, Galahad was a true bro. He'd never do that to Arthur.

My point is that his one flaw was he fucked Gwen. Or attempted to, it varies between the legends.
But all of them say that he loved Gwen and vice versa before Gwen and Arthur got together.
So he has his flaw, the others must've had more flaws if he was the most gallant.

I repeat. Galahad. Galahad was also there. Unless they got rid of Galahad, Lancelot could not possibly be the most gallant knight.

The thing about Galahad is that he doesn't have his own title.
The original knights all have their own titles, the wisest, most gallant, bravest, etc. Depending on the version you listen to these knights change and the specific titles can move between them, except Merlin, the wisest, and Lancelot, the most gallant, are fairly consistent with it.
Galahad, being Lancelots son, never had such a title, although in some stories he inherits the title of most Gallant from his father.
In one version I remember hearing as a kid, all the knights had titles always but Galahad refused to take the title of most gallant until after his fathers death, despite Lancelot wanting to give it up in favour of his son.

TL;DR Galahad is defs gallant, but never had the title officially, at least not while Lancelot was alive

In fact, Galahad could be considered too gallant to accept the title, as Lancelot had it before him

That's a really good idea

If your players really get into the roleplay it's even better.
I have a few 'stock' brands that stay roughly the same even in unrelated campaigns, I do alter them a bit to make them unique to the campaign but my players know there'll be 1 cheap brand, low quality, 1 good brand, not overpriced, never adorned, like military gear, and an expensive, beautiful one, there'll also be one thats made under special conditions.

So one player had his family murdered in his backstory, so he never touched a Moroi item. In that campaign Moroi would occasionally enchant items to have special properties when someone gave them comfort. They functioned identically to anything else (usually) but were so much richer and more story filled.
In another campaign one player would never buy the rich brand, he rejected his noble backgrounds, while another refused to buy anything that wasn't one of the expensive brands, his vanity later made him the target of a gold hoarding dragon

>>#41

It was pretty stupid of them to break the key, though.
Nothing wrong with fuckin with your players a bit for being dumb.
Just saying it isn't really any kind of logical connection that they could/should be expected to know about.

Yeah, it's entirely their fault for ruining a key that would weigh, what? half a kg max? That's the heaviest key I've ever had in a game and even then it was a random object enchanted to open a magical lock, not an actual physical key so if the jackmanagan wanted to fuck with them for breaking it it's his call.

Mostly, my comment was because I think more GMs should brand their ingame stuff.
Items, dungeons, ancient spells, it makes the game so much more fun for players and unbelievably easier for GMs.

That's a really good idea

If your players really get into the roleplay it's even better.
I have a few 'stock' brands that stay roughly the same even in unrelated campaigns, I do alter them a bit to make them unique to the campaign but my players know there'll be 1 cheap brand, low quality, 1 good brand, not overpriced, never adorned, like military gear, and an expensive, beautiful one, there'll also be one thats made under special conditions.

So one player had his family murdered in his backstory, so he never touched a Moroi item. In that campaign Moroi would occasionally enchant items to have special properties when someone gave them comfort. They functioned identically to anything else (usually) but were so much richer and more story filled.
In another campaign one player would never buy the rich brand, he rejected his noble backgrounds, while another refused to buy anything that wasn't one of the expensive brands, his vanity later made him the target of a gold hoarding dragon

All this boils down to is, i think some people have built in fundamental issues that will never allow them to take some forms of verbal abuse, and you don't. You think given enough time everyone can "toughen up" to deal with their current situation in place. And i don't think given all the time in the universe. we could ever empirically prove each other wrong.

I do not agree with the choices and actions they make to try and make schools safer. Why is every one acting like i do. I don't.

I'm not acting like you do.
I'm saying peoples words shouldn't be able to hurt you.
The people whos words will always be able to hurt you are the people who should never use them, and for most people with that power, will never use the,

All this boils down to is, i think some people have built in fundamental issues that will never allow them to take some forms of verbal abuse, and you don't. You think given enough time everyone can "toughen up" to deal with their current situation in place. And i don't think given all the time in the universe. we could ever empirically prove each other wrong.

Using that logic, why not go back to the cave man era, things were way tougher back then, and people far meaner. Why not go back to that. Compared to them we are quite babied, and should "toughen up". When is something too tough, or too easy.

Ty for the mention.

People shouldn't make an effort to be tough on others.
And there is no shame in being smarter about things to reduce workload.
But if you decide to let a strangers words hurt you, especially to the point we're starting to see with 'micro aggression' and 'safe spaces' then you will either grow out of it or you deserve it. Because everyone can learn to not let others hurt them. But all too often we see people actively resisting the process of maturing and learning to not give others that power.
If someone chooses to let others hurt them so easily, I will do nothing to protect such people.
If someone is still learning to not let others hurt them, I will support them. But it is a process they must go through, as everyone must

I do not agree with the choices and actions they make to try and make schools safer. Why is every one acting like i do. I don't.

I'm not acting like you do.
I'm saying peoples words shouldn't be able to hurt you.
The people whos words will always be able to hurt you are the people who should never use them, and for most people with that power, will never use the,

All this boils down to is, i think some people have built in fundamental issues that will never allow them to take some forms of verbal abuse, and you don't. You think given enough time everyone can "toughen up" to deal with their current situation in place. And i don't think given all the time in the universe. we could ever empirically prove each other wrong.

So people who can't take it, who find themselves on the edge. Should just toughen up? What about those who don't? Some people can't just toughen up, that's reality, some just cant. What about them?

Everyone can.
Some take longer, everyone can.
The only time someone can't is when they won't.
And if they won't, then they choose to be hurt, and so I will not begrudge them their pain.

Using that logic, why not go back to the cave man era, things were way tougher back then, and people far meaner. Why not go back to that. Compared to them we are quite babied, and should "toughen up". When is something too tough, or too easy.

Ty for the mention.

People shouldn't make an effort to be tough on others.
And there is no shame in being smarter about things to reduce workload.
But if you decide to let a strangers words hurt you, especially to the point we're starting to see with 'micro aggression' and 'safe spaces' then you will either grow out of it or you deserve it. Because everyone can learn to not let others hurt them. But all too often we see people actively resisting the process of maturing and learning to not give others that power.
If someone chooses to let others hurt them so easily, I will do nothing to protect such people.
If someone is still learning to not let others hurt them, I will support them. But it is a process they must go through, as everyone must

I do not agree with the choices and actions they make to try and make schools safer. Why is every one acting like i do. I don't.

I'm not acting like you do.
I'm saying peoples words shouldn't be able to hurt you.
The people whos words will always be able to hurt you are the people who should never use them, and for most people with that power, will never use the,

All this boils down to is, i think some people have built in fundamental issues that will never allow them to take some forms of verbal abuse, and you don't. You think given enough time everyone can "toughen up" to deal with their current situation in place. And i don't think given all the time in the universe. we could ever empirically prove each other wrong.

They should not, but can, given the right context. That's my opinion.

They shouldn't
If they do, toughen the fuck up

So people who can't take it, who find themselves on the edge. Should just toughen up? What about those who don't? Some people can't just toughen up, that's reality, some just cant. What about them?

Everyone can.
Some take longer, everyone can.
The only time someone can't is when they won't.
And if they won't, then they choose to be hurt, and so I will not begrudge them their pain.

Using that logic, why not go back to the cave man era, things were way tougher back then, and people far meaner. Why not go back to that. Compared to them we are quite babied, and should "toughen up". When is something too tough, or too easy.

Ty for the mention.

People shouldn't make an effort to be tough on others.
And there is no shame in being smarter about things to reduce workload.
But if you decide to let a strangers words hurt you, especially to the point we're starting to see with 'micro aggression' and 'safe spaces' then you will either grow out of it or you deserve it. Because everyone can learn to not let others hurt them. But all too often we see people actively resisting the process of maturing and learning to not give others that power.
If someone chooses to let others hurt them so easily, I will do nothing to protect such people.
If someone is still learning to not let others hurt them, I will support them. But it is a process they must go through, as everyone must

I do not agree with the choices and actions they make to try and make schools safer. Why is every one acting like i do. I don't.

I'm not acting like you do.
I'm saying peoples words shouldn't be able to hurt you.
The people whos words will always be able to hurt you are the people who should never use them, and for most people with that power, will never use the,

All this boils down to is, i think some people have built in fundamental issues that will never allow them to take some forms of verbal abuse, and you don't. You think given enough time everyone can "toughen up" to deal with their current situation in place. And i don't think given all the time in the universe. we could ever empirically prove each other wrong.

Well yes, words can't hurt given the right context, and they can hurt, given the right context. For you it was your girlfriend, those words hurt because it was the right situation, coming out of the right person. So they hurt. I assumed we came to an agreement.

You also appear to be of the opinion that a group of strangers words should be able to hurt you

They should not, but can, given the right context. That's my opinion.

They shouldn't
If they do, toughen the fuck up

So people who can't take it, who find themselves on the edge. Should just toughen up? What about those who don't? Some people can't just toughen up, that's reality, some just cant. What about them?

Everyone can.
Some take longer, everyone can.
The only time someone can't is when they won't.
And if they won't, then they choose to be hurt, and so I will not begrudge them their pain.

Using that logic, why not go back to the cave man era, things were way tougher back then, and people far meaner. Why not go back to that. Compared to them we are quite babied, and should "toughen up". When is something too tough, or too easy.

Ty for the mention.

People shouldn't make an effort to be tough on others.
And there is no shame in being smarter about things to reduce workload.
But if you decide to let a strangers words hurt you, especially to the point we're starting to see with 'micro aggression' and 'safe spaces' then you will either grow out of it or you deserve it. Because everyone can learn to not let others hurt them. But all too often we see people actively resisting the process of maturing and learning to not give others that power.
If someone chooses to let others hurt them so easily, I will do nothing to protect such people.
If someone is still learning to not let others hurt them, I will support them. But it is a process they must go through, as everyone must

I do not agree with the choices and actions they make to try and make schools safer. Why is every one acting like i do. I don't.

I'm not acting like you do.
I'm saying peoples words shouldn't be able to hurt you.
The people whos words will always be able to hurt you are the people who should never use them, and for most people with that power, will never use the,

All this boils down to is, i think some people have built in fundamental issues that will never allow them to take some forms of verbal abuse, and you don't. You think given enough time everyone can "toughen up" to deal with their current situation in place. And i don't think given all the time in the universe. we could ever empirically prove each other wrong.

Words can hurt, given the right context. I like that. Good talk, i'm off to go get yelled at by the other guy now.

Did I ever say they couldn't in the right context? I started my comment saying they can hurt.
But The next thing I said was that most people shouldn't be able to make them hurt.

Well yes, words can't hurt given the right context, and they can hurt, given the right context. For you it was your girlfriend, those words hurt because it was the right situation, coming out of the right person. So they hurt. I assumed we came to an agreement.

You also appear to be of the opinion that a group of strangers words should be able to hurt you

They should not, but can, given the right context. That's my opinion.

They shouldn't
If they do, toughen the fuck up

So people who can't take it, who find themselves on the edge. Should just toughen up? What about those who don't? Some people can't just toughen up, that's reality, some just cant. What about them?

Everyone can.
Some take longer, everyone can.
The only time someone can't is when they won't.
And if they won't, then they choose to be hurt, and so I will not begrudge them their pain.

Using that logic, why not go back to the cave man era, things were way tougher back then, and people far meaner. Why not go back to that. Compared to them we are quite babied, and should "toughen up". When is something too tough, or too easy.

Ty for the mention.

People shouldn't make an effort to be tough on others.
And there is no shame in being smarter about things to reduce workload.
But if you decide to let a strangers words hurt you, especially to the point we're starting to see with 'micro aggression' and 'safe spaces' then you will either grow out of it or you deserve it. Because everyone can learn to not let others hurt them. But all too often we see people actively resisting the process of maturing and learning to not give others that power.
If someone chooses to let others hurt them so easily, I will do nothing to protect such people.
If someone is still learning to not let others hurt them, I will support them. But it is a process they must go through, as everyone must

I do not agree with the choices and actions they make to try and make schools safer. Why is every one acting like i do. I don't.

I'm not acting like you do.
I'm saying peoples words shouldn't be able to hurt you.
The people whos words will always be able to hurt you are the people who should never use them, and for most people with that power, will never use the,

All this boils down to is, i think some people have built in fundamental issues that will never allow them to take some forms of verbal abuse, and you don't. You think given enough time everyone can "toughen up" to deal with their current situation in place. And i don't think given all the time in the universe. we could ever empirically prove each other wrong.

What if it's multiple people, and it's quite often. they're strangers. but i'm certain that would make it easier for the words to hurt. Although it's not correct to say words hurt, it's the idea those words convey that hurt. The idea that you're an idiot, a useless human being. Nothing more than a screw up, always will be, always have been. It's the ideas the words convey that hurt. And it's all about context.

There are indeed a lot of factors, larger numbers does indeed give them more power. But you know yourself better than anyone else, only a few people truly have the power to hurt you if you know yourself.

I have tourettes syndrome and anxiety and depression. I was bullied until well into highschool, but peoples words didn't hurt me because I know myself, I know what tourettes is, I know my own ability. So when people I knew, people I didn't know, people by themselves or in groups, tried to use words to hurt me, it didn't work. Which usually got them angry and made them continue.

You know what did hurt? My girlfriend. The first person I ever properly told about my depression aside from medical peeps like my doctor, and later a counselor. That's how I got the actual diagnosis. and at first she supported me. I loved her, she was my first girlfriend and we'd been dating almost 2 years. We broke up, I missed her, I wanted her back, all that stuff. The words she used then are the words that hurt.
If the words of someone you don't know, someone you don't care about, someone who doesn't know you as close as the people you love do, if their words hurt you. Toughen up.

Words can hurt, given the right context. I like that. Good talk, i'm off to go get yelled at by the other guy now.

Did I ever say they couldn't in the right context? I started my comment saying they can hurt.
But The next thing I said was that most people shouldn't be able to make them hurt.

Well yes, words can't hurt given the right context, and they can hurt, given the right context. For you it was your girlfriend, those words hurt because it was the right situation, coming out of the right person. So they hurt. I assumed we came to an agreement.

You also appear to be of the opinion that a group of strangers words should be able to hurt you

They should not, but can, given the right context. That's my opinion.

They shouldn't
If they do, toughen the fuck up

So people who can't take it, who find themselves on the edge. Should just toughen up? What about those who don't? Some people can't just toughen up, that's reality, some just cant. What about them?

Everyone can.
Some take longer, everyone can.
The only time someone can't is when they won't.
And if they won't, then they choose to be hurt, and so I will not begrudge them their pain.

Using that logic, why not go back to the cave man era, things were way tougher back then, and people far meaner. Why not go back to that. Compared to them we are quite babied, and should "toughen up". When is something too tough, or too easy.

Ty for the mention.

People shouldn't make an effort to be tough on others.
And there is no shame in being smarter about things to reduce workload.
But if you decide to let a strangers words hurt you, especially to the point we're starting to see with 'micro aggression' and 'safe spaces' then you will either grow out of it or you deserve it. Because everyone can learn to not let others hurt them. But all too often we see people actively resisting the process of maturing and learning to not give others that power.
If someone chooses to let others hurt them so easily, I will do nothing to protect such people.
If someone is still learning to not let others hurt them, I will support them. But it is a process they must go through, as everyone must

I do not agree with the choices and actions they make to try and make schools safer. Why is every one acting like i do. I don't.

I'm not acting like you do.
I'm saying peoples words shouldn't be able to hurt you.
The people whos words will always be able to hurt you are the people who should never use them, and for most people with that power, will never use the,

All this boils down to is, i think some people have built in fundamental issues that will never allow them to take some forms of verbal abuse, and you don't. You think given enough time everyone can "toughen up" to deal with their current situation in place. And i don't think given all the time in the universe. we could ever empirically prove each other wrong.

"OH NO, FOUR TO FIVE BULLIES! BETTER CURDLE UP AND CRY LIKE A BITCH!"

Pick up a fucking chair and throw it, scream in rage, show those fuckers that numbers don't mean shit when you're willing to pick a fight against uneven odds.

People respect courage, and it takes a SHIT ton of it to stand up against bullies.

You're not the type to have a calm and collected conversation are you.

I can have a conversation, but bullies are NOT people to be reasoned with, much like terrorists, they don't respect their fellow humans, so they don't get respect from me.

I never told you to reason with them, what i'm saying is, some people can not handle them. Although it depends on the bully, a kid calling you a poo poo head in kindergarden
is not much compared to someone in high school causing full on physical damage.

You know, I think it actually was bullying at a early stage in my childhood, my mother once told me about the time I managed to physically wound a child with a plastic shovel (you know the shitty kind they give to kinder-garden children to play in the sand with) Turns out, this kid, had spent the entire 20 minutes recess just following me around, demanding I gave him the toys I was playing with, eventually I just had a tiny little bucket and a green shovel, he told me to hand them over, and I didn't so he pushed me, I refused, then he tried to pull the bucket from my hand, and I instantly snapped, I jammed the fucking shovel into his face, and managed to make a 2-3 cm's cut along the kids nose and left cheek, he screamed out in fear and the teacher on duty literally had to drag me off the kid as I kept hitting him with the digging end of the shovel, she had to lock me into a closet because I would not stop trying to hurt anyone who even touched me.

Thing is; We need to learn to defend ourselves in adulthood, much like the guy in the Video said, and if teachers are going to preach how to avoid micro-aggression and all that bullshit, everyone from today forth is going to be a "sissy-lad" who's afraid to voice his opinion because he does not want to OFFEND someone.

Do you not agree simply asking a teacher for help would not have been the best action for that situation. Do you think it's best to hurt everyone who tries cause us some form of uncomfort, be it physical,or psychological, with physical violence. Is it the best way to deal with bullies, or is it your way to deal with bullies?

"My way" or anyone else's way is A WAY to deal with bullies, if you are too ingrained in this "Tolerance accepting" society to accept a few rough methods, perhaps YOU are the problem of why we have bullying.

My father always said "Never start a fight by throwing the first punch, but feel free to end it by being the last man standing". So far, there's never been a problem I could not solve by direct confrontation or a show of force.

If you wish to call me a war-mongering steroid monkey, that's fine, at least I don't traipse around on my fucking toes worrying daily if i offended someone.

As for the teachers, I mentioned before that more often then not, they are busy hiding in the teachers room to bother FIXING the issue we're discussing right now.

Some people deserve a punch, yes, and many times i would not blame a man for choosing to punch another in certain situations. But you have to concede that there's often a better way to deal with the situation that won't leave anyone damaged. Not always, but often.

Really? Is that why politicians are circle jerking in whatever country they are, preaching tolerance, acceptance and selling out their nation to the influx of refugee's stemming from a country that's wrecked by war, because they are too stupid to fix their own shit?

I do not care for the choice to let in a bunch of immigrants. It's destroying the countries that choose to do so. But what i am saying is that you don't have to punch every bully in the face. That's not always the solution, sometimes it is, but not always, nor is it seldom the only solution.

You don't think I TRIED telling the fuckers to lay off? Violence is always the LAST step in dealing with a problem, but if bullies wanna be thick-heads who only respond to deterrence by violence, that's perhaps what should be the first option.

There's no kill, quite like over-kill. (except don't kill em, that's bad.)

So you do look for other ways to deal with it. And you treat violence as a last resort. Well that's good, i agree with that.

I got so much shit for picking fights in school from the teaches I was close to being SUSPENDED, but I never got bullied again after showing them that I would not lie down like a beta-wolf and accept that kind of abuse.

Landscapes are next and some will be subterranean.