|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #5139 on CommentsLevel 212 Comments: Comedic Genius
OfflineSend mail to epicalania Block epicalania Invite epicalania to be your friend flag avatar
- Views: 75749one question (from old fj)
4662 262 Total: +4400
- Views: 6848fountain of doubt (m o fj)
200 30 Total: +170
- Views: 8290I love rats
115 11 Total: +104
- Views: 3365So... Im never eating these again.
60 12 Total: +48
- Views: 1446being british (even moar old fj)
37 16 Total: +21
- Views: 1613stoner vision from old FJ
30 12 Total: +18
- Views: 497never say no to panda
2 3 Total: -1
latest user's comments
|#130 - yes, yes, I see that now. It's perfect.||20 hours ago on Marry me please||+5|
|#102 - I understand how it's phrased and how the law is unnecessary i…||03/10/2014 on No, really guys, we're for...||0|
|#108 - BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB…||03/10/2014 on Choose One||0|
|#72 - While I agree that it should mean equivalent qualification, th… [+] (2 new replies)||03/10/2014 on No, really guys, we're for...||0|
#91 - helenwheels (03/10/2014) [-]
"No better qualified" doesn't mean less qualified.
If it where less it would say women who are less qualified.
The United States affirmative action requires that a work place have a certain number of women and that gets women who are less qualified head way against men.
#102 - epicalania (03/10/2014) [-]
I understand how it's phrased and how the law is unnecessary if it is meant as it is phrased but these are feminists so I don't doubt they would try to twist the words to sound like this while meaning less qualified.
In Australia the workplace is required to judge applicants on factors relating to the job first and then the employer can choose as s/he wishes provided there is no discrimination, so if a man and a women are qualified then they would be asked to a meeting and the employer can choose whomever s/he wishes.
|#93 - that would violate to contract and send the lands income back …||03/08/2014 on Tea?||0|
|#51 - Actually the royal family generates more income for England th… [+] (5 new replies)||03/08/2014 on Tea?||0|
#93 - epicalania (03/08/2014) [-]
that would violate to contract and send the lands income back to the next in line for the throne, and due to the population of england and the time since the last royal family just about everyone in england is related to the royal family, along with about 30-40% of australians and 3-5% of US citizens
|#21 - seen that one, it's great.||03/05/2014 on Funniest Banned Commercials||+1|
|#2 - Comment deleted [+] (2 new replies)||03/02/2014 on 50 Things a Geek Should Know||+2|
|#22 - >It's more of, uh, a friend date. hear thousands of nec…||03/02/2014 on 4chen||+25|
|#571 - So what I'm getting from this is that the FJ community can and…||03/01/2014 on Turning off ads for...||0|
Join Subscribe reposts
epicalania has disabled anonymous comments.