| All | Popular >
|
pokemon
|
doctor-who
|
animemanga
|
wallpapers
|
funny
|
ponytime
|
4chan
|
feels
|
batman
|
fucking-science
|
videogames
|
deadpool
|
fucking-tumblr
|
hockey
|
titan-time
|
katawashoujo
|
bendingtime
|
toonhole
|
gifbin
|
skyrim
|
pickogram
|
roosterteethtime
|
oc-comic-makers
|
halo-mtg
|
acully-funny
|
darksoulstime
|
lol-channel
|
archertime
|
omegle
|
minecraft

dubmaster  

Rank #16260 on Comments
no avatar Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower
Offline
Send mail to dubmaster Block dubmaster Invite dubmaster to be your friend
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Gender: male
Age: 112
Date Signed Up:8/01/2011
Last Login:5/19/2013
Location:In dubs heaven
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Comment Ranking:#16260
Highest Content Rank:#32358
Highest Comment Rank:#4032
Content Thumbs: 3 total,  22 ,  19
Comment Thumbs: 2935 total,  3298 ,  363
Content Level Progress: 35% (28/80)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 35% (35/100)
Level 229 Comments: Mind Blower → Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:0
Content Views:25534
Total Comments Made:404
FJ Points:3021
I am the master of doubles.

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

funny pictures

Show:
Sort by:
Order:

user favorites

1 2 3 > [ 25 Total ]

latest user's comments

#146 - Ahhh. I had no idea scientifically illiterate had a different…  [+] (1 new reply) 05/15/2013 on Bill Nye 0
User avatar #151 - sonsofsol (05/15/2013) [-]
Education is the key!
#133 - That's not scientifically illiterate though.... It's ignorant…  [+] (4 new replies) 05/15/2013 on Bill Nye 0
User avatar #142 - sonsofsol (05/15/2013) [-]
No your mixing illiterate as in not being able to read and write with scientifically illiterate which means being unable to follow scientific convention. By which I mean not presenting evidence or refuting evidence without cause.

and of course it can mean not writing equations properly but that is mainly for the wierdos who study physics.
#146 - dubmaster (05/15/2013) [-]
Ahhh. I had no idea scientifically illiterate had a different definition than it's parts. Thanks for the enlightenment!
User avatar #151 - sonsofsol (05/15/2013) [-]
Education is the key!
User avatar #140 - coolcalx (05/15/2013) [-]
if you deny something that is observable, then you don't understand science. you ARE scientifically illiterate.
#113 - How?  [+] (7 new replies) 05/15/2013 on Bill Nye 0
User avatar #117 - coolcalx (05/15/2013) [-]
what.

"here's irrefutable proof that my lolipop is red"
"no, your lolipop is not red"
"well then you're fucking retarded"

same concept.
#133 - dubmaster (05/15/2013) [-]
That's not scientifically illiterate though.... It's ignorant, but it's not scientifically illiterate.

Scientifically illiterate means not able to read or write about science related ideas (more vaguely: not able to understand science). A person who denies something that has proof can still understand natural and theoretical sciences.
I visited fermilab and actually spoke to a man who didn't believe the top quark actually existed. He was not scientifically illiterate, but ignorant for ignoring the evidence that pointed to it.
User avatar #142 - sonsofsol (05/15/2013) [-]
No your mixing illiterate as in not being able to read and write with scientifically illiterate which means being unable to follow scientific convention. By which I mean not presenting evidence or refuting evidence without cause.

and of course it can mean not writing equations properly but that is mainly for the wierdos who study physics.
#146 - dubmaster (05/15/2013) [-]
Ahhh. I had no idea scientifically illiterate had a different definition than it's parts. Thanks for the enlightenment!
User avatar #151 - sonsofsol (05/15/2013) [-]
Education is the key!
User avatar #140 - coolcalx (05/15/2013) [-]
if you deny something that is observable, then you don't understand science. you ARE scientifically illiterate.
User avatar #116 - kanade (05/15/2013) [-]
Because you deny something that's PROVEN. That's like a scientist denying gravity or germs or a round earth.
#107 - Neither did I. I'm making a statement that believing somethin…  [+] (9 new replies) 05/15/2013 on Bill Nye 0
User avatar #108 - kanade (05/15/2013) [-]
You can belief something if it has no proof, but if you deny something that has proof you're scientifically illiterate.
#113 - dubmaster (05/15/2013) [-]
How?
User avatar #117 - coolcalx (05/15/2013) [-]
what.

"here's irrefutable proof that my lolipop is red"
"no, your lolipop is not red"
"well then you're fucking retarded"

same concept.
#133 - dubmaster (05/15/2013) [-]
That's not scientifically illiterate though.... It's ignorant, but it's not scientifically illiterate.

Scientifically illiterate means not able to read or write about science related ideas (more vaguely: not able to understand science). A person who denies something that has proof can still understand natural and theoretical sciences.
I visited fermilab and actually spoke to a man who didn't believe the top quark actually existed. He was not scientifically illiterate, but ignorant for ignoring the evidence that pointed to it.
User avatar #142 - sonsofsol (05/15/2013) [-]
No your mixing illiterate as in not being able to read and write with scientifically illiterate which means being unable to follow scientific convention. By which I mean not presenting evidence or refuting evidence without cause.

and of course it can mean not writing equations properly but that is mainly for the wierdos who study physics.
#146 - dubmaster (05/15/2013) [-]
Ahhh. I had no idea scientifically illiterate had a different definition than it's parts. Thanks for the enlightenment!
User avatar #151 - sonsofsol (05/15/2013) [-]
Education is the key!
User avatar #140 - coolcalx (05/15/2013) [-]
if you deny something that is observable, then you don't understand science. you ARE scientifically illiterate.
User avatar #116 - kanade (05/15/2013) [-]
Because you deny something that's PROVEN. That's like a scientist denying gravity or germs or a round earth.
#70 - Because believing in things that may or may not exist makes yo…  [+] (12 new replies) 05/15/2013 on Bill Nye +1
User avatar #101 - kanade (05/15/2013) [-]
Denying evolution makes you scientifically illiterate, he didn't say anything about god.
#107 - dubmaster (05/15/2013) [-]
Neither did I. I'm making a statement that believing something without proof does not make you scientifically illiterate.
User avatar #108 - kanade (05/15/2013) [-]
You can belief something if it has no proof, but if you deny something that has proof you're scientifically illiterate.
#113 - dubmaster (05/15/2013) [-]
How?
User avatar #117 - coolcalx (05/15/2013) [-]
what.

"here's irrefutable proof that my lolipop is red"
"no, your lolipop is not red"
"well then you're fucking retarded"

same concept.
#133 - dubmaster (05/15/2013) [-]
That's not scientifically illiterate though.... It's ignorant, but it's not scientifically illiterate.

Scientifically illiterate means not able to read or write about science related ideas (more vaguely: not able to understand science). A person who denies something that has proof can still understand natural and theoretical sciences.
I visited fermilab and actually spoke to a man who didn't believe the top quark actually existed. He was not scientifically illiterate, but ignorant for ignoring the evidence that pointed to it.
User avatar #142 - sonsofsol (05/15/2013) [-]
No your mixing illiterate as in not being able to read and write with scientifically illiterate which means being unable to follow scientific convention. By which I mean not presenting evidence or refuting evidence without cause.

and of course it can mean not writing equations properly but that is mainly for the wierdos who study physics.
#146 - dubmaster (05/15/2013) [-]
Ahhh. I had no idea scientifically illiterate had a different definition than it's parts. Thanks for the enlightenment!
User avatar #151 - sonsofsol (05/15/2013) [-]
Education is the key!
User avatar #140 - coolcalx (05/15/2013) [-]
if you deny something that is observable, then you don't understand science. you ARE scientifically illiterate.
User avatar #116 - kanade (05/15/2013) [-]
Because you deny something that's PROVEN. That's like a scientist denying gravity or germs or a round earth.
User avatar #84 - colegaleener (05/15/2013) [-]
right.
#5 - I still dont get why theirs one guy sitting there eating spinach.  [+] (1 new reply) 05/12/2013 on What.... +40
#8 - MotorstormLegend (05/12/2013) [-]
#32 - With a little research (which I should have done before asking… 05/05/2013 on yes...YES...YEEESSSS! 0
#31 - Because triangulation has only ever been used in two dimension… 05/05/2013 on yes...YES...YEEESSSS! 0
#26 - Is triangulate the proper word for 3D location detection?  [+] (4 new replies) 05/05/2013 on yes...YES...YEEESSSS! 0
#30 - smoothmcgroove (05/05/2013) [-]
It's not specifically for three-dimensional locating, but it can be applied here
User avatar #28 - godtherapist (05/05/2013) [-]
Yes. Why would it not be?
#32 - dubmaster (05/05/2013) [-]
With a little research (which I should have done before asking), I've found that the 3D equivalent to triangulation is trilateration.
#31 - dubmaster (05/05/2013) [-]
Because triangulation has only ever been used in two dimensions in my experience.
#178 - Do you have a link to the original video? 04/11/2013 on Look guys, a faggot! 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> [ 402 Total ]

user's friends

User avatar beansandfeet
iamphoenix
treesrocks
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 551 / Total items point value: 551

Comments(0):

Refresh Comments
 
Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
No comments!
 
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)