dubh
Rank #4866 on Comments
Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz Offline
Send mail to dubh Block dubh Invite dubh to be your friend 
| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Gender: | male |
| Age: | 19 |
| Date Signed Up: | 2/02/2014 |
| Last Login: | 1/13/2016 |
| Location: | Ireland |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #4866 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #7425 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #1577 |
| Content Thumbs: | 8 total,
14 ,
6 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 4076 total,
4494 ,
418 |
| Content Level Progress: | 18.64% (11/59) Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here |
| Comment Level Progress: | 5% (5/100) Level 230 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 231 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz |
| Subscribers: | 0 |
| Content Views: | 2171 |
| Total Comments Made: | 1010 |
| FJ Points: | 3014 |
It's pronounced "dove".
I like dance threads.
That's it, really.
I like dance threads.
That's it, really.
latest user's comments
| #31 - thank mr. skeltal | 05/26/2015 on When you finally catch that... | 0 |
| #18 - What the **** is that thing? | 05/26/2015 on Customer Service | 0 |
| #88 - Hankhillofthe, you've returned! | 05/26/2015 on How To Do The Moonwalk | 0 |
| #439 - Heh. Don't cut yourself on them edges, boy. [+] (1 new reply) | 05/26/2015 on Touching story | 0 |
| | ||
| #4 - Well I don't know I did to deserve this, but thanks, I guess. … [+] (1 new reply) | 05/25/2015 on dubh's profile | 0 |
| #8 - ***** , Korra is not a Hindu. Clearly she's Inuit, y… [+] (1 new reply) | 05/25/2015 on Fucked Up Interview | 0 |
| #58 - Godspeed, fellow | 05/25/2015 on woo | 0 |
| #189 - Oh no, this is definitely a real thing. It's not that they… | 05/25/2015 on Fact comp #11 | +2 |
| #11 - Going to see him and the rest of the Foos at the end of the mo… [+] (1 new reply) | 05/24/2015 on Dave Grohl ladies and... | 0 |
| | ||
| #21 - Hey, that's a Harry Potter jumper. You can see the Deathly… | 05/24/2015 on Disney 4 | +2 |
| #31 - Picture | 05/23/2015 on Slayer | +1 |
| #18 - And there it is! Congratulations, Mr. Lotengo, you are t… [+] (1 new reply) | 05/22/2015 on nice advice | +1 |
| #344 - I apologise for the late reply. The lady expicitly states … | 05/22/2015 on #REKT | 0 |
| #29 - I can't even believe we're having this conversation. I'm t… [+] (10 new replies) | 05/21/2015 on People are dumb | +13 |
| #38 -
Nohelpforu (05/21/2015) [-] You couldn't rape your wife in medieval times, a marriage contract makes you property, it's only rape in our eyes with modern lenses, the time period its recreating is fucked up, but rape is defined by the time period its in, and in this one, it wasn't rape, it was however a thing that fills all our requirements of being rape. In short your both morons for bothering to argue the semantics of it. #328 -
anon (05/22/2015) [-] So in other words, you say it isnt rape, get called out on it, then try to bring "for the time period it represents" into it as if that was somehow part of your original argument. You may have meant it that way originally, but you cant call people dumb for not agreeing with you the way you presented it originally. #427 -
Nohelpforu (05/22/2015) [-] I've only said one thing in this conversation dude. One time. Read the thread. #287 -
livefromtokyo (05/22/2015) [-]  Your fact is insightful and interesting, but I don't believe it is relevant to current squabble. #505 -
anon (05/22/2015) [-] Thats exactly the thing, you cant just say: "It was definitely rape" since you can look at it in two ways, Yes from a modern perspective it is rape and no, from the universes perspective it is not rape. As such saying it is stupid as it is both rape yet not rape, simply depending on which way you look at it  well, yes, you can look at it in both ways, but my point is we have the ability to use words to illustrate in which view we are meaning. But then again you say form the universal perspective, I'm sorry, i cant tell if english is your first language But when one says , "universal" it means worldwide. Current-day worldwide. #93 -
anon (05/21/2015) [-] This nigger is actually completely right and anyone who disagrees is a retard. #275 -
anon (05/22/2015) [-] yes and in modern world westeros he would be charged with rape, maybe. however the show takes place in medieval westeros and those scenes are kind of fucking tame, am i the only one who remembers troy? they when they storm the city they rape the women left and right, just after smashing their babies on the floor. | ||
| #26 - She agreed because she had no choice. Because if she said … [+] (16 new replies) | 05/21/2015 on People are dumb | +30 |
 SHE IS NEVER GETTING KILLED BY THE BOLTONS. They need her to make their claim to the north stand stronger. And she could've refused but she wanted to stay and fight for Winterfell. She continues to have the option to escape, but she specifically stated that she is at home and not afraid. The only, THE ONLY argument I can even consider that justifies labeling this as rape is the threat of physical violence, death is absolutely out of the question.  That's not completely true, she wouldn't have been killed, she's the "key to the north" and she knows it. You could argue that it's rape because she clearly didn't want it, but it was her choice to go through it, in order to accomplish her goals. Littlefinger convinced her that she had to "play the game" in order to avenge her family and take back what's hers and that's exactly what she's trying to do and that's also why she married Ramsay, not because she had no other option. In my eyes, this situation is not too different from a prostitute who desperately needs money so she resorts to fucking disgusting men for it, despite hating every second of it and I don't think many people would call that rape. I wouldn't call an independent women who voluntarily prostitutes as raped. (Like a girl/guy who is earning money for for medical school or to feed her/his drug addiction) But I would call a prostitute who was kidnaped and forced/trapped into prostitution by way of force and manipulation as raped. my point is just a friendly reminder that there are different types of prostitutes. But personally I would view Sansa as being raped because I think she's smart enough (finally) to know that she has no way out of the situation. She would have been killed, or tortured, life is horribly unkind to her, I mean even her last "friend" little finger sold her (and tried to feed her some bullshit about reclaiming the north). She's trying to survive. And I personally think that if a man or woman has to have sex actually to stay live, mentally or physically- then it's rape. But I know that different cultures define it differently. #30 -
justtocomment (05/21/2015) [-] Jesus Christ was is wrong with you? I'm not going to chastise the show - it's just writing the story and doing it reasonably well. But how can you call that situation anything other than rape? She didn't consent - she just didn't have the option to say "no". She had sex against her will with a man she did not want to have sex with. Literally, the definition of rape is what occurred. #38 -
Nohelpforu (05/21/2015) [-] You couldn't rape your wife in medieval times, a marriage contract makes you property, it's only rape in our eyes with modern lenses, the time period its recreating is fucked up, but rape is defined by the time period its in, and in this one, it wasn't rape, it was however a thing that fills all our requirements of being rape. In short your both morons for bothering to argue the semantics of it. #328 -
anon (05/22/2015) [-] So in other words, you say it isnt rape, get called out on it, then try to bring "for the time period it represents" into it as if that was somehow part of your original argument. You may have meant it that way originally, but you cant call people dumb for not agreeing with you the way you presented it originally. #427 -
Nohelpforu (05/22/2015) [-] I've only said one thing in this conversation dude. One time. Read the thread. #287 -
livefromtokyo (05/22/2015) [-] Your fact is insightful and interesting, but I don't believe it is relevant to current squabble. #505 -
anon (05/22/2015) [-] Thats exactly the thing, you cant just say: "It was definitely rape" since you can look at it in two ways, Yes from a modern perspective it is rape and no, from the universes perspective it is not rape. As such saying it is stupid as it is both rape yet not rape, simply depending on which way you look at it well, yes, you can look at it in both ways, but my point is we have the ability to use words to illustrate in which view we are meaning. But then again you say form the universal perspective, I'm sorry, i cant tell if english is your first language But when one says , "universal" it means worldwide. Current-day worldwide. #93 -
anon (05/21/2015) [-] This nigger is actually completely right and anyone who disagrees is a retard. #275 -
anon (05/22/2015) [-] yes and in modern world westeros he would be charged with rape, maybe. however the show takes place in medieval westeros and those scenes are kind of fucking tame, am i the only one who remembers troy? they when they storm the city they rape the women left and right, just after smashing their babies on the floor. | ||
| #24 - Yes it was. Don't even ******* pretend it wasn't. [+] (22 new replies) | 05/21/2015 on People are dumb | +399 |
| I talked about this with my girlfriend, she hasn't watched it so I described it: - she married a violent psycho - OK - she was warned about his habits - OK - Sansa said that this is her home and she is not afraid - OK - She didn't resisted in any way - OK - She had to do it while her childhood friend was forced to watch - OK - She cried - Oh no, then it's definitely rape I can't argue with this, I give up. I don't think it can be classified as rape and Sansa was not that much of a victim. more like a participant in a battle that took a serious punch, but the majority of people want to label this as a rape. Nothing more I can do about it.  Yeah like, what's this "non-consensual sex" noise anyway, in the content? There's a word for that. Rape.  She agreed beforehand. She knows having a wedding means you have to consumate the marriage. I'm not saying it's not fucked up that Reek was in the room, or that he roughly took her virginity, but she agreed beforehand knowing how fucked up Ramsey is. It's not even close to as bad as what happened in the book.  but did she really know how screwed he was in the head? She never saw him be an asshole and I think she figured Myranda was just trying to scare her with lies. Also her last husband was willing to wait for her to be comfortable, I think she was naive and thought ramsay would say the same. #26 -
dubh (05/21/2015) [-] She agreed because she had no choice. Because if she said no, she'd be killed. She might have agreed to stay in Winterfell, she may have agreed to marry Ramsay, but only because she had no other option. That's important. No other option That is the definition of rape. She has been forced into agreeing to a sexual relationship with a sadistic lunatic. SHE IS NEVER GETTING KILLED BY THE BOLTONS. They need her to make their claim to the north stand stronger. And she could've refused but she wanted to stay and fight for Winterfell. She continues to have the option to escape, but she specifically stated that she is at home and not afraid. The only, THE ONLY argument I can even consider that justifies labeling this as rape is the threat of physical violence, death is absolutely out of the question. That's not completely true, she wouldn't have been killed, she's the "key to the north" and she knows it. You could argue that it's rape because she clearly didn't want it, but it was her choice to go through it, in order to accomplish her goals. Littlefinger convinced her that she had to "play the game" in order to avenge her family and take back what's hers and that's exactly what she's trying to do and that's also why she married Ramsay, not because she had no other option. In my eyes, this situation is not too different from a prostitute who desperately needs money so she resorts to fucking disgusting men for it, despite hating every second of it and I don't think many people would call that rape. I wouldn't call an independent women who voluntarily prostitutes as raped. (Like a girl/guy who is earning money for for medical school or to feed her/his drug addiction) But I would call a prostitute who was kidnaped and forced/trapped into prostitution by way of force and manipulation as raped. my point is just a friendly reminder that there are different types of prostitutes. But personally I would view Sansa as being raped because I think she's smart enough (finally) to know that she has no way out of the situation. She would have been killed, or tortured, life is horribly unkind to her, I mean even her last "friend" little finger sold her (and tried to feed her some bullshit about reclaiming the north). She's trying to survive. And I personally think that if a man or woman has to have sex actually to stay live, mentally or physically- then it's rape. But I know that different cultures define it differently. #30 -
justtocomment (05/21/2015) [-] Jesus Christ was is wrong with you? I'm not going to chastise the show - it's just writing the story and doing it reasonably well. But how can you call that situation anything other than rape? She didn't consent - she just didn't have the option to say "no". She had sex against her will with a man she did not want to have sex with. Literally, the definition of rape is what occurred. #38 -
Nohelpforu (05/21/2015) [-] You couldn't rape your wife in medieval times, a marriage contract makes you property, it's only rape in our eyes with modern lenses, the time period its recreating is fucked up, but rape is defined by the time period its in, and in this one, it wasn't rape, it was however a thing that fills all our requirements of being rape. In short your both morons for bothering to argue the semantics of it. #328 -
anon (05/22/2015) [-] So in other words, you say it isnt rape, get called out on it, then try to bring "for the time period it represents" into it as if that was somehow part of your original argument. You may have meant it that way originally, but you cant call people dumb for not agreeing with you the way you presented it originally. #427 -
Nohelpforu (05/22/2015) [-] I've only said one thing in this conversation dude. One time. Read the thread. #287 -
livefromtokyo (05/22/2015) [-] Your fact is insightful and interesting, but I don't believe it is relevant to current squabble. #505 -
anon (05/22/2015) [-] Thats exactly the thing, you cant just say: "It was definitely rape" since you can look at it in two ways, Yes from a modern perspective it is rape and no, from the universes perspective it is not rape. As such saying it is stupid as it is both rape yet not rape, simply depending on which way you look at it well, yes, you can look at it in both ways, but my point is we have the ability to use words to illustrate in which view we are meaning. But then again you say form the universal perspective, I'm sorry, i cant tell if english is your first language But when one says , "universal" it means worldwide. Current-day worldwide. #93 -
anon (05/21/2015) [-] This nigger is actually completely right and anyone who disagrees is a retard. #275 -
anon (05/22/2015) [-] yes and in modern world westeros he would be charged with rape, maybe. however the show takes place in medieval westeros and those scenes are kind of fucking tame, am i the only one who remembers troy? they when they storm the city they rape the women left and right, just after smashing their babies on the floor. | ||
| #23 - That is so ******* metal. | 05/21/2015 on (untitled) | 0 |
| #67 - oh god, i said i wouldn't comment, i promised myself i wouldn… [+] (3 new replies) | 05/21/2015 on #REKT | 0 |
| #113 -
thepowerfulones (05/21/2015) [-] the lady represents the SJW movement of "blame the straight white man." the guy (who I assume is the interviewer) seems to be having none of her shit, so I'd say, side with the guy on this one #344 -
dubh (05/22/2015) [-] I apologise for the late reply. The lady expicitly states at the beginning that the doesn't "blame" straight white men. She says that straight white men should take responsibility for the actions of their forefathers. I am on her side in this. There is a difference between blame and responsibilty. | ||
| #4 - **dubh used "*roll picture*"** **dubh rolled image ** … | 05/21/2015 on Random Funny Stuff | 0 |
| #30 - **dubh used "*roll picture*"** **dubh rolled image ** That… | 05/21/2015 on I made a thing! | +5 |
| #43 - Well played, evulchibi. Well played. | 05/21/2015 on FJ choice 2 | +1 |
| #38 - Thank based God Demo's back. | 05/20/2015 on kawaii tegu | 0 |
| #74 - Disco milf cracks me up in this one. | 05/20/2015 on silly kids and their mangos | 0 |
| #72 - >implying Markiplier isn't the hero the internet deserves [+] (3 new replies) | 05/20/2015 on Fullmetal Alchemist Comp | +5 |
 Maes threw a push dagger with enough force to pierce Lust's skull right between the eyes (which can stop a 9mm). Nobody's as badass as a man who has that much skill and sacrifices his life to warn everybody else of the danger. Not to mention how he figured out the truth before anybody else did. | ||
| #35 - You said it, ubercookieboy. | 05/19/2015 on United Kingdom Privilege | 0 |
Anonymous comments allowed.
6 comments displayed.
#2
-
shietposter (05/06/2015) [-]
One time I tried to make a home-made flesh light. I ended up making a huge mess everywhere. I had to take five showers to get the smell off.
