drumandbass
Rank #27294 on Comments
Online
Send mail to drumandbass Block drumandbass Invite drumandbass to be your friend | Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Gender: | male |
| Date Signed Up: | 8/21/2014 |
| Last Login: | 1/13/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Comment Ranking: | #27294 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #5080 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #2448 |
| Content Thumbs: | 134 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 2074 |
| Content Level Progress: | 0% (0/1) Level -90 Content: annoying → Level -89 Content: annoying |
| Comment Level Progress: | 79% (79/100) Level 215 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 216 Comments: Comedic Genius |
| Subscribers: | 1 |
| Content Views: | 29964 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 3 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 1440 |
| FJ Points: | 1489 |
| Favorite Tags: | DnB (39) | drum and bass (39) | State of Mind (3) | at (2) | austria (2) | B Complex (2) | Mefjus (2) | Misanthrop (2) | neurofunk (2) | sigma (2) | The Prodigy (2) |
latest user's comments
| #6 - Body language is a part of Rhetorik, so is NLP, it's both deni… | 08/07/2015 on Eyeballs | 0 |
| #186 - I literally came back from the biggest drum and bass festival … | 08/07/2015 on Can't stump the Trump | -1 |
| #184 - MATE?! [+] (3 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on Can't stump the Trump | -1 |
| #235 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] I actually don't give a fuck, I don't have to live with the consequences. | ||
| #182 - WHAT [+] (4 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on Can't stump the Trump | -1 |
| #235 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] I actually don't give a fuck, I don't have to live with the consequences. | ||
| #181 - ******* [+] (5 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on Can't stump the Trump | -1 |
| #235 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] I actually don't give a fuck, I don't have to live with the consequences. | ||
| #180 - You [+] (6 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on Can't stump the Trump | -1 |
| #235 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] I actually don't give a fuck, I don't have to live with the consequences. | ||
| #170 - Yea, was to lazy to look it up. IMO america doesn't … [+] (3 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on Can't stump the Trump | -1 |
| Well, we don't have, nor have we ever had a democracy. What we have is a republic. As for the major platforms of the parties, You're over simplifying it, but you live in another country so I'll let it slide. I agree on your points with the Swiss though. My dad has been trying to get our family's Swiss citizenship back. Our family moved here about four generations ago and he wants back in. (witch is a damn tragic story) Personally I would love to live there. Where do you live? #245 -
drumandbass (08/20/2015) [-] I live in austria. Austria's also a republic. Republic has nothing to do with being democratic or not. | ||
| #167 - Yes, WAS, like 600 years ago. It's time was due when telegraph… [+] (5 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on Can't stump the Trump | -1 |
| That was a little over 250 years ago dude. Having a direct election is a slightly better idea than having a representative election. Both, by comparison are far better than the system of lobbying and money changing we use now. When there is a direct election you tend to see a lot of parties, witch is great, but the eventual outcome of a true democracy is mob rule. Sweden, Finland, And Switzerland have had government changes. No form of government is perfect, and will eventually come to an end. Go back several hundred years and look at how their government worked. The transition to the government they have today may have been bloodless, or mostly bloodless, but their governments function nothing like they used to. Eventually, they'll have another drastic change. #170 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Yea, was to lazy to look it up. IMO america doesn't have democracy. The election you have are nothing more than deciding between racism and fake human right's. just plain shit from a to z. could you explain how you mean mob rule? The voting system in my country isn't riggable so i'm not sure what you mean. Meh, more minor changes like opening times in voting booth's. If you ask me the only country in the whole world who does it right is switzerland. Their government asks people what they want, if they have a controverse idead they question the country per votes and actually listens to them. This is democracy, no other country will EVER come a government this based. They truly represent their country. They don't rule it. It's a fucking pitty i don't live there... Well, we don't have, nor have we ever had a democracy. What we have is a republic. As for the major platforms of the parties, You're over simplifying it, but you live in another country so I'll let it slide. I agree on your points with the Swiss though. My dad has been trying to get our family's Swiss citizenship back. Our family moved here about four generations ago and he wants back in. (witch is a damn tragic story) Personally I would love to live there. Where do you live? #245 -
drumandbass (08/20/2015) [-] I live in austria. Austria's also a republic. Republic has nothing to do with being democratic or not. | ||
| #165 - Well, you see how that worked out for them... direct vote… [+] (7 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on Can't stump the Trump | -1 |
| There WAS a good reason to use a representative vote. The US is huge. Back in the day the people were too spread out to actually hold a direct vote. Technology wouldn't allow people to make informed decisions about politicians. So, they would get together and say, yeah, Greg is a good guy, he knows what kind of people I like, so we should pay him to go to where the rest of the politicians are and make an informed decision. I trust Greg. That worked a couple hundred years ago, problem is, now we have the technology to have a direct vote. But there's also a problem with a direct vote. The majority always wins. Doesn't matter if they're fucking insane, they always, always win. All you need is for the majority to decide the minority need to be slaves, and then the killing begins. Every form of government ever tried has failed. This one will fail. Yours will fail. All of the ones in the future will meet with the same timely end. And in a way, that's comforting, and terrifying all at the same time. #167 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Yes, WAS, like 600 years ago. It's time was due when telegraph's were invented. That's basically the reason for a vote or am I missing something? Finding out what the country thinks is best hm? The minority doesn't loose, a party will never get the vast majority, it's always a koalition. You don't get NSDAP, you get NSDAP AND Communism Party in the parliament. It's also shit that you have 2 (in name two) fucking partys, in my country we have like 16. >every government has failed >sweden/finn's/NL/Switz begs to differ. That was a little over 250 years ago dude. Having a direct election is a slightly better idea than having a representative election. Both, by comparison are far better than the system of lobbying and money changing we use now. When there is a direct election you tend to see a lot of parties, witch is great, but the eventual outcome of a true democracy is mob rule. Sweden, Finland, And Switzerland have had government changes. No form of government is perfect, and will eventually come to an end. Go back several hundred years and look at how their government worked. The transition to the government they have today may have been bloodless, or mostly bloodless, but their governments function nothing like they used to. Eventually, they'll have another drastic change. #170 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Yea, was to lazy to look it up. IMO america doesn't have democracy. The election you have are nothing more than deciding between racism and fake human right's. just plain shit from a to z. could you explain how you mean mob rule? The voting system in my country isn't riggable so i'm not sure what you mean. Meh, more minor changes like opening times in voting booth's. If you ask me the only country in the whole world who does it right is switzerland. Their government asks people what they want, if they have a controverse idead they question the country per votes and actually listens to them. This is democracy, no other country will EVER come a government this based. They truly represent their country. They don't rule it. It's a fucking pitty i don't live there... Well, we don't have, nor have we ever had a democracy. What we have is a republic. As for the major platforms of the parties, You're over simplifying it, but you live in another country so I'll let it slide. I agree on your points with the Swiss though. My dad has been trying to get our family's Swiss citizenship back. Our family moved here about four generations ago and he wants back in. (witch is a damn tragic story) Personally I would love to live there. Where do you live? #245 -
drumandbass (08/20/2015) [-] I live in austria. Austria's also a republic. Republic has nothing to do with being democratic or not. | ||
| #162 - I know how it works. It's ******* stupid in america, yo… [+] (9 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on Can't stump the Trump | -1 |
| The Romans did it first. When the people found out they could vote themselves extravagant gifts from the public treasury it was basically over. No one figured it out for several hundred years, but that was the beginning of the end. We managed to do the same thing, in a fifth of the time. Go US. #165 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Well, you see how that worked out for them... direct vote is democraty, passive vote is shit since the elected senators can always say FUCK YOU PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR ME I CHANGE MY FUCKING VOTE. and that's basically why america will destroy itself in the next 50 years There WAS a good reason to use a representative vote. The US is huge. Back in the day the people were too spread out to actually hold a direct vote. Technology wouldn't allow people to make informed decisions about politicians. So, they would get together and say, yeah, Greg is a good guy, he knows what kind of people I like, so we should pay him to go to where the rest of the politicians are and make an informed decision. I trust Greg. That worked a couple hundred years ago, problem is, now we have the technology to have a direct vote. But there's also a problem with a direct vote. The majority always wins. Doesn't matter if they're fucking insane, they always, always win. All you need is for the majority to decide the minority need to be slaves, and then the killing begins. Every form of government ever tried has failed. This one will fail. Yours will fail. All of the ones in the future will meet with the same timely end. And in a way, that's comforting, and terrifying all at the same time. #167 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Yes, WAS, like 600 years ago. It's time was due when telegraph's were invented. That's basically the reason for a vote or am I missing something? Finding out what the country thinks is best hm? The minority doesn't loose, a party will never get the vast majority, it's always a koalition. You don't get NSDAP, you get NSDAP AND Communism Party in the parliament. It's also shit that you have 2 (in name two) fucking partys, in my country we have like 16. >every government has failed >sweden/finn's/NL/Switz begs to differ. That was a little over 250 years ago dude. Having a direct election is a slightly better idea than having a representative election. Both, by comparison are far better than the system of lobbying and money changing we use now. When there is a direct election you tend to see a lot of parties, witch is great, but the eventual outcome of a true democracy is mob rule. Sweden, Finland, And Switzerland have had government changes. No form of government is perfect, and will eventually come to an end. Go back several hundred years and look at how their government worked. The transition to the government they have today may have been bloodless, or mostly bloodless, but their governments function nothing like they used to. Eventually, they'll have another drastic change. #170 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Yea, was to lazy to look it up. IMO america doesn't have democracy. The election you have are nothing more than deciding between racism and fake human right's. just plain shit from a to z. could you explain how you mean mob rule? The voting system in my country isn't riggable so i'm not sure what you mean. Meh, more minor changes like opening times in voting booth's. If you ask me the only country in the whole world who does it right is switzerland. Their government asks people what they want, if they have a controverse idead they question the country per votes and actually listens to them. This is democracy, no other country will EVER come a government this based. They truly represent their country. They don't rule it. It's a fucking pitty i don't live there... Well, we don't have, nor have we ever had a democracy. What we have is a republic. As for the major platforms of the parties, You're over simplifying it, but you live in another country so I'll let it slide. I agree on your points with the Swiss though. My dad has been trying to get our family's Swiss citizenship back. Our family moved here about four generations ago and he wants back in. (witch is a damn tragic story) Personally I would love to live there. Where do you live? #245 -
drumandbass (08/20/2015) [-] I live in austria. Austria's also a republic. Republic has nothing to do with being democratic or not. | ||
| #160 - I don't count the votes from retards, therefore he has 2% [+] (20 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on Can't stump the Trump | -2 |
| #235 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] I actually don't give a fuck, I don't have to live with the consequences. Yeah, the problem is that the rest of the real world counts votes form retards on a regular basis. How do you think we got ourselves in this deep? I can't decide if you don't know how voting works, or if you're just out of touch. #162 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] I know how it works. It's fucking stupid in america, you don't vote the president, you vote the guy who shall vote for your choice. I'm happy i don't have to live in a country run by a government who regulates itself. The Romans did it first. When the people found out they could vote themselves extravagant gifts from the public treasury it was basically over. No one figured it out for several hundred years, but that was the beginning of the end. We managed to do the same thing, in a fifth of the time. Go US. #165 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Well, you see how that worked out for them... direct vote is democraty, passive vote is shit since the elected senators can always say FUCK YOU PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR ME I CHANGE MY FUCKING VOTE. and that's basically why america will destroy itself in the next 50 years There WAS a good reason to use a representative vote. The US is huge. Back in the day the people were too spread out to actually hold a direct vote. Technology wouldn't allow people to make informed decisions about politicians. So, they would get together and say, yeah, Greg is a good guy, he knows what kind of people I like, so we should pay him to go to where the rest of the politicians are and make an informed decision. I trust Greg. That worked a couple hundred years ago, problem is, now we have the technology to have a direct vote. But there's also a problem with a direct vote. The majority always wins. Doesn't matter if they're fucking insane, they always, always win. All you need is for the majority to decide the minority need to be slaves, and then the killing begins. Every form of government ever tried has failed. This one will fail. Yours will fail. All of the ones in the future will meet with the same timely end. And in a way, that's comforting, and terrifying all at the same time. #167 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Yes, WAS, like 600 years ago. It's time was due when telegraph's were invented. That's basically the reason for a vote or am I missing something? Finding out what the country thinks is best hm? The minority doesn't loose, a party will never get the vast majority, it's always a koalition. You don't get NSDAP, you get NSDAP AND Communism Party in the parliament. It's also shit that you have 2 (in name two) fucking partys, in my country we have like 16. >every government has failed >sweden/finn's/NL/Switz begs to differ. That was a little over 250 years ago dude. Having a direct election is a slightly better idea than having a representative election. Both, by comparison are far better than the system of lobbying and money changing we use now. When there is a direct election you tend to see a lot of parties, witch is great, but the eventual outcome of a true democracy is mob rule. Sweden, Finland, And Switzerland have had government changes. No form of government is perfect, and will eventually come to an end. Go back several hundred years and look at how their government worked. The transition to the government they have today may have been bloodless, or mostly bloodless, but their governments function nothing like they used to. Eventually, they'll have another drastic change. #170 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Yea, was to lazy to look it up. IMO america doesn't have democracy. The election you have are nothing more than deciding between racism and fake human right's. just plain shit from a to z. could you explain how you mean mob rule? The voting system in my country isn't riggable so i'm not sure what you mean. Meh, more minor changes like opening times in voting booth's. If you ask me the only country in the whole world who does it right is switzerland. Their government asks people what they want, if they have a controverse idead they question the country per votes and actually listens to them. This is democracy, no other country will EVER come a government this based. They truly represent their country. They don't rule it. It's a fucking pitty i don't live there... Well, we don't have, nor have we ever had a democracy. What we have is a republic. As for the major platforms of the parties, You're over simplifying it, but you live in another country so I'll let it slide. I agree on your points with the Swiss though. My dad has been trying to get our family's Swiss citizenship back. Our family moved here about four generations ago and he wants back in. (witch is a damn tragic story) Personally I would love to live there. Where do you live? #245 -
drumandbass (08/20/2015) [-] I live in austria. Austria's also a republic. Republic has nothing to do with being democratic or not. | ||
| #4 - This is actually a proofen fact. Mimic and body gesture m… [+] (2 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on Eyeballs | +19 |
| In your link, under "scientific criticism" it says: "Surveys in the academic community have shown NLP to be widely discredited among scientists." I used to be into nlp but i did a course while i was at uni about scepticism, turns out nlp doesn't have any evidence (apart from anecdotal evidence) to support the fundamental claims, and it's not testable. It's more valuable to learn about body language, I can read body language and as a result I can tell when someone has something to hide, like in poker or any other party game. They don't exactly have a "tell" but there is a change in behaviour in one way or another, a release of pent up tension in some way like: preening, scratching, fiddling, subtle nervousness, touching the face, sudden quietness, tapping their foot. If there's tension your body finds a way to show it. It's not the behaviour that's important, it's the increase in changes that gives them away. A lie can be covered though if you completely ignore the truth and completely believe the lie as if it is reality. #6 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Body language is a part of Rhetorik, so is NLP, it's both deniable due to the fact that people actually can control their body if they put some effort into it. In my life i often used knowledge of both, body language and NLP. Both are one of my most valuable assets. If a client has doubt's and doesn't want to ask some questions you can detect that and lead the conversation into the direction of your choice. The eye movement though is proofen, if the person doesn't concentrate on what it says they instinctively look in these directions. Just think about a small child, when it lies it WILL look to their left up. Alltogether I'd say you can't categorize the human language because it's just too individual but NLP and Body Language are nice guides for basic human understanding. About the lying example you gave.... when you want to lie effectively, the easiest way is to tap a rythm and fully concentrate on it, your body won't react to you lies. sure it seems suspicious if you knock some beats while getting questioned but they can't arrest you for that | ||
| #6 - Pizza is literally a chemical piece of **** nowadays. (… [+] (2 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on LSD | +1 |
| #13 -
anon (08/07/2015) [-] >You're stupid as shit >"you loose it because on acid your brain is hyperconnectivity, all brainparts communicate whit each other" You are both unbelievably stupid, evidently. #22 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Sorry used the wrong word. The images are a representation of the interconnectivity of the brain on placebo and LSD. Other side effects: Increased blood pressure, heart rate, and body temperature Dizziness and sleeplessness Loss of appetite, dry mouth,and sweating Numbness, weakness, and tremors Impulsiveness and rapid emotional shifts that can range from fear to euphoria, with transitions so rapid that the user may seem to experience several emotions simultaneously | ||
| #8 - I'm a transfish, i only breath water. respect my retardeness! … [+] (5 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on GenderFluid | +89 |
| Really. "Oh, I'm not against you, I just think you're retarded and totally full of shit." #121 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] I'm talking about basic genetics, it's a fact that a transgender men>women will never be able to get pregnant. I didn't say that the human society doesn't see them as women/men. I don't see a difference between a normal girl and a transgender girl, in fact i worked with one for several years. she was an asshole but still never had a problem with her. So what if someone can get pregnant. I'm not denying biology... | ||
| #786 - **drumandbass used "*roll picture*"** **drumandbass rolled … | 08/07/2015 on Roll for your superpower | 0 |
| #136 - You actually think he is popular? kek [+] (22 new replies) | 08/07/2015 on Can't stump the Trump | +1 |
| Dude, he's pulling 30% of the republican poles minimum, regardless of who your source is. #235 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] I actually don't give a fuck, I don't have to live with the consequences. Yeah, the problem is that the rest of the real world counts votes form retards on a regular basis. How do you think we got ourselves in this deep? I can't decide if you don't know how voting works, or if you're just out of touch. #162 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] I know how it works. It's fucking stupid in america, you don't vote the president, you vote the guy who shall vote for your choice. I'm happy i don't have to live in a country run by a government who regulates itself. The Romans did it first. When the people found out they could vote themselves extravagant gifts from the public treasury it was basically over. No one figured it out for several hundred years, but that was the beginning of the end. We managed to do the same thing, in a fifth of the time. Go US. #165 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Well, you see how that worked out for them... direct vote is democraty, passive vote is shit since the elected senators can always say FUCK YOU PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR ME I CHANGE MY FUCKING VOTE. and that's basically why america will destroy itself in the next 50 years There WAS a good reason to use a representative vote. The US is huge. Back in the day the people were too spread out to actually hold a direct vote. Technology wouldn't allow people to make informed decisions about politicians. So, they would get together and say, yeah, Greg is a good guy, he knows what kind of people I like, so we should pay him to go to where the rest of the politicians are and make an informed decision. I trust Greg. That worked a couple hundred years ago, problem is, now we have the technology to have a direct vote. But there's also a problem with a direct vote. The majority always wins. Doesn't matter if they're fucking insane, they always, always win. All you need is for the majority to decide the minority need to be slaves, and then the killing begins. Every form of government ever tried has failed. This one will fail. Yours will fail. All of the ones in the future will meet with the same timely end. And in a way, that's comforting, and terrifying all at the same time. #167 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Yes, WAS, like 600 years ago. It's time was due when telegraph's were invented. That's basically the reason for a vote or am I missing something? Finding out what the country thinks is best hm? The minority doesn't loose, a party will never get the vast majority, it's always a koalition. You don't get NSDAP, you get NSDAP AND Communism Party in the parliament. It's also shit that you have 2 (in name two) fucking partys, in my country we have like 16. >every government has failed >sweden/finn's/NL/Switz begs to differ. That was a little over 250 years ago dude. Having a direct election is a slightly better idea than having a representative election. Both, by comparison are far better than the system of lobbying and money changing we use now. When there is a direct election you tend to see a lot of parties, witch is great, but the eventual outcome of a true democracy is mob rule. Sweden, Finland, And Switzerland have had government changes. No form of government is perfect, and will eventually come to an end. Go back several hundred years and look at how their government worked. The transition to the government they have today may have been bloodless, or mostly bloodless, but their governments function nothing like they used to. Eventually, they'll have another drastic change. #170 -
drumandbass (08/07/2015) [-] Yea, was to lazy to look it up. IMO america doesn't have democracy. The election you have are nothing more than deciding between racism and fake human right's. just plain shit from a to z. could you explain how you mean mob rule? The voting system in my country isn't riggable so i'm not sure what you mean. Meh, more minor changes like opening times in voting booth's. If you ask me the only country in the whole world who does it right is switzerland. Their government asks people what they want, if they have a controverse idead they question the country per votes and actually listens to them. This is democracy, no other country will EVER come a government this based. They truly represent their country. They don't rule it. It's a fucking pitty i don't live there... Well, we don't have, nor have we ever had a democracy. What we have is a republic. As for the major platforms of the parties, You're over simplifying it, but you live in another country so I'll let it slide. I agree on your points with the Swiss though. My dad has been trying to get our family's Swiss citizenship back. Our family moved here about four generations ago and he wants back in. (witch is a damn tragic story) Personally I would love to live there. Where do you live? #245 -
drumandbass (08/20/2015) [-] I live in austria. Austria's also a republic. Republic has nothing to do with being democratic or not. | ||
| #40 - nuclear power isn't unsafe, the process for harvesting the pow… | 08/06/2015 on Nuclear is best power | 0 |
| #33 - can't argue with that ^^ I believe if GoT would take… [+] (1 new reply) | 08/06/2015 on Talk shows | 0 |
| #34 -
shoezace (08/06/2015) [-] thats a good and bad thing, lacking details leaves you open to further development later on but too few and youre leaving them with nothing to go on for something possibly important, GoT is still good theyve managed so far but more time and a looser schedule would do well, only problem is their actors are gaining fame and wanted in movies and other shows, emilia clarke was in genisys, natalie dormer had a movie recently, im pretty sure kit harrington has some rumours too | ||
| #1451 - awww **** I don't wanna be the biggest faggot on earth... | 08/06/2015 on roll for your new job | 0 |
| #1448 - **drumandbass used "*roll picture*"** **drumandbass rolled … [+] (1 new reply) | 08/06/2015 on roll for your new job | 0 |
| | ||
| #31 - yea, it gave the character more emotional depth and got the mo… [+] (3 new replies) | 08/06/2015 on Talk shows | 0 |
| #33 -
drumandbass (08/06/2015) [-] can't argue with that ^^ I believe if GoT would take more time per episode, like they did in S1-S2, they could even be better than they are now, sadly the network is pressuring them with a fucking tight schedule and they seem to get lazier on details because of it. :< #34 -
shoezace (08/06/2015) [-] thats a good and bad thing, lacking details leaves you open to further development later on but too few and youre leaving them with nothing to go on for something possibly important, GoT is still good theyve managed so far but more time and a looser schedule would do well, only problem is their actors are gaining fame and wanted in movies and other shows, emilia clarke was in genisys, natalie dormer had a movie recently, im pretty sure kit harrington has some rumours too | ||
| #29 - *question | 08/06/2015 on Talk shows | 0 |
| #28 - yea they used it in an episode... don't know if e get your ans… [+] (6 new replies) | 08/06/2015 on Talk shows | 0 |
| #31 -
drumandbass (08/06/2015) [-] yea, it gave the character more emotional depth and got the mood of the episode really sad #33 -
drumandbass (08/06/2015) [-] can't argue with that ^^ I believe if GoT would take more time per episode, like they did in S1-S2, they could even be better than they are now, sadly the network is pressuring them with a fucking tight schedule and they seem to get lazier on details because of it. :< #34 -
shoezace (08/06/2015) [-] thats a good and bad thing, lacking details leaves you open to further development later on but too few and youre leaving them with nothing to go on for something possibly important, GoT is still good theyve managed so far but more time and a looser schedule would do well, only problem is their actors are gaining fame and wanted in movies and other shows, emilia clarke was in genisys, natalie dormer had a movie recently, im pretty sure kit harrington has some rumours too | ||
| #26 - Not really GoT has the tightest schedule for every scene, they… [+] (8 new replies) | 08/06/2015 on Talk shows | 0 |
| #28 -
drumandbass (08/06/2015) [-] yea they used it in an episode... don't know if e get your answer right ^^ #31 -
drumandbass (08/06/2015) [-] yea, it gave the character more emotional depth and got the mood of the episode really sad #33 -
drumandbass (08/06/2015) [-] can't argue with that ^^ I believe if GoT would take more time per episode, like they did in S1-S2, they could even be better than they are now, sadly the network is pressuring them with a fucking tight schedule and they seem to get lazier on details because of it. :< #34 -
shoezace (08/06/2015) [-] thats a good and bad thing, lacking details leaves you open to further development later on but too few and youre leaving them with nothing to go on for something possibly important, GoT is still good theyve managed so far but more time and a looser schedule would do well, only problem is their actors are gaining fame and wanted in movies and other shows, emilia clarke was in genisys, natalie dormer had a movie recently, im pretty sure kit harrington has some rumours too | ||
| #34 - it's called glass ass men you uneducated **** . | 08/06/2015 on Tail breaking | -6 |
Anonymous comments allowed.
10 comments displayed.
you ever get down on any Sasha or Digweed?
That's my **** from my youth kid.
And *********** Bad Boy Bill.
That's my **** from my youth kid.
And *********** Bad Boy Bill.
#8 to #6
-
drumandbass ONLINE (01/05/2015) [-]
what shall I say except: www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmCNvUyXNGE
they still throw one banger after another +-+
they still throw one banger after another +-+

