Level 115 Comments: Funny Junkie
OfflineSend mail to drugsnothugs Block drugsnothugs Invite drugsnothugs to be your friend
|Last status update:|| |
|Date Signed Up:||6/12/2013|
|FunnyJunk Career Stats|
|Content Thumbs:||27 total, 32 , 5|
|Comment Thumbs:||196 total, 222 , 26|
|Content Level Progress:|| 47.45% (28/59) |
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
|Comment Level Progress:|| 40% (2/5) |
Level 115 Comments: Funny Junkie → Level 116 Comments: Funny Junkie
|Times Content Favorited:||1 times|
|Total Comments Made:||95|
latest user's comments
|#142 - Ok, mate. You keep being all judgmental and we'll just yiff in…||03/11/2016 on Species||-2|
|#64 - I have no idea about anything you said but it looks like you m… [+] (2 new replies)||02/12/2016 on Holy Water||+1|
|#44 - This is scary. As a colourblind person, I've personally run a …||01/19/2016 on Description||0|
|#118 - That would actually be a dank ******* film.||01/09/2016 on New movie||0|
|#97 - Also, it's pretty great. It's a bit tedious at times but getti…||12/30/2015 on Badass||+1|
|#96 - Since I use a third-party payroll company, they were involved …||12/30/2015 on Badass||+1|
|#92 - Depending on his country/state/what have you, at least here if… [+] (3 new replies)||12/30/2015 on Badass||+1|
#95 - sciencexplain (12/30/2015) [-]
So would you consider that an error on payroll behalf, or pin the issue directly on the person who didn't check out? Assuming they did it knowingly, that might not be such a mistake for an accountant to make but simply just a fraudulent attempt to earn more than they've legally worked for. Also, how is accountancy? I hear it's got great pay, and I've always had a love for maths.
#96 - drugsnothugs (12/30/2015) [-]
Since I use a third-party payroll company, they were involved in the settlement and I switched post-hand. You have to consider all sides. Were time cards marked correctly. Was the payroll paying attention when making checks. Investigations have to happen but generally this type of issue is handled internally, since it's all clerical error.
|#105 - Oh, neat.||12/17/2015 on When you realize you're...||+1|
|#100 - [it actually stands for Computer Generated Imagery] [+] (3 new replies)||12/17/2015 on When you realize you're...||+2|
#106 - fatminion (12/17/2015) [-]
here he uses both terms: www.youtube.com/watch?v=bL6hp8BKB24
it just feels strange for me to use CGI for CG when CGI already is an acronym I was using daily and CG had never been used. It's be like if LOL didn't mean "laughing out loud" anymore, but instead peopled used it for "Leage of Legends" or something. Or if "OC" suddenly meant "original content" instead of "Orange County".
#103 - fatminion (12/17/2015) [-]
of course it does, because someone came along and changed the meaning a decade or so ago. When I was growing up, CGI was "Common Gateway Interface" (web technology related) and CG was "computer graphics". Watch any behind-the-scenes deal from the '90s or early 2000s and the graphic people say "CG". So when they started saying "CGI" I was like "what the fuck does Perl programming have to do with computer graphics? Oh, you think it means 'computer-generated imagery'? Well fuck you!"
|#140 - You did well||11/24/2015 on Show me your handwriting||+2|