Does the reason matter or does the content matter? IF a talking fish head on the wall makes a good point it makes a good point if the most intelligent person in the world makes a bad point they have made a bad point. The speaker of the argument does not affect its verisimilitude. I didn't comment for my own aggrandizement btw I just spoke my mind and have defended my point.

I don't care how I sound I am just trying to convey and argument, its message is unaffected by the structure of the language. Also I use big words because small words get boring why use small many times when i can use words like minuscule and microscopic to describe the same thing.

I don't give two shits about this argument but, aside from verisimilitude and aggrandizement, I don't see any other 'big words'...
Step your game up, anon and those who thumbed him.

I do use them regularly its just i start with smaller words and build up to larger words as I exhaust the use of the smaller ones Also the bitching about the language is being pedantic and shallow

Said the pot to the kettle

Aside from pompous, which is the common word for colossal asshat. The fuck are you talking about?

Definitely. Personally I wasn't a big fan of highmaul mainly cause of the last boss wipe on last phase and then you're stuck doing the first 10 mins of the fight again to get to progress and it's funny you mention xhul, as he's the boss we're currently progressing on in mythic hfc.

I like the thought behind having several difficulties, but at the same time the bosses themselves lose a lot of meaning in my opinion. And I'm not a big fan of just cutting boss mechanics and placing them in heroic/normal, allthough I hardly have a better alternative.

You have to consider that the playerbase they have now isn't the same they had back then. People have gotten way older, have more responsibilities and whatnot. The highschoolers in TBC have jobs and/or higher education to take care of now, and if they aren't able to experience the game without full commitment, they're simply going to quit. And even the kids nowadays don't play WoW because they have so many other games right in front of them, and some that do still need an access point because they aren't as prepared and experienced as everybody else. And this might be a sad truth, but the casual audience is the biggest, and Blizzard have to adapt to that if they want the game to bring good revenue. Remember that profit is the number one priority in any business, so they're going for the route that gets the most players to stay.

that's a good point. I'd be fine with keeping LFR as an easy way to get back into current content allthough that is hardly the case atm but I do kinda miss doing old raids to "catch up". I personally don't enjoy killing the same boss three times, where each time it's a bit harder

Definitely. Personally I wasn't a big fan of highmaul mainly cause of the last boss wipe on last phase and then you're stuck doing the first 10 mins of the fight again to get to progress and it's funny you mention xhul, as he's the boss we're currently progressing on in mythic hfc.

I like the thought behind having several difficulties, but at the same time the bosses themselves lose a lot of meaning in my opinion. And I'm not a big fan of just cutting boss mechanics and placing them in heroic/normal, allthough I hardly have a better alternative.

It worked till early wrath, I don't see how it shouldn't work.

You have to consider that the playerbase they have now isn't the same they had back then. People have gotten way older, have more responsibilities and whatnot. The highschoolers in TBC have jobs and/or higher education to take care of now, and if they aren't able to experience the game without full commitment, they're simply going to quit. And even the kids nowadays don't play WoW because they have so many other games right in front of them, and some that do still need an access point because they aren't as prepared and experienced as everybody else. And this might be a sad truth, but the casual audience is the biggest, and Blizzard have to adapt to that if they want the game to bring good revenue. Remember that profit is the number one priority in any business, so they're going for the route that gets the most players to stay.

that's a good point. I'd be fine with keeping LFR as an easy way to get back into current content allthough that is hardly the case atm but I do kinda miss doing old raids to "catch up". I personally don't enjoy killing the same boss three times, where each time it's a bit harder

Definitely. Personally I wasn't a big fan of highmaul mainly cause of the last boss wipe on last phase and then you're stuck doing the first 10 mins of the fight again to get to progress and it's funny you mention xhul, as he's the boss we're currently progressing on in mythic hfc.

I like the thought behind having several difficulties, but at the same time the bosses themselves lose a lot of meaning in my opinion. And I'm not a big fan of just cutting boss mechanics and placing them in heroic/normal, allthough I hardly have a better alternative.

well i main a druid on wow and for pvp im usually around 2k (for rbgs atleast) so i wouldn't say im high. i play horde and alliance, i have friends on horde with whom i raid and do pvp with, and then on alliance i only pvp. most of the players i know and play with on alliance are sticking alliance, and a couple horde friends are switching. because for horde currently you have the blood elf racial yes, but if you want to seriously pvp at the moment, you mostly run a undead for the racials. now in legion the human racial only will negate stuns, but in my eyes that is still more effective than fears and the like, because if you are running with good people fears don't mean anything. and the silence for blood elves is 2 seconds, with a 1.5 minut cd, which in a 10 minute arena can get a couple uses, but seeing as you have to run next to them to use it, many ranged classes are put at a disadvantage if they have to get near the enemy melee, and the healers can see it coming(because a ranged person only charges the healer to cc in most cases). so all in all, im going to be sticking alliance for pvp and horde for pve, and i am sorry for the wall of text, but those are some reasons and examples to why i think pvp is still going to be tipped towards the alliance.

Good job. Youre exatly what we needed in our lives, thank you for your service.

I don't dislike evilhomer or anything, but he constantly just reposts the top comment if the content was a repost as well. I thought it was widely known by now.

Frezia doesn't even know how to tell time so what you think about planning

well i main a druid on wow and for pvp im usually around 2k (for rbgs atleast) so i wouldn't say im high. i play horde and alliance, i have friends on horde with whom i raid and do pvp with, and then on alliance i only pvp. most of the players i know and play with on alliance are sticking alliance, and a couple horde friends are switching. because for horde currently you have the blood elf racial yes, but if you want to seriously pvp at the moment, you mostly run a undead for the racials. now in legion the human racial only will negate stuns, but in my eyes that is still more effective than fears and the like, because if you are running with good people fears don't mean anything. and the silence for blood elves is 2 seconds, with a 1.5 minut cd, which in a 10 minute arena can get a couple uses, but seeing as you have to run next to them to use it, many ranged classes are put at a disadvantage if they have to get near the enemy melee, and the healers can see it coming(because a ranged person only charges the healer to cc in most cases). so all in all, im going to be sticking alliance for pvp and horde for pve, and i am sorry for the wall of text, but those are some reasons and examples to why i think pvp is still going to be tipped towards the alliance.

in my opinion, the "more difficulties to progress through" is just really boring to me. I'd rather have the bosses themselves being hard, and only one difficulty. Progressing on the same boss only "this time it's a bit harder lol" is demotivating.

It worked till early wrath, I don't see how it shouldn't work.

You have to consider that the playerbase they have now isn't the same they had back then. People have gotten way older, have more responsibilities and whatnot. The highschoolers in TBC have jobs and/or higher education to take care of now, and if they aren't able to experience the game without full commitment, they're simply going to quit. And even the kids nowadays don't play WoW because they have so many other games right in front of them, and some that do still need an access point because they aren't as prepared and experienced as everybody else. And this might be a sad truth, but the casual audience is the biggest, and Blizzard have to adapt to that if they want the game to bring good revenue. Remember that profit is the number one priority in any business, so they're going for the route that gets the most players to stay.

that's a good point. I'd be fine with keeping LFR as an easy way to get back into current content allthough that is hardly the case atm but I do kinda miss doing old raids to "catch up". I personally don't enjoy killing the same boss three times, where each time it's a bit harder

Definitely. Personally I wasn't a big fan of highmaul mainly cause of the last boss wipe on last phase and then you're stuck doing the first 10 mins of the fight again to get to progress and it's funny you mention xhul, as he's the boss we're currently progressing on in mythic hfc.

I like the thought behind having several difficulties, but at the same time the bosses themselves lose a lot of meaning in my opinion. And I'm not a big fan of just cutting boss mechanics and placing them in heroic/normal, allthough I hardly have a better alternative.