Upload
YouTube Videos Funny Pictures Funny GIFs Funny Text Funny Movies
Login or register
  • Your Posts
  • Login or register
    Login / Create Account
    Create Account
    Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
     
    Click to Create Account
    Login to FJ
    reset password
    Click to Login
    Log in/Sign with Facebook.
    Log in/Sign up with Gmail.
  • Create Channel 4chan Tumblr-Content vidyagaems politics WholesomeMemes animemanga FJNN aww oc-comic-makers starwars CartoonGoodness cat marvel warhammer40k furry tf2 OneForAll simpsons cat-channel UnlimitFateWorks dank-webms pokemon zootopia cats samurai-jack art bertstrips CopyPastaComics PrimitiveTech dungeons-n-drags gwen stevenuniverse Daily-Jokes MemeComps freestuff overwatch-time dragonballz cringe-channel dccomics Conspiracytime humanity-f-yeah fallout
    Home
    Reset viewedpages
    Sort: ThumbsTrending
      New!2 Kinds of Gamers2 Kinds of Gamers
      502
      2 hrs ago
      New!boiling rightful Octopusboiling rightful Octopus
      471
      3 hrs ago
      New!i like spicy foodi like spicy food
      409
      3 hrs ago
      New!arrogant equal obnoxious Sealarrogant equal obnoxious Seal
      383
      2 hrs ago
      New!BushBush
      520
      3 hrs ago
      New!Friendly reminderFriendly reminder
      450
      3 hrs ago
      Anon has a loving fatherAnon has a loving father
      616
      4 hrs ago
      New!Have I got a story for youHave I got a story for you
      398
      3 hrs ago
      New!wise low Magpiewise low Magpie
      308
      2 hrs ago
      New!ImpressImpress
      396
      3 hrs ago
      Yeah lay off himYeah lay off him
      1587
      9 hrs ago
      New!Last JediLast Jedi
      389
      3 hrs ago
      New!AAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!AAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!
      178
      2 hrs ago
      GodGod
      695
      6 hrs ago
      tawdry unkempt magenta Leopardtawdry unkempt magenta Leopard
      747
      6 hrs ago
      tiny short cruel Humantiny short cruel Human
      376
      4 hrs ago
      New!Kids Are ScaryKids Are Scary
      213
      2 hrs ago
      New!African American Twitter is something else.African American Twitter is something else.
      124
      1 hr ago
      Wisdom from LucasWisdom from Lucas
      617
      6 hrs ago
      New!>Implying>Implying
      178
      2 hrs ago
      New!My steaks were madeMy steaks were made
      296
      3 hrs ago
      New!Anon is ArabAnon is Arab
      260
      2 hrs ago
      No one cared who I was until I put on the maskNo one cared who I was until I put on the mask
      325
      4 hrs ago
      New!Cock and a -----Cock and a -----
      232
      3 hrs ago
      New!Anon can't watch animeAnon can't watch anime
      279
      3 hrs ago
      New!RemoveRemove
      113
      1 hr ago
      The struggle is realThe struggle is real
      615
      7 hrs ago
      Basil's subs are faultyBasil's subs are faulty
      437
      5 hrs ago
      Batman debateBatman debate
      440
      5 hrs ago
      brittlebrittle
      466
      5 hrs ago
    Newest Uploads
      Run!Run!
      0
      20 snds ago
      We Wuz KangsWe Wuz Kangs
      0
      34 snds ago
      catcat
      3
      4 mns ago
      white early nosy Pigwhite early nosy Pig
      2
      6 mns ago
      Uniform switchUniform switch
      2
      6 mns ago
      i made arti made art
      4
      6 mns ago
      Stop this mad ladStop this mad lad
      1
      7 mns ago
      LyricsLyrics
      3
      8 mns ago
      OCOC
      6
      19 mns ago
      Let's fund "Doro".Let's fund "Doro".
      7
      23 mns ago
    User Rankings Funny Pictures Videos / MP4s HD Gifs/Soundless MP4 Animated GIFs YouTube Videos Text Posts
    About us
    • Advertise on FJ
    • Copyright/DMCA Removal
    • Report Abuse/Harassment
    • Report Spam
    • Contact Us
    • Unsubscribe from newsletter

    dontcutmyusernameo

    Rank #4239 on Content
    no avatar
    Level 201 Comments: Comedic Genius
    Offline
    Send mail to dontcutmyusernameo Block dontcutmyusernameo Unblock dontcutmyusernameo Invite dontcutmyusernameo to be your friend
    Last status update:
    -
    Date Signed Up:12/29/2011
    Last Login:4/18/2018
    Stats
    Content Ranking:#4239
    Comment Ranking:#15900
    Highest Content Rank:#4206
    Highest Comment Rank:#2581
    Content Thumbs: 65 total,  181 ,  116
    Comment Thumbs: 1301 total,  1528 ,  227
    Content Level Progress: 60% (3/5)
    Level 2 Content: New Here → Level 3 Content: New Here
    Comment Level Progress: 10% (1/10)
    Level 201 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 202 Comments: Comedic Genius
    Subscribers:0
    Content Views:16105
    Total Comments Made:319
    FJ Points:1166
    Past names:

    What people say about dontcutmyusernameo
    • 6
    • 12
    • 22
    • 34
    • 44
    • Date
    • Thumbs
    • Views
    • Comments
    • Desc
    • Asc

    Text Posts

    • Views: 1476
      Thumbs Up 11 Thumbs Down 5 Total: +6
      Comments: 18
      Favorites: 0
      Uploaded: 04/15/18
      I made music I made music
    • 10
    • 20
    • 30
    • 40
    • 50
    • Date
    • Thumbs
    • Views
    • Comments
    • Desc
    • Asc

    user favorites

    • havent we all havent we all
    • SMASHING SMASHING
    • I am old indeed. I am old indeed.
    • Chinese Racist Chinese Racist
    • Rage faces combined. Rage faces combined.
    • Red Red
    • let's play jenga! let's play jenga!
    • The Good ol' Days The Good ol' Days
    • question. . . question. . .
    • alternate version alternate version
    First23453575LastNext
    [ 1060 Total ]

    latest user's comments

    #15 - Yeah, I only recorded one, but I made two and panned them left…  [+] (2 replies) 04/15/2018 on I made music +1
    #17 - fatminion (04/15/2018) [-]
    **fatminion used "*roll picture*"**
    **fatminion rolled image**it's more effective to use a stereo chorus effect that is only slightly wet (meaning like only 10% is mixed with the dry signal), or really record the part twice and pan left/right.

    Whatever you do, keep experimenting and don't be afraid to try things you read about/people tell you about and also to just try whatever. Close-micing your guitar cabinet will give you a more "natural" sound, but I kinda really like the "room" sound you got going on. But it can never heard to mic up an instrument many times and instead of playing with the EQ and stuff, try just mixing in different mics to get the sound you want. Need more bass? Bring in the mic 2 feet away from the speaker. Need more definition? Bring in the close-mic. Need more hall? Bring in the room mic. And try different angles as well. You'd be surprised how much that can have an effect.

    I'm 33 and have been doing home studio recording since I was 16, and have been in multiple professional studios. My last album was recorded by a dude that used to work at Abby Road, and he's a fucking musical and acoustic genius, and he swears by mixing the mics rather than using the EQ.

    Whatever you do - keep it up! So refreshing to hear people trying to do real art in music rather than just imitate whatever happens to be popular at the time (although that's how many learn)
    #18 - fatminion (04/15/2018) [-]
    **fatminion used "*roll picture*"**
    **fatminion rolled image**about the stereo thing - the reason for using a choruser or actually recording twice is this: if you use the same exact signal for L/R, your head won't really tell the difference and it ends up sounding pretty much like it's still in the middle. A choruser effect will variate the original signal by essentially producing phase-shifted copies to mimic a "chorus" of instruments performing the part, since nobody can 100% play exactly the same on two takes. The actual signals will be similar but shifted in phase (kinda complex shit you might have heard people say, but I didn't really learn about until uni). But I'm personally a huge fan of just recording the part twice. Sometimes I'll even do it with two guitars or once with the neck pickup and once with the bridge pickup. Most people won't be able to tell it was two takes, but everyone will say "it sounds fatter".

    Here's the last album I did if you're curious: open.spotify.com/album/50hAoA5KhE1MXh...
    #13 - To be honest with you I like my mix more haha  [+] (4 replies) 04/15/2018 on I made music +1
    #14 - neppynep (04/15/2018) [-]
    fair enough.
    But I really gotta question your methods since 2 tracks seem to be the exact same thing with the left and right channel switched.
    #15 - dontcutmyusernameo (04/15/2018) [-]
    Yeah, I only recorded one, but I made two and panned them left and right to get a tiny more stereo sound
    #17 - fatminion (04/15/2018) [-]
    **fatminion used "*roll picture*"**
    **fatminion rolled image**it's more effective to use a stereo chorus effect that is only slightly wet (meaning like only 10% is mixed with the dry signal), or really record the part twice and pan left/right.

    Whatever you do, keep experimenting and don't be afraid to try things you read about/people tell you about and also to just try whatever. Close-micing your guitar cabinet will give you a more "natural" sound, but I kinda really like the "room" sound you got going on. But it can never heard to mic up an instrument many times and instead of playing with the EQ and stuff, try just mixing in different mics to get the sound you want. Need more bass? Bring in the mic 2 feet away from the speaker. Need more definition? Bring in the close-mic. Need more hall? Bring in the room mic. And try different angles as well. You'd be surprised how much that can have an effect.

    I'm 33 and have been doing home studio recording since I was 16, and have been in multiple professional studios. My last album was recorded by a dude that used to work at Abby Road, and he's a fucking musical and acoustic genius, and he swears by mixing the mics rather than using the EQ.

    Whatever you do - keep it up! So refreshing to hear people trying to do real art in music rather than just imitate whatever happens to be popular at the time (although that's how many learn)
    #18 - fatminion (04/15/2018) [-]
    **fatminion used "*roll picture*"**
    **fatminion rolled image**about the stereo thing - the reason for using a choruser or actually recording twice is this: if you use the same exact signal for L/R, your head won't really tell the difference and it ends up sounding pretty much like it's still in the middle. A choruser effect will variate the original signal by essentially producing phase-shifted copies to mimic a "chorus" of instruments performing the part, since nobody can 100% play exactly the same on two takes. The actual signals will be similar but shifted in phase (kinda complex shit you might have heard people say, but I didn't really learn about until uni). But I'm personally a huge fan of just recording the part twice. Sometimes I'll even do it with two guitars or once with the neck pickup and once with the bridge pickup. Most people won't be able to tell it was two takes, but everyone will say "it sounds fatter".

    Here's the last album I did if you're curious: open.spotify.com/album/50hAoA5KhE1MXh...
    #9 - that is retarded, I'll dm you  [+] (6 replies) 04/15/2018 on I made music +1
    #10 - neppynep (04/15/2018) [-]
    Well it's a quick and dirty rough cut since I don't have a whole lot to work with but a bit of EQ work and some stereo mixing makes it sound a lot more unified than it started out as tbh.

    my.mixtape.moe/pdtrrr.mp3
    #13 - dontcutmyusernameo (04/15/2018) [-]
    To be honest with you I like my mix more haha
    #14 - neppynep (04/15/2018) [-]
    fair enough.
    But I really gotta question your methods since 2 tracks seem to be the exact same thing with the left and right channel switched.
    #15 - dontcutmyusernameo (04/15/2018) [-]
    Yeah, I only recorded one, but I made two and panned them left and right to get a tiny more stereo sound
    #17 - fatminion (04/15/2018) [-]
    **fatminion used "*roll picture*"**
    **fatminion rolled image**it's more effective to use a stereo chorus effect that is only slightly wet (meaning like only 10% is mixed with the dry signal), or really record the part twice and pan left/right.

    Whatever you do, keep experimenting and don't be afraid to try things you read about/people tell you about and also to just try whatever. Close-micing your guitar cabinet will give you a more "natural" sound, but I kinda really like the "room" sound you got going on. But it can never heard to mic up an instrument many times and instead of playing with the EQ and stuff, try just mixing in different mics to get the sound you want. Need more bass? Bring in the mic 2 feet away from the speaker. Need more definition? Bring in the close-mic. Need more hall? Bring in the room mic. And try different angles as well. You'd be surprised how much that can have an effect.

    I'm 33 and have been doing home studio recording since I was 16, and have been in multiple professional studios. My last album was recorded by a dude that used to work at Abby Road, and he's a fucking musical and acoustic genius, and he swears by mixing the mics rather than using the EQ.

    Whatever you do - keep it up! So refreshing to hear people trying to do real art in music rather than just imitate whatever happens to be popular at the time (although that's how many learn)
    #18 - fatminion (04/15/2018) [-]
    **fatminion used "*roll picture*"**
    **fatminion rolled image**about the stereo thing - the reason for using a choruser or actually recording twice is this: if you use the same exact signal for L/R, your head won't really tell the difference and it ends up sounding pretty much like it's still in the middle. A choruser effect will variate the original signal by essentially producing phase-shifted copies to mimic a "chorus" of instruments performing the part, since nobody can 100% play exactly the same on two takes. The actual signals will be similar but shifted in phase (kinda complex shit you might have heard people say, but I didn't really learn about until uni). But I'm personally a huge fan of just recording the part twice. Sometimes I'll even do it with two guitars or once with the neck pickup and once with the bridge pickup. Most people won't be able to tell it was two takes, but everyone will say "it sounds fatter".

    Here's the last album I did if you're curious: open.spotify.com/album/50hAoA5KhE1MXh...
    #7 - Well I'm kind of limited. But I just got some overhead mics…  [+] (8 replies) 04/15/2018 on I made music +1
    #8 - neppynep (04/15/2018) [-]
    Again I feel like the raw audio quality is actually super good here but the mix keeps dragging it down a notch.

    This is gonna sound retarded but can you like, send me the unedited stems for this solo piece? I feel like I could seriously bring this up a level if it was just processed more effectively.
    #9 - dontcutmyusernameo (04/15/2018) [-]
    that is retarded, I'll dm you
    #10 - neppynep (04/15/2018) [-]
    Well it's a quick and dirty rough cut since I don't have a whole lot to work with but a bit of EQ work and some stereo mixing makes it sound a lot more unified than it started out as tbh.

    my.mixtape.moe/pdtrrr.mp3
    #13 - dontcutmyusernameo (04/15/2018) [-]
    To be honest with you I like my mix more haha
    #14 - neppynep (04/15/2018) [-]
    fair enough.
    But I really gotta question your methods since 2 tracks seem to be the exact same thing with the left and right channel switched.
    #15 - dontcutmyusernameo (04/15/2018) [-]
    Yeah, I only recorded one, but I made two and panned them left and right to get a tiny more stereo sound
    #17 - fatminion (04/15/2018) [-]
    **fatminion used "*roll picture*"**
    **fatminion rolled image**it's more effective to use a stereo chorus effect that is only slightly wet (meaning like only 10% is mixed with the dry signal), or really record the part twice and pan left/right.

    Whatever you do, keep experimenting and don't be afraid to try things you read about/people tell you about and also to just try whatever. Close-micing your guitar cabinet will give you a more "natural" sound, but I kinda really like the "room" sound you got going on. But it can never heard to mic up an instrument many times and instead of playing with the EQ and stuff, try just mixing in different mics to get the sound you want. Need more bass? Bring in the mic 2 feet away from the speaker. Need more definition? Bring in the close-mic. Need more hall? Bring in the room mic. And try different angles as well. You'd be surprised how much that can have an effect.

    I'm 33 and have been doing home studio recording since I was 16, and have been in multiple professional studios. My last album was recorded by a dude that used to work at Abby Road, and he's a fucking musical and acoustic genius, and he swears by mixing the mics rather than using the EQ.

    Whatever you do - keep it up! So refreshing to hear people trying to do real art in music rather than just imitate whatever happens to be popular at the time (although that's how many learn)
    #18 - fatminion (04/15/2018) [-]
    **fatminion used "*roll picture*"**
    **fatminion rolled image**about the stereo thing - the reason for using a choruser or actually recording twice is this: if you use the same exact signal for L/R, your head won't really tell the difference and it ends up sounding pretty much like it's still in the middle. A choruser effect will variate the original signal by essentially producing phase-shifted copies to mimic a "chorus" of instruments performing the part, since nobody can 100% play exactly the same on two takes. The actual signals will be similar but shifted in phase (kinda complex shit you might have heard people say, but I didn't really learn about until uni). But I'm personally a huge fan of just recording the part twice. Sometimes I'll even do it with two guitars or once with the neck pickup and once with the bridge pickup. Most people won't be able to tell it was two takes, but everyone will say "it sounds fatter".

    Here's the last album I did if you're curious: open.spotify.com/album/50hAoA5KhE1MXh...
    #5 - Im a very amateur mixer, I use fl studio, my rig is maybe wort…  [+] (10 replies) 04/15/2018 on I made music +1
    #6 - neppynep (04/15/2018) [-]
    Real talk as someone who's worked on a fair share of recording setups, for this kind of thing you really should use protools or in your case something like adobe audition. Protools is the industry standard for live recording and mixing but it's a fucking nightmare to actually use if you don't know the program inside and out. Ableton Live is also an option but tbh it's more suited to synth heavier stuff. Adobe audition might seem like a slightly odd choice since it's mainly used for video audio (my thing) but it's got the best audio repairing tools in the game and for someone who's using older equipment it'd probably be your best bet.

    But on the other end you could totally still use FL for live recording more effectively if you got higher quality mics, which is honestly the better option here if compressing it is the only way to bring some things back. If you're on a budget I'd reccommend a pair of samson C02 pencil condensers. They're small enough to fit a garage band and high quality enough for a field recorder. Also it's only like $110 for a pair of them right now on amazon. www.amazon.com/Samson-C02-Pencil-Cond... They do require phantom power but if you're using a vocals mic I assume you have an interface capable of that.

    FL is really geared more towards loop based and highly processed music. It can do live stuff sure, but it doesn't have the same kind of repair and restore tools as protools or audition, so you need to get it right at the mic stage for a really good sound. Realistically getting it right at the mic level is the most important part of getting a good sound. If you wanna up your game here, splurge for new mics, it's way more important than good software.

    Keep in mind what kind of room you're using too. Mics like the one I listed are really best suited for rooms with some acoustic foam or at least a big towel hung on each wall.
    #7 - dontcutmyusernameo (04/15/2018) [-]
    Well I'm kind of limited.
    But I just got some overhead mics, and a new mixing board and I'm in the process of re-tuning my drums. I have an absolutely shit laptop and I can't even run Protools on it but I'm looking to buy another in the next year.
    I think my biggest problem is I have to adjust to recording live and relearn that.
    Some of my other solo music sounds crisper but I do the instruments individually.
    soundcloud.com/curtis-brock-997875632...
    #8 - neppynep (04/15/2018) [-]
    Again I feel like the raw audio quality is actually super good here but the mix keeps dragging it down a notch.

    This is gonna sound retarded but can you like, send me the unedited stems for this solo piece? I feel like I could seriously bring this up a level if it was just processed more effectively.
    #9 - dontcutmyusernameo (04/15/2018) [-]
    that is retarded, I'll dm you
    #10 - neppynep (04/15/2018) [-]
    Well it's a quick and dirty rough cut since I don't have a whole lot to work with but a bit of EQ work and some stereo mixing makes it sound a lot more unified than it started out as tbh.

    my.mixtape.moe/pdtrrr.mp3
    #13 - dontcutmyusernameo (04/15/2018) [-]
    To be honest with you I like my mix more haha
    #14 - neppynep (04/15/2018) [-]
    fair enough.
    But I really gotta question your methods since 2 tracks seem to be the exact same thing with the left and right channel switched.
    #15 - dontcutmyusernameo (04/15/2018) [-]
    Yeah, I only recorded one, but I made two and panned them left and right to get a tiny more stereo sound
    #17 - fatminion (04/15/2018) [-]
    **fatminion used "*roll picture*"**
    **fatminion rolled image**it's more effective to use a stereo chorus effect that is only slightly wet (meaning like only 10% is mixed with the dry signal), or really record the part twice and pan left/right.

    Whatever you do, keep experimenting and don't be afraid to try things you read about/people tell you about and also to just try whatever. Close-micing your guitar cabinet will give you a more "natural" sound, but I kinda really like the "room" sound you got going on. But it can never heard to mic up an instrument many times and instead of playing with the EQ and stuff, try just mixing in different mics to get the sound you want. Need more bass? Bring in the mic 2 feet away from the speaker. Need more definition? Bring in the close-mic. Need more hall? Bring in the room mic. And try different angles as well. You'd be surprised how much that can have an effect.

    I'm 33 and have been doing home studio recording since I was 16, and have been in multiple professional studios. My last album was recorded by a dude that used to work at Abby Road, and he's a fucking musical and acoustic genius, and he swears by mixing the mics rather than using the EQ.

    Whatever you do - keep it up! So refreshing to hear people trying to do real art in music rather than just imitate whatever happens to be popular at the time (although that's how many learn)
    #18 - fatminion (04/15/2018) [-]
    **fatminion used "*roll picture*"**
    **fatminion rolled image**about the stereo thing - the reason for using a choruser or actually recording twice is this: if you use the same exact signal for L/R, your head won't really tell the difference and it ends up sounding pretty much like it's still in the middle. A choruser effect will variate the original signal by essentially producing phase-shifted copies to mimic a "chorus" of instruments performing the part, since nobody can 100% play exactly the same on two takes. The actual signals will be similar but shifted in phase (kinda complex shit you might have heard people say, but I didn't really learn about until uni). But I'm personally a huge fan of just recording the part twice. Sometimes I'll even do it with two guitars or once with the neck pickup and once with the bridge pickup. Most people won't be able to tell it was two takes, but everyone will say "it sounds fatter".

    Here's the last album I did if you're curious: open.spotify.com/album/50hAoA5KhE1MXh...
    #4 - Id call it anything that'd get it exposure 04/15/2018 on I made music +1
    #32 - I prefer this one 04/09/2018 on Prequelhub 0
    #216 - incredibles you fools 03/28/2018 on Disney Bracket +3
    #17 - Picture 01/23/2018 on 1 cup of cute 0
    #312 - this is my name in real life 03/30/2015 on Origin of your FJ username 0
    First2345620LastNext
    [ 315 Total ]

    user's friends

    unicornrainbows
    Show Comments (1)
    FunnyJunk, LLC - Copyright - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Community Guidelines - Copyright Removal Request