djmaryhikineet
Rank #1386 on Comments
Online
Send mail to djmaryhikineet Block djmaryhikineet Invite djmaryhikineet to be your friend flag avatar| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Gender: | male |
| Consoles Owned: | wii u, 3ds, xbone (sorta), ps3 |
| Video Games Played: | recently mgs5, mario maker, triforce heros |
| Interests: | weeaboo bullshit and second hand watching the world burn |
| Date Signed Up: | 10/20/2015 |
| Last Login: | 1/13/2016 |
| Location: | Canada |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Content Ranking: | #3739 |
| Comment Ranking: | #1386 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #3750 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #1364 |
| Content Thumbs: | 101 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 1527 |
| Content Level Progress: | 60% (3/5) Level 7 Content: New Here → Level 8 Content: New Here |
| Comment Level Progress: | 11% (11/100) Level 212 Comments: Comedic Genius → Level 213 Comments: Comedic Genius |
| Subscribers: | 0 |
| Content Views: | 11526 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 66 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 754 |
| FJ Points: | 1308 |
latest user's comments
| #204 - sorry misworded the original one your right, but beca… [+] (2 new replies) | 12/27/2015 on WELCOME TO CUCKLAND! | 0 |
| Haha, you misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm saying there is no 'should'. We have zero obligation to take care of others, in fact, evolution guards against that. If a Lion was conscious and you promised him half the world's sheep in exchange for destroying the Amazon forest at the push of a button, there's no doubt which he would pick. i guess your right but the selfishness of us isn't great for morale | ||
| #203 - Comment deleted | 12/27/2015 on WELCOME TO CUCKLAND! | 0 |
| #201 - oh i know its pointless to worry but im more mentioning it b/c… [+] (5 new replies) | 12/27/2015 on WELCOME TO CUCKLAND! | 0 |
| Haha, why does extra consciousness give more responsibility? It doesn't make any difference. We are still animals, and still follow the rules of nature, our introspection only allows us to think more, it doesn't mean we are somehow more responsible. Indeed, if it did, there would be no goodness or benevolence BEHIND good acts. It is the fact we do not have to be good people that makes BEING good so significant. sorry misworded the original one your right, but because were extraordinarily type of life we should try to keep the world in a way so others can evolve to help bare the burden of consciousness so we aren't the only ones with it. Haha, you misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm saying there is no 'should'. We have zero obligation to take care of others, in fact, evolution guards against that. If a Lion was conscious and you promised him half the world's sheep in exchange for destroying the Amazon forest at the push of a button, there's no doubt which he would pick. i guess your right but the selfishness of us isn't great for morale | ||
| #64 - that makes sense for fresh zombies but rotting ones it doesn't… [+] (1 new reply) | 12/27/2015 on Zombies | +3 |
| #65 -
lolglolblol (12/27/2015) [-] well, it's fictional, so there will always be some logical flaws like, for example, walking dead | ||
| #199 - yes but a lot of those animals died to our greed and us thinki… [+] (7 new replies) | 12/27/2015 on WELCOME TO CUCKLAND! | 0 |
| Worrying about animals going extinct is noble, but a waste. Hundreds of species go extinct every day, mostly naturally. Even the common housecat has been responsible for more extinction than humans (with sub species of birds, bugs, and pests). oh i know its pointless to worry but im more mentioning it b/c a lot were lead to extinction by humans thinking we could do what we want. though for house cats they only the way they are b/c of humans and cats don't have a moral thing humans do to determine the long term for world they just care about there genes, we do so we should try to not fuck it up too badly so future humans or life can have a future. Haha, why does extra consciousness give more responsibility? It doesn't make any difference. We are still animals, and still follow the rules of nature, our introspection only allows us to think more, it doesn't mean we are somehow more responsible. Indeed, if it did, there would be no goodness or benevolence BEHIND good acts. It is the fact we do not have to be good people that makes BEING good so significant. sorry misworded the original one your right, but because were extraordinarily type of life we should try to keep the world in a way so others can evolve to help bare the burden of consciousness so we aren't the only ones with it. Haha, you misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm saying there is no 'should'. We have zero obligation to take care of others, in fact, evolution guards against that. If a Lion was conscious and you promised him half the world's sheep in exchange for destroying the Amazon forest at the push of a button, there's no doubt which he would pick. i guess your right but the selfishness of us isn't great for morale | ||
| #186 - but that type of thinking lead to the death of multable specie… [+] (9 new replies) | 12/27/2015 on WELCOME TO CUCKLAND! | 0 |
| yes but a lot of those animals died to our greed and us thinking it would last forever. they may have not been able to adapt but we didn't give them a chance to try. Worrying about animals going extinct is noble, but a waste. Hundreds of species go extinct every day, mostly naturally. Even the common housecat has been responsible for more extinction than humans (with sub species of birds, bugs, and pests). oh i know its pointless to worry but im more mentioning it b/c a lot were lead to extinction by humans thinking we could do what we want. though for house cats they only the way they are b/c of humans and cats don't have a moral thing humans do to determine the long term for world they just care about there genes, we do so we should try to not fuck it up too badly so future humans or life can have a future. Haha, why does extra consciousness give more responsibility? It doesn't make any difference. We are still animals, and still follow the rules of nature, our introspection only allows us to think more, it doesn't mean we are somehow more responsible. Indeed, if it did, there would be no goodness or benevolence BEHIND good acts. It is the fact we do not have to be good people that makes BEING good so significant. sorry misworded the original one your right, but because were extraordinarily type of life we should try to keep the world in a way so others can evolve to help bare the burden of consciousness so we aren't the only ones with it. Haha, you misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm saying there is no 'should'. We have zero obligation to take care of others, in fact, evolution guards against that. If a Lion was conscious and you promised him half the world's sheep in exchange for destroying the Amazon forest at the push of a button, there's no doubt which he would pick. i guess your right but the selfishness of us isn't great for morale | ||
| #184 - but money is just something we agree on so if i spend all my m… [+] (11 new replies) | 12/27/2015 on WELCOME TO CUCKLAND! | 0 |
| And how likely do you think that is to happen? We're not supposed to be 'fine', we're supposed to excel. At the rate of expansion we have, we could literally just keep going with everyone breeding and still not run risk of de-supplying. but that type of thinking lead to the death of multable species we just let people hunt anything and this lead to a lot of unnecessary loss of life yes but a lot of those animals died to our greed and us thinking it would last forever. they may have not been able to adapt but we didn't give them a chance to try. Worrying about animals going extinct is noble, but a waste. Hundreds of species go extinct every day, mostly naturally. Even the common housecat has been responsible for more extinction than humans (with sub species of birds, bugs, and pests). oh i know its pointless to worry but im more mentioning it b/c a lot were lead to extinction by humans thinking we could do what we want. though for house cats they only the way they are b/c of humans and cats don't have a moral thing humans do to determine the long term for world they just care about there genes, we do so we should try to not fuck it up too badly so future humans or life can have a future. Haha, why does extra consciousness give more responsibility? It doesn't make any difference. We are still animals, and still follow the rules of nature, our introspection only allows us to think more, it doesn't mean we are somehow more responsible. Indeed, if it did, there would be no goodness or benevolence BEHIND good acts. It is the fact we do not have to be good people that makes BEING good so significant. sorry misworded the original one your right, but because were extraordinarily type of life we should try to keep the world in a way so others can evolve to help bare the burden of consciousness so we aren't the only ones with it. Haha, you misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm saying there is no 'should'. We have zero obligation to take care of others, in fact, evolution guards against that. If a Lion was conscious and you promised him half the world's sheep in exchange for destroying the Amazon forest at the push of a button, there's no doubt which he would pick. i guess your right but the selfishness of us isn't great for morale | ||
| #181 - we should never breed extra encase we fail to colonize other p… [+] (13 new replies) | 12/27/2015 on WELCOME TO CUCKLAND! | 0 |
| And you should never save your money in case you die tomorrow, just spend it all without a care for the future. Come on now. but money is just something we agree on so if i spend all my money one a car and teh next day the currency is cars then i win though yeah your right. but i mean were fine as is for now And how likely do you think that is to happen? We're not supposed to be 'fine', we're supposed to excel. At the rate of expansion we have, we could literally just keep going with everyone breeding and still not run risk of de-supplying. but that type of thinking lead to the death of multable species we just let people hunt anything and this lead to a lot of unnecessary loss of life yes but a lot of those animals died to our greed and us thinking it would last forever. they may have not been able to adapt but we didn't give them a chance to try. Worrying about animals going extinct is noble, but a waste. Hundreds of species go extinct every day, mostly naturally. Even the common housecat has been responsible for more extinction than humans (with sub species of birds, bugs, and pests). oh i know its pointless to worry but im more mentioning it b/c a lot were lead to extinction by humans thinking we could do what we want. though for house cats they only the way they are b/c of humans and cats don't have a moral thing humans do to determine the long term for world they just care about there genes, we do so we should try to not fuck it up too badly so future humans or life can have a future. Haha, why does extra consciousness give more responsibility? It doesn't make any difference. We are still animals, and still follow the rules of nature, our introspection only allows us to think more, it doesn't mean we are somehow more responsible. Indeed, if it did, there would be no goodness or benevolence BEHIND good acts. It is the fact we do not have to be good people that makes BEING good so significant. sorry misworded the original one your right, but because were extraordinarily type of life we should try to keep the world in a way so others can evolve to help bare the burden of consciousness so we aren't the only ones with it. Haha, you misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm saying there is no 'should'. We have zero obligation to take care of others, in fact, evolution guards against that. If a Lion was conscious and you promised him half the world's sheep in exchange for destroying the Amazon forest at the push of a button, there's no doubt which he would pick. i guess your right but the selfishness of us isn't great for morale | ||
| #13 - though males don't care b/c females do it automatically and it… [+] (5 new replies) | 12/27/2015 on Maximum power | 0 |
| No, males don't care because males have far lower standards proportional to women. A study found that according to women the average man is below averagely attractive, compared to the male's smooth bell curve distribution. Christ man get off this site theres more to life than getting little chalk points for winning internet arguments I see you on like every single post arguing one thing or another I was under the impression that the comments section didn't have a rule stating "if distribution doesn't like it then get rid of it!" its not that I dont like you or whatever you do, its just theres more to life than this I'm doing what I want to do, stop whining and do what YOU want to do. | ||
| #128 - that's worse for the world then letting some immigrants in, be… [+] (15 new replies) | 12/27/2015 on WELCOME TO CUCKLAND! | -5 |
| It would, actually. Considering we are only a decade or so away from full colonization of other planets, population isn't an issue. We SHOULD encourage larger populations and bigger families for that reason. we should never breed extra encase we fail to colonize other planets, also do you want more cring/memelords And you should never save your money in case you die tomorrow, just spend it all without a care for the future. Come on now. but money is just something we agree on so if i spend all my money one a car and teh next day the currency is cars then i win though yeah your right. but i mean were fine as is for now And how likely do you think that is to happen? We're not supposed to be 'fine', we're supposed to excel. At the rate of expansion we have, we could literally just keep going with everyone breeding and still not run risk of de-supplying. but that type of thinking lead to the death of multable species we just let people hunt anything and this lead to a lot of unnecessary loss of life yes but a lot of those animals died to our greed and us thinking it would last forever. they may have not been able to adapt but we didn't give them a chance to try. Worrying about animals going extinct is noble, but a waste. Hundreds of species go extinct every day, mostly naturally. Even the common housecat has been responsible for more extinction than humans (with sub species of birds, bugs, and pests). oh i know its pointless to worry but im more mentioning it b/c a lot were lead to extinction by humans thinking we could do what we want. though for house cats they only the way they are b/c of humans and cats don't have a moral thing humans do to determine the long term for world they just care about there genes, we do so we should try to not fuck it up too badly so future humans or life can have a future. Haha, why does extra consciousness give more responsibility? It doesn't make any difference. We are still animals, and still follow the rules of nature, our introspection only allows us to think more, it doesn't mean we are somehow more responsible. Indeed, if it did, there would be no goodness or benevolence BEHIND good acts. It is the fact we do not have to be good people that makes BEING good so significant. sorry misworded the original one your right, but because were extraordinarily type of life we should try to keep the world in a way so others can evolve to help bare the burden of consciousness so we aren't the only ones with it. Haha, you misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm saying there is no 'should'. We have zero obligation to take care of others, in fact, evolution guards against that. If a Lion was conscious and you promised him half the world's sheep in exchange for destroying the Amazon forest at the push of a button, there's no doubt which he would pick. i guess your right but the selfishness of us isn't great for morale | ||
| #36 - poor frog he wasnt able to get a cute grill like this sexy bea… | 12/27/2015 on That's cocky | +1 |
| #68 - it really is a drug as you enjoy it at teh time but late reget it | 12/27/2015 on What Drugs Do To You | 0 |
| #63 - Comment deleted | 12/27/2015 on Internet friendss | 0 |
| #66 - yep you take it by joining a group of people and then make och… [+] (3 new replies) | 12/27/2015 on What Drugs Do To You | +3 |
| it really is a drug as you enjoy it at teh time but late reget it | ||
| #61 - same here but for japan i just say if its doesnt have circles … | 12/27/2015 on Languages | +1 |
| #46 - that pics totally related and im fine with that your … | 12/27/2015 on Internet friendss | -1 |
| #50 - one hell of a drug [+] (5 new replies) | 12/27/2015 on What Drugs Do To You | +8 |
| yep you take it by joining a group of people and then make ocharacters and unironicly like it it really is a drug as you enjoy it at teh time but late reget it | ||
| #44 - look guys im normally against deleting ones own comments when … | 12/27/2015 on Internet friendss | -2 |
| #42 - thank you for being fair about this, and yes i too agree its j… | 12/27/2015 on Internet friendss | 0 |
| #40 - oh come on this is the only undertale thing i have done | 12/27/2015 on Internet friendss | -1 |
| #38 - why is this getting red thumbs when its just a joke reply, has… [+] (2 new replies) | 12/27/2015 on Internet friendss | -1 |
| #45 -
theaphasic (12/27/2015) [-] Well, you're kind of fanning the flames by asking why/arguing that this shouldn't get hate. People don't like being told what they should like or dislike m8- If I don't like something, I don't like something. (especially if it is something that is entirely a matter of personal taste.) Being told that I should like something or I shouldn't like something is only likely to make me to tell you to fuck off pic unrelated that pics totally related and im fine with that your right i prob should have let this be but i didnt. its just since channel blocking people have been acting like people on tumblr for content they blocked i myself have said to myself that i wouldn't block anything i dont like as that makes me like tumblr not able to face my hatred and just hiding behind a wall of things i like | ||
| #37 - if you img search you would have found its origin, i only pos… | 12/27/2015 on Internet friendss | +1 |
| #36 - yes b/c it totally killed it for everyone who wants to try it.… | 12/27/2015 on Internet friendss | -1 |
| #32 - i like how butt hurt everyone is getting over this just b/c it… [+] (1 new reply) | 12/27/2015 on Internet friendss | -2 |
| When undertale was new all of FJ jumped on the bandwagon. There was a month of nonstop undertale content. Now too many people like it and all of FJ hates it. Bunch of friggin' hipster kids. Still love you fj stop giving this guy so much hate. | ||
| #20 - but m skull facison didn't say he wanted to make the wasteland… | 12/26/2015 on [Ch.1] ZOMBIE KILLING... | -1 |
