Upload
Login or register

detroitshanker

Last status update:
-
Date Signed Up:8/17/2013
Last Login:7/21/2016
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 3 total,  7 ,  4
Comment Thumbs: 469 total,  733 ,  264
Content Level Progress: 15.25% (9/59)
Level 0 Content: Untouched account → Level 1 Content: New Here
Comment Level Progress: 0% (0/10)
Level 134 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry → Level 135 Comments: Respected Member Of Famiry
Subscribers:0
Content Views:1367
Times Content Favorited:2 times
Total Comments Made:339
FJ Points:357

Text Posts

latest user's comments

#183 - Poo. 01/12/2016 on Huh imagine that 0
#177 - That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. 01/12/2016 on Huh imagine that 0
#175 - samefag  [+] (4 new replies) 01/11/2016 on Huh imagine that -1
#202 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
not that anon, but he was agreeing with you.
and rightfully so.
#210 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
no i wasnt
User avatar
#179 - youregaylol (01/12/2016) [-]
Why would i go anon to call you dumb when I've done it with this username over and over again. Once again, reasoning skills.
#183 - detroitshanker (01/12/2016) [-]
Poo.
#152 - "implications" Not evidence. According to you, j…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/11/2016 on Huh imagine that 0
User avatar
#176 - youregaylol (01/12/2016) [-]
Yeah, they totally weren't looking for attention by going to that rally with golden stars on. They weren't yelling and making a scene like every other Trump protester at these rallies. They definitely were just going to be silent and not draw any attention to themselves in a huge loud stadium full of people. I'm a ridiculous troll.

Glad to see you're such a reasonable person.
#177 - detroitshanker (01/12/2016) [-]
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it.
#147 - There is no proof of this. And don't point me to #17 #18 #19 a… 01/11/2016 on Huh imagine that 0
#141 - "You don't think they would?" Still isn't proof, or …  [+] (10 new replies) 01/11/2016 on Huh imagine that 0
#170 - anon (01/11/2016) [-]
"MY SIDE DOESNT NEED PROOF ONLY UR SIDE THEY SAID IT WAS BECAUSE THEY WERE A MUSLIM SO THATS A FACT OKAY BACK UP UR OWN CLAIMS!!!"
#175 - detroitshanker (01/11/2016) [-]
samefag
#202 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
not that anon, but he was agreeing with you.
and rightfully so.
#210 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
no i wasnt
User avatar
#179 - youregaylol (01/12/2016) [-]
Why would i go anon to call you dumb when I've done it with this username over and over again. Once again, reasoning skills.
#183 - detroitshanker (01/12/2016) [-]
Poo.
User avatar
#144 - youregaylol (01/11/2016) [-]
It's called deductive reasoning. Hell it's just called reasoning.

You refusing to accept the obvious implications because of your very apparent biases speaks more against you than me. And here I thought leftists relied on reason. I guess not.
#152 - detroitshanker (01/11/2016) [-]
"implications"
Not evidence. According to you, just the fact that they were there is proof that they did it. That no one would want to partake in a silent protest, that they would only want to cause a scene.
Anyway, this is the last you're getting out of me. Well done trolling, you ridiculous bastard.
User avatar
#176 - youregaylol (01/12/2016) [-]
Yeah, they totally weren't looking for attention by going to that rally with golden stars on. They weren't yelling and making a scene like every other Trump protester at these rallies. They definitely were just going to be silent and not draw any attention to themselves in a huge loud stadium full of people. I'm a ridiculous troll.

Glad to see you're such a reasonable person.
#177 - detroitshanker (01/12/2016) [-]
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it.
#139 - I assumed you meant 25% actively involved in extremism, seems … 01/11/2016 on Huh imagine that 0
#125 - Don't see how any of that proves that these christian fundamen…  [+] (21 new replies) 01/11/2016 on Huh imagine that +1
User avatar
#133 - youregaylol (01/11/2016) [-]
Really? You can't see how wearing a badge calling your opponents evil murdering nazis could hint at a provocation? You think those types of people don't want attention? You don't think that they might cause a disruption to make a political point. With gold stars on their clothes while writing for Fox News

Man, I wish liberals were this understanding when conservatives actually do shit like this and not to just to defend their own bullshit.
#141 - detroitshanker (01/11/2016) [-]
"You don't think they would?" Still isn't proof, or even evidence. If you want me to believe this, someone's going to have to show me some actual evidence at some point.
#170 - anon (01/11/2016) [-]
"MY SIDE DOESNT NEED PROOF ONLY UR SIDE THEY SAID IT WAS BECAUSE THEY WERE A MUSLIM SO THATS A FACT OKAY BACK UP UR OWN CLAIMS!!!"
#175 - detroitshanker (01/11/2016) [-]
samefag
#202 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
not that anon, but he was agreeing with you.
and rightfully so.
#210 - anon (01/12/2016) [-]
no i wasnt
User avatar
#179 - youregaylol (01/12/2016) [-]
Why would i go anon to call you dumb when I've done it with this username over and over again. Once again, reasoning skills.
#183 - detroitshanker (01/12/2016) [-]
Poo.
User avatar
#144 - youregaylol (01/11/2016) [-]
It's called deductive reasoning. Hell it's just called reasoning.

You refusing to accept the obvious implications because of your very apparent biases speaks more against you than me. And here I thought leftists relied on reason. I guess not.
#152 - detroitshanker (01/11/2016) [-]
"implications"
Not evidence. According to you, just the fact that they were there is proof that they did it. That no one would want to partake in a silent protest, that they would only want to cause a scene.
Anyway, this is the last you're getting out of me. Well done trolling, you ridiculous bastard.
User avatar
#176 - youregaylol (01/12/2016) [-]
Yeah, they totally weren't looking for attention by going to that rally with golden stars on. They weren't yelling and making a scene like every other Trump protester at these rallies. They definitely were just going to be silent and not draw any attention to themselves in a huge loud stadium full of people. I'm a ridiculous troll.

Glad to see you're such a reasonable person.
#177 - detroitshanker (01/12/2016) [-]
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it.
User avatar
#136 - scorcho (01/11/2016) [-]
remember: Offense is only taken, never given.
If trump supporters, you included, are so easily upset, by a, granted somewhat provocative gesture, then what does that make them?
User avatar
#137 - youregaylol (01/11/2016) [-]
What does it make liberals when they cry racism whenever they get called out on their bullshit?
User avatar
#140 - scorcho (01/11/2016) [-]
i don't care.
you didn't answer the question.
are you saying you are on the same level as libtards?
sure sounds like it.
#171 - anon (01/11/2016) [-]
You don't care because it makes your argument invalid if you were to answer it. Typical dismissal tactics.
User avatar
#143 - youregaylol (01/11/2016) [-]
Oh you don't care? I wonder why.

Logic would dictate that if both sides are easily upset that neither side should be whining about the others fault, as they both share them. I'm simply smacking down your shitty attempts at gotcha moments.

But no, I don't think they're on the same level as libtards as liberals set up this controversy specifically to get people upset at Trump, Trump supporters are just pushing back.
User avatar
#149 - scorcho (01/11/2016) [-]
i don't care because i don't buy into these childish "us vs them" mentalities.
i am not even american, so i wont get to vote anyway.
And no, that is not dictated by logic at all, that is just rubbish argumentation.
fact is: you get upset just as easy, if not more easy than libtards if a simple sticker causes you this much anger.
and i am talking about you specifically. you lost your temper incredibly easy, even in this short debate.
you are the offended party here, and your childlike attempts to steer this into another
'hurr libtards do the SJW' argument just proves that.
and with that i am done.
i have wasted enough time on your silly bullshit.
User avatar
#161 - youregaylol (01/11/2016) [-]
You don't care about "us vs them" mentalities yet you're committed to seeing Trump as the evil racist party and this muslim woman as a victim despite all the evidence to the contrary. kek.

"and i am talking about you specifically. you lost your temper incredibly easy, even in this short debate. "

lol, you think this is a debate? And your projecting is strong, the fact is you;re about to rage quit because someone is challenging your partisan view of the world.

"you are the offended party here"

No, I think the people whining because a provocateur got rightfully kicked out are, sorry.

"your childlike attempts to steer this into another
'hurr libtards do the SJW' argument just proves that."

Right, best stick to "Trump is racist and evil and a nazi." I'm sure you'd love that. I call a spade a spade, this whole controversy was spawned by liberal sjws. Deal with it, cry about it, I don't care.

"i have wasted enough time on your silly bullshit."

One sec, I need to reply to your newest rage text I just got. Heh.
User avatar
#173 - scorcho (01/11/2016) [-]
i know i said that comment was my last,
but this one really is.
again, you have not presented a smidgeon of solid evidence. Just pure speculation.
you are projecting your infantile rage onto me, don't try to turn this around.
please point me at the comments where i said, that:

'i am committed to seeing Trump as the evil racist party and this muslim woman as a victim'
or
'Trump is racist and evil and a nazi.'

See? That is what projection is. None of these statements even remotely represent any of the points i made, yet you somehow in your convoluted brain attribute them to me.
Because everyone who disagrees with you is obviously one of 'them', right?
That is projection. I think you learned the meaning of a new word today.
And yes, unlike you, i do have better things to do than indulge your fantasies of victimhood, so i am gonna quit chatting with you.
Not like you are gonna contribute anything substantial anyway.
Have a nice day.
User avatar
#178 - youregaylol (01/12/2016) [-]
Oh goody, you're back. Who could've predicted that.

"i know i said that comment was my last, but this one really is."
No don't go, this is fun.

"Just pure speculation."
Deductive reasoning is a thing. If it walks like a duck and all that. But nah, lets just assume that the people with golden stars on with known liberal/sjw ties in the media aren't there to make a disturbance like every other protester at these events. Makes so much sense.

"you are projecting your infantile rage onto me, don't try to turn this around."
I like how I called you out on your projecting and then your response is to accuse me of trying to turn this around on you. You can't make this stuff up.

"None of these statements even remotely represent any of the points i made,"
What points have you made exactly besides stating "NU uh" over and over again? In the end thats what it boils down too. Denial. Denial with very little logic involved.

"That is projection. I think you learned the meaning of a new word today."
You mean the word I just used against you first in perfect context? Yeah that makes alot of sense Einstein.

"And yes, unlike you, i do have better things to do than indulge your fantasies of victimhood, so i am gonna quit chatting with you. "
Ahh, you have things to do and I have no life? Right when you're losing the argument too. Damn. I gotta remember to reach into my closet and find my life card whenever I'm getting smacked around in an argument.

"Not like you are gonna contribute anything substantial anyway. "
I'll take one out of your book here to add some substance, alright. "Nuh Uh."

"Have a nice day."
Make sure you spell my username right when you complain on your blog about the cis male who triggered you today.
#122 - I don't think that's true. If there were that number of islami…  [+] (2 new replies) 01/11/2016 on Huh imagine that 0
#129 - sircool (01/11/2016) [-]
like we're not already?

continuing that I'm vaguely sure the majority of that 25% are dirt poor, so they just say that shit, they can't do anything about it. there's a huge wealth gap in those countries.

but seriously, it doesn't matter what you -think- it matters what is. and according to pew research, typically on point and bipartisan, that's what it is.
#139 - detroitshanker (01/11/2016) [-]
I assumed you meant 25% actively involved in extremism, seems I misunderstood. Still, looking through the source you provided, I can't find where it gives this figure. I'm not saying it isn't there, but can you tell me where exactly it is?
#120 - Don't see how any of that is proof, honestly. I really don… 01/11/2016 on Huh imagine that +2