|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #18255 on CommentsLevel 0 Comments: Untouched account
OfflineSend mail to desperatedan Block desperatedan Invite desperatedan to be your friend
latest user's comments
|#30 - I know no one gives a **** but I'm gonna share a …||09/30/2014 on Shit just got real on...||+1|
|#2 - I can see where you're coming from and it did get tedious in p…||07/09/2014 on So I was watching Lost...||0|
|#194 - But the thing is these auditory hallucinations were not talkin…||06/20/2014 on WTF Facts Compilation - Part 7||0|
|#75 - No they were claiming to have persistent and ongoing auditory … [+] (2 new replies)||06/20/2014 on WTF Facts Compilation - Part 7||0|
#111 - mclaughlinar (06/20/2014) [-]
Ok, well according to the DSM-4 (keeping in mind that in the 70's they were using the DSM-2, which still classified homosexuality as a mental disorder) classified schizophrenia as presenting with any 2 characteristic symptoms including, delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, catatonic behavior, and negative symptoms (affective flattening). Also if the voices were talking to each other they only need ONE symptom.
I'm fairly certain that they met the criteria for schizophrenia at that time, since they may have met the criteria for a much newer DSM.
All I'm saying is they were properly diagnosed based on the information that the doctors had.
#194 - desperatedan (06/20/2014) [-]
But the thing is these auditory hallucinations were not talking to one another and were not bizarre or an ongoing commentary on behaviour so they technically did not meet the criteria. They did not present any other symptoms, negative or positive, and appeared to be healthy and normal individuals. What the research highlighted was the subjective nature of a psychiatrists diagnosis and the varied treatment institutions would give to what was essentially the same illness between each fake patient.
|#119 - No, absolutely not. [+] (3 new replies)||04/13/2014 on Someone had to say it||+2|
|#42 - Its just Joffrey not Jeoffrey [+] (1 new reply)||07/25/2013 on GoT Vs SW||+2|
|#69 - King in the North's lazy Sunday.||07/14/2013 on Feels good||0|
|#108 - Britain granted freedom to the colonies it didn't lose them. A… [+] (2 new replies)||07/05/2013 on Happy....||+2|
#118 - xxxsonic fanxxx (07/05/2013) [-]
I'm sure the good ol' GB just felt like crazy bob and was just GIVING colonies away!
I'm pretty sure global pressure after WWI had something to do with GB giving up their colonies.
#124 - mrcinnamon (07/05/2013) [-]
It didn't really.. if you look at the period it was far more internal pressure. Brits had been told they were going to war for the rights of small oppressed nations and had been helped in doing so by soldiers from around the world. It seemed a bit hypocritical afterward to try and maintain an Empire. It was one of the key reasons Attlee was voted in in 1945 even though Churchill had just won a war.
|#199 - Looks more like David Duchovny imo||05/04/2013 on cod3||0|
|#1139 - Master Bater of the H.M.S Cock Sucker||02/16/2013 on Rename the Anonymous Pussy||-1|