dereker
Rank #2815 on Content
Level 214 Content: Comedic Genius Offline
Send mail to dereker Block dereker Invite dereker to be your friend 
| Last status update: | -
|
| | |
| Personal Info | |
| Date Signed Up: | 5/21/2011 |
| Last Login: | 1/14/2016 |
| FunnyJunk Career Stats | |
| Content Ranking: | #2815 |
| Comment Ranking: | #5036 |
| Highest Content Rank: | #780 |
| Highest Comment Rank: | #5007 |
| Content Thumbs: | 14846 total,
16699 ,
1853 |
| Comment Thumbs: | 710 total,
823 ,
113 |
| Content Level Progress: | 22.8% (228/1000) Level 214 Content: Comedic Genius → Level 215 Content: Comedic Genius |
| Comment Level Progress: | 80% (8/10) Level 155 Comments: Faptastic → Level 156 Comments: Faptastic |
| Subscribers: | 2 |
| Content Views: | 616058 |
| Times Content Favorited: | 1121 times |
| Total Comments Made: | 176 |
| FJ Points: | 14788 |
latest user's comments
| #4 - I'll give you a hint: Jaden Smith | 12/07/2013 on Sudden realization | +9 |
| #69 - Let's go scuba nopeing | 11/16/2013 on Friendly Rainbow Worm Under... | 0 |
| #209 - But that ain't her leg. [+] (1 new reply) | 11/11/2013 on SlumberParty | 0 |
 Well if its his leg its all up in her space, so ether way, she is wants it. I also noticed she had more clothes on in the picture above, which means she actually got more naked then chose to sit next to him. | ||
| #20 - Since ancient times, the dragon has been the only beast to equ… | 11/09/2013 on Let's dance, motherfucker | 0 |
| #6 - Substitution has been there as a move since gen one tho [+] (7 new replies) | 10/15/2013 on Dragonite | +10 |
 "Substitute (Japanese: みがわり Scapegoat) is a non-damaging Normal-type move introduced in Generation I. It was TM50 in Generation I before losing its TM status in Generation II. It regained its TM status, albeit as TM90, in Generation IV onwards" You and your friends are just ignorant, is all. I just said we didn't know about it, so you google it and copy paste, wow fuckhead.. way to be retarded. I already agreed with it, in the wow comment, so you're the jerkoff. Think about it. | ||
| #67 - Thanks to you too, other human. | 08/18/2013 on Incest is Wincest | 0 |
| #65 - Oh well, found it thanks to dsgbiohazard's comment. It's "… | 08/18/2013 on Incest is Wincest | 0 |
| #63 - That's the first thing I tried, other human. [+] (2 new replies) | 08/18/2013 on Incest is Wincest | 0 |
 *sigh* Here, Google this: Tiny Boobs Giant Tits History” by Shiden Akira. You are welcome, human. | ||
| #56 - Source please? :3 [+] (5 new replies) | 08/18/2013 on Incest is Wincest | +1 |
| *sigh* Here, Google this: Tiny Boobs Giant Tits History” by Shiden Akira. You are welcome, human. | ||
| #15 - Picture [+] (4 new replies) | 07/04/2013 on This series cracks me up | +8 |
| | ||
| #8 - Picture [+] (12 new replies) | 07/02/2013 on Ants | +9 |
 Agreed. Gon and Killua are going to need som eserious skills to take on the Royal Guard let alone the King. | ||
| #33 - MYAH [+] (1 new reply) | 06/22/2013 on This is how I kill the bitches | +3 |
| #17 - Picture [+] (2 new replies) | 06/21/2013 on Quetzalcoatlus | +3 |
| #40 -
anon (06/21/2013) [-] how does the gf system work? i cant beat the game because its so damn confusing | ||
| #2 - Picture | 06/19/2013 on Foundation of religion | +1 |
| #22 - AISHA . Mill EATH ' Mil Ell , HIM! HIGHH I Tilt FAKE ‘SURE | 06/15/2013 on Aisha Tyler @ E3 | -1 |
| #1 - Greatness Awaits. | 06/11/2013 on Meanwhile at E3 | 0 |
| #13 - Tony Stark [+] (2 new replies) | 06/11/2013 on dad | +1 |
| #2 - You accidentally the last sentence. [+] (4 new replies) | 06/07/2013 on What a beautiful day to... | +58 |
| | ||
| #16 - Genetic engineering, duh | 06/07/2013 on poor people | +1 |
| #1 - It's its | 06/06/2013 on Good Guy Greg | 0 |
| #35 - Oh well, but I still think that this (or something similar) ha… [+] (1 new reply) | 06/03/2013 on Well it has a good point | 0 |
 Your first link was a discussion on that paper. If you go to the bottom of the main story, but before "Related discussion", there a link to the full story which is www.nydailynews.com/news/national/scientists-uncover-source-homosexuality-article-1.1218017 Personally I don't think Its genetic or a choice, but probably either a chemical difference in the brain, or something similar to Left/right handed people, where even though you can change hands you're still permanently left/right brain dominant. | ||
| #31 - There you go... [+] (3 new replies) | 06/03/2013 on Well it has a good point | 0 |
| #35 -
dereker (06/03/2013) [-] Oh well, but I still think that this (or something similar) has a lot more chances of being right than homosexuality being a choice. Btw where did you get this quote from: “This can be tested and proven within six months. It's easy to test. If it's a bad idea, we can throw it away in short order."? I found the opposite in this article: www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/33773/title/Can-Epigenetics-Explain-Homosexuality-/ "Scientists propose a new model for how homosexuality develops, but observers say it will be difficult to test.". Your first link was a discussion on that paper. If you go to the bottom of the main story, but before "Related discussion", there a link to the full story which is www.nydailynews.com/news/national/scientists-uncover-source-homosexuality-article-1.1218017 Personally I don't think Its genetic or a choice, but probably either a chemical difference in the brain, or something similar to Left/right handed people, where even though you can change hands you're still permanently left/right brain dominant. | ||
| #28 - My statement was not entirely correct, but the main argument s… [+] (5 new replies) | 06/03/2013 on Well it has a good point | -2 |
| They haven't even tested it yet. They specifically state that “This can be tested and proven within six months. It's easy to test. If it's a bad idea, we can throw it away in short order." Its past six months, I think we would have heard something if they found something. #35 -
dereker (06/03/2013) [-] Oh well, but I still think that this (or something similar) has a lot more chances of being right than homosexuality being a choice. Btw where did you get this quote from: “This can be tested and proven within six months. It's easy to test. If it's a bad idea, we can throw it away in short order."? I found the opposite in this article: www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/33773/title/Can-Epigenetics-Explain-Homosexuality-/ "Scientists propose a new model for how homosexuality develops, but observers say it will be difficult to test.". Your first link was a discussion on that paper. If you go to the bottom of the main story, but before "Related discussion", there a link to the full story which is www.nydailynews.com/news/national/scientists-uncover-source-homosexuality-article-1.1218017 Personally I don't think Its genetic or a choice, but probably either a chemical difference in the brain, or something similar to Left/right handed people, where even though you can change hands you're still permanently left/right brain dominant. | ||
| #18 - Being gay or not is not in your brain, but in your genes. So… [+] (7 new replies) | 06/03/2013 on Well it has a good point | -1 |
| #28 -
dereker (06/03/2013) [-] My statement was not entirely correct, but the main argument still stands: a fetus is already gay or not... Epigenetics, check link for more info: www.abc15.com/dpp/news/science_tech/gay-gene-homosexuality-source-may-lie-in-epigenetics-or-epi-marks-scientists-say They haven't even tested it yet. They specifically state that “This can be tested and proven within six months. It's easy to test. If it's a bad idea, we can throw it away in short order." Its past six months, I think we would have heard something if they found something. #35 -
dereker (06/03/2013) [-] Oh well, but I still think that this (or something similar) has a lot more chances of being right than homosexuality being a choice. Btw where did you get this quote from: “This can be tested and proven within six months. It's easy to test. If it's a bad idea, we can throw it away in short order."? I found the opposite in this article: www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/33773/title/Can-Epigenetics-Explain-Homosexuality-/ "Scientists propose a new model for how homosexuality develops, but observers say it will be difficult to test.". Your first link was a discussion on that paper. If you go to the bottom of the main story, but before "Related discussion", there a link to the full story which is www.nydailynews.com/news/national/scientists-uncover-source-homosexuality-article-1.1218017 Personally I don't think Its genetic or a choice, but probably either a chemical difference in the brain, or something similar to Left/right handed people, where even though you can change hands you're still permanently left/right brain dominant. | ||
| #160 - Who is the retard that gave red thumb to source? rofl | 05/26/2013 on Party hard | 0 |
Anonymous comments allowed.
6 comments displayed.
#1
-
carlose (02/06/2012) [-] hi ..i saw that you use one of my content as yours ..can you please remove it ..you know retoasting its pretty bad ..i don't want to report you and get you banned ..
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pic...
www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pic...
