Upload
Login or register

deathedblack

Last status update:
-
Gender: female
Age: 21
Date Signed Up:5/31/2008
Last Login:5/17/2015
Location:Manchester UK
FunnyJunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 1367 total,  1514 ,  147
Comment Thumbs: 910 total,  1000 ,  90
Content Level Progress: 66% (66/100)
Level 113 Content: Funny Junkie → Level 114 Content: Funny Junkie
Comment Level Progress: 50% (5/10)
Level 190 Comments: Anon Annihilator → Level 191 Comments: Anon Annihilator
Subscribers:2
Content Views:52711
Times Content Favorited:70 times
Total Comments Made:190
FJ Points:2187
Favorite Tags: get (2) | my (2) | old (2) | on (2) | the (2)
First found FunnyJunk in 2005 when I was 9 or 10 by googling 'funny pictures', made an account 3 years later, and still coming back to this day.

When I'm not lazily clicking Shift + Next I'm an IT Technician, a small time karate instructor, and occasional receptionist.

latest user's comments

#1919 - I was going through that phase. I'd change it to Ji… 02/24/2015 on Why did you pick that... 0
#125 - Idk, I found it in the comments here a couple of years back. I… 12/22/2014 on 2spooky 0
#120 - Wow, I've not been on in a while, have we really got that hars…  [+] (3 new replies) 12/22/2014 on 2spooky 0
#124 - anon (12/22/2014) [-]
wait, did you legit post tits in sfw and think it wouldn't get banned? This isn't FJ2, mate
User avatar
#125 - deathedblack (12/22/2014) [-]
Idk, I found it in the comments here a couple of years back. I didn't realise we were so strict these days
User avatar
#121 - dragostarc (12/22/2014) [-]
it's a nude female so yeah, it would be nsfw.
#114 - Comment deleted  [+] (5 new replies) 12/22/2014 on 2spooky 0
User avatar
#118 - dragostarc (12/22/2014) [-]
Dude i think this might get the b&nhammer
User avatar
#120 - deathedblack (12/22/2014) [-]
Wow, I've not been on in a while, have we really got that harsh? Thanks for the tip though
#124 - anon (12/22/2014) [-]
wait, did you legit post tits in sfw and think it wouldn't get banned? This isn't FJ2, mate
User avatar
#125 - deathedblack (12/22/2014) [-]
Idk, I found it in the comments here a couple of years back. I didn't realise we were so strict these days
User avatar
#121 - dragostarc (12/22/2014) [-]
it's a nude female so yeah, it would be nsfw.
#24 - We're going to have to send you to the colonies.  [+] (1 new reply) 12/19/2014 on [Bonging Intensifies] +27
#57 - officerbooty (12/20/2014) [-]
"I don't make deals with peasants!"
#88 - I see your point, though the way I see it, having access to dr… 09/17/2014 on Lolicon 0
#85 - Good day to you too 09/17/2014 on Lolicon +1
#83 - Well say that person was working in a school, or for a youth c…  [+] (4 new replies) 09/17/2014 on Lolicon +1
User avatar
#87 - krobeles (09/17/2014) [-]
I agree that his willingness to loudly announce to the world what he jerks off to, is a cause for concern if he held a job as a teacher, but that would be true regardless of what he were jerking it to, Loli or not.
We cant start policing what kind of porn people are allowed to draw, nor pass judgement on it. Thats opening of nasty can of worms of thought policing. We can however, judge the way people conduct themselves in a public area, and admonish them apropriately.
User avatar
#88 - deathedblack (09/17/2014) [-]
I see your point, though the way I see it, having access to drawn images of children should be as acceptable as real. I mean it's not like it isn't out there, hidden, but the amount of anime versions in the wide open just kind of shows it's like an acceptable version.
Though I wouldn't exactly advocate the kind of policing aspect, good point!
User avatar
#84 - therealtjthemedic (09/17/2014) [-]
I see what you're saying.
Well.
I think we've come to a logical conclusion for this debate.
Good day to you.
User avatar
#85 - deathedblack (09/17/2014) [-]
Good day to you too
#81 - It just normalises it the way it's put out there, people see t…  [+] (6 new replies) 09/17/2014 on Lolicon +2
User avatar
#82 - therealtjthemedic (09/17/2014) [-]
But should people get fired for what they whack it to though?
User avatar
#83 - deathedblack (09/17/2014) [-]
Well say that person was working in a school, or for a youth club, then 100% yes.
Many companies still would because they wouldn't want a person who acts like that in their spare time to work for them... I mean if you can get fired for smoking drugs and posting pictures all over facebook, you should probably be fired for whacking it over drawings of children and posting it on your blog.

I hear what you're saying from the defence side, but I just don't see that's it too recoverable. I personally wouldn't hang about with somebody like that, let alone hire one.
User avatar
#87 - krobeles (09/17/2014) [-]
I agree that his willingness to loudly announce to the world what he jerks off to, is a cause for concern if he held a job as a teacher, but that would be true regardless of what he were jerking it to, Loli or not.
We cant start policing what kind of porn people are allowed to draw, nor pass judgement on it. Thats opening of nasty can of worms of thought policing. We can however, judge the way people conduct themselves in a public area, and admonish them apropriately.
User avatar
#88 - deathedblack (09/17/2014) [-]
I see your point, though the way I see it, having access to drawn images of children should be as acceptable as real. I mean it's not like it isn't out there, hidden, but the amount of anime versions in the wide open just kind of shows it's like an acceptable version.
Though I wouldn't exactly advocate the kind of policing aspect, good point!
User avatar
#84 - therealtjthemedic (09/17/2014) [-]
I see what you're saying.
Well.
I think we've come to a logical conclusion for this debate.
Good day to you.
User avatar
#85 - deathedblack (09/17/2014) [-]
Good day to you too
#105 - Well until you teach them how to make condoms out of the grain…  [+] (1 new reply) 09/11/2014 on Cost of food around the world 0
User avatar
#109 - MrDeadiron (09/11/2014) [-]
No, we need creative solutions.
[ 190 Total ]