40+ macs for 36,000 dollars? More like 2 or 3.

hilarious

Hipsters and photography students, i fucking hate having to use film, digital is so much cheaper/easier/better

Better is not the best word. I, personally, love using my film camera, but it's too expensive. So, I found ways to get the same look from any decent DSLR camera.

well yeah film can get equally as good shots, but it's just so time consuming and expensive to develop the film and make up the prints

Actually, it's primarily the features of the Camera. The Multiple Exposure, the bold setting, and the unique Bent Corners many offer are remarkable. Also, the lightweight body and not needing batteries make it good for travel.

Also, the original device costs a lot less. Mine was 26 dollars to begin with. at $20 a roll (to buy and develop) I could Do about 8 or 9 rolls before getting a Digital was more worthwhile. That's 192 photos, with a very light camera. If you don't use the camera that much, then it's not terrible. PLUS, people use film all the time, mainly tourists. Disposables are just cheap 35mm cameras.

Why do you give out about OC?

OP tried
And for that he gets a thumb