|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #17823 on SubscribersLevel 263 Comments: Pure Win
OfflineSend mail to dawgfan Block dawgfan Invite dawgfan to be your friend flag avatar
- Text/Links 1
- Pictures 135
- Video 1
- YouTube 10
- Animated Gifs 4
- Favorites 99
- Friends 8
- Comments 1495
- Channels 4
- All 1762
latest user's comments
|#49 - Man all I have is a Gamecast||05/03/2013 on sega pls||+1|
|#167 - My grandfather never knew how to work a computer he just drank…||05/03/2013 on Feels||0|
|#72 - and Louise||05/03/2013 on I thought it was funny||+4|
|#168 - Holy Mother of God||05/03/2013 on Soon.gif||0|
|#189 - BREAKING NEWS Petoria has invaded and is currently oc…||04/29/2013 on Poor East Germany..||+23|
|#139 - Picture [+] (2 new replies)||04/28/2013 on Ed, Edd and Eddy||+8|
|#64 - It is the Book 1 release date in England however||04/27/2013 on So now it begins....||-1|
|#58 - No [+] (2 new replies)||04/27/2013 on So now it begins....||+1|
|#466 - **dawgfan rolls 0,267** Why not? [+] (1 new reply)||04/26/2013 on I Cant||0|
|#55 - Picture||04/23/2013 on Possibly the greatest gif||+2|
|#18 - That bitch's love of ham nearly destroyed the world [+] (2 new replies)||04/23/2013 on balance like a boss!!||+17|
|#15 - Who the **** hates Super Troopers?||04/23/2013 on o.o||+19|
|#419 - Now do all 50 states Representing the great state of Georgia [+] (1 new reply)||04/23/2013 on FJ Demographic - Complete!||-4|
|#413 - Can we get California to go away too? [+] (2 new replies)||04/23/2013 on FJ Demographic - Complete!||0|
|#543 - Annnnnd.... **** Storm||04/23/2013 on yep||+2|
|#234 - Are you ready to have you mind ****** ? [+] (1 new reply)||04/23/2013 on 4chan Magic Tricks||+5|
|#14 - I have a kid that's hungry and the lazy asses won't feed it. …||04/22/2013 on Cheat on your wife.||+5|
|#28 - Comment deleted||04/22/2013 on Manly man is at it again||+3|
|#182 - Jesus ******* Christ||04/22/2013 on Stupid||+5|
|#18 - So this is why nobody will invade the US. It's not because…||04/22/2013 on Baghdad Ass Ops||0|
|#239 - Just realized I'm a dumbass at spelling||04/22/2013 on World War III explained||0|
|#59 - Or until you flip going down a damn hill||04/22/2013 on It's all fun and games...||0|
|#395 - handguns yes but when it comes to guns such as AR-15s and AK-4…||04/22/2013 on Muricaaaa||0|
|#220 - Way to show how little you know about US History there champ [+] (19 new replies)||04/22/2013 on World War III explained||0|
#310 - anonymous poster (04/22/2013) [-]
Not sure how you attack a fort you legally own.
#316 - anonymous poster (04/22/2013) [-]
Attacking the forces inside that are illegally occupying a structure you own.
#326 - anonymous poster (04/22/2013) [-]
1.Secession was legal at the time, there was no laws against secession until after the civil war.
2.A sovereign nation has every right to forcibly remove a foreign force refusing to leave.
#346 - anonymous poster (04/22/2013) [-]
Show me anywhere in the constitution before 1869 any mention of secession, maybe look into the laws a little bit next time you go off stating something as fact.
#257 - jlew (04/22/2013) [-]
No he's right. Fort Sumter was a Northern Fort, it was attacked by the South.
He was technically right but worded it wrong when he said the South seceded because of Lincoln's views on Slavery. The South believed that Lincoln was going to instantly abolish slavery when in reality he was going to completely leave the issue alone.
The North actually needed the South's cotton and other agricultural products due to its high level of Industrialization and low amounts of land capable of being used to grow food and other products. The South wasn't really even thinking about its economic disadvantages when it seceded and planned to win with the support of Britain by selling them a bunch of cotton for weapons and other supplies.
The South did secede because of social differences. i.e. Slavery. The North had already abolished slavery and was feverishly trying to do so in the south as well. They believed, as did the South, that Lincoln was going to abolish slavery, but he didn't. The Emancipation Proclamation was actually pointless as it abolished slavery in places that it didn't have the jurisdiction to.
Try to argue with me. I read my history book, cover to cover.
#260 - anonymous poster (04/22/2013) [-]
After the secession the union had no rights to Fort Sumter, since it was then in Confederate territory.
#285 - anonymous poster (04/22/2013) [-]
The union soldiers had no rights to be there past the date of secession. And if the US asked Britian to leave it would've been legally compelled to.
#291 - jlew (04/22/2013) [-]
The union soldiers didn't have a CHANCE to leave past the date that the land they were in had seceded. Boats aren't exactly the fastest things in the world you know, especially not back then. And the US did ask Britain to leave. When we started our own country and won the Revolution part of the terms of the Treaty was that Britain would renounce ALL landownership it had in the Americas.
Anyway secession occurred over a long period of time, each state seceded at its own time so saying "the date of secession" is a little bit idiotic.
#295 - anonymous poster (04/22/2013) [-]
The date of secession where the fort was located, and yes, South carolina ordered them to abandon the fort, they had knowledge of the secession and had plenty of time to prepare ships in case secession passed.
#300 - jlew (04/22/2013) [-]
Ships are still slow. The soldiers didn't actually pose a threat to the South. They could have been given more time, but the South was too trigger-happy and started the war.
No matter what the South is still responsible as they attacked first, the North had no plans or reasons to attack the South as they could have imported food as they had been doing even before secession.
#303 - anonymous poster (04/22/2013) [-]
Keeping troops in a sovereign nation against its will was considered an act of war at the time, so technically speaking, no the union started the war when it refused to leave SC.
#305 - anonymous poster (04/22/2013) [-]
I've seen history books that state the south started the war and some that say the north did, I guess it comes down to perspective.
|#340 - I have never heard of a child accidentally shooting themselves… [+] (4 new replies)||04/21/2013 on Muricaaaa||+2|
#347 - anonymous poster (04/21/2013) [-]
happens all the time that a kid finds his parents' firearm and provokes an accident.