Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

davidispissed    

Rank #39610 on Subscribers
davidispissed Avatar Level 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Offline
Send mail to davidispissed Block davidispissed Invite davidispissed to be your friend flag avatar
Last status update:
-
Personal Info
Date Signed Up:7/11/2011
Last Login:9/27/2014
Funnyjunk Career Stats
Content Thumbs: 279 total,  440 ,  161
Comment Thumbs: 3712 total,  5453 ,  1741
Content Level Progress: 40% (4/10)
Level 27 Content: Peasant → Level 28 Content: Peasant
Comment Level Progress: 70% (70/100)
Level 236 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz → Level 237 Comments: Ambassador Of Lulz
Subscribers:1
Content Views:27406
Times Content Favorited:16 times
Total Comments Made:1882
FJ Points:3953

latest user's comments

#9 - here's a thought, let try to improve everyone's situation. let…  [+] (72 new replies) 04/10/2014 on you know it -20
#116 - icecreamonnips (04/11/2014) [-]
#114 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
Well, aren't you just fucking retarded?
User avatar #87 - captainfuckitall (04/11/2014) [-]
Well I think that's a massive lie, but I can't prove that. In any case, it's not at peace in Atheist states and countries either, because the problem is not any one religion, belief, or ideology, and until you realize that you will never grow beyond "Hurr durr, all religion ist dun evil!"

But again, you're viewing it as this objective principle. You literally JUST said it can be manipulated by people into serving personal gain, and so can every belief, so can Atheism in the fact that you right now are promoting totalitarian control over other beliefs. There is no one ideal that everyone will come to love, or even agree to, because people are not all the same and that's okay. World peace will never be achieved and that's okay. People will hurt and suffer and die and that's okay. And all of this has absolutely nothing to do with religion.

So where does it end for you? Where do you draw the line of what is natural or should be allowed? Gays? Transexuals? Zoophiles? Pedophiles? And yes you HAVE said religious belief should be forbidden. You have said that in multiple comments (and if 'belief' is fine but not 'religious belief' then you are once again only proving it is the title you have a problem with). But religion is as much of a killer as it is a creator. If you have conjoined twins and one of them kills, you would not kill them both, and if you have a million people all attached to a single nerve, you would not kill it just because one of them is a bad person.
User avatar #91 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
religion is more than a god. thats the point. people are religious over many things. look at weed culture and MLP.

and many atheist states are in unrest due to a c;ash of atheism and religion.
#99 - spinaltap (04/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #94 - captainfuckitall (04/11/2014) [-]
Again, earlier you said religion absolves you of responsibility, yet here you are making excuses so Atheists are not responsible for unrest.

You are the definition of hypocritical and 'religiously blind'.
#84 - DerpScout (04/11/2014) [-]
#140 - mr skeltal (04/14/2014) [-]
The vast incorrectness of this is what makes it funny.
#80 - spinaltap (04/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #79 - whiteusername (04/11/2014) [-]
Here is a list of people who would agree with you.
Mao Zedong
Pol Pot
Benito Mussolini
Joseph Stalin
Fidel Castro
Kim Jong Il & Sons
Jeff Dahmer

You should move to Cuba or North Korea where you can be happy
User avatar #89 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
also george washington, john adams, john hancock, benjamin franklin, carl sagan, niel tyson, ill gates, steve jobs
#124 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
ill gates indeed
#125 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #90 - whiteusername (04/11/2014) [-]
which of them wanted to outlaw religion?
#117 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
Both of you are idiots
User avatar #66 - captainfuckitall (04/11/2014) [-]
Replying to this comment because I can no longer reply to the most recent.

Actually the church supported finding a cure and advancing medicine, given the fact that they funded so many priests and doctors to come up with ideas of what exactly was wrong with people and how to fix them. This is also what led to the rise of the Renaissance, where many people were still religious and every second person was a scientist, inventor, or artist.

I might trust Hindu records, but considering that muslims and hebrews were both involved in the Crusades, I wouldn't be so keen on their information. Do you just have a stiffy against hating christians or something? Also, the doctors not washing their hands thing is so obviously false, considering people routinely cleaned their food, invented sewers, ect. They also preached against hanging out with animals as they could spread diseases, and also the importance of keeping cloths clean. They even specifically pointed those things out IN the bible. They obviously knew what sanitation was, just perhaps not the impact it might have. And why would they? They didn't have the technology to see bacteria. Just as well, nations were no longer oppressed by religious regime past the 1900's, yet people still died in the American Civil War more due to infection than combat.

If that is so, why do many farming techniques that we hold today come from the Aztecs, masters of the craft, who were one of the most bloody and religious nations in history?

You can't have a "false" political ideology any more than you can have a "true" one. Political views are completely subjective. It's ironic that you have preached multiple times that religions try to absolve people of personal responsibility, yet you are making excuses for why any Atheist ruler who might be evil is, in fact, "Not doing it the way he should be doing it" (Which is the "No True Scotsman" logical fallacy, by the way).
User avatar #70 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
a false political ideology is one that states that any one human life is greater than any other. (i.e. monarchy, oligharchy, matriarchy, patriarchy, theocracy.) the idea that all human life is entitled to all the same rights as another is more logical and is also more apt to breed ideologies of temperance, sufferage and unity.
#93 - spinaltap (04/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #69 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
i cant use a religion i never practiced as an example. I've been buddhist and I've been Christian. so I can use them as a standard candle to compare my universe to. Frankly i like the atheist universe better.
User avatar #76 - captainfuckitall (04/11/2014) [-]
Good for you. Religion is not for everyone. Neither is Atheism.

You say that, yet earlier you preached about not letting religious people have anything Atheists have come up with. You are denying the right to live in a healthy way because of your preconceived (and false) perceptions about their ideology.

Earlier you said that what scares you is that people are willing to die and kill for their god, but what scares me right now is that you truly do believe you are on the fore-front of the most righteous path and are willing to become a tyrant yourself in order to make sure everyone else gets there too, by force if necessary.

You are no different then the religious people you so despise, but I'm sure you'd justify that too, the same way they would.
User avatar #85 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
again belief is not religion. belief is fine, harm is not. believe in god, i don't care, but do not harm other people simply because your preacher says you should. Questioning the evils of a widely held religion does not mean I don't respect those who believe in a higher power. And I am aware many religious people have done great things, but many have also done great evils. Gangs in California have done good, too, but also kill other gang members, should they be left to their own devices? until they can get along, let us separate the kids for a bit, and give them something to do, like fixing roads and bridges or grow more food, maybe even progress our universal understanding a bit. It doesn't undermine their God, but perhaps tey will realize that regardless of belief, they don't need religion.
User avatar #92 - captainfuckitall (04/11/2014) [-]
And religion is not causation of harm.

An evil person will harm because of his own goals, a good person will not. It doesn't matter what the preacher says, it matters what type of person you are, and even if religion itself was gone, they would find another medium to express their goals in a just manner, because that is the way people are.

You are blaming a tool because the maker does not know how to properly utilize it, or utilizes it for evil.

And perhaps they will want it anyways. If you believe something is the truth, your opinion will never change. Why do you think we've been having this conversation this long if either of us were willing to change our minds? Or thoughts are not so revolutionary that they inspire millions to change themselves as people, otherwise they already would have.
#51 - thegoodleftundone (04/10/2014) [-]
While I agree that religion can be bad, outlawing religion is no different than religion itself. That's forcing people not to believe. Even if you don't like it, at least appreciate the fact that we have the freedom to believe whatever we want in countries like America.
#28 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
mhmm
User avatar #21 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
Ah yes, what a good idea! That's exactly what the Chinese have done to the Tibetans time and time before, and you can just see how peaceful everyone got and...

Wait...
User avatar #22 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
you realize the dalai llama is a religous tyrant...

i said all religion. not just state religion.
#95 - spinaltap (04/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #23 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
Give me an example of how that is true.
User avatar #24 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
the lama class of tibet were the elite class. they held all the money and power and commanded armies of slaves and harems. anyone who dissented was put to death. the dalai lama was the creme de la creme of this class.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_classes_of_Tibet
User avatar #26 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
According to American sinologist A. Tom Grunfeld there were a few slaves in Tibet. Grunfeld quotes Sir Charles Bell, a British colonial official in India and a Tibet scholar who wrote of slaves in the form of small children being stolen or bought from their parents, too poor to support them, to be brought up and kept or sold as slaves.[19] Grunfeld omits Bell's elaboration that in 1905, there were "a dozen or two" of these, and that it was "a very mild form of slavery".[20] According to exile Tibetan writer Jamyang Norbu, later accounts from Westerners who visited Tibet and even long-term foreign residents such as Heinrich Harrer, Peter Aufschnaiter, Hugh Richardson and David Macdonald make no mention of any such practice, which suggests that the 13th Dalai Lama must have eliminated this practice altogether in his reforms

Ah, such a tyrant!

In any case, none of anything else you said is included in there. No mention of death, armies of slaves, or harems. Not even of anyone complaining, frankly. If you only have your personal opinion to support your arguments, it would probably be best if you didn't try.
#30 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
i also have pictures if you want.

#96 - spinaltap (04/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #31 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
Any context for them?
User avatar #35 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
that man you see there is Tenzin Gyatso, the current dalai lama. Doesn't look too distraught, does he?
User avatar #36 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
Considering I can't enlarge the picture, I don't have context, don't have any form of reference, and (excuse me for the racist remark) he doesn't really look much different in terms of features to those bodies, all I have to confirm that he is the current Dalai Lama is your own word, and you've already proven you're bias.
User avatar #40 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
and all I'm saying is that I at least brought evidence. Also you should look at his demands for self-immolation of his followers in 2008. he demanded his people set fire to themselves in protest.
User avatar #41 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
You didn't, though. Everything you've given has either been your own opinion or unsourced articles.

Also, the Dalai Lama didn't demand anything. The monks lit themselves on fire in protest of the Chinese regime, you know, the one that always had more slaves, more people dying, more oppressed classes?
User avatar #43 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
so one oppressor is greater than another?

only religion makes people believe that to fight oppression you must die.
that brings me back to my actual point religion is inherently evil and oppressive and should thereby be outlawed.

yeah china is a bunch of dicks, but they still follow a false ideology (i.e. totalitarian communism) but how is that monarchy any different from christianity or islam or even budhism? I put it to you that it is not.

whenever one party is in control of all others, it is evil, be it a man, a priest, or a god.
User avatar #44 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
He's not an oppressor though. Again, you have given NO evidence that the Dalai Lama is a tyrant beyond your own opinions and unsourced materials.

Really? Despite the fact that a Communist Russia sent hundreds of thousands to their death? Buddhists are non-violent, nor do they believe in a final death, that's HOW they protest, to show devotion to their faith and belief as you would fight in the army for your country or government. The fact you do not understand this just shows how narrow a view you have. In all serious, Communism as a political ideology has sent more people to their deaths than religion has.

How in any way is that a 'false ideology'? It's not a religious belief, it's a subjective political standpoint. Well it is different, because, again, it's based on politics rather than religion, which are very different things.

I can't imagine what world you must live in, where anything that promotes any type of control is inherently wrong. So what, you are an Atheist Anarchist who lives in the woods and happens to gain and internet connection through a make-shift computer?
User avatar #49 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
also, im not an anarchist, i beleive in true democracy. but you wouldn't know anything about that, would you? no. you wouldn't because you follow the order to worship a ronz age genocidal, baby-killing king.

Religion is the cause for 90 percent of war, famine, brutality, scientific repression, human rights suppression and death. I'll concede that there will always be bad men, but at least there won't be a society built around the spread of stupidity and terrorism.

Who is the true anarchist here? the man who still believes in a God that despises his own creation, or the man who simply wants us to get on with life in the smoothest manner possible.
User avatar #57 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
I'm not actually a christian, which is also why I don't care about you calling the holy books/sacred texts bullshit in lower comments either. In those comments, I was just trying to point out that it was stupid of YOU to trust information without sources and references, and not only stupid, but hypocritical.

Do you honestly believe that without religion, people would be nicer? Again, Communism as a political ideology has murdered more people than any one religion or religious war, and that's specifically anti-religion. Religion is a tool, it's a medium for a point, the exact same way you'd put a hammer to a nail instead of your fist. If an evil man is truly evil, he will be so regardless of religious beliefs and even twist the beliefs to justify their crimes. And likewise, if a good man is truly good, he will be good regardless of religious beliefs. Any single ideal only serves to express the person you are, and while certain ideals attract certain people, it means different things to all of them.

I actually don't despise anything. Just as well, you don't want to get on with life because you're not minding yourself, you make judgements and extreme opinions about those around you, and by doing so you are obviously allowing people to return those judgements and opinions. I get the feeling you see yourself as a very righteous, noble, and yet still humble person, and I can't imagine the amount of mental gymnastics you do to do just that.

User avatar #60 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
first, the crusades and holocaust kinda beat out communism.

also, religion is oppression. it binds the mind and works of those who believe it with threat of pain and torture, it has slaughtered countless men, women and children, it has divided families and it has inspired the worst in mankind. it kept the world in chains for 500 years while the high priests were living in palaces. you want to compare totalitarianism to religion, then I will. Gods and kings both demand unwavering, unquestioning loyalty. deviation means death. gods and king both repress education in the hopes of maintaining an ignorant populace, one that doesn't ask questions. Both restrict basic rights and both demand blood sacrifice. so i ask you, is my desire to rid the world of religion any less moral than everyone's desire to rid it of totalitarianism?
#97 - spinaltap (04/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #62 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
Actually they don't. Records of the crusades are very shoddy and corrupted by now (which is only to be expected, of course. Everyone was bias and nobody was a scholar), but the general agreed amount of death is 1-2 million people. That doesn't sound like much now, but it really was a lot for its time

The Holocaust has a death total of a generally agreed 11 million (not including the the war itself as it involved many different faiths and ideologies. Some of which were Atheist). I'll be liberal here and give you a grand total of 13 million dead.

Now, Mao Zedong was just ONE communist leader, and while he is considered one of the worst tyrants in history, he is still one man and had a grand total of 49-78,000,000 deaths alone. Even if we completely cut out things caused by him indirectly and even missing/captured people, we would still have 40-50 million deaths. Nearly 4x more than both the Holocaust and the Crusades. And may I remind you, that is just ONE communist regime, out of the many there have been.

You do realize that not every religion is like the Monotheistic ones we have today, right? Have you even studied religion before you decided you hated it? Have you even looked throughout history at it, and it's many wonderful achievements of propelling mankind (including in Mesopotamia, where it was religion that urged the building and innovation of technology, medicine, and engineering, which was the pillar of which civilizations after it were built)?
User avatar #64 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
during the crusades, the church actively suppressed scientific advancement in health and sanitation thereby leading to the spread of the bubonic plague as well as deaths caused by simple, preventable illnesses. also, while the catholic church records are incomplete, the hindus, who also inhabitted the area, kept records also. so did the muslims and hebrews. there are more ways to kill than in combat. by suppressing the knowledge of the people, the murdered countless millions. in fact, doctors didn't know to wash their hands until 1847. how many do you think died from surgical infection before then?

In order to preserve life, scientific advances in medicine, sanitation and agriculture are necessary. Religions around the world have all suppressed this knowlege. can you count those deaths? no one can, there are simply too many to count.

Also, Mao Zedong betrayed his own country and laws. again it is a lack of accountability under a false ideology.
User avatar #47 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
also, i fail to see how faith in religious bullshit is a political view.
#81 - spinaltap (04/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #53 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
It's not (although it can be related to political leaders in some cases), which is why I specifically separated the two as different things. Read my comment again.
User avatar #46 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
read comment 39, fucker. i've given much evidence. and even if that one man isn't oppressive, religion still is.
User avatar #52 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
More oppressive than, say, you demanding a ban on all religion? And what if people refuse? Would you kill them, exile them, and them set up as examples of what happens if people don't follow your laws?

I'm just trying to follow your train of logic here.
User avatar #56 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
no, because that is the christian way. if people wish to believe in nonsense, then they will not be allowed to benefit from the works of those who do not.

if god supplies all your needs, then you don't need medicine or sanitation, etc.

it's religious freedom by making you live what you beleive and if this is unnacceptable, then you must agree that those beliefs are absolute bovine excrement.
User avatar #59 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
That doesn't sound like democracy to me at all.

That's true, but by a certain stretch of logic, he could supply those needs BY the medium of medicine, sanitation, ect.

It's not unacceptable, it is perfectly reasonable (you can also just say "Cow shit". Really. "Bovine excrement" is neither funny nor does it make you sound smart). But does that mean that everything provided BY religion or religious people is also off limits to Atheists?
User avatar #27 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
keep reading

www.antimoon.com/forum/t13141.htm

the dalai family has a longer history than that one article.
User avatar #29 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
I will not. That article contains no sources for its information, and thus is practically worthless unless you were some snobby Atheist who thought he was fundamentally better than any type of religious practice.

Also, even if any of it did happen to be true, there are multiple posts below it refuting it and proving it is the GREATER lesser of far many evils. So either way, you'd still be wrong.
User avatar #32 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
so because an article cites no sources you don't believe it.

i know a whole book that cites no sources.
User avatar #33 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
Well yes, there are many books that make claims without sources

Such as the bible, koran, talmud, dhammapada...

But of course, just because they have no sources or references doesn't mean they're not true, right?
User avatar #50 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
Read the first comment of the first source. It explains why it's worthless (if you don't want to: Basically, they are an extremist religious group that the Dalai Lama holds no sway over. Of course he does not approve, but they would not listen to him).

Second source is obviously bias, a Chinese news outlet blaming him for rising violence, rather than, say, themselves pushing a hostile way of life.

Third source is the same as the first.

The fourth claims he is an evil man simply because he does not believe in god.

In the fifth I can't read a single damn thing. A subscription page pops up and I can't close it, and it covers all the text.

And once more, the sixth source fails to provide any type of source of its own. It has absolutely no references to go by, which it should considering such specific information.

I apologize for not seeing this sooner. My internet crapped out and I guess it didn't register as you replying, but it was still a waste of time.
User avatar #55 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
so you refuse to read any other source but from him? that's like saying "well, he says he didn't kill her, everyone else saw it, i'm letting him go."

The entire conflict between China and Tibet revolves, still, around differences in religious ideology. The master race wanted to keep land that (even at that time) belonged to the government. it was still dictated by a beleif in a deity. you can argue all you want that you would like to fellate the dalai lama, but you still haven't proven why religion is worth keeping. That is still the topic of debate here. can you name one religion that is innocent or even true?
#82 - spinaltap (04/11/2014) [-]
User avatar #86 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
if you have a valid, relevant point, make it. if not, butt the fuck out.
#88 - spinaltap (04/11/2014) [-]
Tibetans are from tibet
User avatar #58 - captainfuckitall (04/10/2014) [-]
No, I refuse to read any source that does not have a reference, and so far you have given none. Did you even read those articles? Or did you just google "Why the Dalai Lama is evil" and copy and paste?

Didn't you just say you were a believer of true democracy? If a majority of a portion of a country wants a different religion, ideology, or leader, isn't it your opinion that they should get it?

Actually the topic of the debate, as it started, was that the Dalai Lama was a tyrant, and I am proving he is not.

If you'd like to change topics though, we certainly can once you concede that you have no basis for this one.
User avatar #61 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
while you make a valid point, the tibetans remaining with the lama class priest were far from the majority and many tibetans left that system and embraced communism, even under a dictator. and no, i dont believe that if a majority wants a religion that it should be allowed, because that is essentially like saying that since i like escargot, i think everyone does. you yourself stated that religion i different from politics. All I am saying is the only true separation of the two wold be the nonexistence of religion. and to be honest i would even be happy to see it made law that a mameber of a religious organization (which serves a monarchy as previously stated) cannot rule in a democracy and that other religious people should be held accountable by laws of the land and of their faith. if christians gave half a fuck about what christ actually said, it would be different, but they don't. the issue is accountability and it's easy to escape responsibility by saying, "God said."

religion is just a way to keep people controlled and ignorant while avoid responsibility for your actions.
User avatar #65 - captainfuckitall (04/11/2014) [-]
And many Chinese asked the government to leave the Tibetans alone, so they're in the same boat, aren't they? People can change and join different things, and many have. The Dalai Lama is, by majority, considered the rightful leader and ruler of Tibet.

Well no it wouldn't. That would be like saying that many people like escargot and so they have it on the average menu at a cafe, which would be sensible, actually.

Yes I did. No it wouldn't. By the very nature of what it is, to be involved in politics and rulership is to have a political ideology. Whether this is entwined within religion or not is completely irrelevant. You cannot get into politics without having a political ideology regardless of your religious affiliation, and you cannot get into religion without having a religious ideology, regardless of your political affiliation. They can exist perfectly independently of eachother.

Yes it is. It's also easy to escape accountability by saying "I'm just following orders". As stated before, evil men will be evil and good men will be good, regardless of what sect they are affiliated with or why.

Is that so? All, roughly, 27,000 religions that have existed since the birth of civilization? Not to mention unrecorded or unheard of ones. All of them are made specifically to subject people? (Which of course is different from the majority subjecting people, in your view, I suppose)
User avatar #67 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
so you are happy now with the world?
it can't get better?
there is a minimum of evil?
religion isn't harming anyone?
the removal of oppression of any sort isn't worth it?
fundamentals in positions of power aren't a threat to the human race as a whole?
someone who believes the world will end for their god's glory with a finger on the launch button is the most terrifying thing in the world. Scarier than hell, scarier than the prospect of being alone in the universe, scarier than the possibility that we are evil by nature. the fact that most christians believe the armageddon and return of christ will ahppen in their lifetime and wish to be one of god's vessels deeply increases the probability that one man will be in a position to initiate Mutually Assured Destruction. Show me the world is fine with religion and I'll tip my hat but if you can show even the slightest amount of evidence that religion and theism of any sort is harmful, then is it not our job as good men to expose that and to free people from that oppression?

If communism is oppressive and is to be destroyed, then what makes religious oppression any different?

I stand by my statement. religion should be removed from human society, the dalai lama teaches a religionthat uses self immolation and separatism as forms of peaceful protest and that is the peaceful religion. How do these beliefs help his people? they don't. if any oppression can be removed should it not be removed?

I am aware that there will alwaays be retarded belief in the supernatural, but must it always become religion, or can it remain as an opinion formed by someone who has yet to discover an answer?

when we rely on religion for the answer, we stop lookiing for the real answers and this is oppressive, too.

So I reitterate, is it not our job as god men to stand up for what we know to be right?

The greatest evil is not committed by the actions of evil men, but by the inaction of good men. It is not enough to no do evil, we should do good.
User avatar #75 - captainfuckitall (04/11/2014) [-]
I never said Communism was oppressive. No political ideology inherently is. I was just making a point that Atheists are just as capable of evil as religious people, and since you would have pulled the "But religious people do it more" card, I wanted to pull the "but historically, Atheists have done it at a great magnitude".

He doesn't teach that, actually. Self-immolation was not his idea.

Religions do not help people? Are you not aware that Catholicism alone is one of if not thee biggest contributor to charity in all of history?

So it's only stupid when it has to do with religion, but not on its own? See, this is the problem with you, is that you are absolutely, 100% convinced that ANYTHING that has to do with religion is fundamentally BAD, and that NOTHING good can come of it. Even if the exact same beliefs were held outside of the spectrum of 'religion', you'd be fine with it, but it's the title that gets you. That's why people dislike you and insult you, you know, it's not because "Oh I'm right and they're just mindless sheep", it's because you are deluding yourself and everyone else can see it.

Well, what I believe is right has a lot to do with personal freedom. "True democracy", as you put it. Yet apparently, what you believe to be right is limiting opportunities that you personally find harmful. Earlier you said that you would not make everyone eat escargot because you alone thought it was inherently delicious, but right now you are literally preaching to ban all religons everywhere because you alone believe they are inherently evil. Can't you see your own hypocrisy? Can't you see your own delusion? Do you even know what you say?

You preach of doing good and having the best intentions for man, but you literally sound like a dictator when you preach of stripping personal freedom and opportunity because "I know what's best more than you". If a religious person ever said that to you, you would nearly murder with rage.
User avatar #78 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
to be honest if the world were at pace with religion, i would be perfectly happy, but it isn't. the reason being that religion is broken. holy books are rewritten by politicians as a means to an end and no one lives by any religion's moral code, but love to throw its laws around when it fits their small world view. as i stated before i would be fine if christians actually cared about what christ said, or if buddhists lived peaceably with others, offering aid when needed, not forsaking their own life or that of his neighbor as the great Sidhartha Guatama (Buddha) asked them to do. jesus said love, but christians hate. Buddha said be polite and obey, buddhists maim themselves in revolt.
Religion is broken and is hurting people. if it wasn't broken, i would be happy. what do you do with the broken toy? you fix it, or throw it away.

i believe that people can believe what they like, but they cannot use it to harm others. laws should protect the populace, not reinforce belief. You believe in God? fine. you think Gays should be exiled or even killed? i think it's time to retire, Sen. Cruz. I'm not sying that belief is to be forbidden. belief is not religion. religion is a repetition of any activity such as prayer or discipline. but once again, it is broken. t has become the repetition of propaganda and hate-speech, and terror. When a killer continues to kill, you put him away. many things have great potential as other things, but are used wrongly.
User avatar #72 - captainfuckitall (04/11/2014) [-]
Everything can always get better, but the way of being better is not to limit opportunities. It is neither positive nor negative to be religious or non-religious, but it IS negative to ban religion as it is to force it. You're trying to hard to make it seem like the "Cause-all, end-all" of problems, yet even in areas where it was or is banned, evil still sprouted and wars still raged as they did everywhere else, you're just either too blind or arrogant to see it, and so are absolutely convinced that YOUR way is the way to absolute peace despite the fact it has been tried, many times before, and failed because it is not.

Well no, considering that christians do not run the world, and christianity as a whole is only 1/3 of the most powerful religions right now, and even then that doesn't include every other religion, or Atheism, or even places that really aren't fundamentally religious. Honestly, you're turning into a paranoid loony because you're both so terrified of religion and convinced that it's so awful, and nobody could ever tell you otherwise no matter what. I look at you the exact same way that I do to feminists who claim all men are inherently evil and oppressors, and everyone else should look at you that way too: An insensible person who will never listen to anything outside of his own argument.

It IS fine with religion, and just by living in peace you are able to see that, but you refuse to accept it and will refuse to accept it even if true peace was achieved. I get a feeling that you would rather have total war with Atheists than world peace if literally every person was religious.

No, because many religions do as much harm as they do good. It is not like a gun where it only has one function, it has many functions and can be used in many different ways. What you're suggesting is like banning a swiss-army knife with many different tools because ONE side of it might be used to hurt.
#83 - spinaltap (04/11/2014) [-]
too much text, needed some pics
#38 - davidispissed has deleted their comment.
#37 - davidispissed has deleted their comment.
#73 - typical software guys, always blaming the hardware. 04/10/2014 on This made me mad then realized -1
#40 - also, ponies are gay.  [+] (7 new replies) 04/10/2014 on dumb blond -24
#61 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
Nigga that aint no pony!
User avatar #76 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
sorry that i confused your homosexual symbol with someone else's. apologies.
#105 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 6,393**

That's from a show called Panty & Stocking. It just shares a similar colour palette.

Also I can't really make out what you are arguing.
User avatar #106 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
i'm making the point that you feel justified in correcting me on that, but yet i'm seen as the enemy for expressing my opinion.
#62 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
That be the grinch.
#58 - colonelxj (04/10/2014) [-]
couldn't contain your 'ponies are gay' comment could ya?
User avatar #59 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
nope.
#38 - the holocaust was made by choices, it was terrible, yes but st… 04/10/2014 on dumb blond -22
#36 - and is a commentary on human behavior, not a physical conditio…  [+] (2 new replies) 04/10/2014 on dumb blond -21
User avatar #72 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
and i didn't say they were comparable by the ability to choose, we're talking about the comedy concerning serious issues, systematic racism is a serious problem, we joke about it, autism is also a serious issue, we also joke about that, in terms of making jokes there really shouldn't be a distinction of how you got to the serious issue that you're joking about, the point is mocking the issue itself
User avatar #52 - harshy (04/10/2014) [-]
no one chooses to be black either
#34 - so a person can't vent? so it's wrong for me to express wh…  [+] (2 new replies) 04/10/2014 on dumb blond -25
#37 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
And the law that states that whenever an internet conversation is held, that a reference to the Nazis or HItler will be made has officially come true.

If that's honestly how you feel, you really shouldn't be on this website. Here, we make jokes that, even though they're usually distasteful, are still jokes. Here, we strive and live off of dry wit and general awful content, but if you're ONLY mad about this, then you're being a hypocrite.

I'm not saying it's wrong, I never said it was wrong, all I'm saying is that, again, you're arguing - and yes, you are - with people that think the same as you just because you dislike how they phrase things or how they might think that is even somewhat different from you.

tl;dr get over it, jokes. are. jokes.
User avatar #38 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
the holocaust was made by choices, it was terrible, yes but still a choice. Autism is not, being black is not, being asian is not, being gay is not, being a cock is debatable. the holocaust was preventable and humor about the holocaust can often be funny as it is a social commentary. If you actually paid attention my upset was about the use of autism as a way of calling people out for being different, being a nazi was a decision that was unfortunately made by many people and is a decision we should criticize. being autistic is forced upon people by an uncaring universe and shouod be helped and supported and researched. To criticize something that people have no choice in is like a grown man attacking a child. if the joke was to say that Jenny McCarthy has missed her whore vaccine it would be different as it would be a commentary as to her actions. I vented here BECAUSE you all agree with my viewpoint no despite it. I'm not arguing, I'm not debating, I am simply upset.
#31 - its just not funny. what other point must i make?  [+] (13 new replies) 04/10/2014 on dumb blond -29
#74 - thewasteland (04/10/2014) [-]
#32 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
It's not that, it's that every single point you made was completely out of nowhere, and nobody else had argued against any of it.

You're legitimately arguing against people that agree with you just because you're mad.

Guess that's your namesake, though.
User avatar #40 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
also, ponies are gay.
#61 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
Nigga that aint no pony!
User avatar #76 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
sorry that i confused your homosexual symbol with someone else's. apologies.
#105 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 6,393**

That's from a show called Panty & Stocking. It just shares a similar colour palette.

Also I can't really make out what you are arguing.
User avatar #106 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
i'm making the point that you feel justified in correcting me on that, but yet i'm seen as the enemy for expressing my opinion.
#62 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
That be the grinch.
#58 - colonelxj (04/10/2014) [-]
couldn't contain your 'ponies are gay' comment could ya?
User avatar #59 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
nope.
User avatar #34 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
so a person can't vent?
so it's wrong for me to express what little emotion i am capable of?
(also pissed can mean very drunk, as was the case when i made the account.)
I'm angry for good reason and I'm not arguing, but I felt it necessary to point out that while others may see this as humorous, I do not. A genetic condition is not controlable. If it were someone's actions like, say smoking a million cigarrettes or killing 60 million jews, then it is acceptable. but I feel that poking fun at something beyond any human control is inherently wrong.

tl;dr autistic niggers are off limits
#37 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
And the law that states that whenever an internet conversation is held, that a reference to the Nazis or HItler will be made has officially come true.

If that's honestly how you feel, you really shouldn't be on this website. Here, we make jokes that, even though they're usually distasteful, are still jokes. Here, we strive and live off of dry wit and general awful content, but if you're ONLY mad about this, then you're being a hypocrite.

I'm not saying it's wrong, I never said it was wrong, all I'm saying is that, again, you're arguing - and yes, you are - with people that think the same as you just because you dislike how they phrase things or how they might think that is even somewhat different from you.

tl;dr get over it, jokes. are. jokes.
User avatar #38 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
the holocaust was made by choices, it was terrible, yes but still a choice. Autism is not, being black is not, being asian is not, being gay is not, being a cock is debatable. the holocaust was preventable and humor about the holocaust can often be funny as it is a social commentary. If you actually paid attention my upset was about the use of autism as a way of calling people out for being different, being a nazi was a decision that was unfortunately made by many people and is a decision we should criticize. being autistic is forced upon people by an uncaring universe and shouod be helped and supported and researched. To criticize something that people have no choice in is like a grown man attacking a child. if the joke was to say that Jenny McCarthy has missed her whore vaccine it would be different as it would be a commentary as to her actions. I vented here BECAUSE you all agree with my viewpoint no despite it. I'm not arguing, I'm not debating, I am simply upset.
#28 - again keep reading. I ******* know. the site isn'…  [+] (4 new replies) 04/10/2014 on dumb blond -24
User avatar #33 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
all comedy deals with serious issues, that's what makes it comedy, like for example how many cops does it take to screw in a lightbulb? none they just beat the room for being black, thats fucking serious stuff backed by generations of descrimination and hatred
User avatar #36 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
and is a commentary on human behavior, not a physical condition. racism is a choice, as is abuse of power. No one chooses to be autistic.
User avatar #72 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
and i didn't say they were comparable by the ability to choose, we're talking about the comedy concerning serious issues, systematic racism is a serious problem, we joke about it, autism is also a serious issue, we also joke about that, in terms of making jokes there really shouldn't be a distinction of how you got to the serious issue that you're joking about, the point is mocking the issue itself
User avatar #52 - harshy (04/10/2014) [-]
no one chooses to be black either
#26 - and if you have a right to teloffensive jokes, i have a right …  [+] (17 new replies) 04/10/2014 on dumb blond -32
#115 - thecommittee (04/11/2014) [-]
I am autistic, and fuck you.
#55 - rabidaardvark (04/10/2014) [-]
#29 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
Yeah, you completely lost me on this one. It's like you're not even capable of continuing a coherent argument, backing up any of your points, or arguing any of mine.

Guess that's why you're so fucking awful.
User avatar #31 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
its just not funny. what other point must i make?
#74 - thewasteland (04/10/2014) [-]
#32 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
It's not that, it's that every single point you made was completely out of nowhere, and nobody else had argued against any of it.

You're legitimately arguing against people that agree with you just because you're mad.

Guess that's your namesake, though.
User avatar #40 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
also, ponies are gay.
#61 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
Nigga that aint no pony!
User avatar #76 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
sorry that i confused your homosexual symbol with someone else's. apologies.
#105 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 6,393**

That's from a show called Panty & Stocking. It just shares a similar colour palette.

Also I can't really make out what you are arguing.
User avatar #106 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
i'm making the point that you feel justified in correcting me on that, but yet i'm seen as the enemy for expressing my opinion.
#62 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
That be the grinch.
#58 - colonelxj (04/10/2014) [-]
couldn't contain your 'ponies are gay' comment could ya?
User avatar #59 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
nope.
User avatar #34 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
so a person can't vent?
so it's wrong for me to express what little emotion i am capable of?
(also pissed can mean very drunk, as was the case when i made the account.)
I'm angry for good reason and I'm not arguing, but I felt it necessary to point out that while others may see this as humorous, I do not. A genetic condition is not controlable. If it were someone's actions like, say smoking a million cigarrettes or killing 60 million jews, then it is acceptable. but I feel that poking fun at something beyond any human control is inherently wrong.

tl;dr autistic niggers are off limits
#37 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
And the law that states that whenever an internet conversation is held, that a reference to the Nazis or HItler will be made has officially come true.

If that's honestly how you feel, you really shouldn't be on this website. Here, we make jokes that, even though they're usually distasteful, are still jokes. Here, we strive and live off of dry wit and general awful content, but if you're ONLY mad about this, then you're being a hypocrite.

I'm not saying it's wrong, I never said it was wrong, all I'm saying is that, again, you're arguing - and yes, you are - with people that think the same as you just because you dislike how they phrase things or how they might think that is even somewhat different from you.

tl;dr get over it, jokes. are. jokes.
User avatar #38 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
the holocaust was made by choices, it was terrible, yes but still a choice. Autism is not, being black is not, being asian is not, being gay is not, being a cock is debatable. the holocaust was preventable and humor about the holocaust can often be funny as it is a social commentary. If you actually paid attention my upset was about the use of autism as a way of calling people out for being different, being a nazi was a decision that was unfortunately made by many people and is a decision we should criticize. being autistic is forced upon people by an uncaring universe and shouod be helped and supported and researched. To criticize something that people have no choice in is like a grown man attacking a child. if the joke was to say that Jenny McCarthy has missed her whore vaccine it would be different as it would be a commentary as to her actions. I vented here BECAUSE you all agree with my viewpoint no despite it. I'm not arguing, I'm not debating, I am simply upset.
#21 - keep reading 04/10/2014 on dumb blond -25
#19 - you should read the rest of the conversation.  [+] (6 new replies) 04/10/2014 on dumb blond -25
User avatar #23 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
the link just leads to a white screen that says "they fucking don't"
User avatar #28 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
again keep reading. I fucking know. the site isn't the point. joking about a serious issue is.
User avatar #33 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
all comedy deals with serious issues, that's what makes it comedy, like for example how many cops does it take to screw in a lightbulb? none they just beat the room for being black, thats fucking serious stuff backed by generations of descrimination and hatred
User avatar #36 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
and is a commentary on human behavior, not a physical condition. racism is a choice, as is abuse of power. No one chooses to be autistic.
User avatar #72 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
and i didn't say they were comparable by the ability to choose, we're talking about the comedy concerning serious issues, systematic racism is a serious problem, we joke about it, autism is also a serious issue, we also joke about that, in terms of making jokes there really shouldn't be a distinction of how you got to the serious issue that you're joking about, the point is mocking the issue itself
User avatar #52 - harshy (04/10/2014) [-]
no one chooses to be black either
#16 - i did. but it still wasn't funny. it's an obvious conclusion t…  [+] (21 new replies) 04/10/2014 on dumb blond -54
#96 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
fuck you
#25 - juffs (04/10/2014) [-]
Firstly, if it's a waste of time arguing about it, stop.

Secondly, what the hell gave you the impression that anyone thought there was something wrong with having an autistic child? I'm a psychology major. I know about stuff like this. On top of that, I have a job where I work in-home with people with any number of mental and/or physical disorders.

I'm obviously no expert, but I bought the text books, I sit in the classes, and I get paid to help people afflicted with these disabilities with nearly every aspect of their life.

Now, stop backreeling, and we can both get on with arguing with people we actually disagree with on the internet, rather than just flinging shit from the same team.
#20 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
I don't see why you're trying to argue it. Nobody's said anything against your thoughts or opinions, it was merely a website post to what is meant to be a humorous depiction of one person's own thought process.

The fact you're taking this so out of control is, honestly, a bit sad. Scrolling up, nobody's said Children with autism grow up differently - Fuck, one of my friends and classmates is a high-functioning autistic person, and he's smarter than I am.

You acting like this only works towards making people disagree with you, because you're trying to spark a debate for no raisins.

tl;dr Jokes are fucking jokes, get over it.
User avatar #26 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
and if you have a right to teloffensive jokes, i have a right to be offended.

and honestly, taking a condition that I fight with daily in myself and in my child and making into something people laugh at is the greatest offense. I'm sick and fucking tired of "autist" being used on this site and many others as an insult to a persons lifestyle and intelligence. and to say that immunizations are causing this "condition" is killing people by making others beleive that autism is inherently evil. Where's the humor? Giving attention to the degenerate minds that concieve this bullshit in any form is giving it undue credibility.

Yeah, jokes are jokes. Dead children aren't.
#115 - thecommittee (04/11/2014) [-]
I am autistic, and fuck you.
#55 - rabidaardvark (04/10/2014) [-]
#29 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
Yeah, you completely lost me on this one. It's like you're not even capable of continuing a coherent argument, backing up any of your points, or arguing any of mine.

Guess that's why you're so fucking awful.
User avatar #31 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
its just not funny. what other point must i make?
#74 - thewasteland (04/10/2014) [-]
#32 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
It's not that, it's that every single point you made was completely out of nowhere, and nobody else had argued against any of it.

You're legitimately arguing against people that agree with you just because you're mad.

Guess that's your namesake, though.
User avatar #40 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
also, ponies are gay.
#61 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
Nigga that aint no pony!
User avatar #76 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
sorry that i confused your homosexual symbol with someone else's. apologies.
#105 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 6,393**

That's from a show called Panty & Stocking. It just shares a similar colour palette.

Also I can't really make out what you are arguing.
User avatar #106 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
i'm making the point that you feel justified in correcting me on that, but yet i'm seen as the enemy for expressing my opinion.
#62 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
That be the grinch.
#58 - colonelxj (04/10/2014) [-]
couldn't contain your 'ponies are gay' comment could ya?
User avatar #59 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
nope.
User avatar #34 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
so a person can't vent?
so it's wrong for me to express what little emotion i am capable of?
(also pissed can mean very drunk, as was the case when i made the account.)
I'm angry for good reason and I'm not arguing, but I felt it necessary to point out that while others may see this as humorous, I do not. A genetic condition is not controlable. If it were someone's actions like, say smoking a million cigarrettes or killing 60 million jews, then it is acceptable. but I feel that poking fun at something beyond any human control is inherently wrong.

tl;dr autistic niggers are off limits
#37 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
And the law that states that whenever an internet conversation is held, that a reference to the Nazis or HItler will be made has officially come true.

If that's honestly how you feel, you really shouldn't be on this website. Here, we make jokes that, even though they're usually distasteful, are still jokes. Here, we strive and live off of dry wit and general awful content, but if you're ONLY mad about this, then you're being a hypocrite.

I'm not saying it's wrong, I never said it was wrong, all I'm saying is that, again, you're arguing - and yes, you are - with people that think the same as you just because you dislike how they phrase things or how they might think that is even somewhat different from you.

tl;dr get over it, jokes. are. jokes.
User avatar #38 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
the holocaust was made by choices, it was terrible, yes but still a choice. Autism is not, being black is not, being asian is not, being gay is not, being a cock is debatable. the holocaust was preventable and humor about the holocaust can often be funny as it is a social commentary. If you actually paid attention my upset was about the use of autism as a way of calling people out for being different, being a nazi was a decision that was unfortunately made by many people and is a decision we should criticize. being autistic is forced upon people by an uncaring universe and shouod be helped and supported and researched. To criticize something that people have no choice in is like a grown man attacking a child. if the joke was to say that Jenny McCarthy has missed her whore vaccine it would be different as it would be a commentary as to her actions. I vented here BECAUSE you all agree with my viewpoint no despite it. I'm not arguing, I'm not debating, I am simply upset.
#12 - don't need to. its either ******** , psudo-science…  [+] (34 new replies) 04/10/2014 on dumb blond -64
#169 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
Autism is the disorder that you have, that you can't play with the normal kids because of.
User avatar #18 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
if it's so positively false why is it so difficult to just read it?
User avatar #21 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
keep reading
User avatar #19 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
you should read the rest of the conversation.
User avatar #23 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
the link just leads to a white screen that says "they fucking don't"
User avatar #28 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
again keep reading. I fucking know. the site isn't the point. joking about a serious issue is.
User avatar #33 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
all comedy deals with serious issues, that's what makes it comedy, like for example how many cops does it take to screw in a lightbulb? none they just beat the room for being black, thats fucking serious stuff backed by generations of descrimination and hatred
User avatar #36 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
and is a commentary on human behavior, not a physical condition. racism is a choice, as is abuse of power. No one chooses to be autistic.
User avatar #72 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
and i didn't say they were comparable by the ability to choose, we're talking about the comedy concerning serious issues, systematic racism is a serious problem, we joke about it, autism is also a serious issue, we also joke about that, in terms of making jokes there really shouldn't be a distinction of how you got to the serious issue that you're joking about, the point is mocking the issue itself
User avatar #52 - harshy (04/10/2014) [-]
no one chooses to be black either
#15 - pineapplepeople (04/10/2014) [-]
Click the link bro, it literally takes 5 seconds and doesn't cause a retarded debate.
#13 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
Just click the fucking link, Jesus Fucking Christ.
User avatar #16 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
i did. but it still wasn't funny. it's an obvious conclusion that reasonable humans should reach on their own and spending any amount of time discussing it is, frankly, a waste.

The comedy stops when children die.

Also, there is no evidence to sugest that autistic children grow up any different (given similar environments) than normal children with the exception of social skills and forming social bonds. So even if something external causes autism, is it really that bad to have what is essentially a shy, intelligent child?
#96 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
fuck you
#25 - juffs (04/10/2014) [-]
Firstly, if it's a waste of time arguing about it, stop.

Secondly, what the hell gave you the impression that anyone thought there was something wrong with having an autistic child? I'm a psychology major. I know about stuff like this. On top of that, I have a job where I work in-home with people with any number of mental and/or physical disorders.

I'm obviously no expert, but I bought the text books, I sit in the classes, and I get paid to help people afflicted with these disabilities with nearly every aspect of their life.

Now, stop backreeling, and we can both get on with arguing with people we actually disagree with on the internet, rather than just flinging shit from the same team.
#20 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
I don't see why you're trying to argue it. Nobody's said anything against your thoughts or opinions, it was merely a website post to what is meant to be a humorous depiction of one person's own thought process.

The fact you're taking this so out of control is, honestly, a bit sad. Scrolling up, nobody's said Children with autism grow up differently - Fuck, one of my friends and classmates is a high-functioning autistic person, and he's smarter than I am.

You acting like this only works towards making people disagree with you, because you're trying to spark a debate for no raisins.

tl;dr Jokes are fucking jokes, get over it.
User avatar #26 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
and if you have a right to teloffensive jokes, i have a right to be offended.

and honestly, taking a condition that I fight with daily in myself and in my child and making into something people laugh at is the greatest offense. I'm sick and fucking tired of "autist" being used on this site and many others as an insult to a persons lifestyle and intelligence. and to say that immunizations are causing this "condition" is killing people by making others beleive that autism is inherently evil. Where's the humor? Giving attention to the degenerate minds that concieve this bullshit in any form is giving it undue credibility.

Yeah, jokes are jokes. Dead children aren't.
#115 - thecommittee (04/11/2014) [-]
I am autistic, and fuck you.
#55 - rabidaardvark (04/10/2014) [-]
#29 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
Yeah, you completely lost me on this one. It's like you're not even capable of continuing a coherent argument, backing up any of your points, or arguing any of mine.

Guess that's why you're so fucking awful.
User avatar #31 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
its just not funny. what other point must i make?
#74 - thewasteland (04/10/2014) [-]
#32 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
It's not that, it's that every single point you made was completely out of nowhere, and nobody else had argued against any of it.

You're legitimately arguing against people that agree with you just because you're mad.

Guess that's your namesake, though.
User avatar #40 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
also, ponies are gay.
#61 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
Nigga that aint no pony!
User avatar #76 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
sorry that i confused your homosexual symbol with someone else's. apologies.
#105 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 6,393**

That's from a show called Panty & Stocking. It just shares a similar colour palette.

Also I can't really make out what you are arguing.
User avatar #106 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
i'm making the point that you feel justified in correcting me on that, but yet i'm seen as the enemy for expressing my opinion.
#62 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
That be the grinch.
#58 - colonelxj (04/10/2014) [-]
couldn't contain your 'ponies are gay' comment could ya?
User avatar #59 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
nope.
User avatar #34 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
so a person can't vent?
so it's wrong for me to express what little emotion i am capable of?
(also pissed can mean very drunk, as was the case when i made the account.)
I'm angry for good reason and I'm not arguing, but I felt it necessary to point out that while others may see this as humorous, I do not. A genetic condition is not controlable. If it were someone's actions like, say smoking a million cigarrettes or killing 60 million jews, then it is acceptable. but I feel that poking fun at something beyond any human control is inherently wrong.

tl;dr autistic niggers are off limits
#37 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
And the law that states that whenever an internet conversation is held, that a reference to the Nazis or HItler will be made has officially come true.

If that's honestly how you feel, you really shouldn't be on this website. Here, we make jokes that, even though they're usually distasteful, are still jokes. Here, we strive and live off of dry wit and general awful content, but if you're ONLY mad about this, then you're being a hypocrite.

I'm not saying it's wrong, I never said it was wrong, all I'm saying is that, again, you're arguing - and yes, you are - with people that think the same as you just because you dislike how they phrase things or how they might think that is even somewhat different from you.

tl;dr get over it, jokes. are. jokes.
User avatar #38 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
the holocaust was made by choices, it was terrible, yes but still a choice. Autism is not, being black is not, being asian is not, being gay is not, being a cock is debatable. the holocaust was preventable and humor about the holocaust can often be funny as it is a social commentary. If you actually paid attention my upset was about the use of autism as a way of calling people out for being different, being a nazi was a decision that was unfortunately made by many people and is a decision we should criticize. being autistic is forced upon people by an uncaring universe and shouod be helped and supported and researched. To criticize something that people have no choice in is like a grown man attacking a child. if the joke was to say that Jenny McCarthy has missed her whore vaccine it would be different as it would be a commentary as to her actions. I vented here BECAUSE you all agree with my viewpoint no despite it. I'm not arguing, I'm not debating, I am simply upset.
#10 - it doesn't. ASD is a trait you are born into.  [+] (39 new replies) 04/10/2014 on dumb blond -55
#183 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
#164 - shabadaka (04/11/2014) [-]
You must be great at parties
#53 - blindpone (04/10/2014) [-]
#11 - juffs (04/10/2014) [-]
You didn't click the link, did you?

Be honest.

We'll know if you lie.
User avatar #12 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
don't need to. its either bullshit, psudo-science, or a poor attempt at humor. I get enough of that from facebook.

But here's a pop quiz for you: What is autism?
#169 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
Autism is the disorder that you have, that you can't play with the normal kids because of.
User avatar #18 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
if it's so positively false why is it so difficult to just read it?
User avatar #21 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
keep reading
User avatar #19 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
you should read the rest of the conversation.
User avatar #23 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
the link just leads to a white screen that says "they fucking don't"
User avatar #28 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
again keep reading. I fucking know. the site isn't the point. joking about a serious issue is.
User avatar #33 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
all comedy deals with serious issues, that's what makes it comedy, like for example how many cops does it take to screw in a lightbulb? none they just beat the room for being black, thats fucking serious stuff backed by generations of descrimination and hatred
User avatar #36 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
and is a commentary on human behavior, not a physical condition. racism is a choice, as is abuse of power. No one chooses to be autistic.
User avatar #72 - whitie (04/10/2014) [-]
and i didn't say they were comparable by the ability to choose, we're talking about the comedy concerning serious issues, systematic racism is a serious problem, we joke about it, autism is also a serious issue, we also joke about that, in terms of making jokes there really shouldn't be a distinction of how you got to the serious issue that you're joking about, the point is mocking the issue itself
User avatar #52 - harshy (04/10/2014) [-]
no one chooses to be black either
#15 - pineapplepeople (04/10/2014) [-]
Click the link bro, it literally takes 5 seconds and doesn't cause a retarded debate.
#13 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
Just click the fucking link, Jesus Fucking Christ.
User avatar #16 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
i did. but it still wasn't funny. it's an obvious conclusion that reasonable humans should reach on their own and spending any amount of time discussing it is, frankly, a waste.

The comedy stops when children die.

Also, there is no evidence to sugest that autistic children grow up any different (given similar environments) than normal children with the exception of social skills and forming social bonds. So even if something external causes autism, is it really that bad to have what is essentially a shy, intelligent child?
#96 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
fuck you
#25 - juffs (04/10/2014) [-]
Firstly, if it's a waste of time arguing about it, stop.

Secondly, what the hell gave you the impression that anyone thought there was something wrong with having an autistic child? I'm a psychology major. I know about stuff like this. On top of that, I have a job where I work in-home with people with any number of mental and/or physical disorders.

I'm obviously no expert, but I bought the text books, I sit in the classes, and I get paid to help people afflicted with these disabilities with nearly every aspect of their life.

Now, stop backreeling, and we can both get on with arguing with people we actually disagree with on the internet, rather than just flinging shit from the same team.
#20 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
I don't see why you're trying to argue it. Nobody's said anything against your thoughts or opinions, it was merely a website post to what is meant to be a humorous depiction of one person's own thought process.

The fact you're taking this so out of control is, honestly, a bit sad. Scrolling up, nobody's said Children with autism grow up differently - Fuck, one of my friends and classmates is a high-functioning autistic person, and he's smarter than I am.

You acting like this only works towards making people disagree with you, because you're trying to spark a debate for no raisins.

tl;dr Jokes are fucking jokes, get over it.
User avatar #26 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
and if you have a right to teloffensive jokes, i have a right to be offended.

and honestly, taking a condition that I fight with daily in myself and in my child and making into something people laugh at is the greatest offense. I'm sick and fucking tired of "autist" being used on this site and many others as an insult to a persons lifestyle and intelligence. and to say that immunizations are causing this "condition" is killing people by making others beleive that autism is inherently evil. Where's the humor? Giving attention to the degenerate minds that concieve this bullshit in any form is giving it undue credibility.

Yeah, jokes are jokes. Dead children aren't.
#115 - thecommittee (04/11/2014) [-]
I am autistic, and fuck you.
#55 - rabidaardvark (04/10/2014) [-]
#29 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
Yeah, you completely lost me on this one. It's like you're not even capable of continuing a coherent argument, backing up any of your points, or arguing any of mine.

Guess that's why you're so fucking awful.
User avatar #31 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
its just not funny. what other point must i make?
#74 - thewasteland (04/10/2014) [-]
#32 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
It's not that, it's that every single point you made was completely out of nowhere, and nobody else had argued against any of it.

You're legitimately arguing against people that agree with you just because you're mad.

Guess that's your namesake, though.
User avatar #40 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
also, ponies are gay.
#61 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
Nigga that aint no pony!
User avatar #76 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
sorry that i confused your homosexual symbol with someone else's. apologies.
#105 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
**anonymous rolls 6,393**

That's from a show called Panty & Stocking. It just shares a similar colour palette.

Also I can't really make out what you are arguing.
User avatar #106 - davidispissed (04/11/2014) [-]
i'm making the point that you feel justified in correcting me on that, but yet i'm seen as the enemy for expressing my opinion.
#62 - mr skeltal (04/10/2014) [-]
That be the grinch.
#58 - colonelxj (04/10/2014) [-]
couldn't contain your 'ponies are gay' comment could ya?
User avatar #59 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
nope.
User avatar #34 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
so a person can't vent?
so it's wrong for me to express what little emotion i am capable of?
(also pissed can mean very drunk, as was the case when i made the account.)
I'm angry for good reason and I'm not arguing, but I felt it necessary to point out that while others may see this as humorous, I do not. A genetic condition is not controlable. If it were someone's actions like, say smoking a million cigarrettes or killing 60 million jews, then it is acceptable. but I feel that poking fun at something beyond any human control is inherently wrong.

tl;dr autistic niggers are off limits
#37 - teamdaigurren (04/10/2014) [-]
And the law that states that whenever an internet conversation is held, that a reference to the Nazis or HItler will be made has officially come true.

If that's honestly how you feel, you really shouldn't be on this website. Here, we make jokes that, even though they're usually distasteful, are still jokes. Here, we strive and live off of dry wit and general awful content, but if you're ONLY mad about this, then you're being a hypocrite.

I'm not saying it's wrong, I never said it was wrong, all I'm saying is that, again, you're arguing - and yes, you are - with people that think the same as you just because you dislike how they phrase things or how they might think that is even somewhat different from you.

tl;dr get over it, jokes. are. jokes.
User avatar #38 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
the holocaust was made by choices, it was terrible, yes but still a choice. Autism is not, being black is not, being asian is not, being gay is not, being a cock is debatable. the holocaust was preventable and humor about the holocaust can often be funny as it is a social commentary. If you actually paid attention my upset was about the use of autism as a way of calling people out for being different, being a nazi was a decision that was unfortunately made by many people and is a decision we should criticize. being autistic is forced upon people by an uncaring universe and shouod be helped and supported and researched. To criticize something that people have no choice in is like a grown man attacking a child. if the joke was to say that Jenny McCarthy has missed her whore vaccine it would be different as it would be a commentary as to her actions. I vented here BECAUSE you all agree with my viewpoint no despite it. I'm not arguing, I'm not debating, I am simply upset.
#22 - no, this is a kernel.  [+] (10 new replies) 04/10/2014 on This is the End +39
User avatar #52 - murdtugget (04/10/2014) [-]
Its pronounced colonel and its the highest rank in the military
User avatar #113 - murdtugget (04/11/2014) [-]
Jesus christ guys it was an office reference calm down
#105 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
It's not pronounced colonel.
#88 - mr skeltal (04/11/2014) [-]
five star general is the highest military rank. Colonel is not that far up the food chain on the officer side
#95 - tomthehippie (04/11/2014) [-]
Five star general or admiral is the highest rank, but in the USA those ranks only exist during wartime.

Also, several countries have ranks that are not recognized that exceed five star, these ranks normally being held either by dictators or by the overall commander of said nation's military.
User avatar #54 - davidispissed (04/10/2014) [-]
if only al-qaida missed targets like you miss points.
#49 - feudd (04/10/2014) [-]
actually this is a kernel
#119 - collegedood (04/12/2014) [-]
**collegedood rolled image**
as someone who randomly rolled this picture, and someone who is studying computer science and analytic mathematics,I like your kernel.
#24 - mrmcput (04/10/2014) [-]
No, this is a colonel.
#57 - dragonreborn (04/10/2014) [-]
No, this is Patrick.
#11 - the person of interest above has developed the potential to sc… 04/07/2014 on Something is in his jacket +1
#3 - not a pig. that's a tapir.  [+] (3 new replies) 04/03/2014 on pig bully +16
User avatar #21 - zoologyexplain (04/04/2014) [-]
Please see comment #20.
User avatar #6 - bullbrigade (04/04/2014) [-]
Nigga that's a baby boar
User avatar #15 - captainrattrap (04/04/2014) [-]
Nigga it's adorable as fuck!
#7 - death wish 04/03/2014 on need help pls 0
#64 - thanks addy. love ya man. 04/03/2014 on Site has been further... 0
#3 - who drank my beer? -me 03/31/2014 on description 0
#6 - insay all the davids should unite and take over the world.  [+] (1 new reply) 03/29/2014 on davidispissed's profile 0
User avatar #7 - badboywantsu (03/29/2014) [-]
i'm in we are many we are strong we have a pretty awesome name ha
#4 - really? mine too. *awkward realization*  [+] (3 new replies) 03/29/2014 on davidispissed's profile 0
User avatar #5 - badboywantsu (03/29/2014) [-]
i work in a place with 4 other people named dave it ends up with confusion all the time
User avatar #6 - davidispissed (03/29/2014) [-]
insay all the davids should unite and take over the world.
User avatar #7 - badboywantsu (03/29/2014) [-]
i'm in we are many we are strong we have a pretty awesome name ha
#32 - Picture 03/29/2014 on Stop and listen +1
#322 - good point. 03/19/2014 on What I've learned +1
#298 - hold me.  [+] (2 new replies) 03/19/2014 on What I've learned +1
#309 - kolehuntstrolls (03/19/2014) [-]
it could of been worse.
User avatar #322 - davidispissed (03/19/2014) [-]
good point.
Show:
Sort by:
Order:

items

Total unique items point value: 1050 / Total items point value: 1500

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - badboywantsu (03/29/2014) [-]
i had to add you your name speaks to me since my names david too
User avatar #4 to #3 - davidispissed (03/29/2014) [-]
really? mine too.


*awkward realization*
User avatar #5 to #4 - badboywantsu (03/29/2014) [-]
i work in a place with 4 other people named dave it ends up with confusion all the time
User avatar #6 to #5 - davidispissed (03/29/2014) [-]
insay all the davids should unite and take over the world.
User avatar #7 to #6 - badboywantsu (03/29/2014) [-]
i'm in we are many we are strong we have a pretty awesome name ha
 Friends (0)