|Funny Pictures||Funny Videos|
|Funny GIFs||YouTube Videos|
Rank #277 on CommentsLevel 286 Comments: More Thumbs Than A Hiroshima Survivor
OfflineSend mail to datmine Block datmine Invite datmine to be your friend flag avatar
ALL SHALL (ponies and furries) YELD OR FALL BEFORE ME
FOR I AM A SPEC MAHREN
I AM THE EMPHRAH'S FURI
FOR I AM A SPEC MAHREN
I AM THE EMPHRAH'S FURI
- Text/Links 4
- Pictures4 new100
- YouTube 2
- Animated Gifs 7
- Favorites 14
- Friends 20
- Comments120 new5278
- Channels 1
- All 5435
- Views: 38554let mi show u how unkl burban works
1172 43 Total: +1129
- Views: 31143Joining the anti feminist train
849 90 Total: +759
- Views: 34600Fuck
976 240 Total: +736
- Views: 11111Dont fuck with bob ross
269 15 Total: +254
- Views: 14540OC FOR THE OC SITE
256 20 Total: +236
- Views: 15682Jim you fucking moron
232 34 Total: +198
- Views: 24183AGATHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
647 23 Total: +624
- Views: 14845"kids movie"
301 45 Total: +256
- Views: 2350ALLAH KEBAB
30 4 Total: +26
- Views: 1260I promised
15 4 Total: +11
- Views: 1157WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...
15 4 Total: +11
- Views: 1036dis nigga ded
9 0 Total: +9
latest user's comments
|#160 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||15 hours ago on GG||+1|
|#56 - ayy||15 hours ago on The police are planning a...||0|
|#312 - I want Dawn of war 3 [+] (1 new reply)||16 hours ago on game genie||0|
|#30 - Picture||09/22/2014 on Hmmm... needs more batman||+3|
|#16 - Picture [+] (22 new replies)||09/22/2014 on Hmmm... needs more batman||0|
#23 - CIS White Male (09/22/2014) [-]
The only one who is going to die is Batman in any fair realistic 1 on 1 fight.
#68 - impureparadox (09/22/2014) [-]
the oribatid mite can lift 1180 times it's own weight and it's not even alien to earth. I don't get why you're so upset about me proposing an alien the size of a human lifting more. I mean there are things here on earth more powerful than some comic book characters and you're hard pressed to believe aliens like superman COULD exist. read your bible more.
#70 - impureparadox (09/23/2014) [-]
im sorry did you mean that thing i know almost nothing about but rather it's something like the smaller something is the stronger it can be exponentially? like how fleas can jump 100000000000000000x(exaggeration) higher than humans? but yeah disregard the fact that science is written in stone and there can be no discoveries that reverse what people thought to be true previously.
#71 - kristovsky (09/23/2014) [-]
the volumetric law is derived from mathematics. Imagine a cube with length l. its volume is l x l x l, or l^3. now imagine a cube with length 2l. so it's volume is 2l x 2l x 2l, or 6l^3. for twice the length, you get 6 times the volume. mass increases exponentially with increase in length. mass = volume x density, so the larger something is the less it can lift in relation to it's body size. this law is mathematically derived, hence it isn't going anywhere.
#72 - impureparadox (09/23/2014) [-]
Ok we switch to math, math is infallible. Know about the dichotomy paradox? It's mathematically sound, but logically makes no sense, well technically it's logically sound but you and me both know that it's not true. But You're right I give up math can't be changed not like it ever has before pythagoras never proved anybody wrong, that was previously "right."
#73 - kristovsky (13 hours ago) [-]
What bearing does something we think is not true have on my argument? Einstein didn't think quantum mechanics was right, but it has been proven. He was wrong. that's the thing about science, you are either right or you aren't. What you are essentially saying is that because we think something doesn't make sense logically, then it's not allowed to be true. If something is proven to be true, then it's true until a counterexample can be provided, simple as that. Since no counter example can be provided for the volumetric rule, it must be true.
Pythagoras existed before scientific methodology came about. With the emergence of scientific methodology, the mathematical proofs humans have developed have all been extensively tested time and time again. Tell you what? If it is one day discovered that the density of the universe is 1< or >1, then I will concede.
#74 - impureparadox (8 hours ago) [-]
To begin if something is proven through math, like the dichotomy paradox, then it must be true (As math is infallible by your standards, until proven otherwise). But you do not move an infinite amount of space every time you take a step forward, if you do I will bow down at your feet and call you my god. So either math is fallible and one day there could be an alien that breaks this law (which i just looked up on Google and it doesn't seem to exist except in the terms of chemistry, something to do with mixing chemicals, and nothing to do with the the mass/length ratio) or it's infallible and no one would have ever proved another person wrong through mathematical proofs.
Essentially it goes like this; the concession of the first means you're wrong and one day there will be something or someone to prove this wrong, just because we believe it true today doesn't make it true, OR math is infallible. (I don't believe the latter is possible, as people have on many occasions found proofs for and against laws, and theories believed to be true at one point in time. So in 10,000 years someone could find proof that the Pythagorean therom is wrong...or maybe today)
I'm just trying to get you to understand things exist that people can't explain, and we have to find new answers for them. So aliens could exist that break these laws. And if you put so much faith in science, math, logic, etc, that you can't believe it could be wrong, you really do need to "read your bible more" because you're just as bad as one of those christians who won't back down.
#75 - kristovsky (8 hours ago) [-]
Math is the purest of sciences, which is specifically BECAUSE it is infallible. 4 is 4, there is no subjectivity to that. When a mathematical law is found to be false, it's because there was a problem with the original proof (i.e miscalculation, a variable wasn't considered etc.) or because measuring methods were inaccurate, not because maths itself is somehow wrong.
And just so you know, I am am well aware of the dichotomy problem, and really it exists in a completely fictional mathematical universe, where everything can be continuously halved. That is NOT the universe we live in. we live in a universe with a standard unit of matter, aka the atom (lets not consider sub atomic particles, because matter is made of atoms), so there is only so little a distance you can physically travel.
However, even looking at the problem from a mathematical point of view, the dichotomy problem HAS BEEN SOLVED, it's not some unkown wonder of mathematics. The theory of the sum to infinity of a geometric progression shows us that the sum to infinity of a series is equal to a/(1-r), when -1<r<1. Cmon, this is highschool mathematics!
And you completely misunderstand the hierarchy of science. I.e, mathematics is the purest science, because it is indefinitely provable, as per my example, 4 = 4 and there is no speculation or argument against it. Physics, as it is derived from mathematics, is the next purest science, it is not totally infallible like mathematics, there is some speculation which can be drawn from each scenario as they are based on a mixture of mathematical derivations (I.e. theoretical physics) and the results from measurement (experimental physics). Chemistry, as being derived from physics, is less indefinitely provable than Physics, and Biology, as derived from chemistry is less definite than chemistry. Physics, chemistry, biology; these have play room.
No, we don't know everything about the universe, but mathematics which contains no working errors must be true.
#76 - impureparadox (5 hours ago) [-]
LOLing atm. 4=4 because man says it does. Because we define it as such. If someone long ago had determined otherwise you would believe that. It's exactly like the bible, it was written by man and thus is fallible. God and the sciences are both creations of man, man is fallible therefore so are his creations. But you win I already said that you can't have your mind changed because you seem to have been brainwashed to believe what you do. I mean 4=4 means what? that a symbol I see is still the symbol i see? well yeah obviously but put it into practice, 4+1=x what is x? 5? 5 what? what is 5? a count? a count of what? shirts? fruits? people? an idea? something that can't be proved because it exists only in your head? lol whatever you say is true I bow down to you, you god among men
#77 - kristovsky (5 hours ago) [-]
what the fuck are you talking about you pleb? science is a methodology for testing the universe, recording the results and forming a conclusion based upon those results. when I say 4 = 4, I'm not talking about the linguistic implications of what 4 is, I'm talking about the fact that if you have coins in front of you, then those 4 coins will always be 4 coins. You can't argue that 5 coins are in front of you, or that 6 coins are in front of you, because you can count them and definitively ascertain that there are 4. Therefore, the fact that there are 4 coins in front of you is INFALLIBLE.
The conclusions of scientific experiments aren't "written by man", they are OBSERVED by man, a very different thing. it's a literal case of seeing what physically happens, and then recording it as fact. You clearly are completely clueless as to what science is and how it works, stop wasting my time.
#78 - impureparadox (5 hours ago) [-]
SOMEONE IS MAD. LOL.
I can debate those 4 coins are not 4 coins but instead x number of atoms, or elements, so on and so forth. You can only take 4 in a linguistic manner because without it it means nothing. Nothing has any meaning without an idea behind it.
And recording things as fact because you observe them is stupid. Observer effect. gtfo mr Iknowallandallothersarewrong.
#79 - kristovsky (4 hours ago) [-]
Regardless of whether you count atoms or coins the total mass available never changes you fuck
You wanna go tell all the world's scientists that their methodology is stupid? Because for 3 centuries now scientists, mathematicians and engineers have used their discoveries to manipulate the world exactly according to their predictions using the models they have ascertained, and guess what? THEY WORK PERFECTLY. You wanna go tell Einstein, Newton and Hawking that they did it wrong? yeah, the entire scientific community is laughing at you right now, do you have any education at all you ignorant fuck?
#80 - impureparadox (4 hours ago) [-]
Mass never changes lol unless it loses electrons and becomes oxidized, or reduced? yeah electrons don't have mass, and as such atoms won't change mass based on loss or gain of them. And you call me dumb.
Their observations mean nothing, they're ideas that happen to be accepted by the masses because they accept them blindly. Then years or eons later someone else says the observation was wrong via experiments and more observation.
So pretty much each of them have been wrong at some point in time, look it up "pleb." The names you mentioned have failed in this area you say they couldn't have been wrong. I love how you attack me personally instead of sticking to the arguments it's great. And you think im the ignorant one, the fact that you think just because they follow a procedure and record their results means they're right is laughable... and I'd like to believe (though it may not be true) the scientific community is sided with me. Laughing at you. LOL cause like i said all three of these men you worship did do something wrong.
As for my education, it's irrelevant, but your intelligence could be called into question, As you seem to think everything you were ever taught by another person with the "authority" and knowledge in a subject you were "learning" is correct. This is called blind faith.
#83 - kristovsky (4 hours ago) [-]
You didnt shoot down any of my arguments, you just kept repeating the same thing "Observations are meaningless" well, if you wanna tell that to every scientist on the earth and see what they say feel free, because you will be laughed at. clearly you have no scientific education whatsoever, because even in primary school they don't just tell you things in scientific classes, teachers make you do experiments and SHOW you that these things work. That is not blind faith, that is excepting the facts of the world. But what if human observation isn't enough for you? fine then, because humans have been putting mathematical and scientific models into computer simulations for decades to test and test and test scientific theories, and any theory they teach you nowadays you can bet is probably gunna last. Newtons theory of gravity hasn't been proved wrong for 300 years, because it isn't wrong. You can sit there with your philosophical bullshit thinking you're better than everyone, but the fact is far far more qualified and intelligent people than you have been using this exact methodology for hundreds of years.
Yes, I understand now, I understand that you are ignorant, have no scientific knowledge much less any understanding of it, you are arrogant and self obsessed, believing that you are right and not the thousands of scientists throughout history who have been remembered and noted. So I'm going to except the facts of things that have been proven and completely disregard the stupid assertions of some idiot, self important internet troll who has done fuck all with his life. Everything you have said is basically an assertion that all of scientific methodology is wrong and pointless, so what kind of scientist is going to side with you? you stupid twat.
#84 - impureparadox (4 hours ago) [-]
You refuse to accept (the word you have been spelling incorrectly while calling me ignorant, stupid, retarded, etc) that these people could be wrong. I never said observations are meaningless only that it can't be taken as fact the way you think it can scientists know this and know they can't just say oh we observed the surface-area-to-mass ratio in nature and know it will never be proven wrong because math is infallible. Unlike you to stupid to believe it could ever be reversed. my whole point. which IM asserting again is it could be flawed and an new lifeform could prove it wrong. But yeah I'm the one who refuses to bend and accept science and math as true. LOL
Btw if i am a troll keep feeding me retard I'll take the attention.
|#66 - Suddenly fat knight out of nowhere.||09/22/2014 on Sad truth||0|
|#25 - What if its a ghost with muscles. [+] (1 new reply)||09/22/2014 on For Admin||+1|
|#40 - mfw waifu pillows||09/22/2014 on desu desu||+3|
|#23 - Are you implying admin is a ghost. [+] (4 new replies)||09/22/2014 on For Admin||+7|
#27 - CIS White Male (09/22/2014) [-]
|#153 - Picture [+] (1 new reply)||09/22/2014 on Popeye Animation Test||0|
Join Subscribe warhammer40k